logo
'Make America Healthy Again' report cites nonexistent studies: authors

'Make America Healthy Again' report cites nonexistent studies: authors

eNCA29-05-2025
WASHINGTON - At least four of the studies cited in a flagship White House report on children's health do not exist, authors listed in the document told AFP Thursday, casting doubt on the paper outlining Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s agenda.
The highly anticipated "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) report was released May 22 by the presidential commission tasked with assessing drivers of childhood chronic disease.
But it includes broken citation links and credits authors with papers they say they did not write.
The errors were first reported on Thursday by NOTUS, a US digital news website affiliated with the nonprofit Allbritton Journalism Institute.
Noah Kreski, a Columbia University researcher listed as an author of a paper on adolescent anxiety and depression during the Covid-19 pandemic, told AFP the citation is "not one of our studies" and "doesn't appear to be a study that exists at all."
The citation includes a link that purports to send users to an article in the peer-reviewed medical journal JAMA, but which is broken. Jim Michalski of JAMA Network Media Relations said it "was not published in JAMA Pediatrics or in any JAMA Network journal."
AFP also spoke with Harold Farber, pediatrics professor at Baylor College of Medicine, who said the paper attributed to him "does not exist", nor had he ever collaborated with the co-authors credited in the MAHA report.
Similarly, Brian McNeill, spokesperson for Virginia Commonwealth University, confirmed that Professor Robert Findling did not author a paper that the report says he wrote about advertising of psychotropic medications for youth.
A fourth paper on ADHD medication, was also not published in the journal Pediatrics in 2008, as claimed in the MAHA report.
"I can confirm that we didn't find that title in a site search," said Alex Hulvalchick, media relations specialist for the journal's publisher, the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The Department of Health and Human Services declined to comment, referring questions on the apparent errors to the White House.
Kennedy was approved as health secretary earlier this year despite widespread alarm from the medical community over his history of promoting vaccine misinformation and denying scientific facts.
Since taking office, he has ordered the National Institutes of Health to probe the causes of autism -- a condition he has long falsely tied to the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine.
The report's chronic disease references appear to nod to that same disproven theory, discredited by numerous studies since the idea first aired in a late 1990s paper based on falsified data.
It also rails against the "over-medicalization" of children, citing surging prescriptions of psychiatric drugs and antibiotics, and blaming "corporate capture" for skewing scientific research.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Measles outbreak in Gauteng: 181 cases confirmed, public urged to vaccinate
Measles outbreak in Gauteng: 181 cases confirmed, public urged to vaccinate

The Citizen

time7 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Measles outbreak in Gauteng: 181 cases confirmed, public urged to vaccinate

The Gauteng Department of Health has intensified its public health response following further measles cases across the province. Between January 1 and June 13, 181 laboratory-confirmed measles cases were reported, primarily in Johannesburg, Tshwane, and Ekurhuleni. In the latest reporting period, Gauteng recorded 15 new measles cases. Local nurse Nhlanhla Mofokeng explained what measles is and how to curb its spread. She defined measles as a highly contagious viral infection that mainly affects children but can infect anyone who is unvaccinated. 'It spreads through droplets in the air when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or talks. Measles symptoms appear about seven to 14 days after exposure,' she said. Signs and symptoms: • High fever; • Dry cough; • Runny nose; • Red, watery eyes; • Tiny white spots inside the mouth (Koplik spots); • A blotchy red rash that usually starts on the face and spreads downward. 'A person is contagious four days before and four days after the rash appears. Many people assume measles is just a rash and fever, but it can lead to severe complications,' she added. She mentioned these complications: • Pneumonia; • Diarrhoea and dehydration; • Ear infections (which might lead to hearing loss); • Brain swelling (encephalitis); • Death, especially in malnourished children or those with weakened immune systems. 'Children under five years, unvaccinated people of any age, people with weakened immune systems (HIV+ individuals) and pregnant women are at risk of contracting measles. 'Prevention is always better than cure. The measles vaccine is safe and free at public clinics across SA. It is given as part of the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine (MMR) at six months (extra dose during outbreaks), 12 months and 18 months,' she mentioned. Mofokeng said vaccination is the best protection because if enough people are vaccinated, the virus cannot spread; this is called herd immunity. She added that during the outbreak, people must ensure children are vaccinated by checking their Road-to-Health card. The nurse advised adults unsure of their vaccination status to visit a clinic for advice. 'If your child shows symptoms, keep them at home and visit a health facility immediately. Inform your school or crèche if a child was diagnosed. They may need to take steps to prevent further spread,' said Mofokeng. What to do if you suspect measles? • Step one: Seek medical care immediately; early detection can prevent serious illness. • Step two: Isolate the patient to avoid spreading the virus to others. • Step three: Follow the instructions from your clinic or doctor. ALSO READ: SASSA announces August payment dates for all social grants ALSO READ: Two arrested in Kwa-Thema for house robbery and possession of unlicensed firearms

Starvation in Gaza: How war and blockades lead to famine
Starvation in Gaza: How war and blockades lead to famine

IOL News

time7 hours ago

  • IOL News

Starvation in Gaza: How war and blockades lead to famine

Palestinian children eat their meal from cooking pans in Gaza City. Image: Omar Al-Qattaa/ AFP Imagine tying bricks to your stomach to quiet your hunger. Imagine scrounging for something - anything - to eat, whether it is grass or lentils, just to get by. Earlier this week, an Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) alert confirmed that Gaza is on the brink of famine. After almost two years of attacks and blockades that resulted in starvation, Gaza experiences the worst-case scenario of famine (IPC AFI Phase 5). "Mounting evidence shows that widespread starvation, malnutrition, and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths. Latest data indicate that famine thresholds have been reached for food consumption in most of the Gaza Strip and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City," stated the IPC report. But what does this mean for Palestinians? Famine, a term synonymous with widespread suffering and death, is the most extreme classification of food insecurity, known as IPC Phase 5 (Catastrophe/Famine) on the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) Acute Food Insecurity scale. The IPC defines famine as an area-level classification where at least one in five households (20 percent) faces an extreme lack of food, leading to starvation and destitution. But the IPC can't just classify situations as famine. For an area to be classified as Famine (IPC Phase 5), specific thresholds must be met. 20% of households experiencing an extreme food shortage and destitution. 30% of children acutely malnourished. A mortality rate of at least 2 deaths per 10,000 people each day, due to outright starvation or the interaction of malnutrition and disease. While common drivers of famine are usually caused by conflict, economic shocks and weather Extremes, this has been described as a man-made famine. According to the World Food Programme, food consumption has plummeted in Gaza since the last IPC Update in May 2025. "Data shows that more than one in three people (39 per cent) are now going days at a time without eating," revealed WFP. 'Gaza is now on the brink of a full-scale famine. People are starving not because food is unavailable, but because access is blocked, local agrifood systems have collapsed, and families can no longer sustain even the most basic livelihoods,' said FAO Director-General QU Dongyu. 'We urgently need safe and sustained humanitarian access and immediate support to restore local food production and livelihoods - this is the only way to prevent further loss of life. The right to food is a basic human right.' Read that again: People are starving not because food is unavailable. This is worth noting because according to Human Rights Watch, Palestinian civilians are attacked at aid sites. This means that starving people are being shot at while trying to get food. Israeli forces at sites of the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) aid distribution scheme 'have routinely opened fire on starving Palestinian civilians in acts that amount to serious violations of international law and war crimes,' Human Rights Watch confirmed. 'Israeli forces are not only deliberately starving Palestinian civilians, but they are now gunning them down almost every day as they desperately seek food for their families,' said Belkis Wille, HRW associate crisis and conflict director. 'US-backed Israeli forces and private contractors have put in place a flawed, militarised aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths.' According to the latest figures from the Gaza Health Ministry, 91 Palestinians seeking aid were killed in the last 24 hours, raising the total number killed to 1,330 and over 8,818 injured, since the end of May when the GHF was launched. IOL

Controversial Med-Lemon ad: ARB's ruling on graphic sneeze sparks debate
Controversial Med-Lemon ad: ARB's ruling on graphic sneeze sparks debate

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

Controversial Med-Lemon ad: ARB's ruling on graphic sneeze sparks debate

The Advertising Regulatory Board took a closer look at a Med-Lemon advertisement following complaints, but gave it the green light. Image: File A med-Lemon advertisement depicting a graphic sneeze with mucus flying over others has sparked two complaints to the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB). However, the ARB concluded that while the ad teeters on the edge of being 'gross' and 'offensive,' it does not breach advertising standards. One complaint described the ad as 'very disgusting and disturbing to watch,' arguing that it fails to promote hygiene, especially in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, and is in poor taste. The second complaint was in a similar vein, with a member of the public who saw the TV advertisement being disgusted by the sneezing person's bodily fluids spraying all over people. The advertiser responded that they recognise the heightened sensitivity around respiratory illnesses, especially in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, but they assured that this was carefully considered in their approach. The advertiser stated that their primary objective with the campaign was to address a critical public health challenge: the significant impact of influenza in South Africa. While Covid-19 has been a focus, the advertiser stated that it is important to remember that influenza remains a serious threat. 'Flu paints a bleak picture,' it said. According to the advertiser, the exaggerated dramatisation of a sneeze and the personal and social chaos it creates was a deliberate creative choice. 'By vividly portraying the unpleasant consequences of delayed treatment via exaggerated dramatisation, we aim to make consumers realise the importance of acting at the very first sign of symptoms,' the advertising company explained. It said this approach, while bold, is reasonable and justifiable in an open and democratic society, as it directly promotes public health and is proportionate to the significant societal concern surrounding respiratory illnesses. In analysing the advertisement, the directorate of the ARB said it has no difficulty in concurring that the sneeze depicted in the advertisement is unpleasant to watch. 'Bodily fluids are a significant disgust trigger for the average consumer, and this commercial certainly hits the mark for many consumers. That being said, disgust felt on the part of a viewer does not necessarily mean that an advertisement is in and of itself offensive,' it said. The directorate noted that the purpose of this commercial, as outlined by the advertiser, is to prevent an outcome such as the unpleasant sneeze. It said it understands that the audience is supposed to be disgusted by the sneezing man. The commercial delivers the message, loud and clear, that going out in public with raging respiratory infection symptoms affects all those around us, it said. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store