logo
5 exemptions from Trump's 12-country travel ban

5 exemptions from Trump's 12-country travel ban

First Posta day ago

The US has clarified that the exemptions to Trump's 12-country travel ban are intended to provide flexibility for individuals who may face hardship or discrimination under the sweeping policy read more
In the wake of President Donald Trump's controversial travel ban on citizens from twelve countries, the White House has clarified certain exemptions to the restrictions. While citizens from countries such as Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, and Somalia face a complete or partial travel ban, the administration has outlined five key exceptions for specific groups.
Here's what you need to know:
Athletes travelling for major sporting events
One of the more notable exemptions is for athletes who are travelling to the United States for major international sporting events, including the World Cup, the Olympics, and other high-profile competitions. This allows athletes from the 12 affected countries to participate in events such as the Summer or Winter Olympics, even if their home countries are under the travel ban.
The administration has stated that this exception aims to promote global sportsmanship and fairness, ensuring athletes are not penalised for their nationalities when competing on the world stage.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Immigrant visa holders from ethnic and religious minorities in Iran
Another exception applies to individuals holding immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran. This includes those who are part of groups such as the Baha'i community, religious minorities, or ethnic minorities who have been specifically targeted for violence or oppression by the Iranian government.
The move has been seen as a gesture of support for persecuted populations, with the Trump administration emphasizing its commitment to human rights and its belief in offering refuge to those in need, particularly when they are fleeing religious or ethnic violence.
Afghan nationals holding Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs)
Afghan nationals who have worked alongside US military and diplomatic personnel in Afghanistan are exempt from the travel ban, as long as they hold Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs). This exemption is designed to protect individuals who have put their lives at risk in support of US interests during the conflict in Afghanistan.
The exemption is part of the US's continued effort to honor its commitment to the safety and security of those who assisted American forces during the war, ensuring they can escape potential retaliation after the US withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Lawful permanent residents of the US
Citizens who are lawful permanent residents (green card holders) of the United States are also exempt from the travel ban. This includes individuals who have already established their residence in the US and are returning from trips abroad.
The White House has assured that this exemption will allow permanent residents to continue living their lives without unnecessary disruption, though their re-entry into the country may still require additional security screening depending on their travel history.
Dual nationals from non-banned countries
Finally, dual nationals who hold citizenship in one of the countries included in the travel ban as well as a country not affected by the restrictions, will be allowed to travel to the US under their non-banned nationality. This provision ensures that individuals with multiple citizenships aren't unfairly targeted due to their country of origin.
For example, a dual national who is both a citizen of Somalia and a citizen of a European Union country would be exempt from the ban as long as they travel on their EU passport.
Why this Trump order became controversial
While these exemptions have provided some relief to affected individuals, the travel ban continues to face significant criticism from human rights groups and international observers. Critics argue that the policy is discriminatory and fails to address the root causes of security concerns, while others contend that it unfairly targets specific nationalities without clear evidence of security threats.
However, the Trump administration insists that the ban is a necessary step to safeguard national security and ensure that individuals coming into the US undergo proper vetting.
The US has clarified that the exemptions to Trump's 12-country travel ban are intended to provide flexibility for individuals who may face hardship or discrimination under the sweeping policy. As the debate continues over the fairness and efficacy of the travel ban, these exceptions serve as a reminder that immigration policies often involve complex and sometimes contradictory considerations, balancing national security with international commitments and human rights. For now, those impacted by the ban face a complex problem.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After AOC, Savannah Guthrie says Trump-Musk feud is ‘giving 7th grade girl' energy
After AOC, Savannah Guthrie says Trump-Musk feud is ‘giving 7th grade girl' energy

Hindustan Times

time36 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

After AOC, Savannah Guthrie says Trump-Musk feud is ‘giving 7th grade girl' energy

Savannah Guthrie has shared her brutally honest thoughts about Elon Musk's explosive fallout with Donald Trump. During Friday's episode of Today, the 53-year-old co-host said that their ongoing feud is 'giving 7th-grade girl' energy. 'First of all, to just use TikTok language, it's giving 7th grade girl,' Guthrie said, adding, 'This back and forth, online, and from the Oval Office.' Co-host Craig Melvin laughed at her choice of words, while Meet the Press anchor Kristen Welker said, 'Savannah, you hit the nail on the head.' Also Read: Elon Musk's trans daughter Vivian reacts to his feud with Trump: 'I love…' Guthrie's scathing remark came as Good Morning America's Jonathan Karl revealed a June 6 conversation with Trump, where the president said he is 'not particularly interested' in speaking with Musk. The political correspondent noted that Trump called Musk, 'A man who has lost his mind.' The Today co-host is not the only one to publicly criticise the ongoing spat between Trump and the Tesla CEO. Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told Spectrum 1 News on Thursday, saying, 'Oh man, the girls are fighting, aren't they?' Also Read: Jake Paul slams Donald Trump and Elon Musk for 'diss tweeting each other' 'You know, I would say that this was something that was a long time coming, where we've been seeing that these two huge egos were not long for being together in this world as friends,' Ocasio-Cortez went on, adding, 'And so I think this breakup, we've been seeing a long time coming. But we'll see what the impacts are of it legislatively.' Earlier this week, Musk wrote on X, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.'

Russia calls Ukraine war ‘existential', strikes back
Russia calls Ukraine war ‘existential', strikes back

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

Russia calls Ukraine war ‘existential', strikes back

The Kremlin said on Friday (June 6, 2025) the Ukraine war was 'existential' for Russia after it launched a wave of retaliatory drone and missile strikes that killed three rescue workers in Kyiv. The comments are Moscow's latest to dampen hopes for a breakthrough amid a flurry of meetings between Russian and Ukrainian delegations, as well as telephone calls between President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump, aimed at stopping the fighting. On Friday (June 6, 2025) — days after the second round of Ukrainian-Russian ceasefire negotiations in Turkey ended without meaningful progress — the Kremlin cast its three-year invasion as nothing short of a battle for the "future" of Russia. 'For us it is an existential issue, an issue of our national interest, safety, our future and the future of our children, of our country,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, responding to remarks by Mr. Trump on Thursday (June 5, 2025) comparing Moscow and Kyiv to brawling children. Mr. Peskov's comments came shortly after the Russian defence ministry said its forces had launched the "massive" missile and drone strike in "response" to recent attacks by Kyiv on its territory. Ahead of the talks this week in Istanbul, an audacious Ukrainian drone attack damaged nuclear-capable military planes at Russian air bases, including thousands of kilometres behind the front lines in Siberia. Mr. Putin had told Mr. Trump he would retaliate for the brazen operation, 18 months in the planning, in which Ukraine smuggled more than 100 small drones into Russia, parked them near Russian air bases and unleashed them in a coordinated attack. 'A farce' Despite recent rounds of peace talks, Mr. Putin has repeatedly rejected a ceasefire and has instead issued a host of sweeping demands on Ukraine if it wants to halt the fighting. They include completely pulling troops out of four regions claimed by Russia, but which its army does not fully control, an end to Western military support, and a ban on Ukraine joining NATO. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has dismissed the demands as old ultimatums, questioned the purpose of more such talks and called for a summit to be attended by him, Mr. Putin and Mr. Trump. Kyiv said the retaliatory Russian barrage overnight consisted of 45 missiles and 407 drones. AFP journalists heard air raid sirens and explosions ring out over the capital throughout the night. Mr. Zelenskyy, who has repeatedly said Russia wants the war to continue, responded with a call for allies to 'decisively' ramp up pressure on Russia. 'Are we supposed to believe in a ceasefire after today?' Alicia, a Kyiv resident and marketing specialist, told AFP near one of the strike sites in Kyiv. 'I think it's a farce, and it was clear from the very beginning that there would be no truce. Our enemies are not interested in this at all,' she added. Mr. Zelensky said at least three people had been killed in the capital and that Russia had targeted nine regions of Ukraine, including Lviv and Volyn in the west, which border EU and NATO member Poland. In the western city of Lutsk, rescuers in the afternoon pulled the body of a dead man from the rubble of a nine-storey building hit overnight, the interior ministry said.

'Irreparable Harm' To Career, Family: Detained Columbia Graduate Pleads For Release
'Irreparable Harm' To Career, Family: Detained Columbia Graduate Pleads For Release

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

'Irreparable Harm' To Career, Family: Detained Columbia Graduate Pleads For Release

Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate facing deportation due to his pro-Palestinian activism, details the emotional toll of his detention, missing his child's birth and losing job opportunities. A judge questions the constitutionality of his deportation. New York: A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the "irreparable harm" caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the "most immediate and visceral harms" he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. "Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone," the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident wrote. "When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep." He also cited potentially "career-ending" harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy adviser. Even his mother's visa to come to the U.S. to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. "As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States," he wrote. "Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?" Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin responded that Khalil should simply self-deport, taking advantage of the administration's offer of $1,000 and a free flight to those in the country illegally that use its CBP Home app. Khalil obtained a green card, but the Trump administration says it is revoking it. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his U.S. citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil - that his beliefs may pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy - could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store