EU proposes global eel trade curbs despite Japan's opposition
KYODO NEWS - 1 hour ago - 20:30 | All, World
The European Union on Friday submitted a proposal to impose export restrictions on all eel species under an international treaty regulating endangered species trade, despite strong opposition from Japan.
If adopted at the conference of the parties to the Washington Convention in Uzbekistan later this year, the proposal would require proof of legal capture and an export permit issued by the exporting country for Japanese eel and other species.
Japan plans to work with China, on which it relies heavily for eel imports, and South Korea to oppose the proposal, sources close to the matter said Thursday. The three countries and Taiwan held informal talks in Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Prefecture, on June 19-20 to coordinate their response.
"We believe there is no risk of extinction due to international trade," a Japanese farm ministry official said.
While the EU argues that Japanese eel populations have declined sharply, Japan contends that numbers have been recovering since the 1990s and that advances in aquaculture have reduced the need for glass eels -- juvenile eels used to stock farms.
It is also warning that regulation could drive up prices for glass eels, increasing the risk of poaching and smuggling.
Under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, species listed in Appendix I are prohibited from international trade for commercial purposes in principle, while those in Appendix II are deemed as species that could become endangered if trade is not strictly regulated.
The EU is seeking to list all 19 eel species and subspecies in Appendix II, including the Japanese eel, American eel and Southeast Asia's Anguilla bicolor. The regulations would apply not only to live glass eels but also to processed products, such as "kabayaki," a type of grilled eel.
The European eel has already been subject to such restrictions following an EU proposal to list the endangered species under Appendix II of the convention approved in 2007.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
39 minutes ago
- The Diplomat
How Do Cyprus and Croatia Fit Into India's Europe Strategy?
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Cyprus, Canada, and Croatia earlier this month was significant in many ways. Notably, it was the first foreign trip by the Indian prime minister after India's Operation Sindoor. The visit to Canada as part of India's G-7 partnership monopolized most analysts' attention. It signaled a thaw in relationship between the two countries, which had soured in the last year. Nevertheless, the G-7 could not produce tangible results in its 50th anniversary, and a rupture in the Western world was visible with U.S. President Donald Trump leaving the summit early. The other two countries on Modi's itinerary – Cyprus, which Modi visited en route to Canada and Croatia, where he stopped on his way back to India– deserve a closer look. India quickly established diplomatic relations from the moment Cyprus acquired freedom in 1960, molded by the shared experience of anti-colonial struggle – the British had colonized both countries – and a mutual commitment to non-alignment. Following U.N. resolutions and opposing any legitimization of the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, India firmly established its support of Cyprus's sovereignty, and deepened the relationship after the 1974 Turkish invasion. This was not only solidarity amid the Cold War. Supporting Cyprus, for India, has long represented its belief in the dignity of international law, its resistance to foreign intervention, and its voice for the post-colonial Global South. In turn, Cyprus has been a consistent friend, supporting India's U.N. Security Council ambitions, standing with New Delhi in several multilateral venues, and backing India's stance on Kashmir. But the relationship has lagged amid shifting geopolitical conditions. The Eastern Mediterranean is now a theater for energy politics, maritime rivalry, and EU border security, not a passive space. Although Cyprus is not a significant EU power, its location and its foreign policy approach make it a perfect partner for India in influencing debates on the rule of law, maritime order, and the course of multilateralism. Cyprus will also hold the Council of Europe rotating chair for the first six months of 2026, helping India reap dividends from this relationship. The unwavering support that Pakistan got from Turkiye after the Pahalgam terror incident also arguably had something to do with Modi's visit to Cyprus. India may be signaling to Turkiye that it will also support its adversaries, just as Ankara supported Islamabad. Modi's visit to Croatia was the first such visit by an Indian prime minister since the Balkan country gained independence from the disintegrated Yugoslavia in 1991. Yugoslavia has been a torchbearer alongside India in the Non-Aligned Movement. With a considerable soft power presence in Croatia, which has a strong tradition of Indology and a fondness for Sanskrit literature, India wants to extend these cultural linkages to economic and political spheres. In 2019, then-Indian President Ram Nath Kovind headed a delegation-level talks with Croatia; however, much of its focus was mainly on cultural, educational and tourism ties. There has been a steady growth in trade between India and Croatia, from $204.15 million in 2019-20 to $291.36 million in 2023-24. Croatia, located around the Adriatic Sea, provides an ample opportunity for the India-Middle East Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). Other than that, it also provides India with much-needed access to Central and Eastern Europe and the Baltic Sea region, providing a link to an effective network of European road transport. India currently uses the Hamburg and Rotterdam ports, which are already very busy. The Croatian ports of Rijeka, Ploce, and Zadar can be good choices to divert some trade volumes. Modi's talks with his Croatian counterpart focused mainly on discussion involving 'trade and investment, science and technology, defense and security, space, cultural cooperation, and people-to-people ties.' According to India's Ministry of External Affairs, 'The two leaders agreed that there were significant opportunities for increased cooperation in sectors such as infrastructure, ports and shipping, digitization, AI, renewable energy, Pharma and tourism and hospitality.' Other than that, the two leaders have also focused on enhanced business-to-business ties between the two countries. The liberal free market idea suggests that the growth of unregulated markets produces a bigger pie, which can be divided among all concerned parties. In a time when free markets are disturbed by tariffs, regional conflicts, and states' weaponization of supply chains, it makes perfect sense for India to increasingly engage with big players in Europe and smaller ones with considerable heft in European political affairs. In a fractured Western world, where apparent differences are visible between the United States and continental Europe, the latter is also searching for like-minded partners that can be relied on in turbulent times. For Cyprus and Croatia, there is also a balance to be found between India and China, embracing greater relations with the former to avoid overdependence on the latter. Nevertheless, India needs to extend this momentum to other states lying between the Adriatic and Baltic Sea regions. Only then can some tangible outcome can be expected for India's European strategy.
The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
Hong Kong's Latest National Security Taboos: 4th of July and a Video Game
Following the Hong Kong authorities' ban of the allegedly 'seditious' mobile game 'Reversed Front: Bonfire,' the Hong Kong education bureau warned teachers against participating in U.S. Independence Day celebrations in the city. The latest restrictions represent yet another phase in the Hong Kong authorities' quest to coerce full allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party regime. Teachers are just the latest group affected by tightening restrictions and moves toward ideological conformity in Hong Kong. As The Guardian reported, a school principal texted staff advising them 'to be careful about Independence Day activities organised by the U.S. consulate in Hong Kong, and not to participate to avoid violating the national security law and Hong Kong laws.' Staff were also told to seek approval before attending such events and to discourage student participation. Notably, the Education Bureau did not specify which laws would be breached by attending Fourth of July events, leaving teachers and students vulnerable to vaguely determined consequences by the Hong Kong government. The Hong Kong government's sensitivity around U.S. Independence Day events may stem from the 2019 pro-democracy movement, when many Hong Kongers espoused American ideals such as liberty and self-governance. Protesters often waved American flags at rallies, believing their call for change paralleled grievances from the American Revolution, like 'taxation without representation.' The Hong Kong government's threats of legal consequences for teachers and students who wish to attend the U.S. Consulate's Fourth of July celebration, or to celebrate in any other way, expose the ongoing erosion of the freedom of expression and the greater dismantling of the education system in Hong Kong. What once was a pluralistic and globally connected system is increasingly constrained by ideological policing. This censorship echoes other recent moves by the authorities, including the banning of 'Reversed Front: Bonfire,' a mobile strategy game in which players can support the independence of groups from Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang (or, alternatively, 'choose to lead the Communists to defeat all enemies,' as the game's description puts it). On June 10, the Hong Kong National Security Department warned that downloading or sharing the game could constitute 'incitement to secession' or 'subversion' under Hong Kong's National Security Law. The National Security Department disabled action on electronic messages related to the mobile game, and the game has been removed from major app stores in the region. The crackdown on 'Reversed Front: Bonfire' resembles earlier efforts to suppress the freedom of expression, such as the banning of children's books that allegorically depicted wolves (representing the Chinese Communist Party) invading sheep villages (symbolizing Hong Kong). In both cases, metaphor and fiction are treated as threats to national security. These actions suggest an increasingly brittle government that responds to children's books, digital games, and foreign holidays with legal threats and censorship. The fear of the authorities around the Fourth of July reveals their increasing insecurities around Hong Kongers setting off their own fireworks in response to the increasing crackdown on their human rights. The U.S. Consulate has already responded. In a statement to the Associated Press, it condemned the repression of U.S. Independence Day celebrations, noting that the Hong Kong authorities' 'attempts to characterize these activities as 'unlawful' only further reveals its insecurity and fear of freedom.' If celebrating the Fourth of July or downloading a mobile game can be deemed a threat, it raises serious questions about the future of civil liberties in Hong Kong. While the city's government claims to safeguard national security, it increasingly does so at the cost of international human rights norms, including freedom of thought, expression, and belief. Looking ahead, there is another troubling implication: if holidays like the Fourth of July are now suspect, others such as Christmas and Easter may be next, given that they present narratives inconsistent with the official ideology of the Chinese Communist Party. Defenders of basic freedoms, both inside and outside Hong Kong, must take note. The situation calls for sustained international scrutiny and action. It is time for the United Nations and democratic nations to treat these escalating restrictions not as isolated incidents, but as part of a systematic dismantling of freedoms in a once-open society.
The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
Why Did Japan Skip the NATO Summit?
On June 23, Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru canceled his attendance at the NATO summit held in The Hague from June 24 to 25. Ishiba had originally planned to attend to 'reaffirm with NATO allies and others the recognition that the security of Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific is inseparable,' according to an announcement from the Foreign Ministry. The Foreign Ministry cited 'various circumstances' for Ishiba's cancelation, which came a day after the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Japan – along with the other Indo-Pacific 4 (IP4) countries, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand – were invited to the annual NATO summit, as they have been every year since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. This year was the first time since then-Prime Minister Kishida Fumio attended in 2022 that the Japanese prime minister skipped the NATO summit. Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi attended the summit instead. During his 30-minute meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the two sides welcomed the progress in Japan-NATO relations since Rutte's visit to Tokyo in April, and 'concurred to work together to elevate the Japan-NATO cooperation to a new height in various fields, including the defense industry.' In a notable setback for this goal, however, a NATO official confirmed that NATO was not currently discussing opening a Tokyo liaison office. Japan had been pursuing such an office to strengthen ties with NATO at least since spring 2023, but France had opposed it due to concerns about China's backlash. Germany was also cautious. Also at the NATO summit, Iwaya had a 10-minute meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, where they both agreed to support the ministerial-level negotiations on tariffs between the two countries and confirmed that they would communicate closely to maintain the Israel-Iran ceasefire. The 'various circumstances' alluded to with regards to Ishiba's cancelation likely included the U.S. strike on Iran – which would make a Japan-U.S. bilateral summit meeting difficult to schedule – and the decisions of Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung to not attend – which made an IP4-U.S. summit meeting impossible. (New Zealand's prime minister was the only top leader from the IP4 countries present.) Another consideration is the upper house elections in Japan, now scheduled for July 20. Some in Japan have criticized Ishiba for not attending, arguing that the prime minister should have tried harder to get other regional countries to attend. Even with hindsight, it can be difficult to know what the right course of action was, but the limited amount of time between the U.S. strikes on Iran and the start of the summit would have severely constrained Ishiba's freedom of maneuver, even if Albanese and Lee would have been receptive to foreign interference. Such criticism also seems to miss how dramatically the world has changed since the NATO summit of 2022, when Japan was shoulder-to-shoulder with its sole ally rallying international opinion against Russia's war. The NATO summit of 2025 occurred in a context where the U.S. has backtracked on support for Ukraine, and Japan faced a dilemma over how to respond to its ally's actions in Iran. Another possible reason that Ishiba stayed home was continued disagreement between the United States and Japan over Tokyo's defense spending and ample signals that allies' defense spending would be a key theme at the NATO summit. Japan is on track to meet its stated goal of spending 2 percent of its GDP on national security-related spending by 2027. According to a June 20 Financial Times report, however, a sudden demand from Washington for Tokyo to increase defense spending still further led Japan to cancelled the annual '2+2' security dialogue between the Japanese and U.S. foreign affairs and defense chiefs scheduled for July 1 in Washington, DC. However, it is unclear whether the meeting was 'canceled' or 'postponed.' From Japan's perspective, part of the problem is the ever-shifting goalposts for defense spending. U.S. officials have at times urged different benchmarks for defense spending, from 3 percent to 3.5 percent or even 5 percent of GDP. Earlier, in his written response to questions from U.S. senators, then-nominee for under secretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby (who has since been confirmed) had answered that Japan should spend 'at least 3 percent of GDP on defense as soon as possible.' Following the agreement at the NATO summit that members will increase their defense and related spending to 5 percent of GDP, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt answered a reporter's question about U.S. Asia-Pacific allies: 'If our allies in Europe and our NATO allies can do it, I think our allies and our friends in the Asia-Pacific region can do it as well.' Following the NATO summit, a senior Japanese government official acknowledged, 'There's no doubt that the United States will step up its demands.' An expert panel is currently reviewing the next Defense Buildup Program within the Ministry of Defense, and there is a widespread view within the ministry that increasing Japan's defense spending is inevitable given the severe security environment. However, it is still unclear where the additional funding would come from. The previous Kishida Cabinet had decided to raise income taxes to achieve the 2 percent target yet the timing for the tax hike has not been determined yet.
