'Used To Be Man': French First Lady Approaches Court In Gender Rumour Case
On Thursday, the Paris appeals court overturned earlier convictions against the two women for spreading false claims -- that went viral online -- that Brigitte Macron, 72, used to be a man.
Disinformation on Macron's gender has circulated on social media for years. Her 24-year age difference with President Emmanuel Macron has also attracted much comment.
Brigitte Macron filed a libel complaint against the two women after they posted a YouTube video in December 2021, alleging she had once been a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux -- who is actually Brigitte Macron's brother.
In the video, defendant Amandine Roy, a self-proclaimed spiritual medium, interviewed Natacha Rey, a self-described independent journalist, for four hours on her YouTube channel.
Rey spoke about the "state lie" and "scam" she claimed to have uncovered that Jean-Michel Trogneux had changed gender to become Brigitte, and then married the future president.
The claim went viral, including among conspiracy theorists in the United States.
A lower court in September last year had ordered the two women to pay 8,000 euros ($9,400) in damages to Brigitte Macron, and 5,000 euros to her brother.
Brigitte Macron's lawyer Jean Ennochi told AFP Sunday that her brother, too, was taking his case against the dismissal of the charges to the highest appeals court, the Court de Cassation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Explained: The Epstein Files, Conspiracy Theories And What's Next
A perceived lack of transparency over the US investigations into notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has carved a rare chasm between President Donald Trump and his typically loyal Republican base. As Trump struggles to quell his supporters' obsessions with the case - one long surrounded by conspiracy theories - AFP outlines its history and why it has caused so much outrage. Origins of the Epstein case Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy American financier, was first charged with sex offenses in 2006 after the parents of a 14-year-old girl told police that he had molested their daughter at his Florida home. He avoided federal charges - which could have seen him face life in prison - due to a controversial plea deal with prosecutors that saw him jailed for just under 13 months. In July 2019, he was arrested again in New York and charged with trafficking dozens of teenage girls and engaging in sex acts with them in exchange for money. Prosecutors said he worked with employees and associates to ensure a "steady supply of minor victims to abuse." Epstein pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. On August 10, 2019, while in custody awaiting trial, authorities said he was found dead in his prison cell after hanging himself. A separate case against Epstein's girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, who was jailed in 2022 for helping him abuse girls, detailed Epstein's connections with high-profile figures like Britain's Prince Andrew and former US president Bill Clinton. Both have denied any wrongdoing. Why are there conspiracy theories? Some people believe that authorities are concealing details about the Epstein case to protect rich and powerful elites who are associated with him, including Trump. Those ideas have gripped Trump's "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement - but demands for more transparency have crossed the political aisle. One key theory centers on a rumored client list of individuals who committed sex offenses alongside Epstein. The Trump administration has insisted that no such list exists. Skeptics also allege suspicious circumstances in Epstein's death such as the security cameras around his cell apparently malfunctioning on the night he died, alongside other irregularities. Trump and the Epstein case Trump, who as a New York property magnate rubbed shoulders with Epstein, said when re-running for president that he would "probably" release files related to the case. But since taking office, many of Trump's supporters have been disappointed by what they see as a failure to deliver. The 79-year-old himself was dragged into the conspiracy theories after his former advisor Elon Musk claimed in June - in a now-deleted X post - that Trump was "in the Epstein files." The Trump administration's efforts to appease demands for a full disclosure of the so-called Epstein files have largely fallen short. A bundle released in February that promised to shed light on the Epstein case contained little new information. Meanwhile, an almost 11-hour video published this month to dispel theories that Epstein was murdered fell flat. The camera angle showed a section of the New York prison on the night Epstein died, but appeared to be missing a minute of footage, fueling more speculation online. And a memo from the Justice Department and FBI last week saying the Epstein files did not contain evidence that would justify further investigation was met by calls for the heads of each agency to resign. What comes next? Trump has been towing a delicate line - saying he supports the release of any "credible" files related to Epstein while dismissing the case as "pretty boring stuff." But even the normally authoritative president seems unable to arrest the disruption, as critics and even key allies call for more transparency. Mike Johnson, the Republican speaker of the House, has not followed Trump's line on the issue and has instead urged the Justice Department to make public any documents linked to Epstein. Meanwhile, Democrats have seized on the rift between Trump and his party by demanding his administration publish the full evidence held by prosecutors in their case against Epstein.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
Trump backtracks on striking Moscow, says Zelenskyy 'shouldn't target' Russian capital
Trump has reversed course, saying Ukraine should not target Moscow, as he denied reports that he urged strikes on Russian cities, outlining new conditions for ending the war. read more US President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy meet in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 28. File image/AFP In a big U-turn, US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Jul 15) said that Ukraine should not strike Moscow, dismissing reports that he had urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attack the Russian capital during a call on July 4. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said, 'No, he shouldn't target Moscow.' When asked if the US was considering sending long-range missiles to Ukraine, Trump replied, 'No, we're not looking to.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD His comments came just a day after he announced what he called a tougher stance against Russia, which includes new military aid for Ukraine. Earlier, the Financial Times reported that during the July 4 call, Trump allegedly asked Zelensky, 'Volodymyr, can you hit Moscow? Can you hit St Petersburg too?' According to the report, Zelensky responded, 'Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons.' The report claimed Trump suggested striking Russian cities could 'make them [Russians] feel the pain' and push President Vladimir Putin toward negotiations. 'I am on nobody's side,' Trump told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House. 'I am on humanity's side because I want to stop the killing.' A spokesperson clarified that 'President Trump was merely asking a question, not encouraging further violence,' and added, 'He's working tirelessly to stop the killing and end this war.' Trump also expressed disappointment with President Putin, saying that while he has helped resolve other conflicts, the war in Ukraine remains unsolved. He called the conflict 'a Biden war, not a Trump war,' and said his goal is to find a way for the US to step back from the situation. Trump has given Russia a 50-day deadline to agree to a ceasefire or face new US sanctions and oil tariffs—a shift that signals a tougher approach but leaves questions about how negotiations might proceed. 'At the end of the 50 days, if we don't have a deal, it's going to be too bad,' Trump said, without offering details on what an agreement would look like. He defended the timeline, saying, 'I don't think 50 days is very long—and it could be sooner than that.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He also threatened 'severe' tariffs if Russia doesn't end the war within the next 50 days, warning, 'If there's no deal in 50 days, we'll impose secondary tariffs—100 percent. That's how it's going to be.' Trump's remarks come just weeks after the Pentagon halted arms deliveries to Ukraine. Speaking from the Oval Office alongside NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Trump confirmed that billions of dollars' worth of US-made weapons would soon be sent to NATO allies. 'We are going to produce top-of-the-line weapons, and they will go to NATO,' he told reporters.
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
'Once he serves his time': Legal Mindset says Vitaly will be deported from the Philippines after sentence
(Image via @PhilippineStar/X & @LegalMindset/YouTube) Controversial internet personality Vitaly Zdorovetskiy might not be leaving the Philippines just yet, but he's definitely not staying forever. According to legal YouTuber Andrew 'Legal Mindset,' the Russian-born prankster and banned Kick streamer could be deported eventually , but only after finishing whatever criminal sentence awaits him in the country. Legal Mindset explains what's really happening with Vitaly's case In a new YouTube upload titled Vitaly NOT , Legal Mindset broke down the buzz around Vitaly's rumored deportation. And if you're wondering whether he's already on a plane out of Manila, that's not happening anytime soon. The lawyer clarified that while some channels have jumped the gun with claims of 'immediate deportation,' the reality is a bit slower and more bureaucratic. 'Once he serves his time… the Philippines will have to send him somewhere,' Andrew explained. 'But that might be one or two or three years.' The road ahead: Court, sentencing, and then maybe goodbye Right now, Vitaly is in the thick of it, facing ongoing legal proceedings after being transferred to the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) back in June 2025. The current known charge? Unjust vexation - a vaguely defined but still criminal offense in the Philippines. Vitaly NOT (Fast Facts) Legal Mindset reminded viewers that no final sentence has been delivered yet. 'He's waiting for his trial, waiting for sentencing,' he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo And until that happens, any talk of deportation is premature. What happens when he does finish his sentence? Here's where it gets interesting. Once the sentence is served, whether it's jail time or something else, the Philippines can't legally keep Vitaly hanging around. Legal Mindset confirmed that he'll either be deported back to Russia or possibly rerouted to a third country, depending on how things shake out geopolitically and legally. Internet reacts to the viral twist in Vitaly's saga As usual, the internet did its thing—some celebrating what they thought was an early deportation, others scratching their heads about what exactly 'unjust vexation' means. And a third group just ran with memes about the prankster trading beach views for jail bars. But Legal Mindset's message was clear: Vitaly's exit isn't off the table; it's just not scheduled yet. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
