Thousands more Afghans affected by second data breach, ministers say
Up to 3,700 Afghans brought to the UK between January and March 2024 have potentially been impacted as names, passport details and information from the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy has been compromised again, this time by a breach on a third party supplier used by the Ministry of Defence (MoD).
This was not an attack directly on the government but a cyber security incident on a sub-contractor named Inflite - The Jet Centre - an MoD supplier that provides ground handling services for flights at London Stansted Airport.
2:34
The flights were used to bring Afghans to the UK, travel to routine military exercises, and official engagements. It was also used to fly British troops and government officials.
Those involved were informed of it on Friday afternoon by the MoD, marking the second time information about Afghan nationals relocated to the UK has been compromised.
It is understood former Tory ministers are also affected by the hack.
Earlier this year, it emerged that almost 7,000 Afghan nationals would have to be relocated to the UK following a massive data breach by the British military that successive governments tried to keep secret with a super-injunction.
Defence Secretary John Healey offered a "sincere apology" for the first data breach in a statement to the House of Commons, saying he was "deeply concerned about the lack of transparency" around the data breach, adding: "No government wishes to withhold information from the British public, from parliamentarians or the press in this manner."
2:57
The previous Conservative government set up a secret scheme in 2023 to relocate Afghan nationals impacted by the data breach, but who were not eligible for an existing programme to relocate and help people who had worked for the British government in Afghanistan.
The mistake exposed personal details of close to 20,000 individuals, endangering them and their families, with as many as 100,000 people impacted in total.
A government spokesperson said of Friday's latest breach: "We were recently notified that a third party sub-contractor to a supplier experienced a cyber security incident involving unauthorised access to a small number of its emails that contained basic personal information.
"We take data security extremely seriously and are going above and beyond our legal duties in informing all potentially affected individuals. The incident has not posed any threat to individuals' safety, nor compromised any government systems."
In a statement, Inflite - The Jet Centre confirmed the "data security incident" involving "unauthorised access to a limited number of company emails".
"We have reported the incident to the Information Commissioner's Office and have been actively working with the relevant UK cyber authorities, including the National Crime Agency and the National Cyber Security Centre, to support our investigation and response," it said.
"We believe the scope of the incident was limited to email accounts only, however, as a precautionary measure, we have contacted our key stakeholders whose data may have been affected during the period of January to March 2024."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
A UK headline wealth tax? It may be simpler to put up existing taxes
Pressure to go further on wealth taxes – by creating new modes of clawing at hoards of hard-to-reach cash – is mounting. For starters, the fiscal picture is looking fairly bleak, with economists estimating that Rachel Reeves must raise £20bn – or even as much as £50bn – to meet her goal of balancing day-to-day spending against the revenue raised from taxation. On the government backbenches, meanwhile, MPs want the chancellor to squeeze the richest in society harder. They even put forward an early day motion last month calling for a 2% annual tax on individual assets over £10m. Yet introducing these kinds of taxes is often not straightforward, with the behaviour of the wealthy being hard to monitor and harder still to predict. The first significant problem is working out where the assets are and who holds them. That has always been difficult and has become even more challenging after one of the most important economic surveys, the household wealth data series, was suspended by the Office for National Statistics because of its low quality. The upshot is that HMRC simply does not know how many millionaires or billionaires there are in the UK. Without reliable figures, it is extremely hard to write policies, cost them and administer them. There is also a battle to be had with an 'old guard with set views' in Whitehall. Whitehall sources paint a picture of a Treasury led by figures influenced by economists whose thinking was prominent at Oxford University in the 1980s and 90s – such as James Mirrlees, Christophe Chamley and Tony Atkinson – leading to something of an orthodox view. In a nutshell, that position is that if you tax capital too much, it will stop investment and hamper growth. Or, in Chamley's words: 'Tax rate on capital income tends to zero in the long run.'. Since this era, the debate within economics has become more nuanced. A growing body of research suggests that some taxation on capital, even at relatively high rates, could lead to greater investment. As it becomes less attractive to hoard wealth because of taxation, risk appetites would then increase in pursuit of higher returns. You might be less tempted to keep your money in a vanilla savings account that can be taxed hard and easily if you can get a much better rate of return – even with a bit more risk – elsewhere. Treasury insiders argue that Reeves has followed the more modern logic, having already taken steps to widen the scope of inheritance and capital gains tax (IHT and CGT). They posit that her reluctance to pursue a headline wealth tax does not mean she has pulled her punches when it comes to taxing wealth. Hostile backbenchers, on the other hand, suggest she follows the old orthodoxy too closely. They often cite her decision to go for relatively small changes in the amounts of tax paid via CGT, rather than bring it more closely in line with income tax at the last budget, which also upset more senior political colleagues. What the debate about how to handle changes to IHT (which have been fiercely opposed by farmers) or CGT illustrates is that if the government really wants to tax wealth more effectively then it has all kinds of ways to do so before opting for a politically – and potentially economically – sensitive route with a headline wealth tax. Yet even changing existing mechanisms might not be easy, when the UK already has one of the highest rates of tax on property and wealth among developed economies, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Political pressure may make it harder to maintain a more gradualist approach, however. Figures on the left of the Labour parliamentary party are attracted to totemic wealth taxes of the kind introduced in Spain – its so-called solidarity tax – and Switzerland. They see it as part of showing a commitment to rebalancing the economy. Reeves is critical of international examples, saying that Switzerland does not have IHT, and that Spain's wealth tax is so riddled with exemptions that it raises too little money. Some developed economies that had comparable wealth taxes have dropped them, too. 'We have inheritance tax. We have capital gains. We've just got rid of the non-dom tax status that doesn't exist anymore in our tax system. So we do have taxes that tax the wealthy,' Reeves said in a recent interview with LBC. Other measures that go further are not yet proven to work, she claims, saying that those who 'come up with simple solutions' must do more to 'explain exactly how it would work, whether it's an ongoing tax, what it would do to tax avoidance, what it would do about people moving or changing the way that their wealth is stored'. Economists argue that the government should focus its energies on raising existing taxes, such as equalising CGT with income tax, for example, or changing gifting rules around IHT first, rather than introduce a novel wealth tax. The Treasury is already examining gifting rules among other possible IHT changes. Yet while Reeves might agree with some of these arguments, it's less clear whether her cabinet colleagues will tolerate a slow and steady approach, particularly if the fiscal picture sours.
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Isle of Wight councillor 'must consider position' over attendance
A newly elected Reform UK councillor will be asked to "consider his position" on an education committee after failing to attend David Maclean has been absent from the first three sessions of the children's services, education and skills committee, its Conservative chair Paul Brading told members on has attended two out of six meetings since being elected as Lake North's representative in May, according to the Isle of Wight Council's Maclean has been approached for comment. His Reform UK colleague Caroline Gladwin stepped in for him on Thursday and told the meeting she would likely be "taking over" from him on the Maclean was not present at the 3 May by-election count or his initiation ceremony at County Hall. At the time, the Local Democracy Reporting Service was told by Reform UK's press office his absences were due to a serious illness in the family. Mr Brading said on Thursday: "I'm conscious Councillor Maclean has not been to our first three meetings. "It really does concern me because at our first three meetings we shared a lot of background information around the portfolio."Going forward we have some real key decisions to make and I'm just wary that without the knowledge we've all picked up from our first three meetings, it may be a problem."Mr Brading previously said the Island had "too many" primary schools and there would need to be told the meeting he would email Mr Maclean "asking him to consider his position".East Cowes independent representative Karl Love said there were "extremely difficult" and "complex matters" that needed to be resolved by the committee. You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's chemical sector at ‘very high risk', claims credit insurer
Britain's entire chemical sector has been branded 'very high risk' by a leading credit insurer after soaring energy costs triggered a wave of collapses. Coface, a leading global credit insurer, said high energy costs were hammering companies' profit margins and leaving them struggling to pay bills and repair vital equipment. Jonathan Steenberg, Coface's UK economist, said: 'We're seeing slow payments in certain sectors and insolvencies are about 60pc higher than they were before the pandemic. 'To a large degree, energy costs have been the root of this quicker deterioration. It has both first and second order effect, obviously starting with the increase in energy prices, which is also pushing up labour and other costs. It means we have taken the decision to move the chemicals sector up to a very high risk.' Coface specialises in insuring companies against non-payment when selling goods, especially across borders, and in commercial debt collection. The need to assess risk means it also analyses the potential for payment defaults across various industries. Mr Steenberg said it was still offering credit insurance to chemical companies. Britain's chemicals sector employs around 138,000 people directly across 5,000 companies, and supports another 360,000 indirect jobs with exports totalling £61bn. It is also a crucial supplier to other industries, providing the raw materials from which many final products are created. Last week the industry was dealt another major blow after the UK's largest bioethanol plant said it would close following Sir Keir Starmer's trade deal with the Donald Trump. Vivergo Fuels, near Hull, warned that the deal, which meant a 19pc tariff on bioethanol imports from the US to the UK was removed, would make its factory uneconomic because it faced much higher energy costs than US competitors. On Friday the Government said it had 'taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer'. Other plants could follow – all linked to energy bills that now typically comprise more than 50pc of their total costs. Bosses at Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos petrochemicals plant in Grangemouth, Falkirk, said last week it had not made a profit for five years because of the taxes and levies imposed on the gas it consumes both for energy and as a feedstock for making plastics. CF Industries has also ceased ammonia and fertiliser production at its plant in Ince, Cheshire, in 2021 and then at its plant in Billingham, Teesside, in 2023. Steve Elliott, the chief executive of the Chemical Industries Association, said the high cost of industrial energy was because of government policy rather than global markets. He said: 'The Government has put multiple levies on power and gas prices while also rejecting supplies from the North Sea and from fracking. It means energy has become a huge proportion of overall costs and makes it difficult to remain competitive.' Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: 'The UK chemicals sector is foundational to much other manufacturing but is being crippled by high energy costs and penal carbon taxes. It's bonkers policy as when British firms die, the same chemicals are simply imported from overseas.' In June, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a report on the impacts of high energy prices, describing how, between 2021 and 2024, industrial electricity costs rose 75 pc and gas prices by 108pc. 'Collectively, the volume of output in [heavy] industries has fallen by one third since the start of 2021, and is now at its lowest level since the start of the available time series in 1990,' the ONS said. Mr Steenberg said: 'When it comes to chemicals the main inputs are energy, specifically gas. If you're not competitive in that, there's no reason to have an industry.' A Government spokesman said: 'We inherited a difficult economic situation, with businesses facing some of the highest industrial energy prices in Europe. That's why we have announced measures to support sectors across the UK as part of our Plan for Change, ensuring that decarbonisation doesn't mean deindustrialisation.'
