
Trump's foreign aid cuts have ‘strengthened tyranny' in Myanmar, rights groups say
The funding cuts are projected to strip the conflict-ravaged nation of over $1bn in development assistance by 2029, according to the Humanitarian Aid Relief Trust, or HART, and Fortify Rights.
This threatens to deepen a humanitarian crisis caused by a series of ethnic armed conflicts and worsened by the army's overthrow of Aung San Suu Kyi 's civilian government in a 2021 coup.
Since ousting the democratically elected government, the junta led by General Min Aung Hlaing has waged civil war against a host of regional rebel groups across the country. The Independent released a documentary last December about the rise and fall of Nobel laureate Suu Kyi, who has remained under house arrest since the coup.
In a report published on Wednesday, HART and Fortify Rights underscored the catastrophic impact of the Trump administration's order to freeze funding for US AID programmes on the first day of his second term in the White House.
Mr Trump slashed USAID funding by about 83 per cent, halting some $60bn in foreign aid. This triggered the termination of over 5,800 grants, severely disrupting humanitarian and development efforts globally.
"Some of our worst fears are now being realised," Sam Mason, CEO of HART, said. 'We warned that such a rushed and ill-conceived policy would weaken local mechanisms for oversight and justice, leaving civilians even more exposed to threats and persecution.'
'Now, in some of the country's most volatile regions,' Mr Manson added, 'the military has carte blanche to violate human rights.'
The report, focusing on Shan State, a key battleground in the civil war bordering Thailand, claimed that armed groups were recruiting children as young as 10 to carry weapons or supplies.
It highlighted that 'prolific' sexual violence by armed groups was used as a weapon of war against Shan minorities and it had become even harder for survivors to seek support or medical treatment due to aid cuts.
Benedict Rogers, senior director at Fortify Rights, said he recently returned from a month-long visit to the region where he witnessed the dire consequences first-hand.
'Refugees' rations have been stopped, leaving them in a precarious struggle for survival. Food, schooling for children, and basic medical care have almost ceased,' he said.
'Unless the international community steps up and works with Thai authorities to find sustainable solutions, these cuts could result in destitution, disease, and death. At a time when Myanmar's military is committing egregious atrocity crimes, now is not the moment to cut lifelines of support.'
Mr Rogers said the ripple effects of the funding cuts were 'far-reaching, putting thousands of lives in grave danger and severely impeding the ability for pro-democracy and human rights groups to make their voices heard'.
The funding squeeze was also a gift to the junta and its international allies as it undermined efforts to seek accountability for mass atrocities.
'The cuts undermine years of international efforts to support a democratic future for Myanmar and strike a devastating blow to the country's courageous but embattled democracy movement,' he said.
Lord Alton of Liverpool, chairman of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, condemned the funding cuts.
'The more we remove deterrents to violence, the more we embolden the perpetrators,' he said. 'We give them a green light to carry on their killings with impunity. It strengthens tyranny and intensifies suffering.'
The military coup in February 2021 plunged Myanmar into a civil war and deep humanitarian crisis, with an estimated 3.5 million people internally displaced.
The fierce fighting between the junta's forces and armed ethnic groups in many areas of the country has led to civilians facing frequent attacks, arbitrary arrests and sexual violence.
The closure of USAID has also disrupted critical humanitarian services along the border with Thailand where over 100,000 refugees rely on programmes funded by the US for food and medical care.
A investigation led by the UN and reported on Wednesday said the Myanmar junta detained children as young as two, subjected them to torture, sexual abuse and beatings, and often used them as proxies for their parents.
The Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar, covering the period from 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025, found evidence of ' war crimes and crimes against humanity committed' taking place with increasing frequency since the coup.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Should Europe wean itself off US tech?
Imagine if US President Donald Trump could flip a switch and turn off Europe's may sound far-fetched, crazy even. But it's a scenario that has been seriously discussed in tech industry and policy circles in recent months, as tensions with Washington have escalated, and concerns about the EU's reliance on American technology have come to the the root of these concerns is the fact just three US giants - Google, Microsoft and Amazon - provide 70% of Europe's cloud-computing infrastructure, the scaffolding on which many online services some question whether an unpredictable US leader would weaponize the situation if relations seriously deteriorated - for example, by ordering those companies to turn off their services in Europe."Critical data would become inaccessible, websites would go dark, and essential state services like hospital IT systems would be thrown into chaos," says Robin Berjon, a digital governance specialist who advises EU believes that concerns over a so called US "kill switch" should be taken seriously. "It's hard to say how much trouble we would be in." Microsoft, Google and Amazon all say they offer "sovereign" cloud computing solutions that safeguard EU clients' data, and would prevent such a scenario ever occurring. The BBC has contacted the US Treasury department for truth, there have always been concerns about the lack of "digital sovereignty" in Europe, where US firms not only dominate the cloud-computing market, but also hardware, satellite internet and now artificial the region's main mobile operating systems - Apple and Android - and payment networks - Mastercard and Visa - are fears became urgent in May when it emerged that Karim Khan, the top prosecutor at the Netherlands-based International Criminal Court (ICC), had lost access to his Microsoft Outlook email account after being sanctioned by the White ICC has issued arrest warrants for top Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, over their roles in the Israel-Gaza war - something Mr Trump called "illegitimate".Khan has since temporarily stepped aside until a sexual misconduct probe against him is says that "at no point" did it cease or suspend its services to the ICC, although it was in touch with the ICC "throughout the process that resulted in the disconnection". Since then digital sovereignty has shot up the agenda in Brussels, while some public bodies are already seeking alternatives to US is it realistic to think they could wean themselves off US technology?Digital sovereignty is loosely defined as the ability of a governing body to control the data and technology systems within its problem faced by those pursuing it is the lack of comparable does have its own providers, such as France's OVHCloud, or Germany's Germany's T-Systems or Delos, in cloud they account for a fraction of the market, and don't have the same scale or range of capabilities, says Dario Maisto, a senior analyst covering digital sovereignty at global business consultancy open-source alternatives are available for common software packages like Office and Windows, but while proponents say they are more transparent and accessible, none is as comprehensive or well known. But while moving to sovereign alternatives wouldn't "happen overnight", it's a "myth" to think it's not possible, says Mr notes that the German state of Schleswig-Holstein is currently in the process of phasing out Microsoft products like Office 365 and Windows in favour of open-source solutions such as LibreOffice and Linux. Denmark's Ministry for Digitalisation is piloting a similar scheme."We sometimes overvalue the role of proprietary software in our organisations," Mr Maisto says, pointing out that for key services like word processing and email, open-source solutions work just fine."The main reasons organisations don't use open source are a lack of awareness and misplaced fears about cyber security," he adds."Our prediction is in the next five to 10 years, there will be an accelerated shift [to these solutions] because of this wake-up call." Benjamin Revcolevschi, boss of OVHCloud, tells the BBC that firms like his are ready to answer the sovereignty needs of public and private organisations in Europe."Only European cloud providers, whose headquarters are in the EU and with European governance, are able to offer immunity to non-European laws, to protect sensitive and personal data," he Microsoft, Amazon and Google say they already offer solutions that address concerns about digital sovereignty, solutions which store data on severs in the clients' country or region, not in the tells the BBC that it also partners with trusted local EU suppliers like T-Systems, granting them control over the encryption of client data, and giving customers "a technical veto over their data". The German Army is one of its Microsoft president Brad Smith has promised the firm would take legal action in the "exceedingly unlikely" event the US government ordered it to suspend services, and that it would include a clause in European contracts to that effect."We will continue to look for new ways to ensure the European Commission and our European customers have the options and assurances they need to operate with confidence," a Microsoft spokesman told the BBC. Zach Meyers, from the Brussels-based Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) think tank, says it might make sense for Europe to develop its own limited sovereign cloud to protect critical government he adds that it's unrealistic to try to "get Americans out of the supply chain, or to ensure that there's Europeans in the supply chain at each point".He points to Gaia X - a scheme launched in 2020 to create a European-based alternative to large, centralised cloud platforms, which has faced significant criticism and delays."A lot of these [tech] markets are winner takes all, so once you're the first mover it's really hard for anyone else to catch up."Instead, Mr Meyers thinks Europe should focus on areas of technology where it might gain an edge."It could be the industrial use of AI, because Europe already has a much bigger, stronger industrial base than the US has," he says. "Or the next generation of chipmaking equipment, because one of the few areas where Europe has foothold is in photolithography - the machines that make the really top-end chips." So where does the digital sovereignty agenda go from here?Some believe nothing will change unless Europe brings in new regulations that force regional organisations and governments to buy local technology. But according to Mr Berjon, the EU has been dragging its feet."There is definitely political interest, but it's a question of turning it into a shared strategy."Matthias Bauer, director at the European Centre for International Political Economy, thinks the goal should be building up Europe's technology sector so it can compete with the US and a report on EU competitiveness in 2024, Mario Draghi, former head of the European Central Bank, noted Europe is "severely lagging behind" in new technologies, and that "only four of the world's top 50 tech companies are European"."It's currently much harder for a tech company based in the EU to scale across the bloc than it would be for the same company in the US," Mr Bauer says."You not only face different languages, but different contract law, labour market laws, tax laws, and also different sector-specific regulation."As for the theory that President Trump might flip a "kill switch" and turn off Europe's internet, he's highly sceptical."It would be a realistic scenario if we were close to a war, but I don't see that on the horizon."Yet Mr Maisto says organisations must take the risk seriously, however remote."Two years ago, we didn't think we would be talking about these topics in these terms in 2025. Now organisations want to get ready for what might happen."


Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
A Ukraine deal that rewards Putin will only invite future aggression
SIR – Donald Trump is inclined to support Vladimir Putin's demand for complete control of Ukraine's mineral-rich Donetsk region in exchange for ending the war ( August 16). Putin has said he would not seek to take any more territory. Could anyone be so gullible as to believe this, given Putin's previous form? Chris Learmont-Hughes Caldy, Wirral SIR – It is an outrage that Vladimir Putin should be laying down conditions for the ending of a completely unjust war that he started. Is there no one with the gumption to state that he is a war criminal, and has no right whatsoever to either seize another country's sovereign territory or be granted tranches of it? Chris Pond East Grinstead, West Sussex SIR – Donald Trump will now be remembered as the Neville Chamberlain of our times. For all his strong words, when face-to-face with a murderous dictator he gave in and stabbed Ukraine in the back. I don't think that 'coward' is too strong a word to describe him. The Nobel Committee should make clear that giving in to aggressors and bullying democratic countries does not count as peacemaking. Phil Coutie Exeter, Devon SIR – After the nauseating scenes in Alaska, how can the King, who admires Ukraine and Volodymyr Zelensky enormously, be expected to host and make small talk with Donald Trump next month? Roger White Sherborne, Dorset SIR – It is easy to claim that Donald Trump is 'rewarding' Vladimir Putin's aggression, but the Europeans are the ones who have continued to buy Russian oil, thus funding Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. As much as I would wish to see Ukraine regain all of its territory – including Crimea – and for Putin to be charged with war crimes, I do not see how either can actually happen. There is no way Ukraine is powerful enough to drive the Russians out of the Donetsk region. So that means there are only a few options. 1. The war goes on for many years, with neither side breaking through. 2. The US or Nato goes in to support Ukraine. This is never going to happen as it could start a world war. 3. Putin falls in a coup. This once looked likely. Not so much now. 4. Ukraine cedes most of the Donetsk region in return for a Nato guarantee on the rest of its territory. On balance, and as completely unfair as it will be, the fourth of these options appears to be the best of a very bad lot.


Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil slips as Russia supply concerns ease after Trump-Putin meet
SINGAPORE, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Oil prices slipped in early Asian trade on Monday as the United States did not exert more pressure on Russia to end the Ukraine war by implementing further measures to disrupt Moscow's oil exports after presidents from both countries met on Friday. Brent crude futures dropped 32 cents, or 0.49%, to $65.53 a barrel by 2213 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $62.57 a barrel, down 23 cents. U.S. President Donald Trump met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday and emerged more aligned with Moscow on seeking a peace deal instead of a ceasefire first. Trump will meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders on Monday to strike a quick peace deal to end Europe's deadliest war in 80 years. "What was primarily in play were the secondary tariffs targeting the key importers of Russian energy, and President Trump has indeed indicated that he will pause pursuing incremental action on this front, at least for China," RBC Capital analyst Helima Croft said in a note. "The status quo remains largely intact for now," she said, adding that Moscow will not walk back on territorial demands while Ukraine and some European leaders will balk at the land-for-peace deal.