Why Tesla's fall forced Musk to step back from DOGE
At the start of the year, Tesla 's share price was at an all-time high.
Elon Musk, owner of the electric vehicle giant, was coasting on the win of his ally Donald Trump, and investors were hedging their bets that soon-to-be-President Trump would enact policies in favour of Tesla and the billionaire's other companies.
But with an astronomical fall in share price, tanking sales and shrinking profits, the reality for Tesla has been far different – and much of it is tied to Musk's public-facing role in the controversial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Tesla stock once made up the majority of Musk's wealth, but now it is reporting huge drops in profit. The decision to step away from DOGE may show that Musk is not immune to Tesla's downfall.
Within one month of Musk's appointment to DOGE, Tesla shares were down 16.5 per cent. Within two, Tesla's share price was down 45 per cent from when Trump came into office.
And Musk himself has lost an estimated $149 billion in wealth since taking the helm at DOGE; at $301 billion compared to $449 billion, according to Bloomberg's Billionaire Index.
Profits slashed
Tesla's share price problems have been far from cosmetic. The business is facing significant headwinds, not least because of the intertwined reputation with its notorious leader.
In January and February, Tesla sales in Europe saw sudden dips, of 45 per cent and 39 per cent respectively year-on-year - despite steady growth in the European electric vehicle (EV) market.
The numbers behind this week's latest earnings reports are, as expected, not pretty.
Quarterly profits of $409m contrasted starkly with last year's $1.4bn figure for the same three months - and the 71 per cent drop represents the company's lowest quarterly profits since 2020.
Actual vehicle sales reported this month were down 13 per cent to a little over a third of a million across the January to March quarter, with notable declines in China and parts of the US, while revenue of $19.3bn fell short of forecasts by more than $2bn and operating margins fell to 2.1 per cent.
'Earnings margin of 2.1 per cent is the lowest since Tesla approached break-even in 2019,' said Mamta Valechha, consumer discretionary analyst at Quilter Cheviot. 'Free cash flow dipped to $660 million, but did not enter negative territory as capital expenditures were nearly halved compared to the prior year due to reduced investments.
'Tesla has [also] effectively removed its growth guidance for this year, no longer promising a return to growth in 2025.'
Additional factors affecting sales include competition from China 's BYD (Build Your Dreams), which undercuts Tesla on price, while frequent recalls of Tesla vehicles may also be doing little to boost confidence in the brand.
But it is impossible to ignore a major factor impacting its brand: Musk's growing unpopularity.
Anti-Elon movement
Musk has made no secret of his increasingly controversial political viewpoints. From accusations of a nazi salute at the inauguration, to criticising Volodmyr Zelensky as 'evil' over the war in Ukraine, it is easy to see how his actions have ruffled feathers.
As a result, a string of attacks have targeted Teslas in Europe and the US over the past few months, with clear anti-Musk messages.
Tesla owners have faced threats to sell their cars over 'Nazi Extremism' in California, while even in the UK, campaign groups have applied pressure against Tesla cars and charging points.
Tesla shareholders are pushing back against Musk's alignment with Trump; his decision to step partly away from DOGE indicates Musk is likely feeling the blowback himself.
Tesla exposed to tariffs
Investors may have hoped that Musk's role in the administration would see carveouts for Tesla in Trump's trade war. But in fact, the electric vehicle brand is far from immune.
Tesla manufactures its electric vehicles in the US, which makes it less exposed to 25 per cent automotive tariffs than foreign brands.
But the tariffs are not just on finished cars; there is also a 25 per cent levy on all imported automotive parts, and Tesla relies on many parts imported from China, in addition to Mexico and Canada: the company is dependent on imported lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries to fuel its EVs, in particular using Chinese manufacturer CATL to supply its factories.
And China's new restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets have also impacted other projects from Tesla such as its Optimus humanoid robots.
With Tesla dependent on batteries and rare earth products from China, the trade war will inevitably hit its supply chain.
Shares see boost despite performance
Following Tesla's plummeting profits, it might have been expected that the share price could drop further - but the opposite has happened.
On Tuesday, the share price had risen 4.6 per cent; following the announcement of Mr Musk's intentions to resume greater oversight of corporate rather than Capitol Hill activities, that trajectory continued.
Tesla shares are up more than seven per cent in pre-trading, set to open well above $250 per share - still a far cry from December's peak.
Lowered expectations can explain part of it, as well as a broader desire from investors to see a bull run resume - from lower share price starting points.
'Tesla's first-quarter delivery and production numbers were as ugly as its Cybertruck design. That meant expectations were rock-bottom in the run-up to its financial results and it's why the shares didn't tank upon release of the Q1 earnings,' noted Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell.
'Certain individuals are spotting an opportunity and might take the view that Tesla's significant share price decline has gone too far - they're buying on the dip, hoping for a bounce-back and might view the recent sell-off as a once-in-a-lifetime chance to pick up shares in a previous stock market darling on the cheap. After all, the fundamentals still give bulls something to get excited about.'
Not everyone is quite as excited about those humanoid robots, self-driving taxis and energy storage products though.
'While Tesla is making progress on these initiatives, we believe the market and management commentary are overly optimistic about the timing. The narrative around Tesla's stock and valuation remains heavily dependent on these future prospects,' Valechha cautioned.
It should also be noted, the uptick isn't totally down to Tesla, Musk or anything to do with electrification - Trump's China tariff climbdown has sent the S&P 500 two per cent higher in pre-trading, with the likes of Amazon and Nvidia up four per cent each.
Market volatility comes as standard in this second Trump term, and for Tesla which inadvertently became a crossover company to the political arena, that continues to go double.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
9 minutes ago
- NBC News
Yellen expects Trump's tariffs will hike inflation to 3% year over year
Former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen predicts President Donald Trump 's tariffs will cause prices to rise and average household income to fall, despite a slowing trend in the U.S. inflation rate. 'I would expect inflation, on a year-over-year basis of this year, to shoot up to at least 3%, or slightly over, because of the tariffs,' Yellen said Thursday on CNBC's ' Money Movers.' The Biden-era Cabinet secretary made that prediction even as she noted that when it comes to Trump's tariffs, 'There remains a huge degree of uncertainty about exactly what is going to go into effect.' But 'I definitely expect that we're going to see them impact pricing,' she said. That will lower average household income, Yellen added. 'The most recent and optimistic estimate I've seen suggested that the average household will see on the order of $1,000 reduction in income,' due to tariffs and their knock-on effects, she said. 'It could be greater than that, depending on how things play out with the tariff program,' she said. The comments came as data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has shown the inflation rate rising less than expected in recent months. Trump has pointed to that trend to fuel his latest attacks on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates. At the White House later Thursday, Trump slammed Powell as a ' numbskull.' Trump's allies, meanwhile, have argued that tariffs do not contribute to inflation. Yellen, who also served as Fed chair from 2014 to 2018, said the central bank should right now 'worry about the possibility of second-round effects or wage increases or inflation expectations feeding into continued inflation.' The Fed does not have a 'good handle on how the tariffs are going to affect either spending in the labor market or inflation,' she said. 'So I would expect them to remain firmly in latency territory,' she added, suggesting that the Fed is likely to continue its wait-and-see approach.
Scottish Sun
9 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Historic Brit clothes shop beloved by the Royal Family which supplied Europe's top fashion houses is forced to close
ROYAL SHAME Historic Brit clothes shop beloved by the Royal Family which supplied Europe's top fashion houses is forced to close A HISTORIC British clothing store once beloved by the Royal Family and known for supplying Europe's top fashion houses has shut down for good—leaving 28 people out of work. Otterburn Mills, based in Otterburn, Northumberland, with a second store in Rothbury, has gone into liquidation following a series of financial blows. 4 The business was further hit by the sudden loss of a key supplier, soaring operating costs Credit: Otterburn Mill 4 Those affected are now being supported with access to the Redundancy Payments Service Credit: Otterburn Mill The 18th-century mill-turned-retail business struggled to recover after the Covid pandemic, with shop visitor numbers failing to return to pre-2020 levels. The business was further hit by the sudden loss of a key supplier, soaring operating costs, and a shift in consumer shopping habits away from the high street. The company, which famously made a pram rug for Queen Elizabeth II in 1926, had recently been put up for sale. However, no buyer could be found, and business recovery experts FRP were brought in to oversee the winding down of operations. FRP confirmed that the company has ceased trading and 28 employees have been made redundant. Those affected are now being supported with access to the Redundancy Payments Service. Antonya Allison, joint liquidator and director at FRP, said: 'Otterburn Mills was a well-known and respected local business that had built a loyal customer base over many years. Unfortunately, the retailer was faced with an array of challenging headwinds that many high-street brands will recognise and, despite our best efforts to identify it has not been possible to find a viable way forward for the business. Our focus is now on supporting those affected and working to ensure the best possible outcome for creditors through the liquidation process.' The business also had debts owed to HMRC. We live next to a Sainsbury's where 'defeaning' building work is ruining our lives – we haven't slept for a week FRP added that it is 'working with all stakeholders to ensure an orderly wind down of the business and to maximise returns for creditors.' Otterburn Mills rose to prominence under William Waddell, the son of a Borders wool manufacturer, and built a reputation for its tweeds and woven fabrics. These high-quality materials were once used by major European fashion houses including Dior and Balmain. The site was transformed into a retail clothing store in the 1990s by Euan Pringle, who preserved much of the original mill machinery as part of the shop's heritage display. The closure adds to a growing list of British retail losses in recent months. The Original Factory Shop has begun closing down sales at several branches across Worcestershire, Dorset, Durham and other parts of the UK, as part of its wider restructuring. Poundland, recently sold to a US-based firm for just £1, is facing the potential closure of around 100 of its 800 UK shops, with job losses expected. House of Fraser is also shutting down its Worcester city centre store, where a 20 per cent off closing down sale has already begun ahead of its final trading day in September. Meanwhile, fashion chain River Island is drawing up a radical rescue plan to avoid collapse, which includes shutting some stores. Its Banbury branch is set to close at the end of June, and more may follow as the retailer attempts to recover from a £33.2 million loss last year. Industry experts say these closures reflect broader trends, including rising energy bills, business rates, and staffing costs. Many shoppers have moved online or prefer to visit large retail parks over traditional town centres. The Centre for Retail Research has warned that more than 17,000 UK stores could shut their doors in 2025, putting up to 202,000 retail jobs at risk. The loss of Otterburn Mills, a once-thriving symbol of British textile heritage, underlines the deepening crisis for both independent shops and national retail chains across the UK. Without meaningful support or change in consumer habits, more historic names could be lost from the high street for good. RETAIL PAIN IN 2025 The British Retail Consortium predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs would cost the retail sector £2.3billion. Research published by the British Chambers of Commerce earlier this year shows that more than half of companies planned to raise prices by early April. Separately, the Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year. It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year. Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025." Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector. "By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020." 4 Many shoppers have moved online or prefer to visit large retail parks over traditional town centres Credit: Otterburn Mill
NBC News
14 minutes ago
- NBC News
Here are the three reasons why tariffs have yet to drive inflation higher
Despite widespread fears to the contrary, President Donald Trump 's tariffs have yet to show up in any of the traditional data points measuring inflation. In fact, separate readings this week on consumer and producer prices were downright benign, as indexes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that prices rose just 0.1% in May. The inflation scare is over, then, right? To the contrary, the months ahead are still expected to show price increases driven by Trump's desire to ensure the U.S. gets a fair shake with its global trading partners. So far, though, the duties have not driven prices up, save for a few areas that are particularly sensitive to higher import costs. At least three factors have conspired so far to keep inflation in check: Companies hoarding imported goods ahead of the April 2 tariff announcement. The time it takes for the charges to make their way into the real economy. The lack of pricing power companies face as consumers tighten belts. 'We believe the limited impact from tariffs in May is a reflection of pre-tariff stockpiling, as well as a lagged pass-through of tariffs into import prices,' Aichi Amemiya, senior economist at Nomura, said in a note. 'We maintain our view that the impact of tariffs will likely materialize in the coming months.' This week's data showed isolated evidence of tariff pressures. Canned fruits and vegetables, which are often imported, saw prices rise 1.9% for the month. Roasted coffee was up 1.2% and tobacco increased 0.8%. Durable goods, or long-lasting items such as major appliances (up 4.3%) and computers and related items (1.1%), also saw increases. 'This gain in appliance prices mirrors what happened during the 2018-20 round of import taxes, when the cost of imported washing machines surged,' Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM, said in his daily market note. One of the biggest tests, though, on whether the price increases will prove durable, as many economists fear, or as temporary, the prism through which they're typically viewed, could largely depend on consumers, who drive nearly 70% of all economic activity. The Federal Reserve's periodic report on economic activity issued earlier this month indicated a likelihood of price increases ahead, while noting that some companies were hesitant to pass through higher costs. 'We have been of the position for a long time that tariffs would not be inflationary and they were more likely to cause economic weakness and ultimately deflation,' said Luke Tilley, chief economist at Wilmington Trust. 'There's a lot of consumer weakness.' Indeed, that's largely what happened during the damaging Smoot-Hawley tariffs in 1930, which many economists believe helped trigger the Great Depression. Tilley said he sees signs that consumers already are cutting back on vacations and recreation, a possible indication that companies may not have as much pricing power as they did when inflation started to surge in 2021. Fed officials, though, remain on the sidelines as they wait over the summer to see how tariffs do impact prices. Markets largely expect the Fed to wait until September to resume lowering interest rates, even though inflation is waning and the employment picture is showing signs of cracks. 'This time around, if inflation proves to be transitory, then the Federal Reserve may cut its policy rate later this year,' Brusuelas said. 'But if consumers push their own inflation expectations higher because of short-term dislocations in the price of food at home or other goods, then it's going to be some time before the Fed cuts rates.'
