
Badenoch: Scrap net zero windfall tax on oil companies
Kemi Badenoch will call for the windfall tax on North Sea oil and gas to be scrapped.
The Conservative leader will say that the energy profits levy (EPL) on oil and gas profits could no longer be justified, and there would be nothing 'left to tax' if it continued.
In her keynote speech to the Scottish Tory conference in Edinburgh, Mrs Badenoch will accuse Labour of ' killing' the industry.
She will also warn that thousands of North Sea workers will be made unemployed under Government plans to keep the levy in place until 2030.
Mrs Badenoch will say in her speech that this would also mean importing more oil and gas from overseas, before concluding: ' Labour must remove the energy profits levy.'
She is also expected to repeat her demand for Energy Secretary Ed Miliband to lift his ban on issuing new exploration licences, amid warnings that 1.5 billion barrels of oil could be left under the seabed.
Her intervention comes ahead of next year's Holyrood election, with the Tories trying to woo thousands of North Sea workers based workers in Aberdeen, the oil capital of Europe.
They are facing a strong challenge from Reform UK, which has lambasted Labour's green energy agenda.
Nigel Farage visited the city last week, and said that efforts to achieve net zero were 'complete and utter madness'.
The windfall tax was first proposed by Labour in opposition, but was adopted by the Conservative government under Rishi Sunak in 2022 in response to the surge in oil and gas prices caused by the Ukraine conflict.
Mr Sunak initially said it would only remain in place while the windfalls lasted. However, he – and then Labour – subsequently decided to retain it, even though oil prices have fallen from a peak of $139 a barrel to about $70 now.
The EPL is currently a 38 per cent levy on top of existing taxes, bringing the effective headline rate for oil and gas producers to 78 per cent.
The North Sea transition taskforce, backed by the British Chambers of Commerce, warned in March that this was ' throttling' investment.
Analysts Stifel estimated that the 'self-defeating' tax will cost the Treasury £3 billion in tax receipts between 2025 and 2030.
Harbour Energy, the UK's largest independent oil and gas producer, announced 250 job cuts in Aberdeen last month. The firm blamed regulation and the Chancellor's 'punitive fiscal position'.
Mrs Badenoch admitted during last year's Tory leadership contest that her party's decision to extend the tax had been a ' mistake '.
However, she is expected to go further during her first speech to the Scottish Tory conference as UK leader by calling for the EPL to be scrapped immediately.
She will say: 'When the oil and gas windfall tax, the energy profits levy, was brought in, the oil price was near a historic high, at the exact time as energy bills for the British people were sky-rocketing.
'But there is no longer a windfall to tax. It has long gone. And the longer this regressive tax on one of our most successful industries remains, the more damaging it becomes.
'Labour have extended and increased this tax. They are killing this industry. And, frankly, if it is allowed to remain in place until 2030, as is Labour's current plan, there will be no industry left to tax.'
She is expected to conclude: 'Thousands will have been made unemployed, and all while we import more gas from overseas – from the very same basin in which we are banned from drilling. So today I say enough.'
Mrs Badenoch said Labour must 'speed up the process of replacing it with a system that rewards success and incentivises investment.'
The Tory leader will argue that the Government should instead 'champion our own industry' by overturning bans on further exploration, and supporting oil and gas technology exports.
'We must let this great British, great Scottish, industry thrive, grow and create jobs – ensuring our energy security for generations to come, driving growth and making this country richer in the process,' she is to say.
'Scotland at the heart of our energy future for the next generation as it has for the last.'
'A just transition'
Dame Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's deputy leader, said: 'The Tories are on the side of oil and gas giants rather than working Scots, but Scottish Labour will work with the UK Government and use devolved powers to deliver a just transition for the industry.
'With Kemi Badenoch desperately attempting to rally the few remaining Scottish Tories, it seems like it won't be long until they can fit all of their MSPs in a single taxi.'
Gillian Martin, the SNP Energy Secretary, said: 'The Scottish Government is clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with climate change commitments and energy security.
'We are deeply concerned at recent announcements of planned job losses in the North East and have called on the UK Government for the earliest possible end to the Energy Profits Levy (EPL) – which was supposed to be a temporary measure.
'We also continue to call on the UK Government to approach decisions on licensing and consenting for North Sea oil and gas projects on a rigorously evidence-led, case by case, basis – with climate compatibility and energy security as key considerations.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
23 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Ban on advertising and safeguard for child patients added to Assisted Dying Bill
The new parts to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill were voted in on Friday as a second day of debate on various amendments came to a close. It is expected the next major vote on the overall Bill could take place next Friday, which could see it either fall or pass through to the Lords. Impassioned debate heard the Bill described by Conservative MP Kieran Mullan as a 'deeply consequential and highly contentious piece of legislation for our society'. He argued not enough time has been allocated for debate on such a divisive issue, but health minister Stephen Kinnock said there had been more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent so far, and more than 500 amendments had been considered at committee stage earlier this year. On Friday a majority of MPs approve a new clause, tabled by Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier, to ensure medics cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. Her separate amendment to prevent health workers from bringing up the issue with adults patients before they have raised it was voted down. The amendment on child patients was hailed as a 'first major Commons defeat' by opposition campaigners Care Not Killing which welcomed 'MPs removing the ability of doctors to raise unprompted assisted suicide with children'. A group of Labour MPs opposed to the proposed legislation called it an '11th hour rejection of the claims made about the safety of this Bill' which 'proves that confidence is slipping away from it'. They also cautioned that MPs might not have a copy of the final Bill by the time they vote 'on this life and death issue' next week, as some outstanding amendments will still be being considered on Friday morning. A ban on advertising assisted dying should the Bill pass into law has also been approved. An amendment, by fellow Labour MP Paul Waugh, to limit exceptions on that ban did not pass. He said the ban as it stands has 'unspecified exceptions, which could make the ban itself worthless', warning online harms from ads about assisted dying on TikTok 'could be a reality without the tighter safeguards in my amendment'. A number of other amendments were passed, including a provision for assisted dying deaths to not automatically be referred to a coroner and around the regulation of substances for use in assisted dying. Other issues debated included an amendment requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law. Pledging her support for the amendment, which was tabled by Liberal Democrat Munira Wilson, Kim Leadbeater said MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people. She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'. Ms Wilson's amendment is supported by Marie Curie, which said it is 'desperately needed as the end-of-life care system is in crisis, with huge gaps in services and a lack of NHS leadership on this vital part of our health and care system'. It is expected that amendment could be voted on next Friday. One MP, who became emotional as she recalled the death of her husband who she said had been 'in extreme pain' with terminal cancer, urged her colleagues to 'mind our language' after words like 'murder' were used. Liberal Democrat MP Caroline Voaden, whose husband died of oesophageal cancer, said it is 'so wrong' to use such language. She said: 'This is about helping people die in a civilised way and helping their families not go through a horrendous experience of watching a loved one die in agony.' The beginning of Friday's session saw MPs add a new opt-out clause to the Bill. The amendment, meaning no person including all health and social care professionals, can be obliged to take part in assisted dying had been debated and approved last month, but has now been formally added to the Bill. The Bill passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 during a historic vote in November which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying. Demonstrators both for and against a change in the law once again gathered outside Parliament to make their views known on the Bill. Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying which is in favour of a change in the law, said: 'Our country is closer than ever before to the safe, compassionate, and tightly regulated assisted dying law that so many people want, from all walks of life and every part of the country.' But former MP Caroline Ansell, from Christian Action Research and Education (Care), which opposes assisted dying, urged parliamentarians to vote against the Bill. She said: 'It is irredeemably flawed in principle and in detail. Parliament should close the door to assisted suicide and focus on truly compassionate and life-affirming forms of support.' As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines.


BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Corbyn and McDonnell to face no action after London rally
MPs Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell will face no further action after being interviewed by police following a pro-Palestinian said the pair had been questioned by officers after taking part in the demonstration in central London in told MPs: "It was alleged that we failed to follow police restrictions on the protest. This is untrue, and at all times we followed police instructions".Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn accused the Metropolitan Police of "picking on us two as members of Parliament". A rally involving several thousand people took place in Whitehall in January after police blocked plans to hold a march from Portland Place, near the headquarters of the had imposed a condition on the organisers of the rally under the Public Order Act that prevented them gathering outside the corporation's headquarters because of its close proximity to a synagogue and a risk there could be "serious disruption" as congregants attended services.A further condition required the rally to be confined to in the Commons on Friday, McDonnell said: "We can now report that the police have dropped the case against us, and there will be no charges".He added that in correspondence with their solicitor, the Met had "informed us that our case was referred to the Crown Prosecution Service because as MPs we were to be held to have, and I quote, a 'greater culpability'"."This is an unacceptable practice that flies in the face of the principle that we are all equal before the law," he added."I wish to place on record my concern about this behaviour by the Metropolitan Police".Speaking after him, Corbyn said: "I saw this whole effort as being a means to try and silence the democratic rights of everyone in our society by picking on us two as members of Parliament".Former Labour leader Corbyn was re-elected as an independent MP for Islington North after losing the Labour whip in and Harlington MP McDonnell currently sits as an independent, after Labour suspended the whip from him for in July 2024 for voting against the government over child benefit rules. In a statement on social media, the pair also called for charges to be dropped against Christopher Nineham, 63, of Tower Hamlets, and Benjamin Jamal, 61, who are facing trial next month on public order charges following the protest.A Met spokesperson said: "No further action will be taken against nine people who were interviewed as part of an investigation into alleged breaches of Public Order Act conditions during a protest on Saturday 18 January."The decision in two cases was taken following a review of the evidence by the Crown Prosecution Service, while the remaining seven cases were decided on by police officers."Two men have been charged with breaching the same conditions as well as inciting others to do so. They will stand trial next month. A further two individuals remain under investigation."A spokesperson for the Crown Prosecution Service said: "Following a thorough review of the evidence provided by the Metropolitan Police Service, we have decided not to bring criminal charges against two men, aged 76 and 73."We have concluded that the case did not meet the evidential test to provide a realistic prospect of conviction against the two men."


Times
32 minutes ago
- Times
Neil Gray's chauffeured pub trip within the rules, says Swinney
John Swinney has defended his health secretary following accusations that he was chauffeured to a pub before a football match. The first minister said the car used by Neil Gray was 'in accordance with the rules that have been set out within the guidance'. In November last year, Gray apologised after it emerged he had attended four Aberdeen football matches and was driven to the games in a government car. He admitted he had given the impression of 'acting more as a fan and less as a minister' and should have 'attended a wider range of games'. However, he said it was legitimate for ministers to attend sporting events and he would continue to do so. The Scottish Daily Mail reported that before an Aberdeen v Livingston game last year, Gray was driven to the Brig O'Don pub. Neil Gray was driven to the Brig O'Don pub before watching a matching between Aberdeen and Livingston Opponents have heaped pressure on the health secretary over the car journeys, but in January a Conservative motion calling on him to quit failed. Swinney was asked about Gray's car use as he attended the British-Irish Council summit in Northern Ireland. He said: 'The ministerial car was used in accordance with the rules that have been set out within the guidance on this occasion. And those rules that are clearly and publicly advertised have been followed on this occasion.' Pressed again on the issue, he said the regulations had been 'followed appropriately on this occasion'. A Scottish government spokesman told the Scottish Daily Mail that the Brig O'Don trip was not initially revealed due to an 'administrative error', adding: 'Mr Gray travelled from government business to a restaurant for a personal engagement before returning to government business.' The Scottish Labour deputy leader, Dame Jackie Baillie, said a further explanation was needed. She said: 'The decision to take a taxpayer-funded car to the pub is questionable enough — but the fact it was hidden from the public reeks of a cover-up. 'Neil Gray must come clean about exactly what happened here and explain why exactly this trip to the pub was legitimate government business.' Rachael Hamilton, a Scottish Conservative MSP, said the 'inaccuracy was hard to fathom. 'He needs to explain why he and his team originally claimed that his ministerial limo took him to a home address rather than to a restaurant for socialising. Given the scandal the misuse of his government car caused, the health secretary ought to have double checked every journey to make sure that his account was factually correct, so this inaccuracy is hard to fathom'.