logo
Minister doubles down on colleague's claim Farage on side of Jimmy Savile

Minister doubles down on colleague's claim Farage on side of Jimmy Savile

Independent20 hours ago
Heidi Alexander has doubled down on her fellow Cabinet minister's claim that Nigel Farage is on the side of 'people like Jimmy Savile'.
The Reform UK leader is 'happy for there to be a free for all on the internet', the Transport Secretary said, as she defended Peter Kyle's comments.
The Technology Secretary had accused Mr Farage of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers' over Reform's pledge to scrap the Online Safety Act.
Asked if she agrees with Mr Kyle's statement, Ms Alexander told Sky News: 'Nigel Farage is, in effect, saying that he is on their side because he's saying he's wanting to repeal the Online Safety Act.
'I think that the position of Reform in saying that they want to repeal the entirety of the Online Safety Act, which is one of the most important pieces of legislation when it comes to the protecting of our children and the safety of young people online, I think that, in effect, what Nigel Farage is saying is that he's totally happy for there to be a free for all on the internet.
'That's not the position of the Labour Government. It's not the position of me. It's not the position of Keir Starmer or Peter Kyle, and that is the point that the Technology Secretary was rightly making yesterday.'
Mr Farage has demanded an apology from Mr Kyle, describing the remarks as 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief'.
Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, the minister had said: 'We have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side.
'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.'
Following this, Clacton MP Mr Farage urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed.
Writing in the Telegraph, Mr Kyle said proposals to overturn the Act 'makes my blood boil', as he argued repealing it would benefit 'disgusting predators who contact children and groom them online'.
He added: 'I make no apologies for putting the interests of vulnerable children ahead of the interests of predators and child abusers – and the Reform leader's ego.'
Also writing for the newspaper, Mr Farage said 'all of this is of course a deflection from the real problem with the Online Safety Act', as he raised concerns over ID checks.
He added: 'In the name of safety, the Act poses the biggest threat to freedom of speech in this country in our lifetimes.
'In the name of protecting children, the law aims to regulate what adults are allowed to say or see – while doing nothing to make our children safer.'
Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said making statements about overturning the Bill is 'very lazy' and 'not responsible'.
Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide.
Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone.
'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.'
The Prime Minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We must fight the deepfake future
We must fight the deepfake future

New Statesman​

timea few seconds ago

  • New Statesman​

We must fight the deepfake future

Photo by Jonathan Brady/Alamy Penny Mordaunt broadsworded her way into Britain's collective imagination when she became the unexpected breakout star of King Charles III's May 2023 coronation. We had lost one stoic queen; here was another. Mordaunt bore the Sword of State, the heaviest in the royal collection, for 50 minutes. The world watching, Mordaunt kept her face composed, the image of ceremonial gravitas, strength, tradition and honour. But imagine that face smeared across violent pornography. Speaking to BBC Newsnight recently, the former Conservative MP and cabinet minister revealed that she had been a victim of deepfake pornography while serving in parliament. Her face, along with those of other female MPs including Priti Patel and Angela Rayner, had been digitally placed onto explicit videos. 'It was deliberately humiliating and violent,' she said. Deepfakes are the latest grotesque frontier in the battle for digital dignity, where artificial intelligence is weaponised to humiliate, disempower, and violate women's bodies. And the harm inflicted is not virtual – it can be as real as any other form of sexual violence. Headlines in 2013 may have asserted otherwise: 'No harm in simulated rape videos (as long as they are well made), say ministers' ran in the Telegraph. Though this predates the inception of deepfakes by a few years, it is grim that, even today, some still think this basic principle of female autonomy is up for debate. Digital violence is violence, as Mordaunt understands. 'The people behind this,' she said, 'don't realise the consequences in the real world when they do something like that.' Since the first deepfake was created in 2017, AI-generated, sexually explicit videos have proliferated across the internet. A study assessed that half a million deepfakes were shared in 2023; this year's total is expected to be eight million. Of all deepfakes, 98 per cent are sexually explicit, and 99 per cent of those are of females. This technology is both misogynistic and, as it stands, unregulated. Worse, it is now so sophisticated that viewers no longer realise they are consuming fakes. We stand on the precipice, looking at potentially an entire generation of young males whose sexual understanding of consent is being warped by digital hallucinations. Keir Starmer's government has shown some willingness to take on issues related to deepfakes. Amendments to the Online Safety Act, which require pornography websites to implement age-verification measures, came into force on 25 July. The aim is to prevent children from accessing explicit material, and thereby protect them. But we might note the unnecessary protractions before the legislation was introduced. (While it is illegal to distribute deepfakes, it is legal to create one. Rishi Sunak pledged to legislate against the production of deepfakes in April 2024 though said legislation never materialised; Keir Starmer pledged the same in January 2025, yet production remains legal.) We may also note that a lot of porn lives outside of traditional porn sites, instead circulating on the murky backwaters of Telegram groups, Reddit threads, and 4chan. Whatever the measures, we need more of them. AI-driven deepfake porn is a disturbing new theatre of abuse advancing, like all AI developments, at an alarming pace. But technology is made by humans. The scaffolding of our digital lives is designed, curated, and upheld by other people. The sword Mordaunt held at King Charles' coronation was historic and symbolic. Today, her sword is rhetorical: a call to action against the degradation of female autonomy, identity, and safety in a world that increasingly treats women's faces and bodies as public property. Mordaunt has exposed a frightening fault line in British society. Children are given unfettered access to pornography. Women are transformed into digitally altered chimeras without consent and without recourse. Allowing this to continue is not just a regulatory failure but a cultural one. Technological change is relentless; violence against women is perennial. The internet is hard to contain and full of malicious actors. But we must summon the will to protect basic privacies and dignities. However heavy, we should pick up and carry that sword. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe [See also: Schools need more sex education, not less] Related

Ferryhill town councillor resigns after wife barred from flower show
Ferryhill town councillor resigns after wife barred from flower show

BBC News

timea few seconds ago

  • BBC News

Ferryhill town councillor resigns after wife barred from flower show

A town councillor says his wife's happiness is more important after he stepped down to allow her to enter an annual flower Hewitt has lived in Ferryhill, County Durham, with his wife Rita for seven years and said they take delight entering the annual Ferryhill in Bloom was appointed to Ferryhill Town Council on 1 May, representing Reform UK, but as it judges the contest he decided to resign when it became clear she could not compete after "working hard" all Hewitt said some people had challenged him over his decision but he replied: "She loves her garden." Last year, the couple came first in the contest for their front garden and second for their Hewitt said: "I don't have a lot to do with the garden at all, it is all my wife's doing."She grows plants from seed and brings them on in the greenhouse - it is her baby." The 65-year-old said he applied to join the town council to "do something for the community". He is already chairman of the residents' association. "There weren't enough applicants to hold an election, I was just appointed," he said."There are 17 councillor places for Ferryhill Town Council and at the moment there are only seven councillors."Mr Hewitt had only been in the post for a month and attended one meeting before he was told his wife, 77, would not be able to compete. He stood down on 26 June."When I found out that this year she wouldn't get to put herself forward after all her hard work I thought I am not really losing anything by giving it up without even getting my feet under the table."Mr Hewitt said he fully understood the situation and said if a "councillor or a councillor's wife won the competition then people could look at that and start wondering what is going on".The results of Ferryhill in Bloom 2025 will be announced in September. Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

Defeated Conservative MP Adam Holloway defects to Reform UK
Defeated Conservative MP Adam Holloway defects to Reform UK

ITV News

time29 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Defeated Conservative MP Adam Holloway defects to Reform UK

A former Conservative MP, who lost his seat at the last general election, has joined Reform UK. Adam Holloway represented Gravesham in Kent for 19 years and served as a government whip under Boris Johnson and Liz Truss. He left Parliament in 2024 after losing to Labour's Lauren Sullivan by 2,712 votes. Mr Holloway told ITV News Meridian: 'I believe Reform are the only people who are serious and able to do something about the peril this country is in. 'The Tory party have still got loads of fabulous people but I just don't think, from where they are now, they're going to be able to win an election, get rid of Labour and start undoing some of the damage.' Asked if he was switching sides simply to try to win his old Gravesham seat back, Mr Holloway replied: 'Yeah, of course that is partly on my mind.' He added: 'I'm not coming to Reform expecting to be allowed to run in my old seat. I'm coming to Reform because I care about this country.' Reform UK failed to win any parliamentary seats in Kent in the 2024 general election. However, in May's local elections the party ousted the Conservatives from Kent County Council, winning an outright majority.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store