English voters face ‘democratic deficit' without devolved parliament
English voters who do not have a devolved national parliament face a 'democratic deficit', a Conservative MP has warned.
Andrew Rosindell described himself as a 'strong supporter' of the UK Parliament in Westminster but told the Commons that English people suffer with a 'rather diminished democratic voice'.
Unlike Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, where some decisions are taken by lawmakers in Stormont, Holyrood and Cardiff Bay, England does not have a devolved national assembly.
Mr Rosindell told MPs that after the devolution process in the late 1990s, 'for the first time in centuries, the unifying lynchpin of these islands – the crown in Parliament – seemed to have been wrenched out of place'.Speaking in a debate about English Affairs, the Conservative MP later added: 'What must in any case be acknowledged is that England, the most populous region with the biggest economy, is the only home nation not to have her own devolved parliament.
'This has created a democratic deficit in which the proud people of England, such as those in my constituency of Romford, Essex, are left with a rich cultural heritage, as I've outlined earlier, and without a fully developed but rather diminished democratic voice.'
Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh, the Conservative MP for Gainsborough, urged Mr Rosindell to 'please spare us another parliament'.
The Romford MP replied that he was a 'very strong supporter of this Parliament and of this United Kingdom', added he 'would have most certainly not voted to break up our United Kingdom in the way that we have done', and said he would 'love to see' the London Assembly abolished in the capital.
Liberal Democrat Scotland spokeswoman Christine Jardine intervened and said: 'What we did was devolve some of the power closer to the people so that they felt more represented, not in an attempt to break up the country, but – as a member of the party who was instrumental with the Labour Party in achieving it – so that we held the country together but gave people the feeling of being closer to where decisions were made.'
Mr Rosindell replied that he thought 'all members of Parliament should be equal and elected representatives should be equal, but if you make different types of elected representation at different levels, it obviously means that English MPs have a different role than Scottish MPs, because they have Members of the Scottish Parliament in Scotland, which have another role'.
Labour MP Adam Jogee, who opened the debate, had earlier said: 'We must work to ensure that people across England, and indeed all those across the United Kingdom, continue to feel pride in our flag and in our communities, and feel hope for the future and respect for our past.'
The Newcastle-under-Lyme MP added that 'any talk about love for flag and country must be matched by an investment in the people who make them what they are – investment in our national health service, in our education and employment support services, in our arts and culture, and in our villages, towns and cities'.
Communities minister Rushanara Ali said St George's day was an opportunity to 'fight against the forces of division' that present the English identity as 'an exclusive identity, that is a white only identity'.
Mr Rosindell intervened and asked: 'Would the Government consider St George's Day to become a public holiday in England?'
Ms Ali replied that she could not 'respond with a positive answer right now'.
She added: 'We must inspire the next generation to carry forward the best of England through education, opportunity and the belief that no matter who you are or where you come from, you belong and you can help shape this country's future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Kemi Badenoch to give speech on the ECHR
Kemi Badenoch is set to use a major speech to declare she is 'increasingly of the view' that the UK should withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights. The leader of the Conservative Party is expected to set out a plan to launch a commission into whether Britain should quit the treaty. The ECHR was a dividing issue in last year's Conservative leadership election, with Mrs Badenoch's rival Robert Jenrick championing the idea that Britain should pull out. Critics of the treaty want to leave it because it has been used to frustrate attempts to deport migrants from Britain. Mrs Badenoch is expected to say that she is 'increasingly of the view that we will need to leave, because I am yet to see a clear and coherent route to change within our current legal structures'. 'I have always been clear that if our national interest means that we need to leave the ECHR, we will leave,' the Conservative leader will say. She will add: 'But I say that not because of any particular obsession with international law or with our treaty arrangements. I say that because for me, the most important thing is making our country safer, richer and fairer.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Waspi campaigners say they have been given green light for High Court challenge
Waspi campaigners say they have cleared a hurdle in their battle for a High Court challenge. The Women Against State Pension Inequality group is seeking a judicial review to force the Government to reconsider its decision to rule out a compensation package for women affected by the way changes to the state pension age were communicated. The campaigners said they have received an update to say that their case is arguable, setting them on course for a court hearing. A previous report by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PSHO) suggested compensation ranging between £1,000 and £2,950 could be appropriate for each of those affected. But in December 2024, the Government said that, while it accepted the ombudsman's finding of maladministration and apologised for there being a delay in writing to 1950s-born women, a blanket compensation scheme, which could cost taxpayers up to £10.5 billion, cannot be justified. Waspi campaigners submitted arguments back in February for a legal case challenging the decision not to compensate women. Lawyers for the campaigners argue that the Government's reasons for concluding that people should not receive any remedy are a breach of legal principles. Waspi said it also expects a hearing to consider its application for a costs capping order, so that campaigners would not be forced to pay unknown costs to cover the legal fees should they lose. The group said that it may be forced to withdraw its challenge without this financial safeguard. It is also calling on supporters to help raise further funds for the legal challenge. Waspi chairwoman Angela Madden described the green light in its legal challenge as a 'landmark moment in our campaign'. She said: 'We are grateful for the funds raised so far and understand the country's purse strings are tight, but the Government cannot be allowed to brush this injustice aside.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Rayner's popularity surges with Labour members after leaked tax memo
Angela Rayner has surged in popularity with Labour members after her plans for tax rises were leaked. Polling by the website LabourList found the Deputy Prime Minister had enjoyed the fastest rise in her favourability rating with members. She had a +71 rating – the proportion who feel positive about her minus those with negative feelings – up from +46 two months earlier. Ms Rayner is now second only to Ed Miliband, the Energy and Net Zero secretary, in the Cabinet rankings. He is on +74. It will be seen as a sign that Labour members supported the tax-raising ideas in her memo, amid growing grassroots unhappiness over welfare and public spending cuts. The leaked memo, seen by The Telegraph, revealed that Ms Rayner had called on Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, to increase eight taxes in the Spring Statement in March 2025. She urged the Chancellor to raise taxes by £3billion a year, including increasing corporation tax on banks, extending the freeze on the threshold at which the 45 per cent income tax rate is paid and scrapping the tax-free allowance on dividends. Disability benefits were cut Ms Reeves instead chose to cut disability benefits by £5 billion, but is under growing pressure from Labour MPs to water down or abandon them. The LabourList-commissioned survey, carried out by Survation, found the average Cabinet minister was more popular than they were in the last poll, which was carried out just after the cuts were announced in the Spring Statement. Hillary Benn, the Northern Ireland Secretary, Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, and Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, were the next most popular members. Ms Reeves was the most unpopular on minus 28, with Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, close behind her on minus 23. Even Sir Keir Starmer is on minus 7 with members of his own party. All three saw their scores increase when compared with the last poll in April. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, stood at +23, but she was one of the few Cabinet members who saw her approval drop. Damian Lyons Lowe, chief executive of Survation, said: 'Rayner's 25-point jump since April 3 suggests members strongly back her performance as Deputy Prime Minister.' Tom Belger, editor of LabourList, said: 'This poll gives a fascinating snapshot of the mood among the party faithful. Many members may be restless, but the notable upward trend for most of the Cabinet members gives ministers a rare piece of good news.' When it comes to who should be the next Labour leader, Andy Burnham, Greater Manchester Mayor, was clearly in the lead. Ms Rayner and Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, came second, even though he is one of the least popular Cabinet ministers among Labour members, with a score of just +7 per cent. Despite being the most popular Cabinet minister, Mr Miliband only came sixth when it came to the pick for next leader, below Left-wing MP Clive Lewis. However, he fared much better than his brother David. The survey also found that most Labour members want to see the Government U-turn on welfare reforms and go further in fully reversing winter fuel cuts. However, they support the Government's decision to oppose Waspi compensation for women born in the 1950s who had their pension age increased.
