Oshkosh school district parts ways with dean of students involved in Jan. 10 student restraint at Vel Phillips
OSHKOSH – The Vel Phillips Middle School administrator who was at the center of a Jan. 10 incident in which a 13-year-old student was handcuffed and pinned under a school resource officer for more than two minutes is no longer with the district.
Dean of Students Christopher Willems was initially placed on a five-day suspension with plans of being reassigned to Jacob Shapiro Elementary School, before the Oshkosh Area School District opted to suspend him with pay for the remainder of the 2024-25 school year.
Inside sources revealed OASD is not expected to renew Willems' contract while his name no longer appears in the Vel Phillips Middle School directory.
Willems' departure from the district stems from his role in the Jan. 10 incident, during which he called for a school resource officer's assistance to deal with a student who refused to hand his cell phone to another teacher.
The SRO's body camera footage showed Willems shoving the student through a door several minutes before he pushed that student up against a wall and assisted the SRO in restraining the child.
Records obtained from OASD April 11 in response to a records request filed Jan. 17 by the Northwestern showed a district investigation that started Jan. 13 took issue with Willems on four separate issues during the incident — one of which OASD believed 'resulted in the student being handcuffed and detained by Oshkosh Police.'
In a letter signed by OASD Assistant Superintendent of Operations Julie Conrad-Peters, OASD administration recommended two forms of discipline: suspending Willems without pay for five days or terminating Willems.
After finding 'no previous discipline' on Willems' employee file, the district opted for the five-day suspension on Jan. 24, according to the records, before Willems signed a disciplinary agreement that would see him suspended Jan. 27-31.
But OASD Executive Director of Human Resources Sabrina Johnson wrote Willems on Feb. 26 saying the district was placing him on a non-disciplinary administrative leave with pay for the remainder of the 2024-25 school year. That letter was sent to Willems the same day the Northwestern published two articles regarding the Jan. 10 incident.
One of the articles referenced Willems' involvement in another sensitive situation dealing with students of color within the district when he was at the former Merrill Middle School.
In 2022, students of color were all expelled from Merrill following a fight with a white pupil in a Donald Trump costume who went unpunished.
Willems was seen in body camera footage speaking with police after the incident saying, 'I'm not sure what happened ahead of time, but before the dance he had been grabbed by a bunch of students and thrown to the ground.'
The ACLU of Wisconsin, in a civil rights complaint against the district, claimed the white student harassed and threw water on three Black and biracial students.
In her letter to Willems, Johnson said his reassignment 'will most likely be met with disruption by those not satisfied with the disciplinary outcome' considering 'the race component of the prior incident.'
'While the District stands by that agreement, we do not think it will be good for either you or the new school to face disruption during the rest of the school year,' Johnson wrote in the communication.
Willems' status between Jan. 31, the end of his five-day suspension, and Johnson's letter Feb. 26 is unclear.
Dig deeper: Vel Phillips incident revives racial discipline disparities raised in 2023 REAL Oshkosh report
The disciplinary agreement, signed by Willems Jan. 24, said he agreed not to file 'any suit, action, grievance or request for hearing as it relates to the facts of this matter, the investigation and/or discipline in this Disciplinary Agreement.'
Attempts to reach Willems for an interview prior to publication of this article were not successful.
According to both the student and the SRO's incident report, the Jan. 10 situation unfolded after the 13-year-old student refused to hand his cell phone over to a female teacher, prompting her to call Willems for assistance.
SRO Dellas Vandenberg's report said Willems asked for his assistance, but OASD Board Policy 5136 only references law enforcement with regards to cell phones if 'the violation involves an illegal activity' or the device is used to transmit things of a threatening, obscene, disruptive, sexually explicit or harassment nature.
With the SRO present, Willems grabbed the boy from behind under both arms and pushed him through a door before releasing the student after the kid refused to go to student services.
Wisconsin Statute 118.305 prohibits "covered individuals" such as teachers, school staff and independent contractors from using techniques or maneuvers on students that 'cause chest compression by placing pressure or weight on the pupil's chest, lungs, sternum, diaphragm, back, or abdomen' or 'place the pupil in a prone position.'
Later in the incident, Willems shoved the student against a wall and assisted the SRO in restraining him when the boy failed to follow instruction to leave the school premises.
The 13-year-old was put in handcuffs and pinned to the ground under the weight of the SRO for more than two minutes before he was taken into custody in a squad car.
Oshkosh police referred charges of resisting/obstructing and threats to a law enforcement officer stemming from the incident, but Winnebago County Juvenile Intake recommended closing the case, saying the situation was managed at the school level.
Dig deeper: Vel Phillips Middle School has grappled with several incidents since opening. A timeline.
In an investigation led by Conrad-Peters and OASD Assistant Superintendent of Instruction Samuel Coleman, district administration felt Willems' failure to call a school administrator during the incident 'resulted in the student being handcuffed and detained by Oshkosh Police.'
OASD also took issue with Willems using 'an inappropriate restraint' to push the student and assisting the SRO in the student's restraint, which is 'not OASD protocol or in alignment with NVCI restraint protocols.'
The district further said Willems leaving the student unattended after the student had exited the building earlier in the incident "resulted in the student re-entering the building" and "The re-entry into the building escalated the situation to a safety concern."
According to the report, Willems said he wouldn't have pushed the student through the student services door if he could go back in time, saying he did not believe it was a law enforcement matter.
'I feel partially responsible for him ending up in cuffs because I could have done more,' Willems said in the investigation.
Willems said he didn't have any prior incidents with the student, adding their previous interactions typically had gone well.
The student's family declined to comment on Willems' punishment.
In her statement to the district, Vel Phillips Dean of Students Trisha Hunter said she wasn't sure what the staff could have done without the SRO but questioned why Willems was assisting and needed 'hands on.'
'It is hard when someone puts hands on kids. Makes me nervous every time that happens,' she said.
Questions to the district regarding the SRO's use of force have been left unanswered.
OASD said it reviews its memorandum of understanding with the OPD during its annual data review at the start of the school year "and will continue independent of any specific investigations or circumstances."
In an email dated Jan. 23, Conrad-Peters asked Sergeant of the Criminal Investigation Division Christopher Gorte the following:
In reviewing the incident described above, what improvements or changes would you recommend to the OASD and SRO Memorandum of Understanding or training?
What specific training does an officer receive to become a School Resource Officer for the Oshkosh Police Department?
What protocol or decision-making process does an SRO use when deciding to restrain or detain a student/juvenile in a school environment? Is the protocol different in the community?
How does an SRO decide to intervene in a school situation? What guidance or training do SROs receive?
In reviewing the incident described above, at what point should the SRO have been involved or not involved?
Contact Justin Marville at jmarville@gannett.com and follow him on X (formerly Twitter) at @justinmarville.
This article originally appeared on Oshkosh Northwestern: Oshkosh school district parts ways with dean in Vel Phillips incident
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sacramento train builder agrees to workplace review after racial harassment complaint
A German company with a large train manufacturing plant in Sacramento agreed to an independent review of its workplace practices after a worker reported race-based harassment, the California Civil Rights Department announced Wednesday. As part of the settlement, Siemens Mobility agreed to compensate the employee — who filed a complaint with the agency in 2023 — without admitting to any liability. That worker alleged that 'multiple co-workers over a period of several months would daily use derogatory terms either associated with Black people or Latinos,' according to a Civil Rights Department news release, which does not specify the amount of monetary compensation. The complainant 'identified as African American,' the department's public affairs staff clarified in an email to The Sacramento Bee. The employee, who worked at Siemens' Florin plant, claimed to have faced retaliation — including suspension and being escorted out of the French Road facility by security staff — for raising the concern about harassment, the news release said. A Siemens spokesperson, Kara Evanko, said that the claims of retaliation were 'false,' adding that the company 'is firmly committed to providing a work environment free of discrimination, intimidation, and harassment and denied the allegations in the complaint.' The eight-page settlement agreement specifies that Siemens Mobility has hired an outside consultant, approved by state regulators, to 'assess the efficacy of its equal employment opportunity practices' at the plant, which builds rolling stock. The consultant will look into any racial tensions, incidents of harassment and how the company handles complaints. The company will have to share with Civil Rights Department officials a written report by the consultant and then implement policies recommended by the consultant and the agency, or else return to mediation. 'There is no place for derogatory slurs in the workplace,' Civil Rights Director Kevin Kish said in a statement. 'Through this voluntary settlement, Siemens Mobility is doing the right thing to help protect workers in our state.' The Siemens Mobility facility in Florin is the company's headquarters for North American railway manufacturing. It employs over 2,500 people, according to the company's website. A unionization effort at the plant failed in March.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Oakland Post editor's confessed killer paroled after years in prison
The man convicted of killing an Oakland newspaper editor who was investigating the finances of a Black empowerment group in 2007 was released from prison last week, officials told the Chronicle. Devaughndre Broussard was released into parole supervision on June 5, according to a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation spokesperson. No other details regarding his release were immediately provided. Chauncey Bailey, the editor of African-American weekly the Oakland Post, had been investigating the bankruptcy proceedings of Your Black Muslim Bakery before he was killed. Broussard, a member of the bakery group, testified in 2011 that its leader, Yusuf Bey IV, had ordered him to learn where Bailey lived and 'find out his routine,' according to a Chronicle report. 'He wanted us to take him out before he wrote that article.' Broussard confessed to killing Bailey with three shotgun blasts on Aug. 2, 2007 as Bailey was walking to work at 14th and Alice Streets in downtown Oakland, according to a previous Chronicle report. A federal judge ordered the bakery to liquidate its assets amid debt and management problems the week following Bailey's killing. Broussard was sentenced to 25 years in prison after pleading guilty to two counts of involuntary manslaughter for the slayings of Bailey and Odell Roberson, 31. Roberson was the uncle of the man who shot and killed Bey IV's brother near the former San Pablo Avenue bakery. Broussard promised to testify against Bey IV and Antoine Mackey, a former bakery associate, who was also a suspect in Bailey's killing. Bey IV was sentenced in 2011 to spend the rest of his life in prison for ordering the killings of Bailey, 57, Roberson, 31, and Michael Willis, 36. Jurors decided that Bey IV was guilty of murdering Bailey because he had ordered Broussard to pull the trigger. Mackey was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder for Bailey and Willis's killings, the Chronicle previously reported. In 2015, a state appeals court denied Bey IV and Mackey's motion to overturn their convictions, dismissing claims that their trial should have been moved from Alameda County due to negative publicity.
5 hours ago
Diddy trial day 25 recap: Prosecutors try to drop a juror over 'lack of candor'
A surprise controversy surrounding a juror erupted Wednesday as the 25th day of Sean Combs' sex trafficking trial opened. U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian told a hushed court that he is considering removing one of the 12 jurors after prosecutors suggested the man demonstrated a "lack of candor" with the court. Neither the judge nor the attorneys in the case detailed the specific issues at work. Defense attorneys, however, took issue with the possibility that Juror No. 6 might be thrown off the panel. Noting that the juror is a middle-aged Black man from the Bronx, Combs' lawyers accused prosecutors of a "thinly veiled effort to dismiss a Black juror." It's not the first time Combs' lawyers have accused federal prosecutors of attempting to unfairly remove Black jurors. During the first week of testimony in the trial, when both sides finalized the jury, defense attorney Marc Agnifilo accused federal prosecutors of bias after most of the government's nine peremptory strikes were used on Black prospective jurors. The judge rejected the defense's challenge, saying the government had provided "race-neutral reasons" to strike the jurors. The judge told Combs and the attorneys that he would decide what to do by Friday and then Combs' lawyers resumed their cross-examination of a woman who accused the rap mogul of coercing her into sex during their three-year relationship. The woman, testifying under the pseudonym "Jane," told jurors during questioning from prosecutors that Combs strung her along for years in what she thought was a loving relationship. In reality, she testified that she was used by Combs to satisfy his extreme sexual appetites that played themselves out through days-long orgies she called "hotel nights." She testified that the drug-fueled sessions allegedly required her to have sex with male prostitutes while Combs watched, directed and masturbated to scenes of his own design. Jane told the jury that Combs threatened to stop paying her rent or to release sexually explicit videos of her if she refused to participate in the sexual escapades. Prosecutors argue that Combs used his wealth, status, and business empire to coerce both Jane and the singer Cassie Ventura -- another ex-girlfriend who was the prosecution's star witness -- into first participating in the sex parties then forcing them into silence. Combs has pleaded not guilty to the charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and transportation to engage in prostitution. His lawyers argue that all sexual encounters were consensual and that Combs led a "polyamorous" lifestyle that was strictly legal. Defense attorneys spent most of Wednesday trying to use Jane's own words in text messages to show that she was a willing participant in Combs' sex life, not the victim of force or coercion. Defense attorneys paint Jane as a willing participant Combs' attorney Teny Geragos spent the better part of the day grilling Jane by showing the jury multiple text messages between Jane and Combs that suggested she was initiating sexual conversations. "What are you doing, baby?" Jane wrote to Combs in one message read for the jury. "Horny for me?" In one message, Geragos was able to extract from Jane the testimony that Combs obliged one time when Jane said she did not want to engage in a sex performance with a male prostitute. During another part of her testimony, Jane told the jury about two other instances when she declined to have sex with other escorts because she was not attracted to them. Jane also testified there was a two-month stretch in 2022 when there were no "hotel nights." When they were engaging in the sex parties, she testified she would buy matching shorts for Combs and the escorts to wear as well as erection pills. After Jane complained to Combs about him spending time with another woman, she said Combs invited her to leave the relationship. "It's not right how you're treating me right now and how you're doing me and the last thing I'd expect from you is coming at me sideways about a girl you like," Jane wrote. "You completely had your way with me." The message concluded, "You have me feeling so taken advantage of." Combs' response was not read aloud but Geragos characterized it as, "He was saying if the relationship was as toxic as you say you were welcome to leave, right?" Jane replied, "That's what he was saying." Defense tries to cast doubt on Jane's earlier testimony about "hotel nights" During days of direct examination, prosecutors used Jane's words to try to highlight a pattern when Combs would allegedly host Jane for a romantic weekend -- which she said she believed would not involve having sex with male escorts -- before pressuring her to participate in so-called "hotel nights." She told jurors that she regretted going on a trip in 2023 to Turks and Caicos because Combs pressured her to have sex with a male escort named Paul. On cross examination, defense attorneys introduced evidence showing Jane expressed gratitude for Combs during the trip. "You are truly a blessing in my life. have never had a man take care of me like you," Jane wrote in a text to Combs during the trip. "I feel blessed to have you in my life and I only wish to be a blessing in yours." Jane became emotional and cried as she testified about the text, saying she could not continue reading the entire message. She also testified about being pressured to have sex with three male escorts in Miami after Combs invited her to celebrate her own birthday. "I am given my gift, I'm taking a pill and awaiting an entertainer," Jane said, describing a pattern that she testified defined her relationship. Combs' attorneys, though, seized on a text message Jane sent to Combs on her way home: "Just wanted to say I loved and appreciated every detail you put together for my birthday." "You tell him you love and appreciate every detail, right?" Geragos asked.
