Oshkosh school district parts ways with dean of students involved in Jan. 10 student restraint at Vel Phillips
OSHKOSH – The Vel Phillips Middle School administrator who was at the center of a Jan. 10 incident in which a 13-year-old student was handcuffed and pinned under a school resource officer for more than two minutes is no longer with the district.
Dean of Students Christopher Willems was initially placed on a five-day suspension with plans of being reassigned to Jacob Shapiro Elementary School, before the Oshkosh Area School District opted to suspend him with pay for the remainder of the 2024-25 school year.
Inside sources revealed OASD is not expected to renew Willems' contract while his name no longer appears in the Vel Phillips Middle School directory.
Willems' departure from the district stems from his role in the Jan. 10 incident, during which he called for a school resource officer's assistance to deal with a student who refused to hand his cell phone to another teacher.
The SRO's body camera footage showed Willems shoving the student through a door several minutes before he pushed that student up against a wall and assisted the SRO in restraining the child.
Records obtained from OASD April 11 in response to a records request filed Jan. 17 by the Northwestern showed a district investigation that started Jan. 13 took issue with Willems on four separate issues during the incident — one of which OASD believed 'resulted in the student being handcuffed and detained by Oshkosh Police.'
In a letter signed by OASD Assistant Superintendent of Operations Julie Conrad-Peters, OASD administration recommended two forms of discipline: suspending Willems without pay for five days or terminating Willems.
After finding 'no previous discipline' on Willems' employee file, the district opted for the five-day suspension on Jan. 24, according to the records, before Willems signed a disciplinary agreement that would see him suspended Jan. 27-31.
But OASD Executive Director of Human Resources Sabrina Johnson wrote Willems on Feb. 26 saying the district was placing him on a non-disciplinary administrative leave with pay for the remainder of the 2024-25 school year. That letter was sent to Willems the same day the Northwestern published two articles regarding the Jan. 10 incident.
One of the articles referenced Willems' involvement in another sensitive situation dealing with students of color within the district when he was at the former Merrill Middle School.
In 2022, students of color were all expelled from Merrill following a fight with a white pupil in a Donald Trump costume who went unpunished.
Willems was seen in body camera footage speaking with police after the incident saying, 'I'm not sure what happened ahead of time, but before the dance he had been grabbed by a bunch of students and thrown to the ground.'
The ACLU of Wisconsin, in a civil rights complaint against the district, claimed the white student harassed and threw water on three Black and biracial students.
In her letter to Willems, Johnson said his reassignment 'will most likely be met with disruption by those not satisfied with the disciplinary outcome' considering 'the race component of the prior incident.'
'While the District stands by that agreement, we do not think it will be good for either you or the new school to face disruption during the rest of the school year,' Johnson wrote in the communication.
Willems' status between Jan. 31, the end of his five-day suspension, and Johnson's letter Feb. 26 is unclear.
Dig deeper: Vel Phillips incident revives racial discipline disparities raised in 2023 REAL Oshkosh report
The disciplinary agreement, signed by Willems Jan. 24, said he agreed not to file 'any suit, action, grievance or request for hearing as it relates to the facts of this matter, the investigation and/or discipline in this Disciplinary Agreement.'
Attempts to reach Willems for an interview prior to publication of this article were not successful.
According to both the student and the SRO's incident report, the Jan. 10 situation unfolded after the 13-year-old student refused to hand his cell phone over to a female teacher, prompting her to call Willems for assistance.
SRO Dellas Vandenberg's report said Willems asked for his assistance, but OASD Board Policy 5136 only references law enforcement with regards to cell phones if 'the violation involves an illegal activity' or the device is used to transmit things of a threatening, obscene, disruptive, sexually explicit or harassment nature.
With the SRO present, Willems grabbed the boy from behind under both arms and pushed him through a door before releasing the student after the kid refused to go to student services.
Wisconsin Statute 118.305 prohibits "covered individuals" such as teachers, school staff and independent contractors from using techniques or maneuvers on students that 'cause chest compression by placing pressure or weight on the pupil's chest, lungs, sternum, diaphragm, back, or abdomen' or 'place the pupil in a prone position.'
Later in the incident, Willems shoved the student against a wall and assisted the SRO in restraining him when the boy failed to follow instruction to leave the school premises.
The 13-year-old was put in handcuffs and pinned to the ground under the weight of the SRO for more than two minutes before he was taken into custody in a squad car.
Oshkosh police referred charges of resisting/obstructing and threats to a law enforcement officer stemming from the incident, but Winnebago County Juvenile Intake recommended closing the case, saying the situation was managed at the school level.
Dig deeper: Vel Phillips Middle School has grappled with several incidents since opening. A timeline.
In an investigation led by Conrad-Peters and OASD Assistant Superintendent of Instruction Samuel Coleman, district administration felt Willems' failure to call a school administrator during the incident 'resulted in the student being handcuffed and detained by Oshkosh Police.'
OASD also took issue with Willems using 'an inappropriate restraint' to push the student and assisting the SRO in the student's restraint, which is 'not OASD protocol or in alignment with NVCI restraint protocols.'
The district further said Willems leaving the student unattended after the student had exited the building earlier in the incident "resulted in the student re-entering the building" and "The re-entry into the building escalated the situation to a safety concern."
According to the report, Willems said he wouldn't have pushed the student through the student services door if he could go back in time, saying he did not believe it was a law enforcement matter.
'I feel partially responsible for him ending up in cuffs because I could have done more,' Willems said in the investigation.
Willems said he didn't have any prior incidents with the student, adding their previous interactions typically had gone well.
The student's family declined to comment on Willems' punishment.
In her statement to the district, Vel Phillips Dean of Students Trisha Hunter said she wasn't sure what the staff could have done without the SRO but questioned why Willems was assisting and needed 'hands on.'
'It is hard when someone puts hands on kids. Makes me nervous every time that happens,' she said.
Questions to the district regarding the SRO's use of force have been left unanswered.
OASD said it reviews its memorandum of understanding with the OPD during its annual data review at the start of the school year "and will continue independent of any specific investigations or circumstances."
In an email dated Jan. 23, Conrad-Peters asked Sergeant of the Criminal Investigation Division Christopher Gorte the following:
In reviewing the incident described above, what improvements or changes would you recommend to the OASD and SRO Memorandum of Understanding or training?
What specific training does an officer receive to become a School Resource Officer for the Oshkosh Police Department?
What protocol or decision-making process does an SRO use when deciding to restrain or detain a student/juvenile in a school environment? Is the protocol different in the community?
How does an SRO decide to intervene in a school situation? What guidance or training do SROs receive?
In reviewing the incident described above, at what point should the SRO have been involved or not involved?
Contact Justin Marville at jmarville@gannett.com and follow him on X (formerly Twitter) at @justinmarville.
This article originally appeared on Oshkosh Northwestern: Oshkosh school district parts ways with dean in Vel Phillips incident
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
LA Riots, Deportations, N-Word Karens and Other Distractions That Have Black Folks Sleepwalking
In an era marked by rising hate and division, the Black community faces a new kind of attack — and it isn't always glaringly obvious. As chaos unfolds on screens and in headlines, the real threats slip by unnoticed, quietly reshaping our future. This is the cautionary tale about how distraction has become a weapon, and why staying truly woke means seeing beyond the noise to protect what's ours. Now, we love the phrase 'Stay woke' — thanks, Donald Glover — but it feels like we're sleepwalking through some of the biggest moves against us without fully grasping the severity of the situation on our hands. Whether people are picking up the pieces to failed immigration policies — sparking protests like the ICE L.A. riots — or we're sucked into reality TV, we must face these issues head-on. Let's take a deep dive into some of the major players in this advanced game of distraction, and how the tactics are used against us. Shocking immigration riots took place on June 8 in Los Angeles, where thousands took to the streets after ICE launched sweeping raids. Protesters were outraged over mass detentions, family separations, and the sudden deployment of National Guard troops while facing troops, tear gas, rubber bullets, and site-wide curfews. While Black and immigrant communities fight for their voice and future, chaos is staged at the hand of the Trump administration — once again — to keep everyone on edge and off their game. Frankly, the visible and physical tactic of slapping down unity is a slap in the face…and protesters weren't afraid to turn up in the faces of the California National Guard. At least 56 were arrested over the weekend, per NBC News. Don't come for us when we say this, but entertainment is slowly but surely becoming a form of mind control. Every scandal, every rabbit hole, every bombshell media trial (we're looking at you, Diddy) — it's all keeping us locked in and tuned out. Using celebs to push agendas? We're over it. It's Rome all over again, a reminder of how entertainment was used as a tool to minimize the potential for civil unrest, while enhancing their popularity and image. Works every time — but we're on to it. Many Black folks feel some decisions made by the Trump administration are slowly chipping away at the potential for Black progress. Community programs that offer support to education and health are being cut and stripped of their funding, such as proposed cuts to Title I funding. By the time we look up, they're already out the back door with a program — such as Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion — that was set in place to encourage Black success. Needless to say, politics can be a masterclass in misdirection. During the era of our civil rights leaders Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, activism was rooted in real sacrifice. Today, social justice is somewhat of a trendy accessory: changing your Facebook photo to stand with victims and adding the black square to your Instagram profile. During the Montgomery Bus Boycotts, people, young and elderly, opted out of the bus system due to harsh treatment for a staggering 381 days—from Dec. 5, 1955 to Dec. 20, 1956. Compare that to now, where many won't log off for three minutes — let alone stand ten toes down for over a year. We can easily call this digital programming. Every person's feed is created especially for them, fueling their triggers, addictions, and messiest obsessions for monetary gain. No matter the social app, the goal is to keep us doom-scrolling until we're late for work, short on sleep, or deep into a chaotic rabbit hole. All the trash gets pushed to the top while real-world updates are suppressed, rendering many uninformed. Election disputes causing voter suppression may not be the intention, but it can delay access or hinder full participation. Allegations of voter fraud, battles over ballot access and unexpected changes to voting rules disproportionately affect Black, Latino, and Indigenous communities. Claims of fraud become justifications for reduced early voting periods, restrictions on mail-in ballots, and stricter voter ID laws — all of which directly impact Black folks. It's bad enough some don't see the need to vote at all, and this surely doesn't help. At this point, just stop selling the microphones. Since the rise of YouTube podcasts, everybody's a scholar, everybody's got 'sources,' and everybody's reporting something — facts optional. It's a mess. And while the misinformation marathon continues, the truth doesn't even get a head start and opinions are seemingly as good as facts. Thanks to the late Kevin Samuels and many others, Black men and women turned what should be a wholesome discussion into a full-blown battlefield — and social media's eating it up. Known as 'Red Pill' content, some podcasts are built on dragging each other down, 'high value' nonsense and endless 'who brings what to the table' debates. Unifying the Black family has to be central to maintain success. While we're busy fighting each other, the real ops stay winning and we're watching it happen in 4K. They're not even hiding it anymore. Right under our noses, Black studies are being slashed from school curriculums, and key parts of our history are vanishing from textbooks. Since 2021, 44 schools have proposed bills in favor of restricting what's called critical race theory (CRT), per EdTrust. This prevents teachers from giving lessons on important topics, including systemic racism. From Florida to Texas, the erasure is real — and strategic. Whether it's 'talk proper' or 'dress like you want the job,' respectability politics whispers lies about what it takes to be accepted or protected here. We're taught to shrink, conform, and dilute our Blackness to make others comfortable — even though it hasn't stopped injustices. It's a distraction that places blame on individuals instead of the system designed to undermine, no matter how polished we appear. Covert anti-Blackness — whether it's subtle or in-your-face systemic discrimination — chips away at a system that talks big about freedom, equality, and representation. Under Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the Navy to wipe the names of civil rights legends like Harriet Tubman, Thurgood Marshall, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg off naval ships. This kind of quiet erasure isn't loud, but it's no accident — it's polished and intentional. It seems Trump's administration has mastered the art of political theatre — one minute commuting the federal sentence of Chicago gang founder Larry Hoover, the next stripping the names of beloved civil rights leaders from U.S. Navy ships. While our attention was diverted to controversy, chaos, and entertainment, critical programs were defunded, protections dismantled, and inequalities deepened. This isn't just politics — it's a performance meant to mislead and confuse. With so many distractions in play before us, becoming more vigilant and spotting foul play is key. The time has come to cut the noise, and focus on moving forward together as a people in power.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Has Long Floated Using Force Against His Own People — Now He Has the Pretext to Do So
'You just [expletive] shot the reporter!' Australian journalist Lauren Tomasi was in the middle of a live cross, covering the protests against the Trump administration's mass deportation policy in Los Angeles, California. As Tomasi spoke to the camera, microphone in hand, an LAPD officer in the background appeared to target her directly, hitting her in the leg with a rubber bullet. Earlier, reports emerged that British photojournalist Nick Stern was undergoing emergency surgery after also being hit by the same 'non-lethal' ammunition. The situation in Los Angeles is extremely volatile. After nonviolent protests against raids and arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents began in the suburb of Paramount, President Donald Trump issued a memo describing them as 'a form of rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States'. He then deployed the National Guard. As much of the coverage has noted, this is not the first time the National Guard has been deployed to quell protests in the U.S. In 1970, members of the National Guard shot and killed four students protesting the war in Vietnam at Kent State University. In 1992, the National Guard was deployed during protests in Los Angeles following the acquittal of four police officers (three of whom were white) in the severe beating of a Black man, Rodney King. Trump has long speculated about violently deploying the National Guard and even the military against his own people. During his first administration, at the height of the Black Lives Matter protests, former Secretary of Defence Mark Esper alleged that Trump asked him, 'Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' Trump has also long sought to other those opposed to his radical agenda to reshape the United States and its role in the world. He's classified them as 'un-American' and, therefore, deserving of contempt and, when he deems it necessary, violent oppression. During last year's election campaign, he promised to 'root out the communists, Marxists, fascists and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country'. Even the Washington Post characterised this description of Trump's 'political enemies' as 'echoing Hitler, Mussolini'. In addition, Trump has long peddled baseless conspiracies about 'sanctuary cities', such as Los Angeles. He has characterised them as lawless havens for his political enemies and places that have been 'invaded' by immigrants. As anyone who has ever visited these places knows, that is not true. It is no surprise that in the same places Trump characterises as 'disgracing our country', there has been staunch opposition to his agenda and ideology. That opposition has coalesced in recent weeks around the activities of ICE agents, in particular. These agents, wearing masks to conceal their identities, have been arbitrarily detaining people, including US citizens and children, and disappearing people off the streets. They have also arrested caregivers, leaving children alone. As Adam Serwer wrote in The Atlantic during the first iteration of Trump in America, 'the cruelty is the point'. The Trump administration's mass deportation program is deliberately cruel and provocative. It was always only a matter of time before protests broke out. In a democracy, nonviolent protest by hundreds or perhaps a few thousand people in a city of ten million is not a crisis. But it has always suited Trump and the movement that supports him to manufacture crises. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, a key architect of the mass deportations program and a man described by a former adviser as 'Waffen SS', called the protests 'an insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States'. Trump himself also described protesters as 'violent, insurrectionist mobs'. Nowhere does the presidential memo deploying the National Guard name the specific location of the protests. This, and the extreme language coming out of the administration, suggests it is laying the groundwork for further escalation. The administration could be leaving space to deploy the National Guard in other places and invoke the Insurrection Act. Incidents involving the deployment of the National Guard are rare, though politically cataclysmic. It is rarer still for the National Guard to be deployed against the wishes of a democratically elected leader of a state, as Trump has done in California. This deployment comes at a time of crisis for U.S. democracy more broadly. Trump's longstanding attacks against independent media — what he describes as 'fake news' — are escalating. There is a reason that during the current protests, a law enforcement officer appeared so comfortable targeting a journalist, on camera. The Trump administration is also actively targeting independent institutions such as Harvard and Columbia universities. It is also targeting and undermining judges and reducing the power of independent courts to enforce the rule of law. Under Trump, the federal government and its state-based allies are targeting and undermining the rights of minority groups — policing the bodies of trans people, targeting reproductive rights, and beginning the process of undoing the Civil Rights Act. Trump is, for the moment, unconstrained. Asked overnight what the bar is for deploying the Marines against protesters, Trump responded: 'The bar is what I think it is'. As New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie recently observed: 'We should treat Trump and his openly authoritarian administration as a failure, not just of our party system or our legal system, but of our Constitution and its ability to meaningfully constrain a destructive and system-threatening force in our political life.' While the situation in Los Angeles is unpredictable, it must be understood in the broader context of the active, violent threat the Trump administration poses to the U.S. As we watch, American democracy teeters on the brink. This article was updated on June 9, 2025 to correct information about Rodney King. Emma Shortis, Adjunct Senior Fellow, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The post Trump Has Long Floated Using Force Against His Own People — Now He Has the Pretext to Do So appeared first on Katie Couric Media.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Construction workers robbed on West Side job sites
CHICAGO — Construction workers were recently robbed on the West Side, according to a Chicago police community alert. The two incidents were part of an alert telling residents about recent armed robberies in Austin and Garfield Park. A timeline of the incidents is below, according to CPD. Thursday, June 5 at 12:25 p.m. — 4300 block of West Washington Boulevard Thursday, June 5 at 4:10 p.m. — 4400 block of West Monroe Thursday, June 5 at 4:11 p.m. — 0-100 block of South Kilbourn Sunday, June 8 at 5:26 p.m. — 4600 block of West Maypole Police did not specify which two incidents were the robberies of construction workers. The suspect is described as a Black male, 16-25, 5'7″-6'1″,140-150 lbs. He was wearing a dark gray hooded sweatshirt with a white design on the back, black pants, white and black gym shoes and a black surgical mask. Anyone with information can leave an anonymous tip at Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
