Three-way agreement approved for $135 million Exit 155 project
On Wednesday, the West Virginia Division of Highways, Monongalia County Commission and developer WestRidge took the critical first step down what promises to be a long and difficult road toward a new I-79 Exit 155 interchange.
In short, they sorted out the money.
In a meeting attended remotely by Secretary of Transportation Todd Rumbaugh and Deputy Secretary Michael DeMers, the commission signed off on a three-way agreement that spelled out how the $135 million project budget will be covered.
About half the cost – $67.2 million – will be provided by the state. Another 40%, or $54.3 million, will come through the US Department of Transportation MEGA Grant awarded in 2024, and the final 10%, totaling approximately $13.5 million, will be provided locally by WestRidge and the county. The local contribution includes design dollars already spent.
As has been reported, the project will include new bridges carrying I-79 over Chaplin Hill Road, a new divergent diamond interchange, a westbound flyover at the intersection of Chaplin Hill and U.S. Route 19 to help clear heavy traffic leaving Morgantown, and a multi-modal path from the rail-trail in Star City to The Gateway. Improvements to Chaplin Hill Road up to the interstate will also be included. Exit 155 in Star City. 5-14-21 GH
Ryan Lynch, representing WestRidge, noted the agreement harkens back to the three-way deal that got I-79 Exit 153 built and paid off in record time. Because of that experience, Lynch said both the county and the development team at WestRidge recognize when they have a willing partner in Charleston after years of false starts and half steps.
'With this administration and this DOH leadership, I feel very confident that we do, and that we're finally going to be able to really move this forward towards groundbreaking,' Lynch said.
Lynch's comments summed up a reoccuring talking point – the renewed hope in Monongalia County brought on by new leadership and direction from the governor's office, the transportation secretary's office and DOH District 4 headquarters in Bridgeport.
Specifically, the commission has lauded Gov. Patrick Morrisey's pledge to allocate funding and project support based on data, not politics.
'There's been a real change, and we've noticed it. We're now being told, and finally seen as an integral part of the state and economic development,' Commissioner Tom Bloom said, later adding, 'Where I'm excited, this is the first time that the first big project coming out of the state is in the north central area. I think that is probably a bigger surprise than anything else we've done. There's a new sheriff in town down there in transportation. I believe data-driven is key, and I believe we are now in the eyes and ears of Charleston and I can only see better things happening in the future. I appreciate that.'
In a press release, Morrisey called the public-private partnership 'a model of what we can accomplish to invest in our infrastructure and grow economic development across the state.'
Exit 155 and Chaplin Hill Road serve as the primary gateway to Morgantown, WVU, WVU Medicine and Mon Health Medical Center. It is the first I-79 exit south of the state line.
Even so, parts of the interchange fail during peak travel times. The failure is particularly evident, and dangerous, during large sporting events and the increasingly large and frequent events hosted by Mylan Park.
The state has pledged to install temporary traffic lights at the interchange's entrance and exit ramps until the reconfiguration project is complete. It was recently explained that those lights likely won't be in place until the end of the year.
'As you all have said, this is a gateway to West Virginia. It is the gateway to WVU, and it really needs to be a showcase. I think this project is going to take it to the next level and really help things out,' Rumbaugh said.
While no timeline was offered during the presentation, the $54.3 million federal grant comes with a 2028 deadline, meaning those dollars will likely be spent first.
Commissioner Sean Sikora said the 'big beautiful deal' is just the first step of many.
'This is the first step. We've got a lot of work to do, but we've got this memorialized, and we also have our marching orders to move forward. Our public is going to start seeing progress,' Sikora said. 'It's going to be two, three, four, five years, but we are working on it and we're phasing it so we can show progress and access those federal funds. I'm really excited to get this thing moving forward.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dominion Post
4 days ago
- Dominion Post
Morgantown Council opposes MARL
MORGANTOWN — In an odd bit of sequencing, Morgantown City Council voted 6-0 Tuesday to add its voice to those opposing the MidAtlantic Resiliency Link power transmission project. Even so, members of the body said they would like to hear from representatives on both sides of the issue – including project developer NextEra – to help raise awareness of the project. Whether NextEra will be willing to make that commitment remains to be seen. The MidAtlantic Resiliency Link, or MARL, is a 105-mile 500-kV transmission line that is looking at Monongalia, and surrounding counties, as potential routes from Greene County, Pa., to Frederick County, Va. The city's resolution came about two weeks after the Monongalia County Commission joined Preston, Hampshire, Jefferson and Mineral counties in publicly opposing transmission projects that will – to paraphrase the county's resolution – use West Virginia's landscape as flyover country and return little to no real benefit to West Virginia or its residents. Monongalia County resident Judy Delagarza said the project is particularly galling in that Virginia's power generation facilities are being scaled down in favor of clean energy. Instead, West Virginia farms and forested land will be cleared to make way for a 100-mile extension cord connecting fossil fuels to power hungry data centers in northern Virginia. A data center is a physical room, building or facility that houses IT infrastructure for building, running and delivering online applications and services. The facilities are the backbone of our always-online existence and have power requirements on par with entire metropolitan areas in some instances. Northern Virginia is the data center hub of the East Coast. As of 2023, data centers accounted for more than one quarter of the state's electricity consumption according to the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. As Virginia's data centers require more power, the Virginia Clean Economy Act signed into law in 2020 requires the state to move to 100% carbon-free energy production within 50 years. 'Virginia has passed ordinances and laws, whatever, for their clean energy, so they don't have enough energy. In addition, they're allowing all these data centers to be built in northern Virginia. That is the reason we need more energy,' Delagarza said. 'West Virginia is being asked to bear the burden of Virginia's mistakes.' Morgantown is not in any of the proposed transmission routes proposed by NextEra. Deputy Mayor Brian Butcher, who initiated the city resolution, explained Tuesday's vote was one of solidarity with the county and region. The resolution says the major transmission lines would negatively impact the county's property values, agriculture, tourism and natural beauty while providing a marginal increase in tax revenue ultimately offset by utility rate increases implemented to subsidize the project's construction. Butcher was among the councilors who said they would like to hear from NextEra and others – both for and against – in an effort to raise awareness about the project. 'It's an important issue and it's obviously going to affect our constituents,' Councilor Mark Downs said. 'The state's beauty is one of our greatest assets. How many times have you met someone who's been in town because they've been hiking at Cooper's Rock or using the rail-trail or any of our amenities that are outside city limits, but they're staying at the Hotel Morgan, or they're staying at the Marriott? It impacts us.'
San Francisco Chronicle
09-08-2025
- San Francisco Chronicle
New California dam removal could restore a river — and destroy a community
LAKE PILLSBURY, Lake County — For those living on the shores of this mountain lake, the bone-rattling drive along a gravel road to get here is a small price to pay for the California dream. Tucked amid towering pines and firs and gleaming with cobalt-blue water, Lake Pillsbury in the Mendocino National Forest is home to about 100 year-round residents and thousands of summer dwellers, lured by the pleasures of lakefront living: boating, fishing, swimming or simply enjoying a cold drink on a hot day. 'I don't know if it will knock your socks off,' Frank Lynch, a third-generation cabin owner, said as he motored his pontoon boat across the sun-splashed reservoir on a recent afternoon. 'But it's a really nice lake.' This vacation outpost about 3½ hours north of San Francisco, however, may not last much longer. The dam that impounds the lake is owned by Pacific Gas and Electric Co., and the company wants to take it down. The move would drain the 2,000-acre reservoir, with its 31 miles of shoreline, and deliver a debilitating blow to the community. Removing the Scott Dam, alongside the removal of the smaller Cape Horn Dam downstream, both on the picturesque Eel River, is part of PG&E's plan to retire a century-old hydroelectric operation known as the Potter Valley Project, which the company says has gotten too expensive to run. Last month, PG&E filed the paperwork to decommission the project, officially putting the two dams and corresponding power facilities on course for demolition. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which oversees power-producing operations, has final say over whether and when the company moves forward. Downstream communities along the Eel River as well as environmental groups and tribes have cheered dam removal as a way to restore the river's natural flows. Long-declining salmon and steelhead runs stand to benefit from the restoration. At the same time, the plan has raised concerns about power and water supplies in Northern California. Perhaps most discussed is the potential to lose water that is tunneled out of the Eel River for power generation miles away, then released into the east fork of the Russian River, where it's long served cities and farms in Mendocino, Sonoma and Marin counties. Much less talked about is the fate of Lake Pillsbury. 'People will no longer be able to enjoy what the lake has to offer,' said Lake County Supervisor Bruno Sabatier, among those leading a long-shot campaign to stop the dam removal. 'If we don't fight for these small rural communities, who will?' A bygone way of life There aren't any boat tours on Lake Pillsbury — or hotels, restaurants or grocery stores — but the next best thing may be Lynch's pontoon. With 70 summers on the water and an active role in the community's advocacy group, Lake Pillsbury Alliance, Lynch knows the place better than most, and he's happy to share. From the captain's seat of his 22-foot Sun Tracker, he pointed out the distant herd of tule elk that roams the lake's north shore. He talked about the ghost town of Hullville that lies beneath the water, submerged with reservoir construction in the early 1920s. He mentioned the landing strip next to the reservoir that served soldiers during World War II. And he noted the possibility of losing it all. 'You'd hear people screaming and yelling if they were going to take down a lake that was more accessible,' Lynch said. 'People don't know about this spot so they might not care if it's gone.' Beyond losing a cherished destination, Lynch and other residents worry that draining the reservoir would mean less water for fighting wildfires and a reduction in taxes for the county as visitation drops and real estate values plunge. Lynch's brother, who also owns a home in the area, has been trying to sell his place for 11 months, but with the lake's future on the line, 'he hasn't had a nibble,' Lynch said. Lynch moored his boat at the Lake Pillsbury Resort, a primitive vacation spot that may be the most developed visitor accommodations in the region: about a dozen rental cabins and 40 campsites on a bluff above the water. All were full at the height of summer. A handful of other campgrounds and boat launches similarly front the lake. The resort sells maps, ice and a few kitchen staples such as milk and cereal as well as T-shirts that read 'Save Lake Pillsbury.' Like all homes and businesses here, the resort operates off the grid — in this case, getting power from generators. It has robust Wi-Fi that's often sought out by campers, given there's no cell service anywhere around. 'Some of the parents come in and say, 'Don't give my kids the Wi-Fi (code),'' said Andrea Coppa, a friendly woman working at the office. 'The things we don't do anymore are still here,' said Joey Friedman, a Martinez resident whose extended family had settled in across several camp sites, as they've done each year for decades. 'We're playing games, telling stupid stories, sitting around the campfire.' The manager of the resort, Mike Ahearn, says most of the roughly 7,500 guests he counts each summer are return customers. 'It's all about tradition here,' he said, noting that he's kept the business going because people keep coming back. 'We've never had a record of making money. It's been a labor of love.' Without the lake, Ahearn said, the place is 'done.' A new vision for recreation Dam removal would bring a whole new look and feel to the area. The reservoir would dry up, and the Eel River, which descends from the rugged, upper reaches of the Mendocino National Forest, would resume its historical course through the mostly empty lake bed. PG&E has committed to revegetating the lake bed with native plants and trees, in keeping with the surrounding forest, beginning a rewilding that supporters of dam removal say would reverberate far downstream — with more natural flows of water and greater vitality across the Eel River basin. 'It's going to restore our habitat, our fishing and our way of life,' said Lewis 'Bill' Whipple, former president of the Tribal Council of the Round Valley Indian Tribes, a federation of Native American communities that has grappled with the exploitation of their ancestral lands in the watershed. The undammed Eel would become the largest free-flowing river in California. The main stem of the river runs about 200 miles, generally northward, through the mountains of the Coastal Range to Humboldt County, where it empties into the Pacific near Eureka. One of the expectations of dam removal is that fish migrating from the ocean will find new spawning grounds in the river and creeks above Scott Dam. The dam has been an obstacle to fish passage for more than a century. Liberating the headwaters, environmentalists say, could boost fish reproduction and ultimately fish populations. Historically, as many as 800,000 chinook salmon swam up the Eel annually. The migration now numbers fewer than 20,000. For residents and visitors, the former reservoir site would remain accessible, per an existing conservation easement on the land. But how the land is used would obviously change. Activities would skew toward hiking instead of swimming, and kayaking instead of motorboating. Hunting and off-roading would probably remain pervasive. A series of community meetings to envision the future of the area, both with or without the dams, has yielded countless ideas, most leaning into the region's identity as a recreation hot spot. Among the proposals, should the dams come down, is building a hiking trail along the Eel River that follows a onetime Native American trade route. Another possible trail would climb from the river to the nearby Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. Many in the community also want to improve the area's roads, telecommunications and fire protection. 'As an undiscovered gem, there's a real opportunity,' said Mark Green, executive director of CalWild, the nonprofit that was commissioned to hold the brainstorming sessions. Officials at the Mendocino National Forest, which manages most of the land around Lake Pillsbury and counts the reservoir as one of its top attractions, declined a request for an interview. But in an emailed statement, District Ranger Frank Aebly said that the Forest Service was committed to 'public recreation and habitat management' if and when the dams are razed. The federal agency hasn't taken a position on dam removal. Aebly said he expects most of the Forest Service campgrounds in the area to stay open, 'though some may close.' PG&E, which owns most of the land beneath the reservoir, told the Chronicle that it intends to sell or give the lake bed to another party, possibly a land trust or tribe, to manage like a preserve. The new owner hasn't been determined. The earliest that deconstruction of the dams and power facilities might begin is late 2028, pending federal approval, company officials said. The work would take two to three years to complete. The estimated cost, to be paid by PG&E and its customers, is $530 million. PG&E officials said the decision to retire the project wasn't taken 'lightly.' But they felt it was necessary to stop saddling ratepayers with the high cost of running the aging operation, especially given the small amount of electricity it generates. The lost power, they said, would be replaced with cheaper energy purchased from the open electricity market. As for the water that the project provides, the company's decommissioning plan supports having a new agency take over the infrastructure that tunnels supplies for power generation from the Eel River to the Russian River. Going forward, however, the new water agency, which won't produce electricity, has committed to moving less water, a setback that communities in the Russian River basin will have to contend with. Appealing to the feds At the Soda Creek Store, shortly after the 9 a.m. opening, Robert 'Buzz' Ogneff was behind the cash register prepping for the day. First order of business was fixing the front door after a bear tried to break in. 'He got in the laundry room (in the back), busted a couple of things,' Ogneff said, as he stood at the counter, shirtless and ready for the morning heat to kick up. 'If the bear got in here, it'd be a real mess.' As the major retailer on the lake, the store is often the first — or last — stop on a visit. Besides offering gas, snacks and beer, there's a small selection of camping equipment, auto accessories and tourist trinkets. For those wanting to commemorate the dust-choked, hourlong drive from Potter Valley (Mendocino County), which is the closest town, koozies for sale at the register proclaim, 'I survived the road to Lake Pillsbury.' The shop, for locals, is also a hub of communications. People come to inquire about road conditions, hunting season, the cannabis harvest and remote residents who haven't been seen or heard from in a while (and probably don't want to be). Nick and Edie Uram have run the store for nearly 35 years. They live on site with their many cats, which means they respond at all hours to lost vacationers, car breakdowns and wildfires. The Urams, both in their 70s, plan to continue operating the business for as long as they can, though they're bracing for change with dam removal. 'It will still be kind of a recreation area,' Nick said. 'But the lake and the waterskiing and the jet skis, if they take out this dam, that's over.' A poster on the front of the store honors Lake Pillsbury as a 'hero' for saving the community during the August Complex fire, the largest wildfire in California history. The lake was used for aerial water drops. The community's efforts to save the lake haven't gone as well, though it has secured support from the county brass. The Lake County Board of Supervisors has sent letters to PG&E and state and federal politicos, making their case that Scott Dam should remain. The board has even petitioned the Trump administration for help, appealing to the president's nationwide directives to boost water supplies and power generation. The federal government hasn't given any indication it will intervene to halt dam removal. Lynch, who stopped at the Soda Creek Store on the way to his permanent home in Sonoma County, doesn't like to think about Lake Pillsbury without a lake. His father and grandfather built their family cabin here in the late 1940s, with only hand tools, and he's never missed a summer on the water. He's even spent the offseason at the lake before, hunkered down in the dark of winter and occasional snow. 'Will I still come when it's 100 degrees and there's only a trickle of a river?' Lynch asked himself aloud. 'No. Not a lot. Well, yeah, I guess I'll still come.'
Yahoo
08-08-2025
- Yahoo
Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) Is An Excellent Firm Struggling With Beef Prices, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . Shake Shack Inc. (NYSE:SHAK) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Shake Shack Inc. (NYSE:SHAK) is an American fast food chain. Its shares dipped by a stunning 20.6% following its second quarter earnings despite the fact that the firm's $356 million in revenue and $0.44 in EPS beat analyst estimates of $354 million and $0.38. Cramer attributed the dip to the current crisis in the US beef industry: '[I'm trying to keep things balanced here and get the consumer weaker the enterprise stronger. Shake Shack, which is a marvellous company, Rob Lynch terrific operation. The stock is down 23 points. Now why is that? One single line, 'beef prices now up low teens' the herd is wrong, you're seeing anyone who is connected to the beef industry really struggling. It's worth it to point out that there is a price point that people won't pay for beef. And it looks like Shake Shack, an excellent firm is starting to bump up against that.' Here are his comments about Shake Shack Inc. (NYSE:SHAK) made later during the day on Mad Money: 'Or what about Shake Shack? Terrific company with a stock that took a real header today, down 14%. As I go over the conference call, I came across this fly in the ointment, 'The majority of the commodity situation is in beef, and obviously we sell a lot of beef.' Boom.' While we acknowledge the potential of SHAK as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio
