The high costs of underinvestment in early childhood care and education
"As New Hampshire families, businesses, and the state economy all have vested interests in the economic impacts of ECE, funding could be shared across these beneficiaries." (Getty Images)
New Hampshire faces a significant child care shortage, with economic impacts extending beyond families with young children. According to a recent New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute analysis that I conducted, each of the approximately 9,000 unavailable Granite State child care slots in 2023 may have cost the state's economy between $22,416 and $35,004 in lost earnings to families, and reduced revenues among New Hampshire's state and local governments as well as businesses.
Families may have lost as much as $177.9 million in wages in 2023 due to inadequate child care availability. While lost wages directly affect family budgets, they also impact local communities that would otherwise benefit from income spent at area businesses. New Hampshire businesses may have collectively lost as much as $55.5 million in 2023 due to reduced productivity and impacts from benefits paid when employees were not working. Business losses also include potential costs associated with recruiting, hiring, and training replacements when employees resign due to inadequate child care.
Tax revenues are adversely affected when families and businesses experience financial losses. Residents pay taxes related to property, travel, leisure, dining out, and certain other sales. Granite Staters have an average tax rate of about 6.6% while effective business tax rates are approximately 4.4%. Using these estimates, New Hampshire's state and local governments may have lost the equivalent of approximately $1,300 to $2,000 per unavailable child care slot.
The governor's state fiscal years 2026-2027 budget proposal allocates about $84.9 million across both years to New Hampshire's Bureau of Child Development and Head Start Collaboration. This bureau administers the main funding mechanism for the New Hampshire Child Care Scholarship Program (NHCCSP), a state-federal partnership that provides child care assistance to families with low and moderate incomes. This allocation makes up about half of one percent of the governor's proposed $16.01 billion state budget.
Addressing the ECE shortage is challenging due to limited resources. Private tuition is the primary way ECE providers raise revenue; however, they are limited in how much they can increase tuition rates before families can no longer afford child care. Many providers operate on thin, if any, profit margins, so there are few funds to reinvest into their businesses. Public support can help providers keep spots available for children and make investments for future expansions. State general funds could provide flexible support as these funds can be spent in any way the Legislature deems appropriate. The state distributed $15 million in General Funds to ECE providers under the current state budget to support the recruitment and retention of child care educators. This funding is not repeated in the governor's budget proposal.
In 2024, New Hampshire passed legislation to allocate $2 million for a six-month program that provides child care assistance to certain ECE professionals who work at least 25 hours per week in licensed child care facilities. To be eligible, these professionals must work in facilities that accept NHCCSP and live in households that earn no more than 100 percent of the state median income, or $133,449 for a family of four. Thoughtful data collection can help determine the effectiveness of these programs for future consideration.
Business partnerships may be an alternative to increased tuition costs for families. Child care development grant programs may be an opportunity for businesses to continually invest in a funding pool accessible to providers. Funds could be used for various expenses, including increasing teacher wages, hiring additional educators, and building or purchasing larger spaces to expand capacity.
Federal funding is another source of ECE support but comes with specific rules regulating how the funding can be spent. To access certain federal resources for ECE, New Hampshire must provide 50:50 fund matching based on the Federal Medicaid Assistance Percentage (FMAP). At least 70% of funding must be utilized for NHCCSP. The remaining funding must be divided between support to help ensure New Hampshire children have high-quality ECE, administrative expenses, and other nondirect services including IT systems costs.
As New Hampshire families, businesses, and the state economy all have vested interests in the economic impacts of ECE, funding could be shared across these beneficiaries. While more public funding would likely be required, investments to address the ECE shortage have positive returns for all Granite Staters. There is no one-size-fits-all solution, even among New Hampshire counties and municipalities, and thus, multifaceted approaches will need to be implemented while ensuring safe, enriching environments for the Granite State's youngest residents.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vox
2 hours ago
- Vox
What happens to DOGE without Elon Musk?
Elon Musk holds a news conference with President Donald Trump to mark the end of his tenure as a special government employee overseeing DOGE on May 30 in the Oval Office of the White House. Tom Brenner for Washington Post via Getty Images Elon Musk may be gone from the Trump administration — and his friendship status with President Donald Trump may be at best uncertain — but his whirlwind stint in government certainly left its imprint. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), his pet government-slashing project, remains entrenched in Washington. During his 130-day tenure, Musk led DOGE in eliminating about 260,000 federal employee jobs and gutting agencies supporting scientific research and humanitarian aid. But to date, DOGE claims to have saved the government $180 billion — well short of its ambitious (and frankly never realistic) target of cutting at least $2 trillion from the federal budget. And with Musk's departure still fresh, there are reports that the federal government is trying to rehire federal workers who quit or were let go. For Elaine Kamarck, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, DOGE's tactics will likely end up being disastrous in the long run. 'DOGE came in with these huge cuts, which were not attached to a plan,' she told Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram. Kamarck knows all about making government more efficient. In the 1990s, she ran the Clinton administration's Reinventing Government program. 'I was Elon Musk,' she told Today, Explained. With the benefit of that experience, she assesses Musk's record at DOGE, and what, if anything, the billionaire's loud efforts at cutting government spending added up to. Below is an excerpt of the conversation, edited for length and clarity. There's much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. What do you think Elon Musk's legacy is? Well, he will not have totally, radically reshaped the federal government. Absolutely not. In fact, there's a high probability that on January 20, 2029, when the next president takes over, the federal government is about the same size as it is now, and is probably doing the same stuff that it's doing now. What he did manage to do was insert chaos, fear, and loathing into the federal workforce. There was reporting in the Washington Post late last week that these cuts were so ineffective that the White House is actually reaching out to various federal employees who were laid off and asking them to come back, from the FDA to the IRS to even USAID. Which cuts are sticking at this point and which ones aren't? First of all, in a lot of cases, people went to court and the courts have reversed those earlier decisions. So the first thing that happened is, courts said, 'No, no, no, you can't do it this way. You have to bring them back.' The second thing that happened is that Cabinet officers started to get confirmed by the Senate. And remember that a lot of the most spectacular DOGE stuff was happening in February. In February, these Cabinet secretaries were preparing for their Senate hearings. They weren't on the job. Now that their Cabinet secretary's home, what's happening is they're looking at these cuts and they're saying, 'No, no, no! We can't live with these cuts because we have a mission to do.' As the government tries to hire back the people they fired, they're going to have a tough time, and they're going to have a tough time for two reasons. First of all, they treated them like dirt, and they've said a lot of insulting things. Second, most of the people who work for the federal government are highly skilled. They're not paper pushers. We have computers to push our paper, right? They're scientists. They're engineers. They're people with high skills, and guess what? They can get jobs outside the government. So there's going to be real lasting damage to the government from the way they did this. And it's analogous to the lasting damage that they're causing at universities, where we now have top scientists who used to invent great cures for cancer and things like that, deciding to go find jobs in Europe because this culture has gotten so bad. What happens to this agency now? Who's in charge of it? Well, what they've done is DOGE employees have been embedded in each of the organizations in the government, okay? And they basically — and the president himself has said this — they basically report to the Cabinet secretaries. So if you are in the Transportation Department, you have to make sure that Sean Duffy, who's the secretary of transportation, agrees with you on what you want to do. And Sean Duffy has already had a fight during a Cabinet meeting with Elon Musk. You know that he has not been thrilled with the advice he's gotten from DOGE. So from now on, DOGE is going to have to work hand in hand with Donald Trump's appointed leaders. And just to bring this around to what we're here talking about now, they're in this huge fight over wasteful spending with the so-called big, beautiful bill. Does this just look like the government as usual, ultimately? It's actually worse than normal. Because the deficit impacts are bigger than normal. It's adding more to the deficit than previous bills have done. And the second reason it's worse than normal is that everybody is still living in a fantasy world. And the fantasy world says that somehow we can deal with our deficits by cutting waste, fraud, and abuse. That is pure nonsense. Let me say it: pure nonsense. Where does most of the government money go? Does it go to some bureaucrats sitting on Pennsylvania Avenue? It goes to us. It goes to your grandmother and her Social Security and her Medicare. It goes to veterans in veterans benefits. It goes to Americans. That's why it's so hard to cut it. It's so hard to cut it because it's us.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool ready to make £100m PSG star their next signing: report
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Florian Wirtz may not be the only £100m man heading to Anfield. | Credit: Getty Images Liverpool have just agreed a £116.5m deal to sign Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen, and already they're eyeing up another £100m man. Advertisement The Wirtz move has been the story of the summer so far, with Liverpool reportedly agreeing on Friday morning to a new record Premier League fee. The Reds have already concluded a £29.5m deal for Jeremie Frimpong from the same Bundesliga outfit, but they aren't done there. Liverpool add £100m Paris Saint-Germain attacker to their shopping list Arne Slot has certainly earned this spending, clinching the Premier League title while barely spending a penny last summer | Credit:With Wirtz, Frimpong and a move for Bournemouth left-back Milos Kerkez mooted to cost around £40m, Liverpool are already fast approaching the £200m mark in their summer spending. Adding another £100m to their outgoings doesn't seem feasible, but the Merseysiders have already sold Caoimhin Kelleher in a deal worth up to £18m, and may yet be open to sales for all of Jarell Quansah, Harvey Elliott, Kostas Tsimikas and Darwin Nunez, to name just a few. Back-up goalkeeper Caoimhin Kelleher, plus a £10m early-release fee for Trent Alexander-Arnold, have been Liverpool's only outgoings this summer | Credit: Getty Images According to the Sun, Liverpool are ready to open their wallet back up for highly-rated PSG winger Bradley Barcola, ranked at no.5 in FourFourTwo's list of the best left wingers in the world right now. Advertisement It's thought that the 22-year-old would cost north of £100m, which, if progressed, could see the Reds footing a £300m bill in total this transfer window. The young Frenchman is also Bayern Munich's primary target, but that was also the case with Wirtz, who has ended up at Anfield. Barcola was once thought to be one of PSG's brightest talents, but has slipped down the pecking order in the French capital on account of the emergence of Khvicha Kvaratskhelia and Desire Doue. Bradley Barcola may need a move away from PSG to continue progressing | Credit: Ulrik Pedersen/NurPhoto via Getty Images In FourFourTwo's opinion, there's surely no way Liverpool spend two lots of £100m+ in one window, is there? If they do, have no doubt that clubs like Newcastle United, who seem to be in a perennial battle with Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) despite their wealthy owners, will have plenty of thoughts about it. But it's tough to deny that an attacking unit containing Wirtz, Barcola and Mohamed Salah would be an exciting watch next season. Barcola is valued at €70m, according to Transfermarkt.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
🎩 Pure class: Louis Vuitton becomes Real Madrid's new sponsor
In the race to be the best team in the world, in addition to the players, another matter also influences: sponsorships. And today, Real Madrid has announced its new alliance with one of the brands that is the greatest synonym of luxury in the world: Louis Vuitton. The luxury giant will be the official sponsor of Real Madrid. In this way, Louis Vuitton will dress the first teams of men's and women's football (as well as the basketball team) in travels and institutional events. Advertisement From Real Madrid, it is highlighted that the collection that their players will wear "includes ready-to-wear clothing, shoes, accessories, and luggage, which present a timeless style and are made with materials that offer a balance between comfort, performance, and elegance". This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here. 📸 Pool - 2024 Getty Images