Federal Court delays hearing on death sentence review case
Lawyer Datuk N.Sivananthan, representing two of the four prisoners, told the media that the hearing did not proceed today to allow the parties to explore the possibility of applying the Federal Court's ruling to 123 other prisoners who are in the same situation as the four.
He said a case management has been fixed for June 3 for parties to update the court on any development.
On Aug 27, last year, the Federal Court ruled in a split decision that it had the jurisdiction under the Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction of The Federal Court) Act 2023 (Act 847), to review the death sentences that were imposed on the four for drug trafficking offences.
The majority decision, made by Justices Tan Sri Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah, held that the 30-year prison sentences imposed on the four prisoners should take effect from the date of their arrest, and not from the date their pardons were granted. Justice Datuk Nordin Hassan dissented.
Following this, the prosecution filed a review application under Rule 137 of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995, contending that the judges who decided the majority ruling had acted beyond their jurisdiction.
Meanwhile, lawyer Abdul Rashid Ismail, representing Zambian national Mailesi Phiri, told the media that the jail terms of 123 other prisoners were calculated from the date of their respective Pardons Board's clemency decision, rather than from the date of their arrest.
'This means that the time they spent in custody prior to the granting of the pardon has not been taken into account, resulting in longer prison terms beyond the 30-year jail term set under Section 39B (2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952,' he explained.
The Federal Court had in August last year allowed the four individuals – G. Jiva, 55; P. Balakrishnan, 48; Thai national Phrueksa Thaemchim, 41; and Phiri, 47 – to commence their 30-year jail terms from the date of their arrest.
Sivananthan is representing Jiva and Balakrishnan, while lawyer K. Simon Murali is representing Phrueksa. Deputy Public Prosecutors Datin Asmah Musa, Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi, Ng Siew Wee, and Solehah Noratikah Ismail are appearing for the prosecution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
12 hours ago
- The Star
'Protect the rakyat's money', Dr Wee urges govt on TNB tax dispute
PETALING JAYA: Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong has responded to Kampar MP Chong Zhemin on the Federal Court's decision regarding Tenaga Nasional Berhad's (TNB) tax dispute, stressing that the issue concerns the people's money, not politics. "This is not about the legal technicalities of Schedule 7A vs 7B. The court has ruled TNB should have applied under Schedule 7B. The issue is not about TNB's status as a utility or manufacturer - the Federal Court has clarified that point," the MCA president stated in a Facebook post on Wednesday (Aug 6). Dr Wee emphasised the concern over RM5bil in public savings, adding that TNB was majority-owned by rakyat savings funds such as ASB, EPF, KWAP and Tabung Haji. "Over 63% of TNB's shares are ultimately rakyat money. If the government enforces this RM8.32bil additional tax and penalties bill, up to RM5bil of the rakyat's savings will be transferred into government coffers. "This is not a political show - it's a real financial blow to ordinary Malaysians," he added. Chong had accused Dr Wee of making a baseless attack on the court decision. Dr Wee argued that the court recognised TNB acted in good faith, acknowledging TNB's long-standing practice of applying for reinvestment allowance under Schedule 7A, previously accepted by the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) for decades. "The decision now is a change in interpretation, not a finding of fraud or wrongdoing. "The solution lies with the Finance Minister and not the courts. Even after the court's decision, the law gives the Finance Minister absolute power to approve TNB's appeal and re-application under Section 7B to waive the disputed amount," he stated. Dr Wee urged for a clear response from the government: 'Will you protect their savings or take their money? This is not about 'cheap politics' but real people's money." He criticised dismissing concerns over billions in savings as "political theatre" and asserted his commitment to standing up for the people's interests. "The real question is: Will the Madani government protect the rakyat's RM5bil, or will they raid the rakyat's savings to cover their budget shortfall? "The people deserve a clear answer,' he concluded. The Federal Court ruled on July 2 in favour of LHDN in TNB's 2018 tax dispute, deciding that TNB should have applied for an investment allowance under Schedule 7B rather than the reinvestment allowance under Schedule 7A.
Free Malaysia Today
2 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Lawyer calls for revival of apex court sittings in peninsula's major cities
Appointed last week, Chief Justice Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh will deliver his inaugural policy address on Aug 6. (Wikipedia pic) PUTRAJAYA : A lawyer has called for Chief Justice Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh to revive circuit sittings of the Federal Court and Court of Appeal across Peninsular Malaysia, saying it would improve access to apex court proceedings and foster professional development among younger Bar members. Currently, hearings of both courts are limited to the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya, with designated sittings in Kuching and Kota Kinabalu. 'Both courts could sit occasionally in major cities to hear criminal and civil appeals, allowing young lawyers to observe proceedings and pick up advocacy skills from senior lawyers arguing cases,' said Syed Iskandar Syed Jaafar. He noted that in the past, the top courts had scheduled two- to three-day sittings in Georgetown, Johor Bahru and Kota Bharu. 'This practice should be revived and extended to other towns,' he added, ahead of Wan Ahmad Farid's inaugural policy address, scheduled for Wednesday. Wan Ahmad Farid was appointed chief justice last week. Syed Iskandar also said that circuit sittings would allow local Bar committees and lawyers to engage with the nation's top judges outside formal courtroom settings, strengthening professional ties between the bench and the bar. Former Malaysian Bar president Salim Bashir said reforms in appellate procedures were needed, particularly in the timely delivery of written judgments. 'Prompt delivery of written judgments is one of the key functions of judges, and a failure to do so would violate constitutional guarantees and the public trust,' he said. Salim urged appellate judges to provide written grounds of judgment when ordering retrials or remitting cases for the defence to be called in criminal appeals. He also suggested that retired and senior judges be tapped to mentor serving judges on judgment writing. He warned that the backlog of cases—especially in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor—has worsened over the past year due to delays in replacing retiring judges. 'Some cases that were registered this year were given longer trial dates. This is unfair to those accused languishing in remand prisons without bail,' he said. Lawyer A Srimurugan proposed that Wan Ahmad Farid explore mediation as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism to ease the courts' caseload. 'Cases like defamation, medical negligence, family law, commercial and contractual disputes could be settled out of court without going through lengthy trials and appeals,' he said. 'Individual, family and business reputations could be spared if parties were amicable to settlements, but this needs to be led by experienced judicial minds with a win-win formula for disputing parties.' Counsel Ramesh Sivakumar, meanwhile, urged Wan Ahmad Farid—who also chairs the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC)—to ensure that judicial commissioners are drawn from among the more versatile members of the Bar and the judicial and legal service. 'The JAC must also ensure they are men and women of integrity, impartial and have the ability to make timely judgments and have good legal writing skills,' he said. Ramesh called on the chief justice to appoint senior lawyers to the bench, as did former chief justice Zaki Azmi. 'These lawyers, who were finally promoted to the Court of Appeal, did well in the disposal of cases and wrote some groundbreaking judgments,' he added.
Malaysian Reserve
6 days ago
- Malaysian Reserve
SIS Forum removes 'Sisters in Islam' name following royal rebuke
by AKMAR ANNUAR SIS Forum (Malaysia) will cease using the name 'Sisters in Islam' following a decision reached at its EGM on July 11, in response to recent remarks by the Sultan of Selangor. The NGO, which has long advocated for gender equality within the framework of Islamic family law, said it would now be publicly identified only by its registered name, SIS Forum (Malaysia). ED Rozana Isa said the change would not deter the group from continuing its core work. 'Even as we drop the word 'Islam' from our pen name, we remain steadfast in our commitment to advocating for gender equality and justice in Islamic family law,' she said in a statement. The group clarified that its advocacy had always aimed to uphold the welfare of Muslim women and families within the legal context of Islam, and not to undermine the religion itself. It cited persistent challenges such as domestic violence, unpaid alimony, extrajudicial polygamy and gender-insensitive interpretations of family law. 'These concerns are real and systemic. They demand attention, not dismissal,' Rozana added. She also expressed hope that the move would end the long-standing dispute over the use of the organisation's former name and pave the way for constructive engagement with all parties. 'We hope this puts an end to the long-standing contention over our name and allows us to go forward in good faith with all parties,' she said. Last month, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah expressed concern after the Federal Court ruled that a 2014 fatwa by the Selangor Fatwa Committee applied only to individuals and not to SIS Forum in its capacity as a registered organisation. In light of the decision, the Ruler urged the organisation to stop using the term 'Sisters in Islam' to prevent the name of the religion from being used indiscriminately for organisational gain.
