Hungarians keep up protests against Orban's move to ban Pride
By Krisztina Fenyo and Gergely Szakacs
BUDAPEST (Reuters) - Thousands of Hungarians protested in Budapest on Tuesday against a law that aims to ban the annual Pride march by LGBTQ+ groups, and which is seen by critics as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of a 2026 parliamentary election.
Right-wing Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who faces a strong challenge from a surging opposition party ahead of the vote, has criticised the LGBTQ+ community and pledged to curb foreign funding of independent media and non-governmental organisations in Hungary.
Parliament, dominated by Orban's Fidesz party, passed a law last month to ban the Pride march on the grounds that it could be harmful to children. Orban, who has been in power since 2010, promotes a Christian-conservative agenda.
The law says police can use facial recognition cameras to identify people who attend the event, and impose fines on participants, which critics say could become a tool to target Orban's political opponents.
Orban has said the fact that rallies such as the one on Tuesday could take place meant there was no threat to democracy, calling opposition protests against the new law "provocation."
However, some demonstrators attending the protest, the third rally over Orban's reforms, voiced concerns about the health of Hungary's democracy more than two decades after it joined the European Union.
A group of embassies in Budapest, including European states but not the United States, has also expressed concern over the changes.
"We, the undersigned Embassies, are deeply concerned about the legislation...that results in restrictions on the right of peaceful assembly and the freedom of expression," 22 embassies including France, Germany and the United Kingdom said.
Festival organisers say the Pride march poses no threat to children and they are planning to hold the event despite the ban.
(Writing by Gergely Szakacs; Editing by Alexandra Hudson)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukrainian woman searches for husband lost in action two years ago
By Tom Balmforth CHERNIHIV, Ukraine (Reuters) -When gaunt Ukrainian soldiers dismount from buses as part of prisoner swaps with Russia, Mariia Pylnyk tries to find out anything she can about her missing husband from the freed men, and hopes, just maybe, that he will be among them. Holding up a photograph of Dmytro Pylnyk, lost in action in early 2023, she has many questions. What happened to his unit when it was ambushed by Russian forces? Was he captured by Russia? Could he eventually be released? The mass prisoner swap last month was an opportunity for people like her to ask troops just out of Russian captivity about missing loved ones who they believe, or simply hope, are prisoners of war. The alternative is unthinkable. "I hold out great hope that someone has heard something, seen something," Pylnyk, 29, told Reuters at a recent exchange in May, flanked by other relatives of those missing in action. "My son and I are waiting for (his) dad to come home. Hope dies last. God willing, it'll all be okay and dad will come back." Precise numbers for soldiers missing in action are not made public. For Ukrainians, and for Russians on the other side of the conflict, it can be hard to find out even basic information. Pylnyk says she has written to government agencies and Russian authorities and learned almost nothing. Ukrainian officials say more than 70,000 Ukrainians have been registered missing since 2022, when Russia launched its full-scale invasion. The majority are from the military but the figure also includes civilians. Another 12,000 have been removed from the list after being identified among the dead or returned in exchanges. Petro Yatsenko, a spokesman for the Coordination Council that arranges prisoner swaps from the Ukrainian side, said Russia had never notified Kyiv which soldiers it is holding prisoner. Ukraine collects that data by other means as best it can, he said. Pylnyk and others like her share information in online chat groups and use it to try to piece together what happened. "Misfortune brought us together," she said. "After two years of this, we're like a family." LAST PHONE CALL Dmytro Pylnyk, an electrician by trade, was drafted into the army in late 2022. He phoned home often so that his wife did not worry but last called on their son Artem's third birthday on Feb. 27, 2023. He was deployed from Kharkiv region towards Bakhmut, a small city that later fell to Russian forces after fierce fighting. His unit's convoy was caught in a Russian ambush, Mariia Pylnyk said she had learned. "The guys ran any which way," she said, citing conversations with commanders who told her 41 soldiers were missing in action. Two were captured and have since been released. One, who was freed in an exchange at Easter and had lost both his arms, was unable to share any valuable information, she said. The second refused to talk. The pace of prisoner swaps has increased in the last month. Ukraine and Russia each released 1,000 prisoners in a three-day exchange last month, the only tangible outcome of direct talks in Istanbul. A prisoner swap of under-25s on Monday was the first in a series of exchanges also expected to include each side repatriating the remains of thousands. Mariia Pylnyk has given her son's DNA to the authorities so that if Dmytro is confirmed killed in action they will be notified. "We all understand that this is war and anything is possible. But to this day, I don't believe it and I don't feel that he is dead. I feel like he's alive and God willing he'll return," she said. NO SIGNAL TO CALL She lives with Artem, now five, in Pakul, a village in the northern Chernihiv region that was briefly occupied by Russians. She has not told Artem his father is missing in action. "He knows that dad is a soldier, dad is a good man, dad is at work and just doesn't have any signal to call," she said. She takes comfort from seeing families reunited and never allows herself to cry in front of her son. She used to work in a shop, but Artem has often been ill. The angst of the last two years have taken their toll on her health too. She receives state support. Pylnyk has vowed to find her husband but has often not had time to attend prisoner swaps while looking after their son. "Only a weakling can give up, you know, throw up their hands and say that's it, he's not there," she said, adding that she was very emotional when she attended last month's big exchange. "When I was there, the fighting spirit awoke in me that I needed. I have to do this. Who else will do it but me?"
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chinese state media calls for crackdown on 'zero-mileage used cars'
By Eduardo Baptista BEIJING (Reuters) -The Chinese practice of selling brand new cars as heavily discounted second-hand vehicles to get rid of inventory should be ended, the official newspaper of the country's governing Communist Party said in an article published on Thursday. The People's Daily, which often signals the positions of China's top Party leaders on a variety of issues, called for a crackdown on the practice, also known as zero-mileage used cars, just weeks after Great Wall Motor's Chairman Wei Jianjun publicly condemned it and China's commerce ministry met with Chinese automakers to discuss it. While China's Commerce Ministry did not make public its position, the People's Daily struck a harsh tone, calling out the inflation of sales data motivating Chinese carmakers and urging "tough regulatory action" to restore market order. "This disguised form of price cutting disrupts normal market order and is a striking example of the auto industry's 'involution'," the People's Daily said, using a term popular in China that describes a race to the bottom driven by excessive competition. "Once market competition rules are properly enforced, 'zero-mileage used cars' won't be able to run far — or for long." China is experiencing growing deflationary pressures as U.S. tariffs add to the gloomy mood in the world's No.2 economy. Companies in sectors from fast food to high fashion have been cutting prices amid concerns about oversupply and sluggish household demand. Price wars have gripped the Chinese auto industry in recent years, partly driven by slumping domestic consumption and overcapacity that has left many struggling to meet sales targets. While the sale of zero-mileage used cars is seen by many Chinese automakers as an effective way of clearing out an ever-growing inventory of unsold cars, with domestic and overseas consumers lured by deep discounts on what are still brand new cars, the state-run newspaper listed a litany of negative effects caused by the practice. "For manufacturers, this sales tactic may help reduce inventory in the short term but compresses profit margins, increases losses, and hinders investment in product quality and innovation — ultimately harming sustainable development," the article said. "For consumers, what seems like a good deal in terms of price comes with hidden risks: the loss of first-owner benefits, potential battery degradation, and steeper depreciation when reselling," it continued, adding the practice undermines fair competition, distorts market data, and disrupts both new and used car markets. The People's Daily singled out manufacturers of electric vehicles as needing to move beyond "data worship" and competing on volume, in order to focus on product quality and technological innovation. It did not name any specific automakers. The newspaper also listed measures Chinese regulatory authorities should adopt in order to prevent the sale of zero-mileage used cars, including strengthening oversight of second-hand vehicle registration, establishing a vehicle lifecycle tracking system, and strictly controlling the practice of immediate resale after registration.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BBC Presenter Shows Ed Miliband All The Times Ministers Defended The Winter Fuel Cut
Ed Miliband was shown all the times Labour ministers backed the cuts to winter fuel payments just a day after Rachel Reeves performed a humiliating U-turn on the policy. The chancellor was among those senior frontbenchers who went on BBC Breakfast last year to defend the controversial decision. On the programme this morning, energy secretary Miliband repeatedly refused to apologise to pensioners who missed out on the payment last year after Reeves took it off 10 million of them. She confirmed yesterday that 9 million more will get the money this winter after the income threshold to qualify for it was raised to £35,000. Presenter John Kay said: 'Millions of pensioners had a really anxious winter. They told us every morning in our inbox that they couldn't afford to put the heating on. Some told us that their health and their wellbeing was affected by losing the winter fuel payment. Will you now apologise for this mistake?' Dodging the question, Miliband replied: 'The chancellor took a decision last year when we came into office that she needed to stabilise the nation's finances, and the principal that we should pay the winter fuel payment to all pensioners wasn't correct. That's why she made the decision she did. 'Two things have happened since then: we've stabilised the nation's finances and we've heard that strength of feeling that you talk about and that's why she made the change she did. I think it's the right thing.' But Kay told him: 'Our viewers like it when politicians own mistakes and admit to mistakes, and they like it when politicians say sorry. Why won't the chancellor, why won't you this morning, just apologise – dead simple.' Miliband said: 'The chancellor is not going to apologise for a series of measures she took to stabilise the nation's finances when we came into office.' Kay hit back: 'Time and time again, you all told us it was not going to change. Let's just play a sample of clips we've got of various cabinet ministers telling us that there was going to be no alteration to this policy.' On July 30 last year, Reeves told the programme: 'The decisions I made on winter fuel payment are not decisions I wanted to make, they are not decisions I expected to make. But when confronted by a £22bn black hole, I had to act.' On September 5, deputy PM Angela Rayner said: 'We know this is a difficult choice, and we was left with very difficult circumstances because of the previous government and what they did.' Health secretary Wes Streeting said on September 12: 'We are not prepared to duck the difficult decisions and leave everyone paying a heavier price down the line. That was the Conservative way, it's not the Labour way.' And on July 31, housing minister Matthew Pennycook said: 'This isn't a change we wanted to make, this isn't a change we expected to make, we did it with a heavy heart. But we do think it is the right decision.' Bizarrely, Miliband then insisted the clips were 'absolutely consistent with that the chancellor announced yesterday'. An incredulous Kay replied: 'What, you're saying this is not a U-turn?' Miliband said: 'No, it obviously is a change on the threshold, but what I'm saying to you is these are decisions she sad she didn't want to make, and now she's got the room for manoeuvre to raise the threshold while sticking to the overall principal.' 'Time and time again you all told us it was not going to change?'On #BBCBreakfast Energy Secretary Ed Miliband was asked about the government's repeated defence of the decision to cut winter fuel allowance for most pensioners - before announcing a u-turn… — BBC Breakfast (@BBCBreakfast) June 10, 2025 Analysis: Rachel Reeves Has Been Left Humiliated By Winter Fuel U-Turn Revealed: Which Pensioners Will Get Winter Fuel Payments Again After Labour U-Turn Rachel Reeves Confirms More Pensioners Will Get Their Winter Fuel Payments This Year