Czech president calls for greater European autonomy within NATO
Speaking at the GLOBSEC security forum in Prague on Thursday, the 63-year-old former general said European nations should consider "mirroring" command posts currently held by US military officers with European personnel.
Such a move, he argued, would ensure Europe-specific operations remain viable regardless of Washington's decisions.
Pavel, who served as chairman of the NATO Military Committee from 2015 to 2018, said Europe must respond to shifting US attitudes toward European security, particularly under President Donald Trump.
"It is time that we draw the necessary conclusions from the fact that the United States' role in European security has changed. The new US administration has unsettled transatlantic relations and forced Europe to face strategic questions it cannot postpone," he said.
"The aim is not to create an alternative to NATO, but to strengthen NATO's European pillar. To succeed, this European pillar cannot remain an abstract ambition. It needs to be institutionalized, embedded in NATO's standard planning, in budgeting and force development processes," he continued.
Security conference under way in Prague
Top politicians, defence officials, and experts are meeting in Prague this week for the 20th annual GLOBSEC security forum. Discussions are focused on global security challenges and strategies for overcoming ongoing crises.
The Czech Republic, a NATO member since 1999, has taken a prominent role in supporting Ukraine in its defence against Russia's war of aggression. Prague's conservative government has backed an initiative to supply Kiev with artillery ammunition and continues to advocate for robust support for Ukraine across the alliance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
a minute ago
- Epoch Times
European Leaders Will Join Zelenskyy at White House Meeting With Trump
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will be accompanied by European and NATO leaders during his meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Aug. 17. Zelenskyy's previous meeting with Trump at the White House in February was cut short after the sit-down turned into a heated exchange, leading to the Ukrainian president's early exit from the talks. European leaders may be looking to prevent a repeat of that meeting.
Boston Globe
30 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelensky for White House meeting with Trump
Advertisement 'It's a power struggle and a position of strength that might work with Trump,' he said in a phone interview. The European leaders' presence at Zelenskyy's side, demonstrating Europe's support for Ukraine, could potentially help ease concerns in Kyiv and in other European capitals that Ukraine risks being railroaded into a peace deal that Trump says he wants to broker with Russia. It wasn't immediately clear whether all or just some of them would be taking part in the actual meeting with Trump. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced on X that she will take part in the talks, 'at the request of President Zelenskyy.' The secretary-general of the NATO military alliance, Mark Rutte, will also take part in the meeting, his press service said. Advertisement The office of President Emmanuel Macron announced that the French leader will travel on Monday to Washington 'at the side of President Zelenskyy' although it didn't immediately specify that he'll be in the meeting. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will also be part of the European group, but the statement from his office likewise didn't specify that he will be in the talks with Trump. The grouped trip underscored European leaders' determination to ensure that Europe has a voice in Trump's attempted peace-making, after the U.S. president's summit on Friday with Putin — to which Zelenskyy wasn't invited.
American Military News
30 minutes ago
- American Military News
No Ukraine Cease-Fire For Trump, And A Red-Carpet Welcome For Putin
Vladimir Putin wanted a world stage. Donald Trump wanted a peace deal. The Russian leader got his. The US president did not. At least not yet. The August 15 face-to-face summit between Trump and Putin was shaping up to be one of the most consequential in years: for US-Russian relations, for international security, for the largest land war in Europe since World War II. Confident in his deal-making prowess, Trump wanted to halt Russia's 42-month-old war on Ukraine, which has killed or wounded well over 1 million Russian and Ukrainian soldiers, and thousands of civilians, mainly Ukrainian. Confident of his military's ability to grind down Ukraine, Putin wanted to appear before global TV cameras, on US soil, shaking Trump's hand, free of international isolation, and negotiating as a peer. In the end, there was no deal to halt Russia's bloodletting in Ukraine. There was no deal announced for a new arms control agreement, as Putin had suggested ahead of time, nor new business investments, as Trump had suggested. 'Nothing Good Happened, But Nothing Bad Happened Either' It's possible there are deals in the works, not yet announced. In interviews and remarks afterward, Trump signaled some agreement could be forthcoming in the near future. 'Had there been even a small item to announce, you can bet Trump would have done so,' said Luke Coffey, a Russian analyst and senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, a Washington think tank. 'So the fact that there was nothing even minor [announced]… tells me that the talks truly got nowhere.' 'To look in a positive light, Trump didn't give anything away, at least from what we can know publicly,' Coffey said. 'He admitted from the podium that he's going to be taking time to consult with and update European leaders, including Zelenskyy, and he said that there's no deal until there's a deal.' Early on August 16, hours after the summit, Trump and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy spoke by phone for an hour, along with European leaders. There were 'positive signals' regarding possible US participation in security guarantees for Ukraine, Zelenskyy said. He also said he would travel to Washington on August 18. 'The Kremlin is touting this as a major reset in relations with the United States, given the red-carpet treatment Putin received and the possibility of another summit in Moscow,' said Stephen Flanagan, who twice served on the White House National Security Council. 'Putin's comment that to achieve a 'settlement, lasting and long-term, we need to eliminate all of the primary causes of the conflict,' suggests that Russia retains its hardline position on Ukraine,' he said. 'Putin would like to see a more compliant government in Kyiv and recognition of its territorial conquests.' Going into the summit, Trump had mentioned 'land swaps' as a possibility: recognizing Russia's claim to occupied Ukrainian territory in exchange for a cease-fire or other conditions. Zelenskyy professed that was a red line. Some in Europe, whose role in the Ukraine conflict has frequently been downplayed by the Trump administration, feared another 'Munich' – shorthand for when Western allies acquiesced to Hitler in 1938. Or another 'Yalta,' when Soviet leader Josef Stalin, US President Franklin Roosevelt, and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill divided up post-WWII Europe. No land swaps were announced. Neither were any new punitive US sanctions on Russia announced, something Trump had threatened. 'Nothing good happened, but nothing bad happened either,' William Taylor, a former US ambassador to Ukraine, told the BBC. 'There was no Munich, and there was no Yalta, where Ukraine would have been sold.' 'The Welcome, The Red Carpet, The Handshakes' 'For Kyiv, it could obviously be worse,' said Stefan Meister, director of the Center for Order and Governance in Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia, at the German Council on Foreign Relations. 'Maybe they agreed on something. But if they had, it would have been announced,' he said. 'Trump is not ready to be the bad guy and force a terrible deal down the Ukrainians' throats,' said Eric Ciaramella, a former White House National Security Council adviser, now a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 'Nor is Putin willing to make any major compromises merely to give Trump a win.' Since launching the all-out invasion in February 2022, Putin has been deemed a pariah in the West, and in other places around the world, isolated, under US sanctions and under threat of an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, refused to meet with him. The 'optics' of the summit – on US soil, red-carpet welcome, personal greeting by the US president – were a victory in itself for the Kremlin. 'Putin certainly got what he wanted out of this meeting,' said Mikhail Alexseev, a political scientist at San Diego State University and expert on Ukraine's governance. 'He got the welcome, the red carpet. He got the handshakes. He even got applause from Trump when he walked from the airplane. In essence, it normalizes his position as [a] world leader.' Senior International Correspondent Mike Eckel reported from Prague; North American correspondent Todd Prince reported from Washington.
