logo
Australia's Tasmania on track for minority government after poll

Australia's Tasmania on track for minority government after poll

Reuters4 days ago
SYDNEY, July 20 (Reuters) - Australia's island state of Tasmania appeared on Sunday to be heading for a minority government as vote counting continued after an election that did not produce a clear winner.
The conservative Liberal government was on track to win more seats than the main Labor opposition in the new parliament but would probably fall short of a majority after Saturday's election, the Australian Broadcasting Corp. projected.
The Liberals' strong performance under Jeremy Rockliff, premier since 2022, follows a heavy defeat suffered at May's national election, which returned Anthony Albanese-led Labor for a second term with an increased majority.
Saturday's vote showed Tasmanians have "no confidence in the Labor party to form government and they have voted to reendorse our Liberal government," Rockliff said in televised remarks from the state capital of Hobart.
The result for Labor, on track to win nine seats of a possible 35, was shaping as the party's worst-ever result in Tasmania, the Guardian Australia newspaper said.
On Sunday, state Labor leader Dean Winter said the result was disappointing for the party, but he did not concede defeat.
The election was triggered by a no-confidence vote against Rockliff initiated by Labor on concerns about public debt and plans to privatise assets.
It came less than two years after the state's most recent poll, in which a majority eluded the Liberals.
The only Australian state to elect its lower house on the basis of proportional representation, Tasmania has a long history of minority governments.
Wilderness or protected areas make up 40% of the island, which is 445 km (275 miles) away from Melbourne, usually requiring a flight of an hour, or a ferry crossing 10 times longer, to cover the distance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Howard-era Asio questioning powers ‘never intended to be permanent', Australia's human rights chief warns
Howard-era Asio questioning powers ‘never intended to be permanent', Australia's human rights chief warns

The Guardian

time5 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Howard-era Asio questioning powers ‘never intended to be permanent', Australia's human rights chief warns

The boss of Australia's human rights commission has questioned Labor's moves to make Asio's powers for compulsory questioning permanent, warning a planned expansion of the 9/11-era laws must include robust safeguards for individuals. The home affairs minister, Tony Burke, introduced two pieces of legislation this week designed to remove so-called sunset provisions on the domestic spy agencies' powers to compel cooperation. The rules act as effective expiry dates on the powers and require parliament to reconsider their reach on a regular basis. Labor will also add sabotage, promotion of communal violence, attacks on the defence system and serious threats to Australia's border security to the rules for compulsory questioning. Under the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act, intelligence operatives have powers to issue a questioning warrant requiring a person as young as 14 to give information or produce items that may assist in a serious investigation. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Introduced after the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in the US, the powers have hardly been used since 2020, with just four warrants served on three people, in counter-terror and espionage cases. The human rights commissioner, Lorraine Finlay, said Asio should have the necessary powers to protect Australians, but that the current compulsory questioning powers are extraordinary in their intrusions on a number of fundamental human rights, 'and were never intended to be permanent'. 'The two bills introduced by the government propose to not only extend, and then repeal entirely, the existing sunset provision to make these compulsory questioning powers permanent, but also in some respects to expand the scope of the existing powers,' she said. Finlay said the commission would closely consider the proposed changes and engage with an inquiry expected to be run by parliament's joint committee on intelligence and security (PJCIS). She said any limitations on human rights must be necessary and proportionate, and come with 'robust safeguards'. The Greens justice spokesperson, David Shoebridge, said the laws should be considered by a transparent and open inquiry, not run by the PJCIS, which is dominated by Labor and the Coalition. 'Making permanent these oppressive Howard-era powers is already deeply troubling, but they are going even further and expanding when and how they can be used,' he said. 'History shows that once governments get these intrusive powers they never want to let them go, and that is exactly what we see here with the sunset provisions now being stripped out. 'Asio wants these powers and the major parties are falling over themselves to deliver them through a stitched-up secret parliamentary inquiry regardless of what the public thinks.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Shoebridge said parliamentary scrutiny of the plan must include public hearings. 'There are real questions about how these new powers could be used to target legitimate protesters and critics of the government, harsh immigration laws and the defence establishment.' The powers are scheduled to sunset on 7 September this year. They will be temporarily extended, for 18 months, to allow parliament to consider the wider bill, which would make the powers permanent. Introducing the changes to parliament this week, Burke said Asio should retain the powers 'to navigate an increasingly complex, challenging and changing security environment and deliver on its mission to protect the safety of Australia and Australians'. When the laws were first introduced, Howard government attorney general Daryl Williams described them as 'extraordinary' and 'a measure of last resort'.

Lara Trump makes major decision on her political future shaking up critical swing state Senate race
Lara Trump makes major decision on her political future shaking up critical swing state Senate race

Daily Mail​

time5 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Lara Trump makes major decision on her political future shaking up critical swing state Senate race

Lara Trump will not seek a seat in the U.S. Senate for her home state of North Carolina, a spokesperson for the president's daughter-in-law told the Daily Mail. Instead, she will support her former colleague and Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Michael Whatley in his bid for the seat. 'Lara worked side by side with Whatley at the RNC for this big election victory last November. North Carolina will be lucky to have him,' a spokesperson said. In reality, Trump's decision to pass on the marquee race is a considerable setback for Republicans, who will instead have to settle for a much less splashy candidate that lacks the powerful surname of the sitting president. The former RNC co-chair is choosing to remain in her current lucrative media role hosting her interview-based show My View with Lara Trump, which airs on Fox News on Saturday nights. Lara Trump lives in Florida with her husband, Eric, and their two children Luke, 7, and Carolina, 5. She is oftentimes spotted in Washington, D.C. conducting interviews with administration officials to air on her weekend show. She kept her future options open, however, saying: 'While I am not running in this election, my passion for Making America Great Again burns brightly, and I look forward to the future, wherever that leads.' It's expected that President Trump will back Whatley's bid for a U.S. Senate seat representing North Carolina in the upper chamber. After the 2024 election, it was rumored Lara was also considering making a bid for Sen. Marco Rubio's open seat in Florida when he was chosen to become Trump's secretary of state. But in December 2024, Lara announced that she would not take on the role and shortly after that her new Fox show was announced. Speaking with the Daily Mail in January, Lara disclosed that her father-in-law 'was a little upset' when she said she wouldn't seek a U.S. Senate seat for Florida. 'The only person that Donald Trump wanted to see there was probably me,' she explained. Although now a Florida resident, Lara is originally from North Carolina. Sen. Thom Tillis announced in June he would not seek reelection as he laid out objections to the president's 'Big Beautiful' tax and spending bill, earning the ire of the MAGA base which threatened to oust him. Republicans are desperate to hold onto their House and Senate majorities in the 2026 midterm elections and North Carolina is one of the critical swing states on the map. While the state has fell consistently in the Republican column in recent years, Democrats believe the open Tillis seat is one of their best chances for a pick-up. Whatley's imminent candidacy was first reported by Politico. Former Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper is also expected to launch a bid, setting the two up for a high-stakes, high-cost general election match-up. Whatley was elected RNC chair in March 2024. He led the party alongside co-chair Lara Trump to sweeping GOP victories in last year's elections. Whatley's donor connections will help launch him to the Senate seat in what could be one of the most expensive races in next year's midterms. It's unclear whether Whatley's candidacy will generate the level of excitement among the MAGA base that a Lara Trump campaign would have guaranteed.

From friends to foes: Why Corbyn's new ‘Your Party' could be a real problem for Starmer
From friends to foes: Why Corbyn's new ‘Your Party' could be a real problem for Starmer

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

From friends to foes: Why Corbyn's new ‘Your Party' could be a real problem for Starmer

Keir Starmer and Jeremy Corbyn have a shared love for Arsenal football club and have both captained the Labour 'red team' in politics against the Tory blues. But that is about as far as they go in terms of any bonds in one of the most turbulent relationships in recent British politics. While the relationship between the pair is beyond repair, Sir Keir's predecessor has today added to the prime minister's headache with the launch of his new 'kinder' party, which threatens to pinch supporters at a time when Labour's poll rating continues to drop. A recent poll put Labour in third equal place with a new Corbyn party, with both on 15 per cent and even the Tories ahead on 17 per cent, behind Reform on a massive 34 per cent. Just five years ago, after Labour's dismal defeat to Boris Johnson in the 2019 election, Sir Keir described him as a 'colleague' and, more importantly, a 'friend'. But once the leadership was in the bag – courtesy of the support and strategy of his now chief of staff Morgan McSweeney – Sir Keir suddenly had a very different view of his predecessor. From 2016 he had been loyal to Corbyn, denied there was an antisemitism problem under his leadership, and continued to serve in a shadow cabinet while other prominent Labour MPs refused. But within months of taking charge of Labour, he had suspended the former leader and attempted to distance himself from Corbyn's time in charge. When Corbyn was kicked out in 2023, Sir Keir insisted that contrary to his previous statement, the former Labour leader 'was never a friend'. As various U-turns have shown, Sir Keir has not worried about changing his mind and rewriting history when circumstances required it. Now though, the former friend is a real problem. On one side it will allow Sir Keir to emphasise that he is the sensible centrist leader in a political world dominated by extremes of Corbyn on the left and Farage on the right. But on the other side there will be fears that the issues around trying to cut disability benefits, failing to really take on Israel over Gaza and the infamous winter fuel cuts will encourage many to switch to this new party. Another ex-Labour leader Lord Kinnock has warned that Corbyn's new party will only help the Tories and Reform. The issue for the prime minister, though, may be that Corbyn remains a more charismatic figure on the left. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch suffers the same in comparison to Farage. The one effect of his former friend's new party may be that it forces the prime minister to be more of a man of the people – less Sir Keir and more just Keir. A quality his premiership has been lacking so far.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store