
Rep. Steny Hoyer raises $232,000 as he mulls reelection bid in Maryland
Rep. Steny Hoyer, a Prince George's County Democrat, raised roughly $232,000 during the second fundraising quarter, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings. After expenses, the cash influx gives the 86-year-old congressman over $636,000 in cash on hand for his campaign. He started the quarter with over $573,000.
The sum is roughly $60,000 less than Hoyer's fundraising numbers during the same quarter of the previous election cycle, when he raised over $291,000 and went on to win reelection to his long-held seat. While the quarterly report won't be among the largest in Congress — Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Montgomery County Democrat, raised roughly $1.2 million, for example — it's a fair amount for a long-tenured member in a safe blue seat.
The fundraising boost comes during a precarious moment for veteran Democratic leaders like Hoyer.
Age has remained a top-of-mind issue for Democratic voters since former President Joe Biden's presidential campaign fell apart last year after he struggled to answer questions during a debate with the then-presumed GOP nominee, Donald Trump, leading to Vice President Kamala Harris becoming the Democratic nominee.
It's only become more prescient since Trump's election. Three Democratic lawmakers have died since March. Each was at least 70 years old.
As a former member of the party's leadership, Hoyer remains an influential member of the Democratic caucus, the House Appropriations Committee, and serves as the ranking member of the Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee.
Hoyer's office did not respond to a request for comment.
The age debate isn't strictly about age, but health — whether aging lawmakers are healthy enough to fulfill the responsibilities of a member of Congress. Reps. Gerry Connolly of Virginia and Raul Grijalva of Arizona both suffered from cancer. Turner passed after experiencing a medical emergency.
Their deaths reinvigorated questions about the party's emphasis on experience in leadership, particularly given the energy needed to keep up with the frenetic pace of the Trump administration.
Being a Democratic lawmaker under Trump hasn't been relaxing. The president has blitzed a series of immense structural changes to the federal government that Democrats have decried, while Republican lawmakers have passed new policies that Democrats have detested — most recently, the partisan 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that extended current tax rates while enacting cuts to social programs.
Donations from political committees accounted for $140,500 of Hoyer's new funds, with contributions ranging from $1,000 to $7,500. Individual donations made up $84,700. The campaign spent over $169,000 during the past three months.
Hoyer has held his seat since 1981. He is one of the oldest members of Congress and spent years as the second-ranking House Democrat before stepping down from his post of Majority Leader in 2023, saying that, 'The timing was right.'
In August of last year, Hoyer suffered a mild stroke. Despite the health scare, he went on to win reelection, defeating Republican Michelle Talkington with 68% of the vote. He received 72% of the vote during the Democratic primary, defeating three younger challengers.
At least one Democrat will challenge Hoyer in 2026: political newcomer Harry Jarin. Jarin's campaign disclosures weren't available prior to publication.
-----------
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
‘Ridiculous': Obama's patience wears thin in response to Trump's latest hysterics
During campaign seasons, Barack Obama maintains a rather high profile, appearing in Democratic ads and headlining Democratic rallies. There's no great mystery as to why: The former president remains one of the nation's most liked political leaders. But in terms of day-to-day political events, Obama tends to maintain a relatively low profile, steering clear of the arena. In fact, he's sometimes criticized in progressive circles for not engaging in more partisan and political fights. There are, however, occasional exceptions. NBC News reported: Former President Barack Obama's office issued a rare rebuke of President Donald Trump on Tuesday after the president accused his predecessor of having committed 'treason' and rigging the 2016 and 2020 elections. A written statement issued from a spokesperson for the former president spanned just six sentences, though it said quite a bit. 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' the statement read. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.' The 'document' that Obama's office referred to was, of course, the bizarre report from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, issued last week, which alleged that Trump's Russia scandal was the result of a 'treasonous conspiracy.' The document was quickly discredited, with independent analyses characterizing Gabbard's report as, among other things, 'ludicrous.' As for Team Obama's reference to Rubio, this, of course, reminded the public that just five years ago, the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee published devastating findings about Trump's Russia scandal, at one point literally describing a 'direct tie between senior Trump Campaign officials and the Russian intelligence services.' If Gabbard and her allies want to argue that Trump's secretary of state, who led the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time, was part of a 'treasonous conspiracy' against Trump, they're welcome to try, though this doesn't seem like an especially smart idea. Or put another way, the Obama statement worked because it had reality on its side. The incumbent president, however, doesn't seem to care. On Monday, Trump amplified a fake video that appeared to have been created with AI that depicted Obama being arrested in the Oval Office. A day later, in the Oval Office, the Republican explicitly endorsed the Justice Department targeting Obama, suggesting that the former Democratic president is 'guilty' as part of a scheme that Trump considers 'treason.' Trump falsely claimed that Obama 'has been caught directly' of unspecified crimes, added that his administration found 'proof' — which, again, does not exist — that Obama was 'seditious' and 'trying to lead a coup.' The incumbent concluded, 'Whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people. Obama's been caught directly. So people say, 'Oh, you know, a group.' It's not a group. It's Obama.' It's not Obama. The underlying claims are fiction. Trump's entire conspiracy theory is rooted in a delusional foundation. What's less clear is what might happen next. Under normal circumstances, a sitting president accusing his predecessor of 'treason' would be a stop-the-presses moment in American politics, but the reaction to Trump's meltdown was largely muted, in part because so many observers worked from the assumption that the Republican routinely makes bonkers claims, which amount to very little, and his latest absurdities are little more than a clumsy effort to distract attention away from his Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Perhaps. But with the White House pulling the strings at the Justice Department, and Attorney General Pam Bondi effectively positioning herself as a political operative who's a little too eager to make the president happy, it's hardly outlandish to wonder whether federal prosecutors might actually try to build a case against the former Democratic president. Around this time four years ago, Charlie Sykes said during an appearance on MSNBC, 'A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.' It's a quote that came to mind anew this week. This article was originally published on


CBS News
3 minutes ago
- CBS News
Mike Lawler to sit out New York governor's race and run for reelection in House district
Rep. Mike Lawler says he will run for reelection in his Hudson Valley House district in the 2026 midterms, forgoing a bid for governor. Lawler had been considering a gubernatorial run, among the Republicans looking to challenge incumbent Gov. Kathy Hochul in next year's statewide election. But he said in an interview Wednesday morning that he intends to stay in the U.S. House representing the 17th Congressional District. "There's no question Kathy Hochul is the worst governor in America," Lawyer told Fox and Friends. "But after months of deliberating over this and really working through it, I've decided the right thing to do for me and my family and my district is to run for reelection. My seat was determinative of control of the House back in 2022 and again in 2024. I'm one of only three Republicans that won a seat that Kamala Harris also won. Keeping the House majority critical if we are going to continue to move this economy in the right direction." Lawler's seat has been targeted by Democrats in past election cycles and is a key part of Republican's current narrow House majority. Shortly after the interview, Hochul posted on social media that "this is the same Mike Lawler who caved to Trump the minute he asked to rip away New Yorkers' health care. Of course he doesn't have the spin to face me." President Trump appeared to weigh in on the governor's race back in May, with what experts said was a not-so-subtle attempt to clear the field for upstate Rep. Elise Stefanik to get the GOP nomination. Mr. Trump had initially tapped Stefanik to serve as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, but she withdrew her name for consideration two months later with Mr. Trump asking her to stay in Congress to protect Republicans' razor-thin majority. In a pair of social media posts, Mr. Trump endorsed Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman for reelection this November and Lawler for reelection in 2026. "As I've said repeatedly, you know, when it comes to deciding about whether to run for governor or reelection, I'll be making that decision in June, and so we're still going through that process," Lawler responded at the time. Hochul and Stefanik recently sparred during a congressional hearing on sanctuary policies, and the governor has said "bring it on" to whomever she faces next fall. Meanwhile, her number two, Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado, is also running to replace her.


CNN
3 minutes ago
- CNN
Rep. Mike Lawler announces he will seek reelection in the House in a win for Trump
GOP Rep. Mike Lawler announced on Wednesday that he will seek reelection in the House in a win for President Donald Trump. 'After months of deliberating over this and really working through it, I've decided the right thing to do for me and my family and my district is to run for reelection,' the New York Republican said on Fox News. 'My seat was determinative of control of the House back in 2022 and again in 2024,' he added. Lawler had been weighing a challenge to New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and criticized the Democratic politician on Wednesday, calling her 'the worst governor in America' and saying she needs to be defeated in 2026. His decision is a win for Trump who had made it clear that he would prefer for the two-term congressman to remain in the narrowly divided House rather than risk losing a GOP seat. 'Keeping the House majority is critical if we're going to continue to move this economy in the right direction. I'm proud to have delivered on my key promise, which was to lift the cap on SALT in the one big, beautiful bill. That is a big win for New York. It's the single largest tax cut in the whole bill. And I'm proud to run for reelection on my record and win next November and keep the House Republican majority,' Lawler said on Fox News. GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York praised Lawler in a statement on Wednesday and said she will make her own decision on running for governor after this year's November election, which includes the New York City mayoral race. Stefanik had been inching towards a run for New York governor after launching a new state PAC in June. It came after her team commissioned internal polling against Hochul, a source familiar with the matter told CNN last month. 'Mike Lawler is a great, effective, and hardworking Representative for New York's 17th Congressional District and is committed to protecting the House Republican Majority,' Stefanik said in a statement on Wednesday. 'I will make a final decision and announcement after this year's November election which we are all focused on.' Stefanik was pulled in March from a nomination to be US ambassador to the United Nations over concerns of slim margins in the House. Trump said he pulled the nomination to help preserve the House GOP's razor-thin majority. The president has been focused on keeping the Republican majority and has been working behind the scenes to secure more GOP seats. Trump and his team have said they believe they can squeeze five more seats out of Texas as part of a Republican redistricting effort in the state. Lawler's decision is a much-needed boost for Trump and the GOP's push to hold onto the House next year in the midterms. His seat in New York's Hudson Valley is one of his party's most competitive districts in the country — one of just three won by Kamala Harris in 2024. Republicans are already preparing to potentially lose one of those seats, as Nebraska GOP Rep. Don Bacon decided to retire from the House this cycle. Lawler flipped the seat in 2022, marking the House Republican's biggest upset of the cycle as he defeated the House Democrat's campaign chief, former Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney. Lawler easily defeated former Democratic Rep. Mondaire Jones in the 2024 race but is expected to face a more competitive Democratic field next time around. His former opponent, Maloney, has suggested he could run again for the seat in 2026, which would bring an immense Democratic war chest to the race.