Rep. Steny Hoyer raises $232,000 as he mulls reelection bid in Maryland
Rep. Steny Hoyer, a Prince George's County Democrat, raised roughly $232,000 during the second fundraising quarter, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings. After expenses, the cash influx gives the 86-year-old congressman over $636,000 in cash on hand for his campaign. He started the quarter with over $573,000.
The sum is roughly $60,000 less than Hoyer's fundraising numbers during the same quarter of the previous election cycle, when he raised over $291,000 and went on to win reelection to his long-held seat. While the quarterly report won't be among the largest in Congress — Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Montgomery County Democrat, raised roughly $1.2 million, for example — it's a fair amount for a long-tenured member in a safe blue seat.
The fundraising boost comes during a precarious moment for veteran Democratic leaders like Hoyer.
Age has remained a top-of-mind issue for Democratic voters since former President Joe Biden's presidential campaign fell apart last year after he struggled to answer questions during a debate with the then-presumed GOP nominee, Donald Trump, leading to Vice President Kamala Harris becoming the Democratic nominee.
It's only become more prescient since Trump's election. Three Democratic lawmakers have died since March. Each was at least 70 years old.
As a former member of the party's leadership, Hoyer remains an influential member of the Democratic caucus, the House Appropriations Committee, and serves as the ranking member of the Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee.
Hoyer's office did not respond to a request for comment.
The age debate isn't strictly about age, but health — whether aging lawmakers are healthy enough to fulfill the responsibilities of a member of Congress. Reps. Gerry Connolly of Virginia and Raul Grijalva of Arizona both suffered from cancer. Turner passed after experiencing a medical emergency.
Their deaths reinvigorated questions about the party's emphasis on experience in leadership, particularly given the energy needed to keep up with the frenetic pace of the Trump administration.
Being a Democratic lawmaker under Trump hasn't been relaxing. The president has blitzed a series of immense structural changes to the federal government that Democrats have decried, while Republican lawmakers have passed new policies that Democrats have detested — most recently, the partisan 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that extended current tax rates while enacting cuts to social programs.
Donations from political committees accounted for $140,500 of Hoyer's new funds, with contributions ranging from $1,000 to $7,500. Individual donations made up $84,700. The campaign spent over $169,000 during the past three months.
Hoyer has held his seat since 1981. He is one of the oldest members of Congress and spent years as the second-ranking House Democrat before stepping down from his post of Majority Leader in 2023, saying that, 'The timing was right.'
In August of last year, Hoyer suffered a mild stroke. Despite the health scare, he went on to win reelection, defeating Republican Michelle Talkington with 68% of the vote. He received 72% of the vote during the Democratic primary, defeating three younger challengers.
At least one Democrat will challenge Hoyer in 2026: political newcomer Harry Jarin. Jarin's campaign disclosures weren't available prior to publication.
-----------
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
26 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Public media isn't partisan — reality just leans left
Deputy Opinion Editor Jacob Stewart's column, "Public media funding cuts create fair competition for local news in Indiana," ignores reality. We need look no further than recent events involving the capitalistic and capitulatory decision by CBS to cancel "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" to see the value of public media. Stewart points out that 87% of people who name NPR as their main source of news are Democrats or Democrat-leaning but fails to understand why this is the case. In the 1980s, President Reagan eliminated the Fairness Doctrine from television and radio and right-wing propagandists like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity capitalized on this. It takes only a few minutes of listening to NPR to understand that it is not the left-wing equivalent of conservative talk radio. Rather, it is a purer form of news and information. Do we also not trust C-SPAN since the government funds it as a public utility? Even Stewart acknowledges that NPR did not deliberately attract a more Democratic-leaning audience. It just happened that way because conservative talk radio and networks like Fox News, OANN, and Newsmax have found a great deal of profit in confirming their viewers' and listeners' biases. Opinion: Critics said Trump would ruin America. Six months in, he's proving them wrong. I, for one, am grateful that we have some media outlets that are focused on informing and educating the public, not turning a profit. As Stephen Colbert said at the 2006 White House Correspondents' Dinner, which aired on C-SPAN, "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Appeals court blocks Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship, upholding lower court order
A divided federal appeals court panel on Wednesday ruled that President Trump's executive order outlawing birthright citizenship cannot go into effect, upholding a lower court order blocking the directive. In a 2-1 ruling, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals determined that Democratic attorneys general from Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon challenging Trump's Jan. 20 birthright citizenship executive order would be likely to succeed in demonstrating that it is unconstitutional. 'The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order's proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is Unconstitutional,' read the appeals court's majority opinion. 'We fully agree.' 3 The appeals court ruling comes after the Supreme Court curbed the use of nationwide injunctions in response to lawsuits against Trump's birthright citizenship order last month. AP Judges Michael Day Hawkins and Ronald M. Gould, both appointees of former President Bill Clinton, ruled in the majority, while Judge Patrick J. Bumatay, a Trump appointee, partially dissented. Bumatay argued that the states didn't have standing to sue the Trump administration over the order. 'Courts must be vigilant in enforcing the limits of our jurisdiction and our power to order relief,' Bumatay wrote. 'Otherwise, we risk entangling ourselves in contentious issues not properly before us and overstepping our bounds,' he added. 'No matter how significant the question or how high the stakes of the case — at all times, we must adhere to the confines of 'the judicial Power.'' The Trump-appointed judge did not express an opinion on the constitutionality of ending birthright citizenship. The judges in the majority found that the Democrat-led states were entitled to a nationwide injunction, because a narrower block would not provide them with 'complete relief.' The ruling keeps an injunction issued by Seattle District Judge John C. Coughenour in place. Federal judges in New Hampshire, Maryland and Massachusetts have also issued sweeping universal injunctions blocking Trump's order from taking effect. 3 The appeals court found that Democrat-led states challenging the executive order were likely to succeed. Michael Brochstein/ZUMA Press Wire / The appeals court order comes after the Supreme Court ruled last month that nationwide injunctions issued by lower-court judges 'likely exceed' the judicial branch's constitutional authority. The case centered on injunctions related to Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, and the high court curtailed the ability of federal judges to block presidential policies. The justices, however, allowed some plaintiffs — including those in class-action lawsuits and states — to continue to seek universal injunctions if needed for complete relief. Both avenues have been pursued by plaintiffs seeking to stop Trump's directive. Since the Supreme Court ruling, two courts — the Ninth Circuit and a New Hampshire district court — have issued temporary nationwide injunctions of Trump's birthright citizenship order. The Ninth Circuit panel concluded that the Seattle district court 'did not abuse its discretion in issuing a universal injunction in order to give the States complete relief.' 3 The appeals court agreed with the Democrat-led states and the lower court that deemed the order unconstitutional. Eric Kayne/ZUMA / Trump's executive order seeks to only grant automatic citizenship to children with at least one parent who is a US citizen or legal permanent resident. The 14th Amendment stipulates that '[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.' Trump maintains that birthright citizenship has been abused and ushered in an era of 'birth tourism,' in which foreign nationals have babies in the US to give their children citizenship. The president and his allies have also argued that the Civil War-era amendment was originally aimed at the children of freed slaves, and has since been improperly interpreted as applying to the children of migrants. The White House did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nebraska Dems hosting Beshear, possible 2028 presidential candidate
Gov. Andy Beshear speaks to reporters in Louisville. (Kentucky Lantern photo by McKenna Horsley) LINCOLN — Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear is coming to Nebraska to speak to Democrats for the state party's top annual fundraising event in November. Beshear is a Democratic governor in a deeply red Republican state. He and other 2028 potential presidential hopefuls visited South Carolina in recent weeks, to test the water for their campaign messages. He was picked to lead the Democratic Governors Association into next year's midterm elections and has been touted as 'most popular Democratic governor in America.' Beshear was attorney general of Kentucky before becoming governor in 2019. His father was previously governor. National Democrats have been seeking answers as President Donald Trump made gains among working-class voters, including minority voters, last year. A trend of prominent Democratic figures making their way to the heartland has emerged, and some are crossing the Missouri River from traditionally first-in-the-nation Iowa into Nebraska. Independent U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders launched his 'Fighting Oligarchy' nationwide tour in Omaha. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz hosted a Democratic town hall earlier this year And Former Texas U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke is having a similar town hall in Omaha next month. The events with prominent Democratic figures appear aimed at energizing the Nebraska Democratic base for the midterms and come when two federal races could be competitive. Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District has drawn national attention as its single presidential race electoral vote has swung from Republicans to Democrats in recent years, most recently to former Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024. Nebraska could regain the national spotlight in 2026, with an open seat race in the state's 2nd District for the U.S. House and Dan Osborn's nonpartisan Senate bid against Republican U.S. Sen. Pete Ricketts. Both races could determine which party controls what parts of Congress. But Nebraska Democrats face an uphill battle in a state where Republicans outnumber Democrats about 2 to 1, Republicans have gained a legislative supermajority, and the party last held a congressional seat with former U.S. Rep. Brad Ashford in 2017. Nebraska Examiner is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Nebraska Examiner maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Aaron Sanderford for questions: info@
