Will fight tooth and nail against inclusion of Marathas in OBC category, says Bhujbal
Maharashtra Cabinet Minister and senior Other Backwards Classes leader Chhagan Bhujbal told The Hindu that he will fight 'tooth and nail' against the demand for the inclusion of Marathas in the OBC category to get reservation benefits.
Mr. Bhujbal's comments come against the backdrop of a fresh round of agitation in August called by Maratha quota activist Manoj Jarange-Patil.
'No space for more'
'Our house is already full. OBC is not a caste. It is a class. There are many small groups in it. There is no space in our house. So we are telling the Marathas, 'Don't come here. You have another house, please go there,'' he said.
The senior Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader added, 'If they still continue to ask for reservation under the OBC category, we are ready. We will fight it. They won't get anything in that case.'
Mr. Bhujbal, who was sworn in as a Minister on May 20, accused Mr. Jarange-Patil of disrupting the social harmony in parts of Maharashtra. 'The OBCs used to look up to the Marathas as their elder brothers. But Jarange-Patil has caused a rift in society,' he said.
The OBC leader claimed that the Maratha community wields a lot of influence in the State and gets reservation benefits. The Minister added that 60% of Maharashtra's MLAs and Ministers hail from the Maratha community. 'The banks are with them, the milk and sugar cooperatives are with them. The district bodies are with them. Why do they still want to be included in the OBC category?' he added.
When asked if the State Government would withdraw the Banthia Commission report from the Supreme Court, Mr. Bhujbal said it would not matter as the 1992 judgment in the Indra Sawhney case would ultimately prevail.
The report, commissioned by the Maharashtra Government, had recommended 27% reservation for OBCs in local body elections. The report was in the news recently when the Supreme Court directed the State Election Commission to hold the pending local body elections according to the OBC reservations that were in place before 2022, when the Banthia Commission had submitted its report. The Supreme Court had, in its Indra Sawhney judgment, placed a 50% cap on reservations.
The interview will be available on The Hindu's YouTube channel 'Pulse Maharashtra' on May 31.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Centre eyes quota for women ahead of 2029 elections
The Union government intends to roll out 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies—to be based on a fresh delimitation exercise—in time for the 2029 general elections, said three people aware of the details on Wednesday. The delimitation exercise is also likely to consider the demand from the southern states to ensure their proportionate representation in Parliament is not reduced, the people added. Also Read: Stick to pre-2010 7% quota on OBC students: Court Last week, the Union government said that the long-delayed census will be carried out in two phases before March 1 2027, announcing a crucial exercise that will enumerate caste for the first time since independence and likely become the basis for delimitation . However, given that the delimitation commission, which decides the new contours of the Lok Sabha and of Lok Sabha constituencies, will be formed after that, and will then have to work out the details, it was always assumed —especially before the surprise announcement of the much-delayed census—that the expansion of the Lok Sabha and the reservation of 33% of the seats for women would happen only in time for the 2034 national elections. Also Read: Panel drafts report on quota in J&K, to submit in next cabinet meeting The 2029 timeline is an aggressive one, and this is the first time it is being mentioned. Government officials are banking on digitisation to speed up the process of releasing the population numbers in time for the delimitation process which itself typically takes between two to three years to finalise, given the widespread consultation process. Also Read: State govt restores old in-house quota rule for Class 11 admissions after widespread opposition To be sure, the bigger challenge for the delimitation commission will be to address the concerns of the southern states which have demanded that population not be the sole criteria for deciding representation because that would effectively be punishing them for getting their population under control, the key national imperative in the 1970s and 1980s. The Women's reservation bill or the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, 2023 that was passed in Parliament in September 2023, stipulates setting aside one third or 33% of the total seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies for women. A provision in the Constitution (128th Amendment) Bill also states that political reservation for women can come into effect only after the delimitation exercise is carried out. The delimitation process is frozen until after the first census conducted after the year 2026. 'We intend to roll out women's reservation by 2029. The process of conducting the census will begin soon and we are confident that it will be completed in three years. That will then be followed with a fresh delimitation process...,' said one of the three people cited in the first instance, a senior government functionary who spoke on condition of anonymity. His reference is likely to the publication of census data because the entire field exercise including information collection, house-listing and population enumeration will be completed by March 1, 2027. To a question on whether the government will accept the demand of the southern states to increase their Lok Sabha seats, the functionary said, the government has already assured the states that their concerns will be addressed. In February, while speaking at a party event in Coimbatore, union home minister Amit Shah said the southern states would not lose a single seat to delimitation. In a 2019 analysis first published in Hindustan Times Carnegie Endowment's scholars Milan Vaishnaw and Jamie Hinton wrote that extrapolated for 2026's estimated population, the Lok Sabha would have to become a 848-member House, with Uttar Pradesh alone accounting for 143 (up from the current 80), and Bihar 79 (up from 40). In contrast, Tamil Nadu would see its numbers increase from 39 to 49, and Kerala would see its numbers stay at 20, lowering their proportionate representation in the Lok Sabha. Several opposition parties such as the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and the Congress have pointed out that should the delimitation exercise be based solely on population, it will reduce the representation of southern states in Parliament. Following the government's announcement of the Census, Tamil Nadu chief minister, MK Stalin, in a post on X, said, 'The Indian Constitution mandates that delimitation must follow the first census after 2026. The BJP has now delayed the census to 2027, making their plan clear to reduce Tamil Nadu's parliamentary representation. I had warned about this. It is now unfolding… We need clear answers from the Union government.' He also demanded that the 1971 census-based delimitation framework should be in place for another 30 years beyond 2026. 'Census data will pave the way for beginning the process of delimitation. A delimitation commission will be set up by Parliament, which will then draw up the formula for carving out the new constituencies and based on discussions with stakeholders,' said a second functionary, also speaking on condition of anonymity.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Sudha Murty conferred with Justice K.S. Hegde Charitable Foundation Award
Author, philanthropist, and Member of Rajya Sabha, Sudha Murty was on Wednesday conferred with the Justice K.S. Hegde Charitable Foundation Award 2025 for her contributions to literature and social service. The award ceremony was held on the Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology campus in Bengaluru. N. Vinaya Hegde, president, Nitte Education Trust and Chancellor, Nitte Deemed to be University, praised Ms. Murty's service and commitment to rural development, drawing inspiration from K.S. Hegde's legacy. N. Santosh Hegde, former Supreme Court judge and Karnataka Lokayukta, lauded Ms. Murty's work in empowering women and youth. In her acceptance speech, Ms. Murty highlighted the impermanence of material wealth, stressing the enduring impact of social contributions. 'Only the sacrifices we make for society will truly last,' she said. The foundation, established in honour of K.S. Hegde, former Supreme Court judge and Speaker of the Lok Sabha, recognises individuals annually on June 11 for societal contributions.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Judicial overreach risks unsettling power balance, says Justice Kant
NEW DELHI: At a time when judicial activism is often perceived as intrusion into the legislative domain, senior most judge of Supreme Court, Justice Surya Kant, Wednesday warned against courts supplanting the role of the legislature. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Courts mustn't supplant the role of legislature or override the will of the people. Instead, they must act as facilitators of democratic dialogue - strengthening participatory governance, protecting the vulnerable, and ensuring rule of law prevails even in moments of political uncertainty... Judicial overreach risks unsettling the delicate balance of power," he said. CJI Gavai: Judicial activism mustn't turn into judicial terrorism In his keynote address at the 'Envision India Conclave' in San Francisco, Justice Surya Kant said, "True constitutional guardianship lies not in dominance but in restraint - an ethos that reaffirms the judiciary's legitimacy in a vibrant democracy." Speaking on similar lines on Tuesday night, CJI B R Gavai had said at Oxford Union, "Judicial activism is bound to stay. At the same time, judicial activism should not be turned into judicial terrorism. .. (judiciary at times) try to exceed the limits and try to enter into an area where, normally, the judiciary should not enter." Outlining the challenges faced by judiciary in the era of social media explosion where every person has something to say on everything, he said, "In today's hyper-connected world, we are witnessing the rise of a vast digital community - vocal, impatient and, often, uninformed - whose engagement with law is shaped less by understanding and more by sentiment." CJI B R Gavai further said, "They expect courts to deliver judgments that align with their transient emotions and impulses and when the courts' rulings do not match with their expectations based on half-cooked knowledge of law and Constitution, what follows is not reasoned critique but a barrage of trolling, misinformation and personal attacks." This phenomenon posed a subtle yet significant threat to the independence of judiciary, especially in a globalised digital age, CJI Gavai said, adding that it posed a challenge to the reputation of judges and the judicial institution. "It must be met not with timidity, but with the firmness and clarity of purpose that befits a constitutional democracy governed by reason, not rhetoric," he said.
