Samsung & Apple Team Up? The 200MP iPhone Camera Could Be Real
Apple is reportedly testing a massive iPhone camera upgrade that could vastly exceed the ... More capabilities of the iPhone 16 Pro Max (pictured).
Apple is reportedly testing a new 200-megapixel camera tipped to feature in future iPhones, potentially matching the resolution of Samsung's Galaxy S25 Ultra.
This information, revealed by frequently-accurate Chinese tipster, Digital Chat Station, implies a massive upgrade from the 48-megapixel primary cameras of the iPhone 16 series.
Apple is reportedly testing a 200-megapixel iPhone camera.
Apple, like many smartphone manufacturers, has steadily increased camera resolution over the years while concentrating primarily on computational photography and image processing to maximize quality. However, a leap to 200 megapixels would bring radical improvements to the iPhone camera not possible through software alone.
A 200-megapixel camera isn't just about headline-grabbing numbers: Professional users may, on rare occasions, want to take a massive 200-megapixel photo, but ultra-high resolution cameras also bring tangible benefits to the average user, including:
If Apple does launch a 200-megapixel camera, expect increased detail in photos at all resolutions as well as an improved, more feature-rich video experience, potentially incorporating some of the advanced features currently found on Samsung's flagships.
Furthermore, the added resolution available from the new sensor could potentially show enormous improvements in iPhones without a dedicated telephoto lens, such as the 'non-Pro' and 'e' models. by expanding the current 48-megapixel '2x optical quality' zoom to an equivalent 4x with a new 200-megapixel Fusion camera.
Upgrading the iPhone's primary camera to 200 megapixels could also deliver a big marketing win for Apple as the iPhone would match its arch-rival's headline camera resolution pixel-for-pixel, making it easier for Samsung owners to switch to iPhone without feeling like they're losing out on camera specs.
Details are limited, but it's likely that any forthcoming 200-megapixel iPhone camera will use a Samsung sensor. Last year, respected analyst Ming-Chi Kuo predicted that Apple, rather than relying on Sony sensors exclusively, will start using Samsung image sensors in iPhone cameras 'as early as 2026,' including a new 48-megapixel three-layer stacked component. This timing points to next-year's iPhone 18 range as a possible candidate for a new Samsung-powered camera.
Sony is also reportedly working on a 200-megapixel camera sensor
Apple's partnership with Samsung will give the company access to an established range of 200-megapixel sensors such as the Isocell HP2 used in the Galaxy S25 Ultra, and the smaller Isocell HP9, designed specifically for telephoto cameras. However, Sony is also reportedly developing a 200-megapixel smartphone camera, potentially giving Apple the option of sourcing from both companies.
Follow @paul_monckton on Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
I put the Galaxy S25 Edge and Galaxy S25 Ultra through a 10-round photo face-off — here's the winner
Apart from its smaller battery, a big trade-off that many point out about the Galaxy S25 Edge is its camera system. Unlike the rest of the S25 lineup, the Edge only gets a dual camera setup — a 200MP main sensor paired with a 12MP ultrawide. The only thing the S24 Edge is lacking is a dedicated telephoto camera, which shouldn't be too bad, right? Well, it's tougher because of its $1,099 cost, which isn't too far away from the $1,299 sticker price attached to the S25 Ultra. Sammy's flagship comes with two dedicated telephoto cameras, a 10MP telephoto with 3x optical zoom and a 50MP one with a slightly longer 5x optical lens. They complement the S25 Ultra's 200MP main sensor and 50MP ultrawide. There are clearly differences between them, but I mention in my Galaxy 25 Edge review how its main camera performs just as good as the S25 Ultra. Still, it's going to take more than that to convince people the Edge is the one to get. It's no surprise that the Galaxy S25 Ultra is the best phone and best camera phone you can get right now, made better by its longer battery life and added S Pen utility. I've taken both phones with me to capture the same scenes, then preview them on my computer to inspect their differences. In this Galaxy S25 Edge vs Galaxy S25 Ultra photo face-off, there can only be one that comes out on top. After taking countless shots with their main cameras, I can say that their performances are more or less identical — which is a good thing. Overlooking Bryant Park's sprawling lawn, it's almost hard to tell the two apart because they're similar. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Both phones do an excellent job of exposing the entire scene, including the shadows all around the trees in the background. Details in the foreground, like the chairs with Bryant Park etched on them and the wooden box, all look the same. Farther away in the background, the surrounding buildings and skyscrapers all hold the same amount of detail. Winner: Tie This is another reason why you can't always judge a camera by its specs. On paper, it seems that the S25 Edge is at a disadvantage with its 12MP ultrawide camera — especially against the pixel packed 50MP ultrawide of the S25 Ultra. But since the phones by default downsize images to 12MP, their performances look very similar. At the corner of Broadway and 42nd street near Times Square, I pointed both cameras straight up to see how much of the scene they could capture. Even though Samsung hasn't disclosed its field of view, it appears as though the Edge has a wider one over the Ultra. Meanwhile, the exposure of the shot and details throughout the scene, like the one way and Broadway signs to the left, all appear identical. But since the S25 Edge has a smidge wider reach, I'm giving it the win here. Winner: Galaxy S25 Edge Without switching to other color profiles, it's clear that Samsung's signature style is evident in how they produce colors by default. It's all about the saturated tones with these shots inside of Whole Foods by the produce section. Many of the colors appear to be the same, like the yellow peppers on the middle shelf and green squash to the right. However, the red peppers on the top right and middle shelves are much more oversaturated with the S25 Ultra. I personally don't mind, but it's more of an unrealistic look compared to the Edge — which is still saturated in tone in my opinion. Winner: Galaxy S25 Edge Their main cameras again appear to have no major differences, as these shots from Bryant Park underneath the trees deliver the same exposure. I like how they prioritize the exposure on the trees, so the areas in shadow are brightened up a bit. With the buildings peeking from behind the trees, they're overblown by the two phones, but neither one seems to be better or worse with this. Winner: Tie Sticking with their main cameras for capturing panoramas (instead of their ultrawide cams), it's another similar outcome between the S25 Edge and S25 Ultra. Most notably, they cast the same exposure from left to right — struggling a bit with the brighter spots in the middle, which is due to how they compensate for the shot starting from the left. That area was in shadow when I started the shot more so than the rest, which explains the overexposure in the middle. Winner: Tie Both phones have 12MP (f/2.2) selfie cameras, and based on all the selfies I shot of myself, I can say they're identical. I really like how they capture the same fine details around my face, like my hairline and slight stubble. The S25 Edge and S25 Ultra capture the same details in the fabric of my hoodie. And finally, I don't see any difference in how my skin tone looks — which gets the exposure treatment to brighten me up a little. Winner: Tie With my colleague Ryan Epps as my model, the portrait shots from the S25 Edge and S25 Ultra appear identical at first glance. There's proper subject-background separation when I shot these portraits at 2x zoom, along with accurate blurring all around the edges of Ryan — including the two areas between his arms that can sometimes hang up some phones. But when I zoom into his face, I notice an over-sharpening effect applied to the S25 Ultra's shot, which does draw out a little more detail. It's also worth pointing out that the S25 Ultra also offers portrait mode in 3x and 5x zoom, which I feel are better suited for portraits. In contrast, I'm locked into either 1x or 2x zoom with the S25 Edge. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra One of the trickiest parts of capturing macro photos with both phones is getting the same focus between them, since it's really narrow the closer I get to subjects — and this is one of those examples. I will say, though, that both phones take exceptional macro shots that are rich in detail. Overall, I like how the shots came out with this yellow flower. Not only are the petals well defined, but they also capture the water droplets all around it. But it ultimately comes down to focus, which in this case goes to the S25 Edge. Winner: Galaxy S25 Edge So far in this Galaxy S25 Edge vs Galaxy S25 Ultra photo shoot-out, it's been largely a close race with neither one proving to me its cameras are considerably better. But as I've alluded earlier on, the lack of a dedicated telephoto camera with the S25 Edge could be a big trade-off for those needing to get closer. I captured these telephoto shots at 10x zoom, seeing that's where the S25 Edge maxes out — whereas the S25 Ultra goes to an ridiculous 100x zoom. Right away, there's a noticeable difference in what they capture with more detail and definition from the S25 Ultra's dedicated 50MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom. I can make out the individual bricks and other ornamental details around the building, which appear as nothing more than streaky details with the S25 Edge. For all the optimizations and enhancements that Samsung applies with the Galaxy S25 Edge's shot, its performance just can't match what an optical lens offers. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra Despite the rainy and windy conditions, the low light shots I captured with both phones appear to deliver the same qualities — which I'm not surprised given how similar their main cameras behave. The scene above was actually darker than what the images show, which proves how well they are at brightening up dark conditions with their night modes. I don't see much difference between the S25 Edge and S25 Ultra here, as they properly boost the exposure to draw out the hidden details around the tree, while also mitigating the strong light source in the background. When it comes to low light, they can turn any dim scene and make them bright. Winner: Tie Technically this Galaxy S25 Edge vs Galaxy S25 Ultra photo shoot-out is a tie after tallying up the results, but it's not in my opinion. While the Galaxy S25 Edge wins in categories like colors and ultrawide, its margin of victory is narrow in those rounds. In contrast, the Galaxy S25 Ultra proves to be superior when it comes to its portrait and telephoto performances. The former isn't a huge stretch over the S25 Edge, but its telephoto performance can't be overlooked because of the amount of detail it's able to capture. This gives the S25 Ultra an inherent advantage for capturing subjects farther away. I'm not saying that the $200 difference separating the two is justified solely by the S25 Ultra's telephoto performance, but it's just one of many things that would convince me to buy the Ultra over the Edge. Based on its performance, I would suspect the S25 Ultra would also have a benefit with video recording with its telephoto capabilities. All of these reasons validate my sentiments of the S25 Ultra being the better phone overall.
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
I walked 8,000 steps with the Apple Watch 10 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 — and one was more accurate
These days, the best fitness trackers on the market do a hell of a lot more than just count your steps. Both the Garmin Forerunner 570 and Apple Watch 10 are designed to be worn 24/7, and can track everything from your heart rate variability to your menstrual cycle. But if you've wondered which is more accurate when it comes to step-counting, you've come to the right place. In my latest step-counting challenge, I strapped the Garmin Forerunner 570 to one wrist, my Apple Watch Series 10 to the other, and manually counted my steps to compare. Read on to find out which came out on top. Both watches count your steps by using an internal accelerometer, which measures the swing of your arm. Each swing counts for two steps. It doesn't matter whether you wear your watch on your dominant or non-dominant hand, or whether you're walking with your hands in your pockets, or holding something, the accelerometer should still measure your body's movement. I've used both devices for tracking my workouts in the past, although the Garmin Forerunner 570 is a newer device, only launching a month ago. If you've followed Tom's Guide for a while, you'll know this isn't my first step-count comparison. In fact, you can read what happened when I did the same test with the Garmin Forerunner 570's predecessor in my Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Apple Watch 10 face-off here. For all of these challenges, I use my trusty clicker counter. Every step I took, I clicked. When I got home, I downloaded all the data. If you own an Apple Watch, you'll also know that Apple doesn't include step count data in its workout summaries. You can see your overall steps for the entire day, but not how many steps you took on a particular walk (probably because steps aren't actually that useful a metric, but annoying for me when writing these articles.) Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. This challenge was originally 10,000 steps, but I lost the beginning of my walk as the StepsApp on my Apple Watch decided to stop working. I switched to the Pedometer+ app and started again. Here are the results: Manual: 8,000 steps Garmin Forerunner 570: 8,100 steps Apple Watch 10 7,700 steps As you can see from the results, the Garmin Forerunner 570 was pretty much spot on, counting 100 steps more than I did. The Apple Watch 10, on the other hand, missed 300 steps. Of course, to truly test the accuracy of the two watches, you'd need to do a lot more testing on a much bigger scale. I'm also not saying that the Apple Watch 10 isn't accurate. The average person takes 2,000 steps in a mile, so missing 300 steps isn't a lot in the grand scheme of things. Interestingly, for the walk, my Apple Watch recorded the distance as 3.79 miles, whereas my Garmin recorded 3.85 miles. Again, we're talking about very small differences here. Without getting into the smartwatch vs sportswatch debate, it seems important to also point out that these watches do a lot more than just count steps. Without getting into the smartwatch vs sportswatch debate, it seems important to also point out that these watches do a lot more than just count steps. The Apple Watch 10 is the best smartwatch on the market and is like having your iPhone on your wrist. The Garmin Forerunner 570, by comparison, doesn't have as many smartwatch features but is Garmin's mid-tier Forerunner, designed to accurately track your marathon training. It's one of the best Garmin watches I've ever tested, and the bright screen is truly beautiful. Whichever device you choose to strap to your wrist, know that they're both counting your steps, so, unlike me, you don't have to. While counting steps isn't always the best metric to focus on when it comes to getting in shape and losing weight, it's a good place to start. A review of 32 studies, published in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity found that '10,000 steps/day is a reasonable target for healthy adults.' If you're looking for more inspiration, you've come to the right place — read what happened when I tried this Japanese walking method, as well as this 5-4-5 walking technique.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Bono: Stories of Surrender' Is Now Streaming Online: How to Watch the Music Documentary for Free
All products and services featured are independently chosen by editors. However, Billboard may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links, and the retailer may receive certain auditable data for accounting purposes. There's a new documentary, which is based on his one-man stage show, that takes a closer look at the life and music of U2's Bono. Starting on Friday (May 30), Bono: Stories of Surrender drops on Apple TV+. It's available to stream for subscribers only. More from Billboard Speed Into Summer With Racing-Inspired Pieces From A$AP Rocky & Puma Capsule Collection Dallas Wings vs. Seattle Storm: How to Watch the WNBA Commissioner's Cup With Hulu + Live TV Face Masks, Eye Patches & More Beauty Essentials to Upgrade Your Skincare This Summer watch 'Bono: Stories of Surrender' on Apple TV+ A subscription to Apple TV+ can give you access to stream Bono: Stories of Surrender online. Apple TV+ is ad-free and goes for $9.99 per month. You can watch everything the streamer has to offer, including original titles, such as The Morning Show, For All Mankind, Severance, Long Way Home and Long Way Up, Servant, Silo, Invasion, Foundation, Lessons in Chemistry, Monarch: Legacy of Monsters, Masters of the Air and more. The service also includes music documentaries and programming, like 1971: The Year That Music Changed Everything, Watch the Sound with Mark Ronson, K-Pop Idols, Carpool Karaoke and others. Apple TV+ has access to live sports, including Friday Night Baseball. Not a subscriber? Sign up for a seven-day free trial to watch Bono: Stories of Surrender. Directed by Andrew Dominik, Bono: Stories of Surrender is a reimagining of Stories of Surrender: An Evening of Words, Music and Some Mischief…, the U2 frontman's one-man stage show. The documentary follows Bono's relationships with his family, friends, faith and career in music. It features never-before-seen footage of life on the road with U2, as well as performances of U2 songs. Meanwhile, if you're an Apple Vision Pro owner, then you can watch the film in an immersive experience with Bono: Stories of Surrender (Immersive). You can watch Bono: Stories of Surrender on Apple TV+ starting on Friday, May 20. You can watch for free with a seven-day free trial. In the meantime, watch the trailer below. watch 'Bono: Stories of Surrender' on Apple TV+ Want more? For more product recommendations, check out our roundups of the best Xbox deals, studio headphones and Nintendo Switch accessories.
