Russian drone hits apartment block in Donetsk Oblast, injuring two
Source: Donetsk Oblast Prosecutor's Office on Telegram
Quote: "At 02:30, the occupiers struck Bilozerske. A Russian Geran-2 UAV hit a five-storey residential building. The strike caused a fire."
The aftermath of the attack.
Photo: Prosecutor's Office
Details: A 40-year-old woman and her 16-year-old son sustained injuries while inside their flat.
The aftermath of the attack.
Photo: Prosecutor's Office
"The injured have been diagnosed with blast injuries and carbon monoxide poisoning. Medical assistance has been provided." the prosecutor's office summed up.
The aftermath of the attack.
Photo: Prosecutor's Office
Background:
Ukraine's Air Force reported that on the evening of 29 May, Russia launched two Iskander-M/KN-23 ballistic missiles and 90 Shahed-type attack UAVs, along with various decoy drones. A total of 56 drones were shot down, but impacts were recorded at 12 locations.
On the same night, Russian forces targeted Kharkiv, Odesa and Donetsk oblasts.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
15 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Karoline Leavitt Says 'Perhaps' Trump Will Visit Russia in the Future
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked on Tuesday whether President Donald Trump has plans to travel to Russia sometime soon. The question came after Trump said twice this week that he will go to Russia for ceasefire talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin. "This is a tragic emergency and it's embarrassing for me to be up here," Trump told reporters at a press briefing on Monday. "You know, I'm going to see Putin. I'm going to Russia on Friday." The president is not going to Russia on Friday but rather to Alaska to meet with Putin and discuss bringing an end to Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine. Leavitt was asked about Trump's comments during Tuesday's White House press briefing. "The president said on the podium yesterday, twice, that he was planning to go to Russia," a reporter asked the White House press secretary. "Was that a verbal slip-up or does he actually plan to go to Russia?" Leavitt confirmed Trump's plans to go to Alaska but did not close the door to him visiting Putin in Russia down the road. "Perhaps there are plans in the future to travel to Russia and on Friday the president will be meeting with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska, as you know," she said. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Zelensky can save Ukraine (and himself)
For European diplomats, officials and analysts, Vladimir Putin has done little to soften his long-standing war aims in Ukraine. They say the Russian president wants nothing less than a Kremlin-friendly government in Kyiv, Ukraine blocked from joining Nato and the size of its armed forces curtailed. When Putin first discussed the parameters of a peace deal with Donald Trump in February 2025, demanding an election as the price for a ceasefire appeared a realistic way of toppling Volodymyr Zelensky's government. But as the months have gone by, the US president has slowly appeared to tilt his favour from Moscow to Kyiv. The apparent change in direction in the White House has made it harder for Moscow to make these sorts of ultimatums. Maintaining these demands cements Putin as the main barrier to Mr Trump's peace efforts. Now, with the Russian and American leaders set for their first face-to-face meeting since 2019, Putin needs another way to sell his vision for removing Kyiv's Western-facing government. Could the key to sowing further chaos through a US-backed peace settlement lie in Ukraine's own constitution? Kyiv's laws state that its president or parliament cannot legally cede territory without a nationwide referendum. Practically, that would not currently be possible, given that Russia occupies around 20 per cent of Ukraine. And any attempt to act unilaterally and overrule the constitution would foment unrest – not least among the soldiers who have fought so hard to defend their homeland for more than three years. Mr Zelensky's position would probably be untenable. For this reason, when Washington and Moscow were exploring a deal that would bring about a ceasefire if Ukraine were to withdraw its troops from the Donbas regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, Mr Zelensky was forced to speak out very loudly against it. Militarily, the Ukrainian president would have got nothing in return, other than a halt to the fighting, while Russia would have been allowed to bypass some of Ukraine's stiffest defences for free. There was some talk of Russian forces being made to withdraw from the northern region of Sumy and neighbouring Kharkiv. This strategy, according to Jaroslava Barbieri, a research fellow at Chatham House's Ukraine Forum, was designed by Putin to position Mr Zelensky as the main blockage to peace in Mr Trump's eyes. 'I'd say in demanding swathes of Ukrainian territory as part of a peace deal, Putin is aware the condition is unacceptable for most Ukrainians,' Ms Barbieri said. Rejecting the offer could 'portray Ukraine's position as unco-operative and ungrateful to Trump's peace-brokering efforts,' she added. Ms Barbieri said: 'It could drive a wedge between Trump and European allies, who have reiterated the importance of preserving Ukraine's sovereignty. 'And ... potentially destabilise Ukrainian society by mobilising grievances among the minority who are willing to accept concessions to end the war.' Polling by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology released in June found that just 38 per cent of Ukrainians were willing to accept territorial losses 'in order to achieve peace as soon as possible and preserve independence'. In comparison, 52 per cent said they were firmly against ceding land 'even if this makes the war last longer'. But Mr Zelensky has accepted that some form of cession of territory will be necessary to end the war. Without it, he'd be likely to lose support of the Americans, and eventually European allies would start to fade away. There will be, Mr Trump declared on Monday: 'Some swapping, some changes to land.' Sources have told The Telegraph that the Ukrainian president could be ready to stop fighting, freeze the front line and hand over de facto control of territories occupied by Russian forces to Moscow as part of any settlement. These include swathes of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea. Mr Trump added: 'We're going to try to get some of that territory back for Ukraine.' The key to Mr Zelensky managing the process and selling it back to his public will be in the language. De jure recognition of Russia's control would require a referendum, and would be likely to stoke tensions in the population, enough to hurt Mr Zelensky at the ballot box of any future election. Handing de facto control, which is not legally recognised, in acceptance of the temporary reality of the situation on the ground is more likely. One possibility for this being discussed amongst war-watchers would be to replicate the Sino-British Joint Declaration signed between China and the UK to decide on Hong Kong's future. That deal saw Britain return sovereignty to Beijing in 1997, but under the condition that it would maintain Hong Kong's special status for 50 years. Could Ukraine and Russia agree to recognise that the Donbas regions are legally Ukrainian but managed as if they belonged to Moscow for a set period of time? That would be likely to settle Mr Zelensky's referendum problem by kicking any real decision into the long grass. The bloodshed would stop and the line in the sand would be drawn – for now. However, Moscow would use the time to sow anti-Ukrainian sentiment in the region, with the intention of making its eventual return almost impossible and unpalatable for Ukrainians, who have all lost a father, brother or friend in the war. Whatever the proposal, it would appear that Putin has covertly edged closer to one of his war aims again by leaving Mr Zelensky with a decision that will shape his future as president. And he has put the spotlight back on Ukraine's leader. Mr Trump cut through the public protestations on Monday. The US president said: 'I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelensky was saying: 'Well, I have to get constitutional approval.' I mean, he's got approval to go into war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap?' The final representations will be made by Mr Zelensky and other European leaders in a video call with Mr Trump on Wednesday. Forty-eight hours later, Putin will arrive in Alaska. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
44 minutes ago
- USA Today
Russian troops advance in Ukraine ahead of Trump-Putin peace summit
Ahead of an Aug. 15 summit in Alaska between Trump and Putin, Russian troops continued their campaign to take full control of Ukraine's Donetsk region. MOSCOW, Aug. 12 (Reuters) - Small bands of Russian soldiers thrust deeper into eastern Ukraine on Tuesday ahead of a summit this week between Russian President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump, which European Union states fear could end in peace terms imposed on an unlawfully shrunken Ukraine. In one of the most extensive incursions so far this year, Russian troops advanced near the coal-mining town of Dobropillia, part of Putin's campaign to take full control of Ukraine's Donetsk region. Ukraine's military dispatched reserve troops, saying they were in difficult combat against small groups of advancing Russian soldiers. Trump has said any peace deal would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" Russia and Ukraine, which has up to now depended on the U.S. as its main arms supplier. More: Trump says deal to halt Russia's war on Ukraine could include 'swapping' of territories Virtually all the territory in question is Ukrainian, alarming President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his European allies. Zelenskyy and most of his European counterparts have said a lasting peace cannot be secured without Ukraine's voice in the negotiations, and must comply with international law and Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. They plan to call Trump on Aug. 13 to sway him ahead of his summit in Alaska on Aug. 15 with Putin, and they have praised the U.S. president's peace efforts, if not every idea he has floated for getting there. "An imitated rather than genuine peace will not hold for long and will only encourage Russia to seize even more territory," Zelenskyy said in a statement on Aug. 12 after a phone call with Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan, who has hosted previous talks between Ukrainian and Russian leaders. Russia advances in Eastern Ukraine Ukraine faces a shortage of soldiers after Russia invaded more than three years ago, easing the path for the latest Russian advances. "This breakthrough is like a gift to Putin and Trump during the negotiations," said Sergei Markov, a former Kremlin adviser, suggesting it could increase pressure on Ukraine to yield territory under any deal. Ukraine's military meanwhile said it had retaken two villages in the eastern region of Sumy on Aug. 11, part of a small reversal in more than a year of slow, attritional Russian gains in the southeast. More: Putin stalls. Trump changes his mind. Ukraine targets Moscow. Latest on the war. Russia, which launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, has mounted a new offensive this year in Sumy after Putin demanded a "buffer zone" there. Ukraine and its European allies fear that Trump, keen to claim credit for making peace and seal new business deals with Russia's government, will end up rewarding Putin for his 11 years spent in efforts to seize Ukrainian territory, the last three in open warfare. Europeans link Ukraine to their own security More: President Trump says Zelenskyy should not target Moscow with strikes European leaders have said Ukraine must be capable of defending itself if peace and security is to be guaranteed on the continent, and that they are ready to contribute further. "Ukraine cannot lose this war and nobody has the right to pressure Ukraine into making territorial or other concessions, or making decisions that smack of capitulation," Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said at a government meeting. "I hope we can convince President Trump about the European position." Zelenskyy has said he and European leaders "all support President Trump's determination." Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Putin's principal ally in Europe, was the only leader not to join the EU's statement of unity, and mocked his counterparts. "The fact that the EU was left on the sidelines is sad enough as it is," he said. "The only thing that could make things worse is if we started providing instructions from the bench." Trump had been recently hardening his stance towards Russia, agreeing to send more U.S. weapons to Ukraine and threatening hefty trade tariffs on buyers of Russian oil in an ultimatum that has now lapsed. Even so, the prospect of Trump hosting Putin on U.S. soil for the first U.S.-Russia summit since 2021 has revived fears that he might put narrow U.S. interests ahead of the security of European allies or broader geopolitics.
