Amid BLACKPINK's over-priced tour; YG Entertainment's Yang Hyun Suk sentenced to 6 months in prison
BLACKPINK's DEADLINE World tour marred by criticism
Their return as a group after solo activities has been welcomed with widespread excitement, but they have also be receiving a lot of criticism. Fans have complained about high ticket prices, questionable tour logistics, and YG's continuous mismanagement. Jennie, in particular, has received online criticism for what some have dubbed "lazy dancing," reigniting questions over the group's performance standards and agency management.
Yang Hyun Suk convicted by Supreme Court
Adding to the turmoil, Yang Hyun Suk, the executive producer of YG Entertainment, is now facing criminal accusations. On July 17, South Korea's Supreme Court (1st Division, Chief Justice Ma Yong-joo) upheld a previous ruling that sentenced Yang to 6 months in jail with a one-year suspended sentence. The charges are based on coercion under the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes Act.
Yang Hyun Suk's allegation dates back to 2016
The incident occurred in August 2016, when a former YG trainee known as "A" was detained for drug-related charges. During the investigation, "A" revealed that former iKON member B.I (Kim Han-bin) was also involved in illegal drug operations. Prosecutors said that Yang attempted to quiet the witness by threatening and coercing "A" to retract the testimony. Yang was indicted in May 2020 but was not detained.
Trial timeline and verdicts
First Trial (December 2022): Yang was acquitted due to "insufficient evidence" of direct harm to the victim.
Second Trial (November 2023): Yang was found guilty of coercing meetings - though still acquitted of "coercive threats" - and was sentenced to 6 months in prison with a 1-year suspended sentence.
The court emphasized the power imbalance, noting that Yang's status and the setting made the meetings inherently coercive. Despite Yang's appeal, the Supreme Court upheld the second trial's decision, stating there were no legal flaws in the ruling.
Yang Hyun Suk responds to final verdict
Following the Supreme Court's decision, Yang Hyun Suk released an official statement via YG Entertainment:
"Although I am disappointed by the Supreme Court's ruling, I humbly accept the decision. While I was acquitted of the initial charge of 'retaliatory threats' in both the first and second trials, the prosecution changed the indictment during the second trial to the unfamiliar charge of 'coercion of an interview.' After a long legal battle lasting five years and eight months, I have now received the Supreme Court's final verdict. From now on, I will devote myself to my duties with even greater caution and a stronger sense of responsibility. Thank you."
Spotlight turns to YG once again
Yang's legal issues have brought attention to the company's history of scandals and internal mismanagement, even though the groups under them are still adored throughout the world. It remains to be seen whether these incidents will impact BLACKPINK's tour or the agency's reputation in the long run.
For all the latest K-drama, K-pop, and Hallyuwood updates, keep following our coverage here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
Supreme Court Issues Notice To Assam Chief Secretary Over Goalpara Demolition Drive
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice on a plea seeking contempt action against the Assam Chief Secretary and other officials for allegedly conducting a mass eviction and demolition drive in Goalpara's Hasila Beel in violation of the apex court guidelines. A bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, sought responses of Chief Secretary Ravi Kota, Principal Secretary, Revenue & Disaster Management Department, Gyanendra Dev Tripathi, Goalpara's District Commissioner Khanindra Choudhury, Goalpara's Superintendent of Police Nabaneet Mahanta, and other officials in the matter. "Issue notice, returnable in two weeks. [P]ersonal presence of the alleged contemnnor(s) is dispensed with, until further orders," ordered the Bench, also comprising Justice K. Vinod Chandran. As per the plea, filed through advocate Adeel Ahmed, no sufficient time or any opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners and in an "arbitrary and high-handed manner" a notice was issued to remove their houses, structures, shops, buildings and crops within two days. "The houses, crops, properties, belongings, etc. of the petitioners and other similarly situated persons have all been demolished in the eviction and demolition exercise." The petitioners, claiming to be landless, said that their forefathers had to settle in the Hasila Beel revenue village of Balijana Revenue Circle about 50 to 60 years ago after losing their houses and land due to the riverbank erosion of the river Brahmaputra. The plea said that the eviction and demolition exercise was carried out without granting a personal hearing and without providing adequate time for appeal or judicial review, in blatant violation of the guidelines issued in the case titled "In Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of structures". In November last year, a bench of then Justice Gavai and Justice K.V. Viswanathan laid down pan-India directives governing demolitions of unauthorised structures. The top court had cautioned that flouting its directions by state authorities will result in criminal contempt and prosecution. Issuing a slew of directions under Article 142 of the Constitution, the apex court said that no demolition will be carried out without a prior show-cause notice. It added that the demolition order will not be implemented for a period of 15 days and will be displayed on a designated digital portal to be maintained by every municipal and local authority. The Supreme Court had clarified that its directions will not be applicable if there is an unauthorised structure in any public place, such as a road, street, footpath, abutting railway line or any river body or water bodies and also to cases where there is an order for demolition made by a court of law.
Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Freed after 19 years, India train blast accused look to rebuild lives
Nearly two decades lost, a family fractured and a city still without closure the scars of the 2006 Mumbai train bombings remain, even as the men once blamed for the deadly attacks walk free. Freed after 19 years, India train blast accused look to rebuild lives After 19 years behind bars, Mohammad Sajid Margub Ansari can finally hold his daughter in his arms. Ansari, now 48, was one of 12 men convicted in 2015 for murder, conspiracy and waging war against India over the 2006 train blasts. The evening rush-hour attacks, carried out with pressure-cooker bombs hidden in bags beneath newspapers and umbrellas, killed 187 people and wounded hundreds more. Five of the accused were sentenced to death, while the other seven including Ansari were given life imprisonment. At the time of the blasts, Ansari was just 29, running a modest mobile and computer repair shop. He was arrested soon after the explosions, reportedly accused of assembling the bombs and sheltering two Pakistani nationals. But this week, a two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court overturned the convictions, ruling that the prosecution had "utterly failed" to prove the men were responsible. The prosecution appealed to the Supreme Court to halt their release, but it declined to intervene. "It feels amazing to be free," Ansari told AFP. "We are innocent." Freedom, however, feels bittersweet for Ansari. "My whole youth is gone. My family had to face financial troubles," he said. His wife was pregnant when Ansari was arrested, leaving him to miss his daughter's entire childhood. In her early years, she wouldn't even come near him. "As a dad that felt terrible, that I could not hold my own daughter," he said. "I used to feel very helpless and think why do we have to go through all this when I am innocent." The 2006 attacks were initially blamed on the Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, although a little-known outfit, Lashkar-e-Qahhar, later claimed responsibility. Pakistan denied the allegations. For survivor Chirag Chauhan, who was paralysed from the waist down in one of the blasts, the acquittal of the men felt like being dragged "back to square one". "We don't know what to do and where to start from. The entire system is hopeless," he told AFP. In 2006, Chauhan, now 40, was returning home from chartered accountancy training when the train he boarded was hit by an explosion. Prosecutors said the explosives were deliberately placed in first-class coaches to target the city's wealthy Gujarati community. They also said the bombings were intended as revenge for riots in the western state of Gujarat in 2002, which left around 2,000 people dead, most of them Muslims. A spinal cord injury left Chauhan requiring the use of a wheelchair. "After 19 years if the accused are let free, who carried out the blasts then?" he asked. But he also said there should be a "fair investigation", noting that the now freed men could have been framed. "All are equally to be blamed, the judiciary, the investigative agencies, everyone," he said. For Ansari, his years behind bars demand more than an acquittal. "The agencies should be ashamed of what they did and should definitely apologise to us," he said. While his old mobile and computer repair shop is no longer an employment option, given the advances in technology since he was imprisoned, Ansari is aiming to rebuild his life. He plans to finish the undergraduate law degree which he enrolled in while in prison. "I hope to put it to good use," he said. asv-ash/abh/cdl/sco This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
India Today
37 minutes ago
- India Today
Supreme Court slams Karnataka High Court over bail actor Darshan
The Supreme Court has strongly criticised the Karnataka High Court for granting bail to Kannada actor Darshan in the Renuka Swami murder case, highlighting a stark disparity in justice. The apex court questioned the High Court's handling of the matter, with one justice stating, "What's troubling us is the approach of the High Court!" The top court observed it was a "perverse exercise of discretion" for the High Court to delve into the merits of the evidence at a bail stage. This development comes after Darshan, accused of a brutal murder, was granted regular bail in December 2024, partly on medical grounds, despite later travelling abroad for a film shoot. The Supreme Court has now reserved its order on the Karnataka government's plea to cancel the bail, raising serious questions about influence and judicial impartiality.
