How to get a $500 Georgia Tax Rebate Check
Some good news could be coming to your mailbox or via direct deposit this week.
The Georgia Department of Revenue announced this week that it will begin issuing $500 rebate checks to all eligible taxpayers in the state.
Gov. Brian Kemp announced his intention to issue a rebate back in April when he signed House Bill 112 into law. This is the third time that Georgia has issued a tax rebate, with the previous amounts being released in 2022 and 2023. The $1 billion rebate comes as a result of the $16 billion surplus Georgia announced at the end of fiscal year 2024.
$250 for individuals filing as single or married filing separately
$375 for those filing as head of household
$500 for couples filing jointly
Taxpayer must have filed Georgia income tax returns for both 2023 and 2024
Taxpayer may not be claimed as a dependent on someone else's 2023 return
Taxpayer must be a full-time Georgia resident for tax purposes
If a taxpayer is set up to get their refunds through direct deposit, the money will be wired into their bank account. If a taxpayer directed their refund to be sent through the mail, a physical check will be issued.
The Georgia Department of Revenue began issuing the surplus rebate checks in late May.
According to House Bill 112, refunds are not taxable for Georgia individual income tax purposes but could be taxable on federal returns.
'Our Department is ready to get this third round of refunds out the door efficiently and securely,' said State Revenue Commissioner Frank O'Connell. 'We appreciate the continued partnership with the Governor and the General Assembly in making this happen.'
According to a press release from the Department of Revenue, taxpayers can check their eligibility using the Surplus Tax Refund Eligibility Tool, available through the Georgia Tax Center, by inputting their tax year, Social Security Number or Tax Identification Number, and Federal Adjusted Gross Income.
For more details on the 2025 tax rebate distribution and to track the status of your rebate check, visit: https://dor.georgia.gov/georgia-surplus-tax-refund.
The post How to get a $500 Georgia Tax Rebate Check appeared first on Capital B News - Atlanta.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump asks Supreme Court to green light Education Department firings
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to give the go-ahead to carry out a plan to fire almost 40 percent of the Education Department's workforce. In an emergency appeal filed Friday morning, Solicitor General John Sauer asked the high court to lift a preliminary injunction a federal judge in Boston issued last month after determining that such sweeping staffing cuts would cripple the agency's ability to carry out functions assigned to it by Congress. While Trump has vowed to eliminate the Education Department, Sauer insisted that the proposed, wide-ranging reductions in force target 'inefficiency' and are not an attempt to kneecap the agency as the president advocates for its demise. Sauer said Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's order was part of a pattern of federal judges overstepping their proper role and second-guessing executive branch decisions. The Constitution 'does not empower district courts to presume that all 1,400 employees must be reinstated to their previous jobs and functions based on anecdotal speculation about impairment of some of the Department's services,' Sauer wrote, adding: 'The Department remains committed to implementing its statutorily mandated functions.' Joun issued the injunction May 22 in connection with lawsuits brought by Democratic-led states, the Somerville, Massachusetts, public school system and several labor unions. Noting that Trump has repeatedly vowed to shutter the Education Department 'immediately,' the Biden appointee concluded that the layoffs amounted to 'an attempt … to shut down the Department without Congressional approval.' The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Joun's order, although the administration's appeal remains pending. In April, the Supreme Court stepped in at the administration's request to block an order Joun issued in a separate lawsuit involving the Education Department. That directive required the agency to keep funding certain teaching-related grants that Trump appointees had sought to terminate. Four of the high court's nine justices dissented from the stay blocking Joun's order in that case. In an emergency appeal already pending at the Supreme Court, the Trump administration is trying to lift a block a federal judge in San Francisco issued on tens of thousands of layoffs at all major federal agencies except for the Education Department.
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Trump asks Supreme Court to green light Education Department firings
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to give the go-ahead to carry out a plan to fire almost 40 percent of the Education Department's workforce. In an emergency appeal filed Friday morning, Solicitor General John Sauer asked the high court to lift a preliminary injunction a federal judge in Boston issued last month after determining that such sweeping staffing cuts would cripple the agency's ability to carry out functions assigned to it by Congress. While Trump has vowed to eliminate the Education Department, Sauer insisted that the proposed, wide-ranging reductions in force target 'inefficiency' and are not an attempt to kneecap the agency as the president advocates for its demise. Sauer said Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's order was part of a pattern of federal judges overstepping their proper role and second-guessing executive branch decisions. The Constitution 'does not empower district courts to presume that all 1,400 employees must be reinstated to their previous jobs and functions based on anecdotal speculation about impairment of some of the Department's services,' Sauer wrote, adding: 'The Department remains committed to implementing its statutorily mandated functions.' Joun issued the injunction May 22 in connection with lawsuits brought by Democratic-led states, the Somerville, Massachusetts, public school system and several labor unions. Noting that Trump has repeatedly vowed to shutter the Education Department 'immediately,' the Biden appointee concluded that the layoffs amounted to 'an attempt … to shut down the Department without Congressional approval.' The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Joun's order, although the administration's appeal remains pending. In April, the Supreme Court stepped in at the administration's request to block an order Joun issued in a separate lawsuit involving the Education Department. That directive required the agency to keep funding certain teaching-related grants that Trump appointees had sought to terminate. Four of the high court's nine justices dissented from the stay blocking Joun's order in that case. In an emergency appeal already pending at the Supreme Court, the Trump administration is trying to lift a block a federal judge in San Francisco issued on tens of thousands of layoffs at all major federal agencies except for the Education Department.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Afghan Allies Left Behind as Trump Administration Ends Resettlement Programs and Issues Travel Ban
Last week, the Trump administration eliminated the Congressionally mandated entity that oversees vetted Afghan allies' travel to the U.S. and stated that it will dismantle the program that oversees their resettlement, continuing the series of blows dealt to our Afghan allies since January 20. In a document sent by the State Department to multiple Congressional Committees on May 29, the Department announced that "the Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts (CARE) Office will be eliminated and its functions will be realigned to the Afghanistan Affairs Office." The decision angered Rep. Dina Titus (D–Nev.), sponsor of the CARE Authorization Act, which passed with bipartisan support in November 2024. The act states that the Secretary of State "shall appoint" a coordinator for a term of three years to assist in relocating and resettling "eligible Afghan allies," facilitating the relocation of American citizens or legal permanent residents, and coordinating with the interagency. On May 29, Titus shared a video on X of a question she asked of Secretary of State Marco Rubio only a week earlier, as he came before the House Foreign Affairs Committee. "We are going to continue with this Afghan relocation…this CARE office, is what you're committing to me?" Titus asks. "We're going to comply with the statutory requirements," Rubio replies. "Clearly, he lied," Titus commented. Two days later, the White House's Technical Supplement to the 2026 Budget included notice that the government will soon terminate the Enduring Welcome program, "the U.S. Government's long-term resettlement program which relies on standard immigration pathways for immigrant visa, Afghan Special Immigrant Visa, and refugee admissions programs." "The Department will shut down the Enduring Welcome program by the end of FY 2025," the document explains. With no additional funds for the program, the document states that "any remaining prior-year balances will be used solely to finalize contractual and/or other legal obligations." I asked the State Department whether CARE will recommence funding travel for vetted allies prior to its July 1 sundown date, and whether the Trump administration has made a final decision about the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), the 90-day suspension and review of which was meant to end on April 20. I received no response. On June 4, days after announcing the sunset of the systems that assist our allies, the Trump administration announced via executive order that it will ban travel for nationals of 12 countries, including Afghanistan. There are exceptions for Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) applicants, and the executive order states that it does not "limit the ability of an individual to seek asylum, refugee status, withholding of removal, or protection under the [Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment of Punishment]." Shawn VanDiver, president of the nonprofit #AfghanEvac, said the exemption for SIV applicants is "functionally useless" given that CARE and Enduring Welcome no longer exist to help with resettlement and travel. According to VanDiver, the order blocks some family reunification programs, eliminates student visas for Afghans, and "does nothing to help our allies, including the family of active duty U.S. military service members stranded" in third countries. The nonprofit No One Left Behind expressed gratitude for the SIV exemption in a press release but noted that the order does not protect Afghans "who were injured in the line of duty and were unable to complete a full year of service" or "the women and men of the Afghan National Army who trained and served with U.S. Special Forces," among others. Advocates, such as veteran Elizabeth Lynn, director of government affairs at the nonprofit evacuation organization Operation Recovery, are concerned about the developments. "It is as if the chaos of the withdrawal in 2021 continues and our allies are not just being left behind but dumped. Ending both Enduring Welcome and CARE places this administration at the epicenter of the chaos," Lynn said. "Essentially stranding our allies across the globe while potentially deporting them from the United States," is something Lynn said veterans and "people around the world will remember." Multiple Afghans, all of whom spoke on condition of anonymity, explained the impact these decisions have had on them. Ahmad, who has been waiting on a Priority-1 referral to the USRAP due to his work with the Ministry of Interior, has been living in Camp As Sayliyah in Qatar for nine months. He says that the elimination of CARE has increased his "stress and sadness" as "CARE was a vital source of support, hope, and guidance for us during such a difficult time." Ahmad reports that camp life "has become more unstable" as families have "started to lose hope about relocating to the U.S." "Personally, my 206 bones have pain from inside," Ahmad said, though he said he tries "to hold on to hope." Feroza said that "living in Afghanistan is [a] nightmare as a girl who worked with USA government [sic]." Though it feels that "they left us behind and totally forget us [sic]," she implores the U.S. to relocate its allies to countries friendly to Afghan women if it will not help them directly. Masud says that his "adorable" son perished of cerebral palsy while he underwent USRAP processing in Pakistan because he "wasn't able to help him with proper medical care and treatment due to our refugee status" and a lack of funds. Awaiting word about the USRAP, Masud says he is "devastated." Nasir, another USRAP applicant, says he faced "extremely difficult conditions" once he made the difficult decision to relocate to Pakistan on the U.S. government's advice after working for several years on projects supported by the U.S. Embassy in Kabul and the U.S. Agency for International Development. After selling his Kabul home "for half its value," Nasir says he "faced three years of hardship and instability," including a lack of employment and education for his two children, and a "constant fear of deportation." Though his case was in its final stages and he was set to travel to the U.S. within two weeks of the January suspension of USRAP, Nasir says he is now "trapped in limbo." The post U.S. Abandons Afghan Allies as Trump Administration Shuts Down Resettlement Programs appeared first on
