
How Emma Hayes is fortifying the pathway from the under-23s to the senior USWNT squad
During an under-23 U.S. women's national team game against Germany on May 30, 18-year-old center-back Jordyn Bugg launched a long shot of a cross in the waning seconds of stoppage time. The ball landed just in time for Evelyn Shores to run onto and score past Germany's goalkeeper, giving the U.S. a 2-1 lead and dramatic victory in a small stadium just outside of Stuttgart.
Advertisement
Less than one month later, in Commerce City, Colorado, Bugg found herself replacing Naomi Girma as a substitute in the senior USWNT's meeting with the Republic of Ireland. By the time she entered the field in the 73rd minute, the U.S. held a commanding 3-0 lead; Bugg's assignment was to maintain the U.S.'s grip on the game.
'Honestly, I was a little nervous coming into the game, but I came in a time where it was really calm in the game and the information they gave me was just be calm, be yourself, just keep the game in the flow it is in,' Bugg told the media following Thursday's match, which ended 4-0. 'I think I did a really good job and I think they prepared me very well.'
Under USWNT head coach Emma Hayes, life can come fast at a deserving player. Since stepping into her role just over a year ago, the former Chelsea manager has reorganized and fortified the talent pipeline of the women's national team — not only the senior side, but the under-23s — with a militancy never before seen on the women's side of U.S. soccer's ranks.
Hayes has said repeatedly that everything players do counts toward their invitations to camp, from club play to international performances at any given level. Joining Bugg in senior camp during this window are 21-year-old defender Lilly Reale, 23-year-old midfielder Sam Meza, and 24-year-old goalkeeper Angelina Anderson, who recorded a shutout on Sunday — all of whom were on the field for that under-23 win over Germany. (Per an agreement between U.S. Soccer and the German federation, each team was allowed to bring five over-age players to camp.)
The intention behind Hayes' strategy is to shrink the gaps she's identified between age groups within the national team setup, and also those that exist between those who typically start on the senior team and those who come off the bench. When Hayes first took the helm of the program, she admittedly pumped players with information in order to prepare them for Olympic competition. With that gold medal secured, she turned her sights to development and preparation for the World Cup, two different yet interrelated mandates. With the information logged and dispensed through both teams, Hayes is now focused on exposing players to a range of experiences.
Advertisement
In Colorado, the under-23s and senior team trained side by side. Ahead of Thursday night's game, Hayes reflected on how much the programs have changed with her new approach.
'Everything is earned, and the beautiful thing about where we are is I stood on the field yesterday with our team and thought, 'We've got top quality out here. We've got top quality at home, and there are too many to name. We've got top quality on the field next to us, who are watching and aspiring up, and we've got all of our players looking back and saying, 'Gosh, I've got such great memories,'' she said of the dual training groups. 'But also, our senior players talk about how important the under-23s program is. They felt it was a missing gap for lots of them.'
Hayes was always obliged to strengthen her bench of senior players, if only to be able to respond to the inevitable absences that affect any elite athlete, from injuries to pregnancies to retirement. Triple Espresso, the superlative attacking trio of Mallory Swanson, Sophia Wilson, and Trinity Rodman, have collectively been missing in action since the start of this calendar year: Swanson and Wilson are pregnant and Rodman has taken an extended break to manage issues with her back. On the other side of the pitch, USWNT goalkeeper Alyssa Naeher announced her retirement from international soccer last November, throwing open the gates to the team's next No. 1 and exposing the lack of a clear pathway for qualified goalkeepers.
The first definitive step took place in January when Hayes selected 24 players for the inaugural Futures Camp run by her and her staff, along with all U.S. Youth National Team head coaches. The roster consisted of 14 professional players — including Bugg and Reale, along with Gisele Thompson, Claire Hutton, Michelle Cooper, and Avery Patterson, who also made the current senior team squad — and was described by Hayes as an opportunity to take a look at some newer faces who will soon by vying for spots on the senior team.
'It's a significant jump from college to the pro game and an even bigger jump to the elite international level, but we will be patient with all these players as we understand the process and want to help all of them reach their maximum potential,' she said at the time.
Another international window opened three months later and U.S. Soccer announced a 24-player roster for the under-23 camp, who trained alongside the senior team in Southern California as the latter geared up for a pair of matches against Brazil. Of the players named, 11 participated in Futures Camp, with Patterson, Hutton, and Cooper making their way straight onto the senior team. The U.S. split results across two legs against the 2024 Summer Olympic silver medalists in April.
Advertisement
Patterson's foray onto the senior team began with a bizarre elevator incident in which she got stuck between floors with defenders Alanna Cook and Becky Sauerbrunn during their time in LA. She's since earned five caps and scored a goal for the U.S.
'It's been a whirlwind,' Patterson said of her ascent on the USWNT following the team's first match against Ireland. 'That elevator incident seems like it was a year ago, like how much I've grown as a player and person. I'm speechless, honestly, because it's crazy how much has happened in the past couple of months and has had such a positive impact on my life.'
And while the linear nature of the under-23 and senior USWNT teams suggests a unidirectional pathway, Hayes has again usurped the norm. She's shown that she sees the two groups as fluid spheres, which grants her the flexibility, wherever possible, to respond to changes in real time when a player experiences a dip in form or another is playing beyond their age and could benefit from time with a different team in camp, for example. That was how Hayes explained the absences of forwards Jaedyn Shaw and Mia Fishel, and midfielder Korbin Albert, all of whom have USWNT caps, from senior camp, and their inclusion on the under-23 roster that was announced on May 21 ahead of their two games against Germany.
'Yes, (Fishel) could come in and sit on the bench for (the senior team), but it's much better for her to go and play in Germany and get the experiences so that these players are tracking to compete in the place that we want them come 2027,' Hayes said following the announcement. 'I think the trip to Germany for her, plus Jaedyn, plus Korbin, will be, again, another step in their development.'
That three senior-capped players teamed up with uncapped players and Hayes selected the latter for the current camp speaks volumes about the relatively blank slate with which she assesses players; senior caps alone aren't enough to justify a new invitation under her strategy. And because the under-23 camps are run in concert with the senior team, younger players are now receiving guidance they say has eased the transition from one team to another.
'The system that Emma's pushing right now is definitely one that takes some time to learn and feel comfortable in,' said Reale, who earned her first cap and start for the USWNT on Thursday against Ireland and assisted Alyssa Thompson for the team's fourth goal of the night.
'That time with the under-23s was an awesome opportunity to establish myself and try to figure out where I fit into that system, not only get some games and just play against some high level competition, but also just apply some of the things that Emma has been teaching us and wants to see more of so that we can fit into that system at the higher level,' Reale added.
Advertisement
Between the presence of Hayes and her coaching staff at previous under-23 camps and their close communication with the under-23 coaches about the team's standards and expectations, 'we were able to coordinate and learn and grow throughout that camp,' she explained.
Hayes has continually emphasized the importance of international experience against top-ranked opponents to a successful national team career, which typically happens at the youth level. But given the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and its unprecedented setbacks, she appears to also be accounting for that stolen time when granting younger or inexperienced players looks at the senior level.
Meza, who started in the second USWNT match against Ireland on Sunday, has won Concacaf titles at the under-15, under-17, and under-20 levels. Her journey on the national team was cut short during the pandemic, which saw the cancellation of the Under-20 Women's World Cup that year, a tournament in which Meza was likely to play. But after establishing herself as a pro, first with the Dallas Trinity in the USL-W (where she was playing on loan from the Seattle Reign) and then back with her home club, she caught Hayes' eye and worked her way back into camps.
'I've grown up in the U.S. youth system, and my cycle of under-23s kind of got canceled a little bit, so I hadn't been to camp in a while,' Meza said on Thursday. She called the pair of Germany games 'really good exposure, and then, as we know, the under-23s are being used in a great way. I think it's going to benefit the U.S. in general. We have so many talented players, and to be able to harness and use those players in the right way is just going to be so beautiful.'
It also helps that each of the previously uncapped under-23 players in this window — Bugg, Meza, Reale, and Anderson — have all had strong starts to their NWSL seasons, which Hayes says she follows closely. Bugg has started each of Seattle Reign's 13 games, notched two goals, and intercepted an average of 1.73 passes per 90 minutes; Meza has recorded two assists for the same club and averages 4.7 tackles and 2.7 blocks per game; and Reale has shone at NJ/NY Gotham FC with a goal and an assist, with an average of 3.1 tackles each game. Anderson, meanwhile, has a 67.7 per cent save percentage and has an average of 1.54 actions taken outside the penalty area each game, per FBref.
As Hayes continues to fold younger and less experienced players into the USWNT, though, she is steadfast about her other values for individual player development: pacing and timing.
She described Bugg, who played the entirety of the second U.S. match against Ireland on Sunday, a 'superb football player,' but was also candid about her path and the possibilities for her growth.
Advertisement
'I don't know whether she will be a candidate for 2027,' Hayes said, referring to the roster for the next Women's World Cup in Brazil. 'But she will be for (the) 2028 (Olympics) and 2031 (World Cup), so a call up to the national team now, maybe a move back to under-23s in October, ideally a World Cup for the under-20s next September, this is the type of individual player development you have to get right.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Players' union urges FIFA to scrap early kick-offs at ‘extremely high risk' World Cup venues
Football's global players union has urged FIFA to abandon plans for midday and afternoon kick-offs to avoid the heat in three 'extremely high risk' venues at next summer's World Cup. A report by FIFPRO, which represents more than 70,000 professional players worldwide, identified Kansas City and Miami, along with Monterrey in Mexico, as cities that carried 'extremely high risk' of heat-stress injury if World Cup matches are played in the afternoon. Advertisement Atlanta, Dallas and Houston were also identified in that category due to high temperatures and humidity, but FIFPRO expects retractable roofs and climate-control technology to be used there to reduce the risk to players and spectators. Another five World Cup host cities were cited as 'very high risk' (Boston, Philadelphia and Guadalajara) or 'high risk' (Los Angeles and New York/New Jersey). Only San Francisco and Vancouver were classed as 'low risk'. Weather conditions have disrupted this summer's Club World Cup in the U.S., with FIFPRO saying that the matches between Chelsea and Esperance de Tunis, and Paris Saint-Germain and Atletico Madrid, should not have been allowed to kick off in such extreme heat in Los Angeles at midday local time. FIFPRO has made representations to FIFA about kick-off times, but the union's leadership fears 'commercial interests' — driven by a pressure to satisfy a huge global TV audience, particularly in Europe and Asia — will hold sway in some cases. Professor Dr Vincent Gouttebarge, FIFPRO's medical director, told reporters on a Zoom call on Monday: 'From our research, a couple of cities and some matches on the ongoing Club World Cup can be labelled as having a higher risk for heat-related illness, or, in the worst case, extreme high risk for heat related illness. 'There are certain areas in a country that will be more at risk. So think about match destinations such as Orlando or Miami, for example, where you can see over a period of years that there's a higher risk attached to these venues and destinations. 'The question is, if we look at match scheduling and match planning ahead of the tournament, if we actually need midday kick-off times in these locations or in these high-risk areas — if we should probably move towards late kick-off times as a preferences for these venues.' Advertisement FIFPRO general secretary Alex Phillips said some of its recommendations for the Club World Cup had been taken on board by FIFA, but others — including around kick-off times — had been rejected. FIFA is due to settle on its match schedule for the World Cup after the draw for the finals is made in December. There will be further conversations with FIFPRO over the months ahead, but the union says its powers are limited. 'I think based on this experience (of the Club World Cup), it (FIFA) is likely to be more flexible, but we have absolutely no power to force them to,' Philips said. 'We can only use informal pressure and good argumentation. We don't really have any coercive right. 'FIFA have actually modified how they've been dealing with heat during the (Club World Cup) matches, based on the FIFPRO outfit. Obviously it would have been if that had happened in advance, but it's better than they have adapted and they've put in place various different mitigation measures. There's additional water around the pitch, towels and so on.' Dr Gouttebarge said one proposal being trialled is the extension of the half-time break — from 15 to 20 minutes — to help players hydrate and cool down. He also proposed shorter but more frequent in-game cooling breaks, suggesting that the three-minute break used at the Club World Cup (generally at 30 and 75 minutes) are less beneficial. ()
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Playing at the Club World Cup could eventually take a toll on the Manchester City squad
Manchester City have been busy preparing for their FIFA Club World Cup round of 16 clash with Al Hilal. Tomorrow morning's match against the Saudi Pro League side is the first step in City's bid to progress through the knockout stages of the competition. But heading into the match questions about what toll playing in the competition will have on the Manchester City squad have arisen. There is no doubt that a toll will have to be paid for City's participation in a tournament in the American summer heat. But when it comes is anybody's guess. Pep Guardiola has spoken of what may come later in the season for his Manchester City squad. Speaking ahead of Manchester City's round of 16 clash with Al Hilal, Pep Guardiola was asked about the potential toll playing in the FIFA Club World Cup may have on his squad. Guardiola explained that the competition is a key part of helping his team restore their belief and confidence. He added that there may be a physical price to be paid for his team's participation in the tournament. Guardiola explained: 'I want them to feel that this is our path again to be competitive like we have been in eight of the last nine years. After this, let's see what happens. Let's see what happens after the final. We will rest for the time the Premier League allow us.' Advertisement 'Maybe in November, December or January, it will be a disaster, we are exhausted, and the World Cup has destroyed us. I don't know, it's the first time in our lives that this has happened. We will see when we come back.' Time will tell if there is a price to be paid for Manchester City's involvement in the FIFA Club World Cup. There's no way of knowing what the toll of playing in the FIFA Club World Cup will be for the Manchester City squad. That won't reveal itself until the 25/26 season is well and truly underway. Perhaps there will be a physical price to pay for Manchester City's involvement in the competition. Potentially playing seven games in the American summer heat may become a bridge too far for Pep Guardiola's squad. But that bridge can only be crossed when it is met. That's the reality of the situation in front of the Manchester City squad. For now, all that matters for Pep Guardiola's squad is tomorrow morning's match against Al Hilal. Manchester City will be hoping to pick up a victory to progress to the quarter-final stage of the Club World Cup. That's the next obstacle in front of Pep Guardiola's side. What may come months down the track will be dealt with then. There is nothing to be gained from dwelling on what hasn't occurred just yet. Or what may not come at all for the Manchester City squad if they're lucky.


New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
Will Canada learn from a total Gold Cup failure, or just keep talking a big game?
As Jesse Marsch was questioned on whether Canada's relentless style of play would work throughout the Gold Cup and what exactly his Plan B was if things went belly up, Canada's head coach did as he does. He punched back. 'Plan B is a typical question from English people,' Marsch replied to the English media member. 'As managers, we have Plan A, Plan B, Plan C, Plan D, all the way up to Plan double Z. So by trying to simplify us as one thing, I think it's a little bit insulting to me and to the team.' Advertisement Marsch meant to inject his team with confidence. Seated beside him, defender Richie Laryea's prideful smile suggested it worked. The problem? As the Gold Cup played out, none of Marsch's plans worked nearly as well. Canada crashed unceremoniously out of a second tournament in a row, this time with a humbling and embarrassing Gold Cup quarterfinal defeat to Guatemala on penalties Sunday in Minnesota. Canada has risen to 30th in the world according to FIFA's rankings, the highest in program history. You need to open a secondary page on FIFA's rankings site to find Guatemala, all the way down at 106. Considering the end result – and it following a draw vs. 90th-ranked Curaçao and an unconvincing win over nine-man and 81st-ranked El Salvador – Canada's Gold Cup was an abject failure. Outside of performances from stars such as Jonathan David and Tajon Buchanan and the development of a small handful of young players, it's a failure that deserves to be worn by the entire organization. Last year's Copa América run suggested Canada under Marsch was going to be different. One year later, it feels an awful lot like more of the same old Canada. Marsch's men remain eager to prove they can hang with the world's best. Instead, outward displays of confidence were followed by poor game management, questionable squad use and repeated errors that would crush any tournament team. Forget the world's best. Canada struggled to navigate through Concacaf's middle of the pack. As a result, they raised questions about whether they're ready to contend at the World Cup. For all of Marsch's unyielding public comments, the men's national team appears to have learned little from John Herdman's tournament-defining 'We're going to F- Croatia' remark in 2022. It's more of the same: too much emotion, not enough results. You can't continue to talk a game as big as the country itself, until the players show they're ready to follow suit on the pitch. Advertisement Canada might be different under the current regime, but is it truly better off? Not yet. And right now, it's in danger of losing so much of the goodwill Marsch has built up over that past year. The approach has to be adjusted. 'I still felt really strongly that this was a really good group, and it was really important to develop more players with this team and see how far we can push it,' Marsch said. The justifiable expectations of this team are far too high to cite individual player development as a reason for success in a tournament. These are expectations the team has invited. 'We want to win the World Cup,' Marsch said earlier in the month. You can downplay results if the performances themselves were admirable. But strip away the veneer of development and growth? Canada hasn't put up commendable performances in games that truly matter in a year. They were lacking in cunning and experience with its game management against Mexico in the Nations League semifinals in March, going down a goal in the opening minute. Marsch made poor tactical and game-management choices against Guatemala. Individual errors from his players didn't help matters, either. If Marsch wants to mold this team in his image, which so many coaches do, he has to understand that with relentlessness comes errors. Jacob Shaffelburg's two yellow cards weren't tactical in any sort. They were a byproduct of a player not knowing when to hit the gas and when to hit the brakes. 'Moments change matches, and the double yellow right before half obviously then changes the match. So it's frustrating. I don't think the first (yellow card) on Shaffelburg is a yellow. I agree with the second one, but not the first one,' Marsch said. Marsch has taken aim at Concacaf and its officials plenty – he was suspended for the first two games of the Gold Cup as a result – and there may be validity to claims that Canada has not been treated historically with the same reverence as the region's two traditional powers, the U.S. and Mexico. But Concacaf alone cannot be blamed for Canada's failure to make a final in two tournaments over the course of three months. Accountability has to play a big part, and that comes with an honest look in the mirror. Advertisement How Canada's players and coaches wear this failure will define the most important tournament in their lives next summer. Because if Marsch and Canada can't take a step back and re-evaluate how they approach tournament play, there's reason to suggest they might suffer an even more disappointing fate on home soil, on the biggest possible stage. One of Marsch's priorities with this Canada team has been coaxing more braggadocio out of this team. That space, where you can only walk with your chest puffed out to the sky, is one that Marsch occupies. A 6-0 dismantling of Honduras in the opening match made it seem like they'd be able to maintain their strut throughout the Gold Cup. Yet Canada rarely looked convincing through the following three games. Marsch's tactical plan – no variations either – never took hold. 'I told the guys, we win as a team and we lose as a team, and we learn from it and we grow and we get better. And we are fixated on exactly what it's going to take to be successful next summer,' Marsch said. It's the right message to deliver to the younger players in the group. But missing was Marsch's admission that he, too, has learning to do. Though he might want otherwise, Marsch has made himself the face of this team. He named Alphonso Davies captain before Copa América, a questionable move considering Davies hadn't been captain for club or country since he exploded as a player in 2018. Marsch then named David, an even more reticent character, captain for the Gold Cup. His goal was to transfer the balance of power to his players. But Marsch's outward charisma and penchant for making headlines with controversial statements, well, makes headlines. From the outside, the most memorable moments of Canada's long month of June include Marsch alleging that Concacaf allowed his players to be poisoned and his dig at the U.S. by pointing out how he didn't have players asking out of the Gold Cup (all while the U.S. wrestled with Christian Pulisic's summer decision). Advertisement What was missing from the headlines were Canadian results and the admission that learning has to be done. Canada deserves credit for dismantling Ukraine in a friendly, yes. Yet all month, Marsch did nothing to extricate himself from the center of the conversation. He hoped his players would take the ball and run with it. Without results, Marsch's efforts feel more like bluster than a damaging wind. Come the World Cup, Marsch has to learn the balance between sticking up for his players in public and setting them up to do their own talking on the field. As much as the greater Canadian public likely appreciate having a coach who can stand for his team, what will truly resonate next year is results. Canadians want to adore their national teams. The proof is in seeing local sports bars explode with joy when Canada's hockey team toppled the U.S. in the 4 Nations Face-Off in February. Canadians will remember that uber-likable head coach Jon Cooper didn't utter his most famous line of the tournament and after Canada earned the gold medal. 'Canada needed a win,' Cooper said, 'and the players bared that on their shoulders.' Cooper knew enough to let the results do the talking until he could follow suit. The Gold Cup proved Marsch has to approach the World Cup differently from a messaging standpoint. Otherwise, he and the federation could risk losing a nation desperate for its defining soccer moment to a global audience. On the field, the Gold Cup revealed where Canada needs to be better: the goalkeeping debate is not over and Canada's center backs didn't look capable of locking down a must-win game. Canada's midfield duo didn't break games wide open late in the tournament and no forward proved beyond a doubt they are ready to start beside David. Marsch has hard questions with a deadline to answer: June 12, 2026, the date of Canada's World Cup opener. But the questions Marsch will have to ask of himself will be the most pressing. Advertisement His game management, heavy rotation and use of substitutions at key moments in the Gold Cup all fell short. Marsch wants his players to be more crafty and in control during games. He needs to do the same. Whether using three forwards down a man and up a goal against Guatemala was part of his Plan B, C or D, it missed the mark on what the game demanded. Turning to Daniel Jebbison and Cyle Larin, both of whom have not looked in control of recent performances for Canada, to finish off a game suggests either Marsch was either out of options or didn't understand what the situation called for. It shouldn't have been trying to press forward when added defenders or midfielders might have sealed the win. There needs to be more to Marsch's team that just aggression. Heavily rotating his team throughout the group stage was a means to better understand his depth. But it also meant very few players settled into their roles come the quarterfinal. In the end, Marsch and his depth were exposed. If that happens again in a year, nearly 10 years of gradual growth in the men's program will be for nought. There's still time for change, even without a tournament between now and the World Cup. The pressure to land high-profile friendly opponents permeates throughout Canada Soccer, and facing Colombia in October fits the bill. That's when Plans E, F and G, as it were, should be revealed. What those plans look like will determine whether this Gold Cup was a harbinger for change or the precursor for Canada's worst failure of all.