logo
Slim phones with 10,000 mAh batteries are possible, but may be a bad idea

Slim phones with 10,000 mAh batteries are possible, but may be a bad idea

Phone Arena25-07-2025
If there's one shared grievance among all smartphone users, it would likely be something related to the battery. Regardless of the brand you use, chances are you'd like your phone to have a bigger, longer-lasting, and faster-charging battery. That's true for me, my friends and family, and the vast majority of people who take the time to answer our polls and participate in our discussions. Given all that, it's no surprise that whenever a smartphone with a giant battery makes the news, people get at least intrigued, if not outright excited. That's also the reason the recent rumor of a phone the size of a Galaxy S25 Ultra, but with a 10,000 mAh battery, may sound like a dream coming true. I hate being a killjoy, but if something sounds too good to be true, it usually is for a reason. I won't say that silicon batteries are a scam, but there's definitely a catch, which is why some of the biggest smartphone companies in the world avoid them.
Recently, we've seen a few Chinese manufacturers adopting silicon-carbon batteries with much higher capacities than traditional cells. Among the latest examples are the Honor X70 and Oppo K13, featuring 8,300 mAh and 7,000 mAh batteries, respectively.Such numbers are possible thanks to the updated technology of the lithium-ion batteries. In silicon-carbon batteries, the graphite anode is infused with silicone, allowing it to store more energy in the same space. In theory, the difference can reach ten times, which makes silicon batteries have a much higher energy density.
The Honor X70 has an 8,300 mAh battery | Image credit — Honor
Simply put, you get much higher capacity for a battery of the same size, which allows slim phones and foldables to have better batteries. That's the reason the Honor Magic V and Oppo Find N5 have larger batteries, despite being thinner than the Galaxy S25 Ultra . However, that achievement comes with its own problems, which are the likely reason we won't be seeing more of those batteries anytime soon.
You might have heard that there are limitations for flying with lithium-ion batteries. While the whole battery shouldn't exceed 100 Wh, there's also a 20 Wh limitation for each individual cell. If a battery exceeds that limit, it has to be treated as a dangerous good, and it wouldn't be easily allowed on airplanes. Unlike the US regulators, we usually measure the capacity of smartphone batteries in mAh. That can easily be converted to Wh, and @UniverseIce has recently done the math for some of the most popular smartphones. Here are their capacities in Wh and mAh:
You might wonder how the OnePlus 13 manages to pack a 6,000 mAh battery and pass regulatory checks. After all, its capacity puts it above the 20 Wh limit. The answer is simple and obvious in the notes on the official OnePlus 13 specs page – it adopts a dual-cell design, so each individual cell has a capacity of 3,000 mAh.The multi-cell design is also the reason you can carry your laptops and tablets on airplanes without labeling them 'dangerous goods.' But that's not the only challenge with silicon-carbon batteries.
Even if the major manufacturers follow OnePlus' example and decide to go the multi-cell way, that won't solve all issues. One of the greatest challenges that pure silicon batteries face is extreme expansion. When completely charged, the structure of a fully silicon battery can swell up to 300%, which would put mechanical stress on the battery and affect its functioning. I mean, have you ever seen a swollen battery and not worried? I haven't!
Manufacturers limit the expansion by using a silicon-carbon composite instead of pure silicon. Adding carbon helps the structural integrity, reduces swelling, and helps with other issues. For example, the low electrical conductivity of silicon can slow down charging and lead to the production of more heat, but carbon reduces these effects.
Phones with best battery life in 2025: Independent test results Essentially, the more silicon in a battery, the bigger its capacity, but the lower the longevity. The good news is that companies are working on ways to solve those issues and improve our phones' batteries. The bad news is that it'll probably take a while before we can see the results on our smartphones.I'm all in for a battery tech breakthrough that would make my phone last forever, but that's only part of the equation. More efficient chipsets and improved energy management have already boosted battery life. The next step might simply be using current tech in smarter ways.Ultimately, it's all about making a choice. On the one hand are big batteries, which may not retain much of their capacity for more than a couple of years, but will last longer during that time. On the other hand are the smaller batteries, that might need a charge more often, but will likely keep their capacity for all 7 years of software updates we get with modern devices.The choice Apple, Samsung, and Google appear to be making is a combination of safety and longevity, while some Chinese brands opt for flashy specs. I am with the giants in that regard, but I like that we finally have a different choice. Switch to Total Wireless and buy 2 months of a 5G Unlimited plan to score the phone free!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The global tablet market is booming again, but not thanks to Apple or Samsung
The global tablet market is booming again, but not thanks to Apple or Samsung

Phone Arena

time18 minutes ago

  • Phone Arena

The global tablet market is booming again, but not thanks to Apple or Samsung

While global smartphone shipments continue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to many different reasons ranging from complex macroeconomic issues to tariff volatility and the industry's general lack of innovation over the last few years, the tablet market is amazingly posting year-on-year growth for the sixth quarter in a row. Of course, worldwide tablet sales aren't exactly doubling from year to year, but a 9 percent increase in the market's Q2 numbers compared to the same period of 2024 is certainly nothing to sneeze at either. That's a very positive trend for the global tablet market. Surprisingly enough, this latest healthy progress is not primarily owed to the largest vendor out there... or even the industry's second-biggest player. Instead, it's the companies ranked third, fourth, and fifth between April and June 2025 that shined brightest in terms of year-on-year growth. Yes, Huawei managed to jump from 2.5 million unit shipments in Q2 2024 to a little over 3.2 million now, extending its previously very fragile lead over Lenovo and consolidating its place on the podium with an 8.3 percent slice of the global pie (up from 7 percent). Lenovo's 24.7 percent rise from under 2.5 million unit shipments to more than 3 million is also not too shabby, keeping the China-based brand in fourth place for yet another quarter, but Xiaomi is closing in on both Lenovo and Huawei fast after improving its Q2 tally by no less than 42.3 percent between 2024 and 2025. Should Apple fear Huawei, Lenovo, and Xiaomi's rise? Probably not. At least not yet. It pretty much goes without saying that the flourishing numbers of all three of these vendors are derived mainly from China, which means that one of the key reasons why Apple and Samsung are unable to keep up with those scores right now might be their weak presence in Huawei, Lenovo, and Xiaomi's huge domestic market. At the end of the day, however, Apple is still the global tablet market's top dog, with more than 14 million unit shipments and 36.1 percent share in Q2 2025. One of those numbers is actually (slightly) higher than how the company ended Q2 2024, which is not what we can say about Samsung. The industry's silver medalist remains miles ahead of Huawei, but both its quarterly shipments and market share are down from last year's April to June timeframe, which can't be viewed as a positive thing for the world's number one smartphone vendor.

Here's why the Galaxy S26 Ultra's camera upgrade matters, but won't grant it the king's crown
Here's why the Galaxy S26 Ultra's camera upgrade matters, but won't grant it the king's crown

Phone Arena

time4 hours ago

  • Phone Arena

Here's why the Galaxy S26 Ultra's camera upgrade matters, but won't grant it the king's crown

When it comes to camera phones, nobody should disregard Samsung's upcoming Galaxy S26 Ultra… and Galaxy Ultra phones as a whole. They've proven to be tough, potent and capable. Yet, many choose to go with a phone made by another it because Samsung's Ultra flagships are too expensive for some?Yeah, money could definitely be a decisive factor. For example, the Galaxy S25 Ultra (12 GB of RAM, 256 GB storage – the baseline model) was launched at $1,300 some months ago. Not counting various trade-in offers or carrier-locked offers, I must say: $1,300 is a lot. A year ago I was able to get a Galaxy S24 Ultra rival from China (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 on board, same RAM and storage, plus four 50 MP cameras and a 1-inch sensor on its back) for about $750.I don't know about you, but a $550 difference is a lot in my book. Especially if I'm not getting a $550 difference in real-life usage. So, if I was on the lookout for a great camera phone right now, I'd definitely look into the possibility of getting the S25 Ultra… but I'd definitely the end of the day, it's not just money. People also pay attention to hardware numbers and specs. As popular and as good the Galaxy series may be, the truth is that Samsung doesn't offer the most impressive, cutting-edge hardware when it comes to photography and why I almost popped a champagne bottle yesterday, when I stumbled upon the following PhoneArena article title:I was so-o-o sure it's a new main camera sensor that was promised. Good that I didn't open that champagne bottle, though: it turns out that this huge upgrade is a new, brighter don't get me wrong – I'm all for brighter lenses (that's what a lens with a large aperture is called: "bright"). As a rule of thumb, the larger the aperture – the better. Bright lenses are always more refined, more expensive, more I can't wash away that foul taste in my mouth either: when will Samsung step in the 1-inch sensor territory? The Galaxy S25 Ultra for reference. | Image by PhoneArena When you hear about upgrades to a phone's camera, most people immediately think of more megapixels or bigger sensors. But in reality, smartphone photography is shaped by a combination of many things. Camera sensors in smartphones have evolved rapidly. While many flagship phones – especially from Chinese brands like Xiaomi and Oppo – have already adopted 1-inch-type sensors, Samsung has stuck with smaller sensors on its Ultra line. The S24 Ultra uses the 1/1.3" ISOCELL HP2 sensor, which is expected to be used on the S25 Ultra. While a 1/1.3" sensor is definitely large (in comparison to what mid-rangers pack), it's still smaller than a 1-inch sensors have clear benefits: better low-light performance, improved dynamic range, and more natural depth of field. Features like pixel binning, which merges multiple pixels into one for brighter, cleaner photos, help smaller sensors stay competitive. Autofocus systems have also improved, with technologies like Dual Pixel and laser focus enhancing accuracy. And of course, periscope lenses have become common for achieving long-range zoom without compromising phone many feel Samsung has fallen behind by not moving to a larger sensor. In 2025, a 1-inch sensor isn't groundbreaking – it's what I expect from Samsung in the future. That particular future is not happening in 2026, per current rumors. And while sensor size isn't everything, it's a key part of the equation, especially for a device marketed as the best camera phone money can buy. The Galaxy S25 Ultra for reference. | Image by PhoneArena That brings us to lenses and apertures. The aperture – measured by an f-number like f/1.4 or f/2.2 – tells you how wide the lens can open to let in light. The lower the number, the wider the opening, and the more light that hits the sensor. A brighter (lower f-number) lens can dramatically improve photo quality, especially in low-light situations. It allows for faster shutter speeds and lower ISO settings, both of which help reduce blur and noise. Again, reports suggest the Galaxy S26 Ultra will get a brighter main lens, likely improving indoor and night photography compared to the f/1.7 lens on the S25 Ultra. The Galaxy S25 Ultra for reference. | Image by PhoneArena The expected change on the S26 Ultra is a meaningful one – but only up to a point. A great lens matters most once you've crossed a certain threshold in sensor quality. If your sensor is still relatively small, the benefits of a brighter lens are limited. For example, the same APS-C sensor paired with an f/1.4 lens will outperform that same sensor with an f/2.2 lens, especially in low light. But if you shrink the sensor too far, even the best lens can't fully can a lens actually be too bright? In some cases, yes. While a wide aperture lets in more light, it can also reduce depth of field too much, especially on larger sensors – leading to parts of the subject being out of focus. It can also cause issues with lens aberrations or softness at the edges of the frame. In the end, Samsung's decision to upgrade the lens rather than the sensor isn't pointless – but it feels overdue. For a phone line that markets itself as a camera king, the hardware needs to reflect that ambition. A better lens is a good step. A bigger sensor would be a serious leap!

Honor's device cloning feature is now compatible with Android, iOS, and HarmonyOS Next
Honor's device cloning feature is now compatible with Android, iOS, and HarmonyOS Next

GSM Arena

time5 hours ago

  • GSM Arena

Honor's device cloning feature is now compatible with Android, iOS, and HarmonyOS Next

Sagar, 05 August 2025 Honor introduced the AI Connect feature a few months ago that enables wireless file transfer between Honor and Apple's iOS devices. Now, the brand has come up with a new device clone feature that works with Android, iOS, and Huawei's HarmonyOS Next. Honor has upgraded its Device Clone app to support device cloning with devices running the three smartphone operating systems mentioned above. This will allow users to easily transfer data from one device to another through cloning without requiring any additional equipment or accessories. This development also makes Honor the first brand to support HarmonyOS Next data transfer. To clone an old device, Honor smartphone users can download and install the "Device Clone" app from the official app store on old and new smartphones. Next, to activate the Device Clone feature, navigate to the new smartphone's Settings menu > Select System & Updates > Tap on Device Clone > Click "This is a new device" > Select the old device type as "HarmonyOS". Follow the same steps on the old device, but select "This is an old device" instead of "This is a new device." After that, scan the QR code on the new device with the old device to connect both devices, then select the data that needs to be transferred to the new device, and click "Next." Via

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store