logo
Trump moves to tackle school discipline, but advocates divided on federal approach to classroom issue

Trump moves to tackle school discipline, but advocates divided on federal approach to classroom issue

Yahoo29-04-2025

President Trump is shining a spotlight on the issue of school discipline, which is closely related to the growing problems of learning loss and falling test scores, though it's unclear how much can be done about classroom behavior from the federal level.
As part of a recent list of moves on education, Trump signed an executive order to create new federal school discipline guidance for K-12 institutions, with those in school leadership positions saying the problem has grown steadily worse since the 2020 pandemic.
While parents and educators agree something needs to be done, satisfying solutions for all parties are hard to find.
'This is long overdue,' said Neeraja Deshpande, policy analyst and engagement coordinator at Independent Women.
'I see this as a really good sign, that they're really bluntly saying that discipline needs to come back in America schools, because it's good for students, for teachers — it's honestly best for the most disadvantaged students,' she added.
The executive order from Trump, who has long talked about a need to get 'tough' in U.S. schools, requires Education Secretary Linda McMahon and the attorney general to team up and create guidance regarding school discipline, along with coordinating with state officials on 'the prevention of racial discrimination in the application of school discipline.'
Since the pandemic and its related school closures, surveys year after year have shown concerns about student behavior in the classroom.
Earlier this year, 48 percent of educators and school leaders said student behavior was a lot worse now than before the pandemic, according to the EdWeek Research Center. In 2023, about one-third of educators felt that way.
In his order, Trump blamed the policies of former Presidents Obama and Biden for the increase in behavioral issues, saying the problem started with Obama in 2014 when a 'Dear Colleague' letter was sent out warning schools they could be in violation of Title IX if more official punishments are handed out to students of one particular race or ethnicity.
That 11-year-old letter pointed out Black students are three times more likely than White students to be expelled or suspended.
'The Departments recognize that disparities in student discipline rates in a school or district may be caused by a range of factors. However, research suggests that the substantial racial disparities of the kind reflected in the CRDC [Civil Rights Data Collection] data are not explained by more frequent or more serious misbehavior by students of color,' it said.
Although Trump rescinded that letter during his first presidency, the Biden administration resurfaced similar concerns back in 2023.
Why exactly the pandemic so inflamed school disciplinary issues is a subject of debate, but experts agree that learning loss and behavioral problems have become entwined in a compounding spiral: Falling test scores and mental health issues lead to more misbehavior, and back again.
Critics of Trump's order say it's just another way to undermine diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts and that the real way to improve discipline in schools is to target those test scores, chronic absenteeism and student mental health.
'It's just about attacking DEI. It's very short-sighted. And frankly, it's going to disproportionately impact kids that are in low-income schools, that don't have resources, children of color that are always disproportionately impacted by disciplinary processes,' said Keri Rodrigues, the president of the National Parents Union.
'Unfortunately, this is just more political games and showmanship when we actually need to have some evidence-backed, data-driven solutions for kids to help them during what is a very unstable and difficult time,' Rodrigues added.
While the federal government has little direct control over classroom procedures, the executive order signals it will not apply Title IX investigations in the same way against school discipline outcomes.
'[U]nder the Biden-Harris Administration, schools were forced to consider equity and inclusion when imposing discipline. Their policies placed racial equity quotas over student safety — encouraging schools to turn a blind eye to poor or violent behavior in the name of inclusion,' McMahon said after Trump signed the executive order.
Kendra Jenkins, a middle school assistant principal in Georgia, told The Hill that while the federal government can offer guidance, actually addressing student behavior will really fall on a local level.
When thinking about the concerns of racism in school discipline, Jenkins said, schools 'do look at that to see where we are … disproportionate, but we also look at what are the incidences.'
She said there was definitely an increase in misbehavior at her school since the pandemic but that educators addressed it through socio-emotional tools and have seen the number of discipline referrals go down.
'We definitely have focused on building relationships and strengthening our culture to help our kids,' Jenkins said.
Those in favor of the Trump administration's approach say the focus on race in school discipline practices has done a disserve to students.
Policies by past presidents were 'put forward in the name of anti-racism and of non-discrimination. And what actually ended up happening was that the schools that became the most chaotic were often the ones with the most number of minority students, especially when you look at the sheer number of school closures during COVID, and how COVID worsened student behavior,' said Deshpande.
'So you know what ends up happening is that when teachers feel like they can't discipline students, the students suffer and the teachers suffer,' she added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk Urges Americans Take Action to ‘Kill' Trump Tax Cut Bill
Elon Musk Urges Americans Take Action to ‘Kill' Trump Tax Cut Bill

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Urges Americans Take Action to ‘Kill' Trump Tax Cut Bill

(Bloomberg) -- Elon Musk is on a mission to block President Donald Trump's tax bill after he tried — and failed — to convince Republican lawmakers to preserve valuable tax credits for electric vehicles in the legislation, according to a person familiar with the matter. ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars NYC Residents Want Safer Streets, Cheaper Housing, Survey Says At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access The Buffalo Architect Fighting for Women in Design The Tesla Inc. chief executive officer personally appealed to House Speaker Mike Johnson to save the tax credit, the person said, requesting anonymity to discuss a private conversation. The House version of the tax measure calls for largely ending the popular $7,500 electric car subsidies by the end of 2025. Since losing that battle, Musk ratcheted up his offensive against the president's signature legislation on Wednesday, urging that Americans contact their lawmakers to 'KILL' the legislation, pinning his opposition to the bill's $2.4 trillion price tag. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman,' Musk wrote in a social media post. 'Bankrupting America is NOT ok!' The post came one day after Musk lashed out at the tax bill, describing it as a budget-busting 'disgusting abomination' as Republican fiscal hawks stepped up criticism of the massive fiscal package. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. NBC News reported earlier on Musk's overture to Johnson. Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who voted against the measure, defended Musk, saying in a post on X: 'He knows if America collapses financially, we aren't making it to Mars. He's right.' Trump hasn't publicly responded to Musk's comments, but the White House put out a statement Wednesday saying the legislation 'unleashes an era of unprecedented economic growth.' Tensions between Musk and the White House have flared in recent days after the tech titan formally stepped down from his role leading Trump's federal cost-cutting effort, the Department of Government Efficiency. After a meeting with Trump and Republican senators at the White House on Wednesday evening, Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas told Bloomberg Television that 'Elon was not important at all as far as this conversation goes.' Earlier, Johnson told reporters that Musk was 'dead wrong' about the bill and that the tax cuts would pay for themselves through economic growth. Musk's public condemnation pits him against the president at a critical time as Trump is personally lobbying holdouts on the bill. His campaign against the legislation threatens to stiffen resistance and delay enactment of the tax cuts and debt ceiling increase. Musk has attacked the legislation days after leaving a temporary assignment leading the administration's Department of Government Efficiency initiative to cut federal spending. The Tesla Inc. chief executive officer's high-profile role in the Trump administration eroded his business brand and sales of his company's electric vehicles plunged. The House-passed version of the tax and spending bill would add $2.4 trillion to US budget deficits over the next decade, according to an estimate released Wednesday from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The CBO's calculation reflects a $3.67 trillion decrease in expected revenues and a $1.25 trillion decline in spending over the decade through 2034, relative to baseline projections. The score doesn't account for any potential boost to the economy from the bill, which Johnson and Trump argue would offset the revenue losses. Johnson said Musk had promised to help reelect Republicans just a day before savaging Trump's bill, adding that he did not want to ascribe a personal motive. Musk did not respond to a request for comment. Separately, Jared Isaacman, a financial technology billionaire, appeared to suggest Trump withdrew his nomination to run NASA because of his close ties to Musk. 'There were some people that had some axes to grind, I guess, and I was a good visible target,' Isaacman said on an episode of the All-In Podcast released on Wednesday. His ouster was driven by Sergio Gor, the head of the White House Presidential Personnel Office, according to people familiar with the matter. Gor and Musk had butted heads during the billionaire's tenure running the Department of Government Efficiency, the people said, and Gor moved to have Isaacman's nomination withdrawn after Musk pulled back from the administration. A White House spokesperson said Trump ultimately makes the decisions regarding who will serve in his administration. Musk, the world's richest man with a net worth of about $377 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, has become a crucial financial backer of the Republican party. After making modest donations most years, Musk became the biggest US political donor in 2024, giving more than $290 million. Most of Musk's political giving was aimed at electing Trump but he also supported congressional candidates. America PAC, the super political action committee that Musk largely funded, spent $18.5 million in 17 separate House races. Though that total pales in comparison to the roughly $255 million he spent backing Trump, the spending means a lot in a congressional election, where challengers on average raise less than $1 million. Control of the House will likely be decided by the outcome of fewer than two dozen close races in the 2026 midterm elections. The GOP's chances of holding their majority would suffer a major blow if Musk were to withdraw his financial support. --With assistance from Bill Allison, Kailey Leinz, Joe Mathieu and Ari Natter. (Updates with Thomas Massie comment, in seventh paragraph.) Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump promised to welcome more foreign students. Now, they feel targeted on all fronts
Trump promised to welcome more foreign students. Now, they feel targeted on all fronts

The Hill

time43 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump promised to welcome more foreign students. Now, they feel targeted on all fronts

To attract the brightest minds to America, President Donald Trump proposed a novel idea while campaigning: If elected, he would grant green cards to all foreign students who graduate from U.S. colleges. 'It's so sad when we lose people from Harvard, MIT, from the greatest schools,' Trump said during a podcast interview last June. 'That is going to end on Day One.' That promise never came to pass. Trump's stance on welcoming foreign students has shifted dramatically. International students have found themselves at the center of an escalating campaign to kick them out or keep them from coming as his administration merges a crackdown on immigration with an effort to reshape higher education. An avalanche of policies from the Trump administration — such as terminating students' ability to study in the U.S., halting all new student visa interviews and moving to block foreign enrollment at Harvard — have triggered lawsuits, countersuits and confusion. Foreign students say they feel targeted on multiple fronts. Late Wednesday, Trump himself took the latest action against international students, signing an executive order barring nearly all foreigners from entering the country to attend Harvard. In interviews, students from around the world described how it feels to be an international student today in America. Their accounts highlight pervasive feelings of fear, anxiety and insecurity that have made them more cautious in their daily lives, distracted them from schoolwork and prompted many to cancel trips home because they fear not being allowed to return. For many, the last few months have forced them to rethink their dreams of building a life in America. Markuss Saule, a freshman at Brigham Young University-Idaho, took a recent trip home to Latvia and spent the entire flight back to the U.S. in a state of panic. For hours, he scrubbed his phone, uninstalling all social media, deleting anything that touched on politics or could be construed as anti-Trump. 'That whole 10-hour flight, where I was debating, 'Will they let me in?' — it definitely killed me a little bit,' said Saule, a business analytics major. 'It was terrifying.' Saule is the type of international student the U.S. has coveted. As a high schooler in Latvia, he qualified for a competitive, merit-based exchange program funded by the U.S. State Department. He spent a year of high school in Minnesota, falling in love with America and a classmate who is now his fiancee. He just ended his freshman year in college with a 4.0 GPA. But the alarm he felt on that flight crushed what was left of his American dream. 'If you had asked me at the end of 2024 what my plans were, it was to get married, find a great job here in the U.S. and start a family,' said Saule, who hopes to work as a business data analyst. 'Those plans are not applicable anymore. Ask me now, and the plan to leave this place as soon as possible.' Saule and his fiancee plan to marry this summer, graduate a year early and move to Europe. This spring the Trump administration abruptly revoked permission to study in the U.S. for thousands of international students before reversing itself. A federal judge has blocked further status terminations, but for many, the damage is done. Saule has a constant fear he could be next. As a student in Minnesota just three years ago, he felt like a proud ambassador for his country. 'Now I feel a sense of inferiority. I feel that I am expendable, that I am purely an appendage that is maybe getting cut off soon,' he said. Trump's policies carry a clear subtext. 'The policies, what they tell me is simple. It is one word: Leave.' A concern for attracting the world's top students was raised in the interview Trump gave last June on the podcast 'All-In.' Can you promise, Trump was asked, to give companies more ability 'to import the best and brightest' students? 'I do promise,' Trump answered. Green cards, he said, would be handed out with diplomas to any foreign student who gets a college or graduate degree. Trump said he knew stories of 'brilliant' graduates who wanted to stay in the U.S. to work but couldn't. 'They go back to India, they go back to China' and become multi-billionaires, employing thousands of people. 'That is going to end on Day One.' Had Trump followed through with that pledge, a 24-year-old Indian physics major named Avi would not be afraid of losing everything he has worked toward. After six years in Arizona, where Avi attended college and is now working as an engineer, the U.S. feels like a second home. He dreams of working at NASA or in a national lab and staying in America where he has several relatives. But now he is too afraid to fly to Chicago to see them, rattled by news of foreigners being harassed at immigration centers and airports. 'Do I risk seeing my family or risk deportation?' said Avi, who asked to be identified by his first name, fearing retribution. Avi is one of about 240,000 people on student visas in the U.S. on Optional Practical Training — a postgraduation period where students are authorized to work in fields related to their degrees for up to three years. A key Trump nominee has said he would like to see an end to postgraduate work authorization for international students. Avi's visa is valid until next year but he feels 'a massive amount of uncertainty.' He wonders if he can sign a lease on a new apartment. Even his daily commute feels different. 'I drive to work every morning, 10 miles an hour under speed limit to avoid getting pulled over,' said Avi, who hopes to stay in the U.S. but is casting a wider net. 'I spend a lot of time doomscrolling job listings in India and other places.' Vladyslav Plyaka came to the U.S. from Ukraine as an exchange student in high school. As war broke out at home, he stayed to attend the University of Wisconsin. He was planning to visit Poland to see his mother but if he leaves the U.S., he would need to reapply for a visa. He doesn't know when that will be possible now that visa appointments are suspended, and he doesn't feel safe leaving the country anyway. He feels grateful for the education, but without renewing his visa, he'll be stuck in the U.S. at least two more years while he finishes his degree. He sometimes wonders if he would be willing to risk leaving his education in the United States — something he worked for years to achieve — if something happened to his family. 'It's hard because every day I have to think about my family, if everything is going to be all right,' he said. It took him three tries to win a scholarship to study in the U.S. Having that cut short because of visa problems would undermine the sacrifice he made to be here. He sometimes feels guilty that he isn't at home fighting for his country, but he knows there's value in gaining an education in America. 'I decided to stay here just because of how good the college education is,' he said. 'If it was not good, I probably would be on the front lines.' ___ AP Education Writer Collin Binkley contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Federal judge declares Texas law granting illegal migrants in-state college tuition unconstitutional after state joins Trump in lawsuit
Federal judge declares Texas law granting illegal migrants in-state college tuition unconstitutional after state joins Trump in lawsuit

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Federal judge declares Texas law granting illegal migrants in-state college tuition unconstitutional after state joins Trump in lawsuit

A federal judge on Wednesday permanently blocked Texas from enforcing a state law allowing illegal immigrants living in the Lone Star State to pay in-state tuition rates for public universities after the Trump administration challenged the statute. The two-decades-old law was overturned after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a motion in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas agreeing with the Justice Department's contention that the statute 'expressly and directly conflicts' with federal immigration law. '[T]he Court hereby declares that the challenged provisions … as applied to aliens who are not lawfully present in the United States, violate the Supremacy Clause and are unconstitutional and invalid,' District Judge Reed O'Connor determined. Advertisement 3 The Trump administration filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas over the law on Wednesday. Francis Chung/UPI/Shutterstock 'The Court also hereby permanently enjoins Defendant as well as its successors, agents, and employees, from enforcing Texas Education Code § 54.051(m) and § 54.052(a), as applied to aliens who are not lawfully present in the United States,' O'Connor, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, ruled. After the ruling, Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott declared on X that 'In-state tuition for illegal immigrants in Texas has ended.' Advertisement 'Ending this discriminatory and un-American provision is a major victory for Texas,' Paxton said in a statement. In a lawsuit filed shortly before Paxton entered the state's joint motion in the case, the Trump administration argued that 'federal law prohibits illegal aliens from getting in-state tuition benefits that are denied to out-of-state U.S. citizens.' 'There are no exceptions. Yet the State of Texas has ignored this law for years,' the lawsuit stated. 'This Court should put that to an end.' 3 Texas quickly joined Trump in a motion supporting arguments that the law was unconstitutional. Getty Images for 2025 NCAA March Madness Music Festival Advertisement The 2001 state law was passed by the Texas Legislature under the administration of former Republican Gov. Rick Perry, who served as energy secretary during President Trump's first term. The law, which survived several Republican-led legislative repeal efforts, allowed illegal immigrant students who have been Texas residents for at least three years leading up to their high school graduation and who pledge to apply for permanent legal status to pay dramatically lower tuition rates than out-of-state students. 3 'In-state tuition for illegal immigrants in Texas has ended,' Abbott wrote on X after the judge's ruling. James Breeden for the NY Post The University of Texas at Austin, for example, charges out-of-state students between $40,582 and $48,712 for annual tuition, whereas in-state students pay between $10,858 and $13,576, according to the school. Advertisement Texas was the first state in the nation to pass such legislation, which is now on the books in dozens of states. 'Under federal law, schools cannot provide benefits to illegal aliens that they do not provide to US citizens,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement issued before the judge's ruling. 'The Justice Department will relentlessly fight to vindicate federal law and ensure that U.S. citizens are not treated like second-class citizens anywhere in the country.' The DOJ's complaint cited Trump's February executive order, 'Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders,' and his April directive, 'Protecting American Communities From Criminal Aliens,' as the impetus for the lawsuit.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store