logo
How Taylor Won

How Taylor Won

Yahoo2 days ago

It happened — Taylor owns everything. All her songs, all her masters, her life's work. She won. Eight years after her label Big Machine sold off her catalog, Taylor Swift has finally achieved her goal of buying it back herself. The most impossible battle of her career, the most invincible dragon she's ever picked a fight with, the most doomed leap she's ever taken. As she announced in her bombshell public statement on May 30, she bought her catalog from Shamrock Capital, after a six-year struggle for control over her own music. 'The memories,' she wrote. 'The magic. The madness. Every single era. My entire life's work.'
It can't be overstated what a victory this is for her, or the ramifications for other artists. This is the independence that generations of musicians have fantasized about, but never gotten close to seeing. 'Long Live' hits different today. 'New Romantics' hits different today. 'Ours' hits different, so does 'Dear John,' 'All Too Well,' 'I Did Something Bad,' and damn, don't even start about 'A Place in This World.' 'It's Time to Go.' All those songs feel bigger right now. It's one of those 'remember this moment' occasions. The patriarchy is having an extremely fucked day. Taylor won. How did this happen?
More from Rolling Stone
'I Couldn't Stop Crying': Swifties React as Taylor Swift Reveals She Finally Owns Her Music
Taylor Swift Got Her Old Albums Back, But Her Re-Records Were Still a Massive Success
Taylor Swift's Vinyl Records Are on Sale After Revealing She Now Owns All of Her Music
'I'm trying to gather my thoughts into something coherent,' Taylor wrote in her bombshell public statement. 'But right now my mind is just a slideshow. A flashback sequence of all the times I daydreamed about, wished for, and pined away for a chance to get to tell you this news. All the times I was this close, reaching for it, only for it to fall through. I almost stopped thinking it could happen, after 20 years of having the carrot dangled and then yanked away. But that's all in the past now. I've been bursting into tears of joy at random intervals ever since I found that this is really happening. I really get to say these words:
'All of the music I've ever made…now belongs…to me.'
Taylor's battle was always much bigger than her. She's taking on the whole issue of artists controlling their own work. When Big Machine boss Scott Borchetta sold her masters to her arch-enemy Scooter Braun in 2019, she wrote, 'He knew what he was doing; they both did. Controlling a woman who didn't want to be associated with them. In perpetuity. That means forever.' Six years later, she owns herself.
Taylor was fighting for a kind of artistic freedom that her heroes never had, from Prince to Joni Mitchell. They never got to own their music, which was why Prince wrote 'Slave' on his face and renounced his name. Even Paul McCartney, the most successful musician ever, had to suck it up, after the Beatles publisher Dick James sold off the Lennon-McCartney song catalog in 1969, while both John and Paul were out of the country. (John was actually on his honeymoon.) Macca lived with this disappointment for decades, and being Macca, he didn't keep quiet about it. But still, he got up there every night and sang 'Hey Jude,' and had to pay for the right to sing it.
But Taylor, still only 35, has won control of her work in a way that never seemed possible for artists, even the biggest ones. It's an unprecedented victory—you have to wish Prince had lived to see this day. As she wrote, 'To say this is my greatest dream come true is actually being pretty reserved about it.' As she wrote, 'To say this is my greatest dream come true is actually being pretty reserved about it.' It seemed like a crazy battle for her to carry on — a guaranteed failure, a waste of her time. Yet as she said three years ago at the Tribeca Film Festival, in one of her all-time greatest quotes, 'People often greatly underestimate how much I will inconvenience myself to prove a point.'
Her fight began in 2019 when she announced that Borchetta had sold her masters to Braun. 'This is my worst case scenario,' Swift said. Braun was not just any music-biz mogul; he was a man who had seriously bad blood with Swift. (For one thing, he was the manager of a famous male rapper who was bizarrely obsessed with her — can't remember his name right now but he's the guy who just released the summer jam 'Heil Hitler.')
For Borchetta to sell her off to Braun was seen as gamesmanship, especially since both men openly strutted about the deal. To the general public, it looked like they were going out of their way to make her mad, and it's safe to say they succeeded. Talk about a 'be careful what you wish for' situation.
But when she raged about it, the industry response was basically: You're on your own, kid. Sorry, but that's the music business. Welcome to the big leagues. Unfair or not, that's how it works. All your old-school heroes, they all had to shut up and live with this, so what makes you special? This is the business we've chosen, remember? There was a bit of bemusement that she was taking this so personally. It was just proof that she was an emotional girl who didn't have a head for business and didn't get how things worked in the grown-up world.
'For years I asked, pleaded for a chance to own my work,' Taylor wrote at the time. 'When I left my masters in Scott's hands, I made peace with the fact that eventually he would sell them. Never in my worst nightmares did I imagine the buyer would be Scooter.' But big deal — Scooter was just playing the game. As Bloomberg reported, 'All along it's been clear she was using personal animus towards him to make a few larger points about the music business.' Maybe she had some valid points about artists' rights. But as Bloomberg sniffed, 'Swift was never the ideal messenger.'
She lashed back in 2019 by announcing plans to re-record all six of her albums, in new versions that she would own. Every single person in the music industry — every last one of them — assumed she was bluffing. She wasn't. Since the Taylor's Version project became a blockbuster, nobody wants to admit now they thought it was a dumb idea, just as nobody wants to admit they booed Dylan at the Newport Folk Festival. It only looks like a brilliant move in hindsight, especially since it led to the Eras Tour phenomenon. But there was no precedent for any artist attempting this, much less getting away with it. Everybody thought it was crazy, even if they were rooting for her. Anyone who tells you different is a liar (and pathetic, and alone in life).
Controlling her own music was obviously a silly thing to even talk about — just a childish fantasy. It was another one of those doomed quests that Taylor has always kept taking on — like her fight with Apple Music over artists' rights, or her legal fight against the male DJ who groped her at a concert. (Combat, she's ready for combat.) She'll pick the battles that seem crazy, or beneath her, and turn them into major victories. Other artists were stunned she had the nerve to try Taylor's Version. SZA called it 'the biggest 'fuck you' to the establishment I've ever seen in my life, and I deeply applaud that shit.'
But it was the fight of her life, and she won. As Taylor wrote today, 'All I've ever wanted was the opportunity to work hard enough to be able to one day purchase my music outright with no strings attached, no partnership, with full autonomy.' Today is that day, and it's a major victory for artists.
Her statement has so many ramifications for her fans. For one thing, we can now listen to the old version of 'Holy Ground' with a clear conscience, since sorry, but the Red (Taylor's Version) mix blew it with the rhythm track. (Try it again, Taylor—hell, you own it now. Take all the do-overs you want.)
Taylor also announced that she has barely begun work on Reputation TV. This can only mean she's about to drop Reputation TV. 'Full transparency: I haven't even re-recorded a quarter of it,' she wrote. 'To be perfectly honest, it's the one album in those first six that I thought couldn't be improved upon by redoing it. Not the music, or photos, or videos. So I kept putting it off. There will be a time (if you're into the idea) for the unreleased vault tracks from that album to hatch.'
As for 'full transparency,' yeah well — this is the artist who posted 'Not a lot going on at the moment' the day she wrote 'Cardigan.' We all know better than to trust her. She loves to deceive, to mislead, to disrupt. She's fooled us before; she will never NOT fool us. Don't be surprised if we get Rep TV this weekend.
Taylor also spelled 'thiiiiiiiiiiiis close' with the letter 'i' 12 times, which may or may not be a hint about TS12, just like water may or may not be wet. She added that her debut album has been totally re-recorded. 'I really love how it sounds now,' Taylor said, which probably means she's adjusted the accent a tiny bit. 'Those two albums can still have their moments to re-emerge when the time is right, if that would be something you guys would still be excited about.' Oh, the modesty. Yes, people will be slightly excited. The audience has been fiending for Debutation TV for way too long, the last two missing pieces of the Taylor's Version puzzle. She made headlines this week by not announcing these albums at the American Music Awards (or even showing up). 'But if it happens,' she wrote, 'It won't be a place of sadness and longing for what I wish I could have. It will just be a celebration now.'
Today is a celebration for sure, and it's a celebration Taylor Swift has earned. Nobody thought this victory was possible. She had the time of her life fighting this dragon—even though nobody thought the dragon could lose. But she won. She did something bad, and it feels so good. Long live.
Best of Rolling Stone
The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs
All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked
The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stocks to Watch Monday: Cleveland-Cliffs, Stellantis, Moderna
Stocks to Watch Monday: Cleveland-Cliffs, Stellantis, Moderna

Wall Street Journal

time8 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Stocks to Watch Monday: Cleveland-Cliffs, Stellantis, Moderna

↗️ Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF), Steel Dynamics (STLD), Nucor (NUE): Shares of U.S. steelmakers jumped premarket after President Trump, speaking at a rally in Pittsburgh on Friday, said he would double tariffs on and steel and aluminum to 50%. ️↘️ Stellantis (STLA): Higher tariffs on imported metal could raise input prices for carmakers with U.S. factories. Stellantis, whose brands include Chrysler, Jeep and Ram, fell premarket. ↗️ Moderna (MRNA): The drugmaker said the FDA had approved a new Covid-19 vaccine for use by people aged 65 or above.

Download CrossOver for macOS and Linux
Download CrossOver for macOS and Linux

Gizmodo

time9 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Download CrossOver for macOS and Linux

The main attraction of CrossOver goes beyond its capability to execute Windows applications, according to users. The application operates in such a way that users feel like they never disconnected from their Mac or Linux environments. You're not creating virtual machines. There's no need for a computer reboot when you require a specific app through this software. The software enables you to maintain your position on your macOS or Linux desktop while gaining access to programs that were previously unavailable to you. Few professionals working across diverse environments will find this significant benefit particularly helpful. Your primary computer operates with Mac, but you require an accounting software that functions exclusively on Windows. If you switched to Linux, then your preferred design application does not provide support for your new operating system. The design of CrossOver allows users to avoid making sacrifices with their software choices. You can experience dual functionality since CrossOver operates between macOS and Linux desktops through a single interface. The several years of development have made the platform solid, so it remains resistant to breakage. About 75% of standard applications Americans wish to operate on have undergone testing, and developers have simplified the installation process with basic click commands. Simplicity stands out as the key distinguishing fact of this particular product. For decades, Wine demonstrated complete power while maintaining requirements that demand technical abilities. The sophisticated, complex functions of the program remain hidden behind an elegant user interface provided by CrossOver. The system functions best without needing to understand how everything operates within the program code. The application selection process is simple since you just need to choose the desired app to install, then watch CrossOver execute all operations automatically. Softness in user experience activates two significant benefits: first, it reduces the amount of time required to complete actions, and secondly, it conserves precious energy for other tasks. The process requires no debugging activities or searches on online forums. Moving forward with your work process just requires you to launch your selected software. Managers who work with productivity tools combined with older software or games without native system compatibility will experience a total shift in their work process because of this access method. The software removes the ongoing platform battle between different operating systems. It reduces friction. Open-source foundations enable this platform, while the provider delivers support through regular updates along with technical assistance that users need. The stable, practical functionality of CrossOver provides an excellent program solution for developers and gamers and business owners, and strictly functional users who require particular software without damaging their system operations.

Market fall-out as Trump doubles steel, aluminium tariffs
Market fall-out as Trump doubles steel, aluminium tariffs

News24

time14 minutes ago

  • News24

Market fall-out as Trump doubles steel, aluminium tariffs

• For more financial news, go to the News24 Business front page. Shares in South Korean and Vietnamese steelmakers, major Asian exporters of the metal to the United States, dropped on Monday after US President Donald Trump said he would double tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50%. Trump announced on Friday the new steel and aluminium levies, which take effect on June 4, intensifying a global trade war just hours after he accused China of violating an agreement with the US to mutually roll back tariffs and trade restrictions for critical minerals. Steel industry experts said while the increased tariff would cause significant disruption for major exporters to the US, the rates could go down in light of some of Trump's trade policy reversals. "Frequent shifts in the Trump administration's tariff policies introduce considerable uncertainty regarding the actual impact ... I think the final result will be far lower than initially projected, especially concerning its duration," said Chelsea Ye, senior analyst at metals research firm McCloskey. South Korea's Industry Ministry said on Monday it will respond to the 50% tariff on steel products as part of its trade discussions with Washington in order to minimise the impact on industry. South Korea was the fourth-biggest exporter of steel to the United States last year, behind Canada, Mexico and Brazil, according to American Iron and Steel Institute data. South Korea's Industry Ministry said in a statement that it had held an emergency meeting with officials from the country's major steelmakers, including POSCO and Hyundai Steel . Shares of South Korean steelmakers lost ground on Monday, with POSCO and Hyundai Steel falling 3% and SeAH Steel Corp down 6.3% in morning trade. In Vietnam, major steelmakers Hoa Sen Group and Nam Kim Steel fell 2.8% and 3.4% respectively. Vietnam Steel Corp also fell 2.7%. Vietnam's exports of steel and steel products to the U.S. fell 27% in the first four months of this year, government data showed. The 50% tariffs will add to the challenges facing Korean steel exporters, which have refrained from sharply boosting exports to the US to avoid Washington's scrutiny, despite rising US steel prices, an industry executive told Reuters. "It will be a burden to exporting companies, if there are no additional steel price increases in the U.S," he told Reuters, asking not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue. Despite tariffs, South Korea's steel shipments to the United States rose 12% in April from a year earlier, according to trade data. Steel and aluminium tariffs were among the earliest Trump imposed when he returned to office in January. The tariffs of 25% on most steel and aluminium imported to the US went into effect on March 12. Industry officials said the tariffs have increased US steel prices, affecting several sectors, including home appliances, cars, and construction. Trade talks South Korea, a major US ally, has called for an exemption from tariffs on steel, autos and others items, during talks with the United States. Seoul agreed in late April to craft a trade package by the end of the 90-day pause on Trump's reciprocal tariffs in July, but it has been difficult for negotiators to make big decisions due to a political leadership vacuum ahead of elections on Tuesday. In late March, Hyundai Steel announced a plan to build a $5.8 billion factory in Louisiana in response to US tariffs, but the factory will not open until 2029. In April, Hyundai Steel's bigger rival POSCO signed a preliminary deal to make an equity investment in the factory project. In India, which relies heavily on the US for aluminium exports, industry experts also warned of a major hit. "This is going to have a detrimental impact," B.K. Bhatia, director-general at the Federation of Indian Mineral Industries, the country's leading mining body, told Reuters. "The US is the biggest market for Indian aluminium. Government has been negotiating so we are hopeful that with talks, the tariffs will come down." The US is the world's largest steel importer, excluding the European Union, with a total of 26.2 million tons of imported steel in 2024, according to the Department of Commerce. As a result, the new tariffs will likely increase steel prices across the board, hitting industry and consumers alike. "The latest hike will prompt these sellers to renegotiate with their US buyers on how to and who will shoulder the extra 25% cost," said Thaiseer Jaffar, founder of Dubai-based steel industry event organiser Global Steel Summit.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store