Lawsuit accuses Atlanta police of illegally targeting 'Cop City' activists
The Brief
An arrested "Stop Cop City" activist has filed a lawsuit accusing Atlanta police of illegally targeting critics of the city's public safety training center.
Jamie Marsicano was arrested after a music festival and accused of being part of a group that clashed with police at the construction site in 2023.
Their lawsuit claimed that authorities have repeatedly made arrests without cause and led to difficulties finding a job or housing.
ATLANTA - A new lawsuit filed in federal court by an arrested "Stop Cop City" activist has accused Atlanta police of illegally targeting critics of the city's soon-to-be-opened public safety training center.
The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Jamie Marsicano, alleges that authorities view any critic of the training center as a would-be criminal and have repeatedly made arrests without cause, depriving protesters of their First Amendment rights and their civil rights protections against false arrest and malicious prosecution.
MORE: Cop City fight: Court battle over Atlanta Public Safety Center continues as opening date nears
The backstory
The 85-acre, $115-million facility has been the subject of debate and protests for years as activists attempt to stop what they have nicknamed "Cop City."
Protests against the project, which have at times resulted in violence and vandalism, escalated after state troopers fatally shot an activist near the site in January 2023. A special prosecutor in October 2023 said he would not pursue charges against the troopers who shot Tortuguita, saying he found that their use of deadly force was "objectively reasonable."
The city says the issues caused by protesters have raised the cost of the training center by about $20 million.
PREVIOUS STORY: Tour Atlanta's new $115M training facility for first responders
In March 2023, officers arrested 23 people near a music festival near the construction site after officials say a group of more than 150 masked individuals stormed the area and clashed with police. A video released by the Atlanta Police Department showed what appears to be fireworks aimed at officers. In the same video, you can see items including rocks and Molotov cocktails being thrown by protestors in the direction of police, a tipped-over vehicle that later became engulfed in flames, and protestors attempting to set other pieces of construction equipment on fire.
Marsicano was taken into custody on the same day during a sweep of the area because they had on "muddy clothing" and was carrying a shield, officers wrote in their arrest warrant. Marsicano's attorneys say those assertions were false.
What they're saying
Marsicano's attorneys say their client was not among the group that attacked the construction site and never left the festival grounds until they were arrested while walking back to their vehicle after police ordered everyone to disperse.
According to the lawsuit, Marsicano was caught up in an "indiscriminate mass arrest of legitimate festival attendees" that was part of a pattern spearheaded by Atlanta Police Chief Darin Schierbaum of authorities targeting the "Stop Cop City" movement.
Marsicano was subsequently charged with domestic terrorism. Months later, they were one of 61 charged with violating Georgia's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, known as RICO, by the Georgia Attorney General.
As a result of their arrest, Marsicano was banned from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill campus and completed their law degree remotely, but has had difficulty finding a job and securing housing because of the charges, the lawsuit claimed.
Marsicano was "publicly broadcast to the world as a 'domestic terrorist' and 'RICO co-conspirator,' forever tarnishing Plaintiff's personal and professional life," the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit lists more than a dozen instances in which authorities "pretextually charged individuals deemed to be at or around Stop Cop City," including after a May 2022 protest where three people "walking home were selectively stopped for carrying Stop Cop City signs," and taken into custody. Those arrests, as well as others, have led to civil lawsuits that are pending.
Marsicano's lawsuit names various law enforcement officials as well as the city of Atlanta, which it accuses of having made a "custom and practice" of targeting critics of the training center.
What's next
Last week, attorneys for the city and activists attempting to stop the project appeared in court to argue over a push for a referendum that would put the city's lease to the Atlanta Police Foundation, the nonprofit that runs the facility, up for a vote.
The court has not ruled on the referendum at this time.
The center is expected to be fully operational by the end of March or the beginning of April.
The Source
Information for this story came from the Associated Press and previous FOX 5 reporting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
DeSantis admin pressures news outlet to stop reporting on fraud allegations
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' opposition to the First Amendment is well established: see for example his efforts to roll back legal protections for media outlets and to quash diversity measures at private companies (which earned a colorful condemnation from a federal judge back in 2022). But his administration's latest effort to shut down a news investigation into alleged corruption is uniquely disturbing, even by his standards. The administration is facing criticism from First Amendment advocates over an unsigned cease-and-desist letter from Florida's Department of Children and Families (DCF) sent last week to the Orlando Sentinel, demanding that the paper and its reporter Jeffrey Schweers stop investigating allegations of fraud related to a community welfare program spearheaded by Casey DeSantis, the governor's wife and potential Republican candidate in next year's gubernatorial race. As NBC News reported: The investigation, first reported by the Tampa Bay Times/Miami Herald, centered on what the DeSantis administration did with money from a $67 million settlement with Medicaid contractor ... Desantis administration officials 'directed' $10 million from that pot of money to the Hope Florida Foundation, the nonprofit arm of an organization led by Casey DeSantis, according to records the group had to file as part of its nonprofit status. Of that money, $5 million was then sent to a group aligned with the Florida Chamber of Commerce, and another $5 million to a group called Save Our Society from Drugs. Those groups then sent a total of $8.5 million toward a political committee led by [state attorney general James] Uthmeier that was working to defeat the recreational marijuana amendment. It's not clear how much of the $10 million went directly to the PAC. The governor's administration apparently wants the Sentinel to cease its reporting on the matter. The cease-and-desist letter from the Florida DCF accuses Schweers of 'falsely and with malicious intent asserting that the families are implicated in fraudulent activity by accepting financial assistance from Hope Florida Foundation' and claims that Schweers' 'threats and accusations were used as coercion to get the families to make negative statements about Hope Florida.' (The Hope Florida Foundation, as NBC News notes, is the nonprofit arm of the DeSantis' welfare alternative, 'which has a goal to steer Florida residents away from government programs and instead toward services from nonprofits and faith groups,' according to the Tallahassee Democrat.) 'We stand by our stories and reject the state's attempt to chill free speech and encroach on our First Amendment right to report on an important issue,' Roger Simmons, the Sentinel's executive editor, told The Associated Press via email, adding that DCF's description of Schweers' reporting was 'completely false.' DeSantis appeared to co-sign the agency's demand in a tweet sharing the letter. 'Bottom feeders gonna bottom feed,' he said. In a reply to the governor's post, Schweers asked why the administration hadn't responded to his public records requests. He's also shared social media posts from people who say he's done nothing untoward and accusing the administration of blatant intimidation tactics. In the absence of any evidence of wrongdoing by Schweers or the Sentinel, it certainly looks like DeSantis is bearing down on the free press to silence a story simply because it might portray his family in a bad light. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
DeSantis admin pressures news outlet to stop reporting on fraud allegations
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' opposition to the First Amendment is well established: see for example his efforts to roll back legal protections for media outlets and to quash diversity measures at private companies (which earned a colorful condemnation from a federal judge back in 2022). But his administration's latest effort to shut down a news investigation into alleged corruption is uniquely disturbing, even by his standards. The administration is facing criticism from First Amendment advocates over an unsigned cease-and-desist letter from Florida's Department of Children and Families (DCF) sent last week to the Orlando Sentinel, demanding that the paper and its reporter Jeffrey Schweers stop investigating allegations of fraud related to a community welfare program spearheaded by Casey DeSantis, the governor's wife and potential Republican candidate in next year's gubernatorial race. As NBC News reported: The investigation, first reported by the Tampa Bay Times/Miami Herald, centered on what the DeSantis administration did with money from a $67 million settlement with Medicaid contractor ... Desantis administration officials 'directed' $10 million from that pot of money to the Hope Florida Foundation, the nonprofit arm of an organization led by Casey DeSantis, according to records the group had to file as part of its nonprofit status. Of that money, $5 million was then sent to a group aligned with the Florida Chamber of Commerce, and another $5 million to a group called Save Our Society from Drugs. Those groups then sent a total of $8.5 million toward a political committee led by [state attorney general James] Uthmeier that was working to defeat the recreational marijuana amendment. It's not clear how much of the $10 million went directly to the PAC. The governor's administration apparently wants the Sentinel to cease its reporting on the matter. The cease-and-desist letter from the Florida DCF accuses Schweers of 'falsely and with malicious intent asserting that the families are implicated in fraudulent activity by accepting financial assistance from Hope Florida Foundation' and claims that Schweers' 'threats and accusations were used as coercion to get the families to make negative statements about Hope Florida.' (The Hope Florida Foundation, as NBC News notes, is the nonprofit arm of the DeSantis' welfare alternative, 'which has a goal to steer Florida residents away from government programs and instead toward services from nonprofits and faith groups,' according to the Tallahassee Democrat.) 'We stand by our stories and reject the state's attempt to chill free speech and encroach on our First Amendment right to report on an important issue,' Roger Simmons, the Sentinel's executive editor, told The Associated Press via email, adding that DCF's description of Schweers' reporting was 'completely false.' DeSantis appeared to co-sign the agency's demand in a tweet sharing the letter. 'Bottom feeders gonna bottom feed,' he said. In a reply to the governor's post, Schweers asked why the administration hadn't responded to his public records requests. He's also shared social media posts from people who say he's done nothing untoward and accusing the administration of blatant intimidation tactics. In the absence of any evidence of wrongdoing by Schweers or the Sentinel, it certainly looks like DeSantis is bearing down on the free press to silence a story simply because it might portray his family in a bad light. This article was originally published on
New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Anti-ICE rioters are just as out of line as anti-black racists in ‘62
On Sept. 30, 1962, the University of Mississippi experienced a 'mostly peaceful' demonstration. As with all such protests, it was peaceful until it wasn't — it became a riot, and a particularly heinous and destructive one. The mob attacked federal officers, including border-patrol agents, with rocks and Molotov cocktails. They burned cars. They smashed street lights. They ransacked buildings. They drove vehicles at the officers. And they did it all to try to prevent the federal government from enforcing the law. This, discerning readers will realize, was the notorious Battle of Oxford, when students at Ole Miss and outside agitators exploded in fury to prevent the enrollment of James Meredith, an African-American, who was under the protection of federal agents. President John Kennedy had federalized the Mississippi National Guard days before the disturbance, and sent in the Army when things got out of hand. Eventually, he drew on 31,000 troops, a necessary exercise of overwhelming force. Now, once again, mobs are in the streets in opposition to federal power and federal law. We are probably at the beginning stages of another titanic struggle over whether the writ of federal law will run in jurisdictions opposed to it, and over the morality of those underlying laws. To use a term borrowed from segregationists in Virginia the 1950s, the opponents of ICE are engaged in a campaign of 'massive resistance.' Virginia Democrat Harry Byrd and his allies came up with an across-the-board strategy to undermine Brown v. Board of Education. 'If we can organize the Southern States for massive resistance to this order,' Byrd said, 'I think that in time the rest of the country will realize that racial integration is not going to be accepted in the South.' Similarly, Democratic officeholders and activists hope to make ICE raids so politically toxic and so painful to implement that the federal government stands down and accepts the status quo of routine lawlessness. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The opposition is relying on a version of another doctrine of the Southern resisters, nullification. This is the idea that states can invalidate federal laws that they deem an offense against our constitutional order. This notion has a long, undistinguished history in this country as a pre-cursor to the Civil War and, later, as a tool to attempt to preserve segregation. Although it is most associated with the South, other parts of the country have tried to resort to it, as well. Now progressive cities and states are joining the list. They have no equivalent of John C. Calhoun, the brilliant, if catastrophically wrong, South Carolina statesman who developed a sophisticated defense of the concept. Instead, they want de facto nullification, or nullification as a practical matter rather than a theory. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has been quite clear about this. 'We need to stop the raids,' she insists. 'The only thing it does is contribute to chaos.' Her attitude would take Los Angeles well beyond its status as a sanctuary city, which involves not affirmatively cooperating with the feds, and make it something else — effectively a no-go zone for immigration officers and a jurisdiction that affirmatively resists them. Of course, the anti-ICE resistance would reject any association with the massive resistance of yore, arguing that its cause is just, in contrast to the segregationist South. But violent opposition to law-enforcement officers acting within their lawful powers is deeply wrong, whatever the underlying cause (and mass illegal immigration imposes significant costs on our society). If enforcing our laws is offensive to progressives, they should seek to change the statutes in question and to pass a large-scale amnesty, rather than relying on a rioter's veto to dictate what ICE agents can do and where they can go. Violent mobs have no legitimate part to play in our democratic republic, not in Oxford, Miss., in 1962, not in Los Angeles, Calif., or anywhere else inspired by its sordid example in 2025. Twitter: @RichLowry
