
The TRUTH about resident doctors' pay and their eye-watering demands for up to £20,000 extra a year - ahead of 5-day NHS strike
In pursuit of salary hikes worth up to £20,000, resident doctors will bring hospitals to a standstill from Friday as they walkout for five consecutive days.
Militant union bosses orchestrating the carnage claim the medics – previously known as junior doctors – need a rise worth in excess of 29 per cent to make up for 17 years of 'pay erosion'.
This is on top of the average 28.9 per cent awarded to resident doctors over the last three years, including an inflation-busting hike this year of 5.4 per cent – the most generous in the public sector.
British Medical Association (BMA) bosses argue this is not enough.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting blasted the BMA's strike action, calling it 'shockingly irresponsible' and insisting he will not budge on pay.
The Government claims the average full-time basic pay of a resident doctor now sits at £54,300. This is up from around £42,000 in 2022/23.
If the BMA's demands are met, their average basic salary would exceed £70,000 per year. Compared with 2024/25 pay packets, this would give the most senior resident doctors an extra £20,000.
Ministers are still seeking a deal to avert more strike chaos, which could see doctors have some of their student loan debt wiped off to appease them.
Resident doctors have taken industrial action 11 times since initial negotiations began in 2022.
Campaign materials pushed out by the BMA say pay erosion equates to 21 per cent below inflation since 2008/09.
On its website, the union writes: 'Put another way, resident doctors are still working a fifth of their time for free.'
However, this sum is calculated against the Retail Price Index (RPI) inflation measure.
Tracking resident doctors' salary against the Consumer Price Index (CPI) instead, the Nuffield Trust found they are just 4.7 per cent below since 2008.
Addressing this erosion would amount to an average lift of around five per cent. This would amount to an average pay boost of below £3,000.
When measured against CPI levels since 2015/16, the Nuffield Trust revealed resident doctors have actually had a 7.9 per cent pay increase.
Government sources have criticised the BMA's use of RPI in its calculations because it overstates inflation.
It was, for this reason, the statistics watchdog downgraded RPI as an official national measure in 2013. Since then, CPI and CPIH (CPI including housing costs) have been the accepted standards for calculating inflation.
MailOnline understands the Government will phase out its use by the end of the decade.
Grilled about the pay of other NHS staff, Mr Streeting told MPs that cash is 'finite'.
He said: 'These sorts of choices and trade-offs about resources are precisely why I asked BMA resident doctors to understand why, having received a 28.9 per cent pay rise from this government in the last year, they ought to remember the responsibility that I have, and they also have to some of their lower paid colleagues.
'Resources are finite, and it is important that I act in the interests of all NHS staff and have particular concern for those who work extremely hard but are not properly rewarded.'
However, the BMA has defended its use of RPI, arguing it is a more accurate metric for everyday people.
A BMA spokesperson said: 'RPI is a measure which we, in line with the wider trade union movement, believe best reflects the real life experience of working people in the UK, and which the Government continues to use when it suits.
'For one thing, RPI sets student loan repayments. In a country where new doctors often have student debts of over £100,000 this is a hefty chunk of their living costs.
'Car taxes and train fare caps are also set by RPI, making up a huge part of the costs of many doctors finding themselves with long commuting distances as they get moved around the country on rotations.
'These moves also mean the need to find housing, a cost which itself feeds back into the calculations of RPI and make it even more relevant to the life of a working doctor.'
MailOnline analysis shows that basic full-time equivalent (FTE) pay packets for all but one group of resident doctors has risen over the past 15 years against CPIH.
Just foundation year 2 (FY2) doctors have seen a pay erosion when looking at the figures this way.
FY1, core training and speciality registrar doctors' salaries were 1.1, 6.5 and 1.7 per cent higher, respectively, in March 2025 than August 2010, when compared with CPIH inflation.
Our calculations only include basic pay, so the approximate one-quarter of doctors' salaries which is additional pay – such as overtime and uplifts for unsocial hours – is not included.
In September, BMA members voted to accept a Government pay deal worth 22.3 per cent on average over two years to end a swathe of strike action plaguing the previous Tory government.
The 2025/26 pay deal saw resident doctors given a 4 per cent uplift plus £750 'on a consolidated basis'.
This worked out as an average pay rise of 5.4 per cent, totalling 28.9 per cent over the three years.
However, this did not prove enough to ward off further strike action, with BMA members overwhelmingly voting in favour of fresh action over the offer. Nearly 90 per cent of 30,000 doctors (55 per cent turnout) voted to walk out.
A spokesperson for the Department for Health and Social Care told MailOnline: 'Resident doctors have seen the biggest pay rises in the public sector two years in a row thanks to this government, and a pay increase of 28.9 per cent across three years.
'Public support for resident doctors strikes has collapsed and the majority of BMA resident doctors did not even vote for these strikes.'
Nuffield Trust researcher Lucina Rolewicz said: 'You can paint a very different picture of real-terms changes to resident doctors' pay packets over time, depending on the methods you use.
'It's important to look at a range of baseline years to get a more complete understanding of what has happened to pay. For example, if you look at what's changed since 2008, pay erosion appears much worse than if you looked at the changes since 2015 in isolation.
'Against the CPI measure of inflation, this can make the difference of showing a 4.7 per cent fall in pay since 2008 or a 7.9 per cent increase since 2015.
'Comparing changes to pay at the same point in time, using different measures of inflation, also results in very different answers. For instance, resident doctor pay has fallen by 4.7 per cent since 2008 against CPI, but has decreased by 17.9 per cent over the same period when using RPI.
'Given the importance of the debate for doctors, their colleagues, patients and taxpayers, it is crucial that we look at all the ways that pay can be seen to have changed.'
It comes after a report yesterday warned the looming strikes could cause 250,000 appointments to be cancelled or postponed this month.
The walkouts may also cost the NHS £87million in staffing cover, the Policy Exchange think-tank said.
Charities have expressed their 'deep concern' at the action and warned it will cause 'significant distress, pain and worsening health for patients'.
Consultants will be able to cash-in by charging hospitals inflated rates of up to £2,504 a shift to cover for absent junior colleagues, depleting them of funds that could have been used to buy new scanners, repair buildings or deliver more procedures.
Resident doctors have qualified from medical school but remain in clinical training for up to eight years. They work under the supervision of senior doctors during their on-the-job experience.
Previous strikes by junior doctors led to the deaths of at least five patients, an audit revealed last week.
NHS leaders have warned even 'more lives could be put at risk' during next week's five-day full walkout.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
Third of young people want fat jabs as demand spirals
A third of young adults want to take fat jabs amid a surge in demand for the drugs, pharmacists have said. One in five people say they have tried to access a pharmacy weight-loss treatment in the past year but this figure is 35 per cent for those aged between 16 and 34. Pharmacists have raised the alarm that demand has far exceeded what can be clinically delivered. Concerns have also been raised that people could resort to looking for drugs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro from online sellers. Current guidelines state that patients being prescribed Mounjaro and Wegovy through pharmacies need a BMI of at least 35 and at least one weight-related comorbidity, such as diabetes, to be eligible. Wegovy can also be prescribed to patients with a BMI of 30–34 who meet the criteria for referral to specialist overweight and obesity management services. However, the NHS is only rolling out Mounjaro to patients with a BMI of over 40 and at least four co-morbidities. It spent £269million on fat jabs in 2024-2025 and prescriptions doubled to almost three million a year. Mounjaro, regarded as the strongest jab and known as King Kong, has driven the spike in prescriptions with 1.1million given out in a year compared with 3,300 in the previous 12 months. The National Pharmacy Association (NPA), which represents about 6,000 pharmacies, surveyed 2,000 Britons and found evidence of demand beyond what the NHS can offer. It is now seeking greater clarity on how pharmacies will be further involved in the distribution of weight-loss medication, something laid out in the Government's recent 10 Year Health Plan. Olivier Picard, chairman of the NPA, said: 'Weight-loss jabs are one of the biggest drug innovations this century but growing demand highlights the need to make sure this is appropriate for those who want it. 'It's clear from this polling that many more people are interested in getting weight-loss jabs than would actually be suitable for treatment. 'We want to make sure supplies are carefully managed so that those in most clinical need can benefit from medication. 'We're also urging the Government to bring forward plans to include pharmacies in the rollout of their NHS weight-management programme. 'Pharmacists are experts in medication and many have extensive experience delivering weight-loss injections as part of a package of care including lifestyle advice. 'Pharmacies are well placed to help roll this treatment out on the NHS and help people make the best use of these powerful medicines,' he added


Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Prostate cancer checks soar after Sir Chris Hoy reveals diagnosis
Thousands more men are having checks for prostate cancer since Sir Chris Hoy revealed he had been diagnosed with the disease and was terminally ill. The six-time Olympic cycling gold medallist was told in 2023 that he was terminally ill with cancer that originated in his prostate, and shared his diagnosis publicly last year. Despite a family history of prostate cancer – which also affected his father and grandfather – Sir Chris was never offered the PSA test that could have detected it. New NHS data show almost 5,000 extra men have been referred for urological cancer in the six months after Sir Chris, 49, spoke out, a trend described by experts as 'staggering'. The figures, from October 2024 to March 2025, show 138,734 men were given an urgent referral for urological cancers, with prostate cancer the main form of disease. This amounts to an extra 4,962 cases compared with the same six-month period in 2023-24. Separate data show a huge increase in the number of men with a family history of prostate cancer who have assessed their own risk. The number of men with such a history who have used an online risk checker to assess their chances of the disease rose by 77 per cent over the period. Telegraph launches screening campaign The findings have been released as The Telegraph launches a campaign calling for the introduction of targeted screening for prostate cancer. Men are not offered tests currently, even if they have a family history of the disease. Experts believe there is a growing case for targeted screening, meaning that PSA blood tests would be offered to those at heightened risk of the disease. Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, hopes to harness AI and data to improve prostate cancer screening for high-risk men which factors in family history, genetics, demographics and other factors. Mr Kyle, writing in The Telegraph, said he hopes researchers can harness the vast amount of health data available to 'develop AI-powered tools that can predict cancer risk' to save thousands of lives a year. The UK National Screening Committee is currently considering whether to recommend the introduction of mass testing. 'I told my story to raise awareness' Sir Chris said: 'I was diagnosed with stage four prostate cancer at 47. By this age, my prostate cancer was advanced and could have been progressing from when I was 45 or even younger. With prostate cancer, the earlier you find it, the easier it is to treat. We need the system to change to enable more men to get diagnosed earlier, and stop them getting the news I got. 'That's why I believe men at highest risk, for example men with a family history like me, or black men, should be contacted by their GP earlier on to discuss a simple PSA blood test that can check for signs of prostate cancer. 'Then if there are any issues, they can get it treated it at an earlier stage. 'I've told my story to help raise awareness about the most common cancer in men and get more thinking about their risk and what they can do, but it shouldn't all be men's responsibility.' The online risk checking tool, published by Prostate Cancer Research UK, asks men simple questions about their family history and ethnicity to determine risk levels, and gives advice about what help to seek. The charity found that the number of men undergoing the check rose by 45 per cent overall, when data from October 2024 to February 2025 was compared with the same period the year before. The sharpest increase by far came from men aged between 45 and 49, with a family history of the disease. In total 10,427 such men checked their risk, compared with 5,891 in the same period the previous years. In total there were 688,796 checks during the period, up from 473, 843 the year before.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Whitehaven plans for mental health hub at former bank
Plans have been submitted to create a 24/7 mental health hub in a former bank building, as part of an NHS pilot Community Trust Limited has applied for permission to turn the former Halifax branch on King Street, Whitehaven, into the Hope Haven comes after NHS England announced the pilot to expand mental health services in the area and bring different services under one roof."The hub will provide drop-in support, 1:1 consultations, group therapy and sessions focused on physical health, fitness, health promotion and shared learning," planning documents submitted to Cumberland Council said. Various organisations would work from the hub including Cumbria, Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, mental health charities and organisations that can provide housing and employment Halifax branch shut in 2024 and although the building is not listed it sits within the Whitehaven town centre conservation documents said minimal alterations would be made to the outside of the building and any work would respect its "architectural character and historic value"."The proposed use seeks to revitalise the building, currently vacant and in a state of decline," they added. Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.