logo
EPA funds still frozen despite agency memo, lawmakers' pressure

EPA funds still frozen despite agency memo, lawmakers' pressure

Yahoo06-02-2025

Funding for several key Environmental Protection Agency programs remained on hold Wednesday despite an internal directive calling for agency staff to comply with a court ruling to disburse the money and intervention from lawmakers concerned about projects in their states and districts.
An internal EPA memo issued Tuesday that was obtained by POLITICO directed agency officials to 'enable the obligation' of funds under the bipartisan infrastructure law and Inflation Reduction Act that had been paused by the Trump administration since it took office. The EPA memo cited a ruling by a federal judge on Monday that barred agencies from enforcing any remaining elements of the administration's spending freeze.
However, EPA has not issued information on which of the programs funded by the two laws have been unfrozen, sparking confusion among award recipients and on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers from both parties are pushing the administration to allow the money to flow to particular programs.
EPA declined to comment for this story, citing the pending litigation.
'It's hard to tell what is incompetence and what is confusion and what is basically contemptuous trickery,' said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Environment and Public Works Committee. 'But it does seem that they say one thing, and then the funds don't move.'
EPW Chair Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) has been in contact with EPA in a bid to get funds released, she and other lawmakers said.
Awards under EPA's brownfields remediation program, which was funded by the infrastructure law, were flowing again on Wednesday after Capito and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) intervened, the two lawmakers said in a hearing. Most of the programs that EPA initially targeted to be unfrozen were from the infrastructure law, POLITICO previously reported.
But the internet portal to access funds from EPA's $5 billion Clean School Bus program, which was created by the infrastructure law, remained inaccessible on Wednesday, according to two recipients.
Chris Kilbride, the superintendent of the Ritenour School District outside St. Louis, Missouri, told POLITICO the district was unable access the EPA funds it was planning to draw down this week to pay for 21 new electric buses, all of which are built and ready to be delivered.
'Our grant is still frozen,' Kilbride said. 'We've got our CFO checking three times a day on the portal.'
The district also received a $830,000 bill this week for EV charging stations it installed for the buses — costs that are meant to be funded by the program. It is working with its contractor to delay payment until it gets clarity on the federal funds. 'We're committed to not using local tax dollars to make this happen,' Kilbride said.
Neither Kilbride nor Rep. Wesley Bell , a Democrat who represents the district, have been able to get information from EPA on if or when the grant will be unfrozen.
'There's no guidance — I'm a congressman, and we're scrambling to figure out what the administration is trying to do,' Bell said. 'We should not be wondering if a school district can buy school buses that are ready and waiting for it.'
Capito said she had also discussed the Clean Bus Program with people in the Trump administration after GreenPower, a bus manufacturer in her state that has received orders funded by the program, told her it is 'concerned' about losing funding.
'We are trying to help them work through it to figure out what the status is,' Capito said.
One person who works with state governments on climate policies said on Wednesday all the IRA money was frozen, including the $7 billion Solar for All program and the $5 billion climate pollution reduction grants programs.
Another official with a state energy office also told POLITICO on Wednesday that it still could not access EPA climate funds despite the new agency memo.
Whitehouse accused EPA of purposefully creating a 'fog bank of confusion and uncertainty and uncommunicativeness' around the status of the funds.
He praised Capito for her effort 'to work through individual jams of Republican and Democratic members' by flagging issues to the Trump administration, but said those interactions have not led 'all the way to money flowing.'
Sen. Martin Heinrich of New Mexico, the top Democrat on the Energy Committee, said he had seen some 'surprising and positive' progress on unfreezing funding for his state, but money for some other programs was still held up.
'It's chaos, and that's the point,' Heinrich told POLITICO Wednesday.
Energy Committee staff members familiar with the situation had previously told POLITICO that recipients of money from the Interior Department's Bureau of Reclamation had informed the committee that their awards for several projects funded under the IRA and infrastructure law were on hold. Those included projects enhancing drought resilience, erosion mitigation and sediment removal.
Other Democrats said they are fearful the Trump administration could start unlocking funding for Republican-led states, but not theirs.
'At what point is he [Trump] going to start picking winners and losers?' said Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.). 'And at what point is he gonna decide if you're from a Republican state you get to keep some of this funding but if you're a Democrat from a blue state, you don't? That's not how this should work.'
Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), a Trump ally, said the administration is coming to terms with the challenge of clawing back obligated funds appropriated in laws passed by Congress.
'What they are probably finding is it's not as easy as you might think to take a scalpel at a law that has passed,' Cramer said. 'He [Trump] throws this stuff out and sees where it lands and it's already working itself through.'
Zack Colman contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret
I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret

Business Upturn

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret

By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 11, 2025, 12:44 IST In what appears to be a shift in tone, Elon Musk on Tuesday posted that he regrets some of his recent remarks about President Donald Trump, saying, 'They went too far.' I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 This comes just days after Trump addressed their ongoing feud, stating he wished Musk 'very well' and suggesting the tech mogul might be seeking a conversation. In a gesture that caught attention, Musk had responded with a heart emoji on X (formerly Twitter), sparking speculation about a possible reconciliation. Tensions between the two escalated last week after Musk called Trump's proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' a 'pork-filled abomination' and accused the President of suppressing Jeffrey Epstein-related files. The latter post, which Musk later deleted, reportedly infuriated Trump, who retaliated with harsh criticism and even threatened to sever government contracts with Musk-led firms. The feud intensified when Musk countered by threatening to halt NASA-linked SpaceX missions and claimed Trump would have lost the 2024 election without his support. He also floated the possibility of impeachment. However, Musk's latest message—posted at 12:34 PM on June 11—marks a notable departure from his confrontational stance, possibly signaling the beginning of a de-escalation. While no official conversation has been confirmed, both camps appear to be softening their positions, leaving the door open for future dialogue. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill

time28 minutes ago

Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda. Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles, where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers 'much-needed reinforcements,' including 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, $45 billion to expand migrant detention facilities and billions more to carry out at least 1 million deportations a year. 'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families," he said. "It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.'

Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump
Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump

(Reuters) -Billionaire Elon Musk said on Wednesday that he regrets some of the posts he made last week about U.S President Donald Trump, in a message on his social media platform X. "I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote. Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination." Musk's post comes days after Trump said his relationship with Musk was over.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store