logo
Iraqi activists seek to oust Iranian influence, normalize ties with Israel

Iraqi activists seek to oust Iranian influence, normalize ties with Israel

Yahoo17-02-2025
FIRST ON FOX - A group of young Iraqis launched an initiative called "Iraq Only" with the goal of having better relations with the U.S. and eliminating Iranian militias' hold over Iraq.
The campaign, which involved posting stickers printed with the Iraqi flag and placed over images of militia leaders in Iraq, was a grassroots initiative started by young people to empower the rule of law and build a democratic and citizen-based state in Iraq, free of Iranian influence.
Fox News Digital spoke exclusively with one of the activists who spearheaded the recent effort, Muqtada al-Tamimi, about his experience of social activism, their goals for Iraq's future, and being kidnapped for his activity of sounding the alarm on Iranian influence.
A Weakened Iran Has Iraq Looking To Curb Tehran-backed Extremists In Country
"We as activists suffer the most from Iranian influence over Iraq. Many of us have been kidnapped and taken into illegal detention centers run by Iranian-backed militias. And some were killed," al-Tamimi, who is a businessman and in his late 20s, told Fox News Digital through his interpreter.
Al-Tamimi and some of his fellow activists were kidnapped by Iranian-aligned armed groups and were tortured for five days. They were shackled, abused, tortured and had their phones and personal data confiscated without any legal document or judge's signature proving they had the right to access these documents.
Read On The Fox News App
"We as activists are persecuted for simply trying to raise our own flag, the Iraqi flag," al-Tamimi lamented.
Al-Tamimi said the Iranian militias act with impunity and don't respect the Iraqi constitution or Iraqis' rights as citizens.
"The people most harmed by Iranian militias are people like us who call for peace and co-existence in Iraq and with our neighboring countries," he said.
Al-Tamimi and his fellow activists want a strong Iraq that has a stable and integrated economy with the West.
"We believe that an Iraqi alliance with the West would make Iraq stronger, stable, and more prosperous."
Al-Tamimi and his associates' desire to remove Iranian influence and move Iraq closer to the U.S. and the West is what leaders in Tehran fear most.
Who Is The Iran-backed Coalition Islamic Resistance In Iraq, Responsible For Deadly Drone Strike On Us Troops?
The groundwork for the activism was first laid in 2021 when 312 Iraqis from the Shi'a and Sunni communities convened in Erbil in a conference facilitated by the Center for Peace Communications (CPC), and called for peace and normalization with Israel. Once word of the conference spread across international media, the Iran-backed militias issued death threats, and the Iraqi government issued arrest warrants for conference organizers. CPC took measures to protect all participants from jail or being harmed.
"The Iraq Only movement speaks to pent-up Iraqi demand for peace, development, and an end to Iranian domination. We wish these young men and women Godspeed in driving change, and hope the U.S. will do everything it can to help them," CPC's founder and president Joseph Braude told Fox News Digital.
Iraq has become a central battleground for regional dominance between U.S. and coalition forces and Iran. Tehran uses allies in Iraq to exert its regional influence and also undermine Iraqi sovereignty through various proxy forces.
The Islamic Resistance of Iraq is a group of armed Islamic resistance factions under the umbrella of the Iran-backed "Axis of Resistance." These groups are the most difficult for the Iraqi government to manage and were responsible for the attack that killed three U.S. service members in Jordan in January 2024.
The IRI has been engaging in armed operations against Israel and U.S. coalition forces since Oct. 7. Also operating in Iraq are the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), which were formed in 2014 to fight ISIS.
Iraq Only is also supportive of U.S. forces on Iraqi soil, even as the status of the 2,500 troops in the country remains uncertain.
Netanyahu Hails 'Historic' Fall Of Bashar Assad In Syria, Credits Israeli Attacks On Hezbollah, Iran
"The American presence in Iraq does not at all contradict a strong Iraq but the opposite. A good relationship with the United States means a strong Iraq."
Al-Tamimi said he understands and appreciates the heavy price paid by American forces in upholding the stability and security of Iraq since the invasion of 2003.
One aspect of their platform that may raise eyebrows is their recognition of Israel's place in the Middle East and their desire for closer ties with Israel.
"Israel is a great country and has a great culture. We share with them a lot of the geography and as we are looking at and seeking a strong Iraq, we need to seek a strong partnership with a country like Israel if needed."
Al-Tamimi also notes that everyday Iraqis have suffered and paid a high price because of the alliance between Iraq and Iran. Physical infrastructure was destroyed, and Iranian interference undermined state institutions. Eradicating Iranian influence will help Iraq, in their view, ultimately become safer and more prosperous.
"We think once we have a strong relationship with Israel and the United States, we will have a strong Iraq."
Click To Get The Fox News App
Al-Tamimi also sees positive signs for Iraq and the Middle East after the fall of longtime dictator Bashar al-Assad in Syria.
"We believe the removal of the Assad regime is a very good step for undermining Iranian influence in the region and gives us as Iraqis hope for better change in the region."Original article source: Iraqi activists seek to oust Iranian influence, normalize ties with Israel
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran Reacts to Nuclear Deal Threat
Iran Reacts to Nuclear Deal Threat

Newsweek

time5 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Iran Reacts to Nuclear Deal Threat

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Tehran has been preparing "for years" to counter the possible reimposition of U.N. sanctions under the existing nuclear deal's "snapback" mechanism, Iran's foreign minister said on Wednesday as tensions over stalled nuclear talks threaten to renew conflict between Iran and the West. Newsweek has reached out to European Commission's foreign affairs spokesperson for comment. Why It Matters The E3 nations of France, Germany and the United Kingdom have threatened to invoke a sanctions clause under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) if there remains no progress on a new deal with Iran before the old one expires in October. Iran in turn has openly signaled that it is coordinating with China and Russia to withstand the growing Western pressure on its nuclear program, which the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says poses a threat due to Tehran's enrichment levels. In this photo released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a ceremony commemorating military personnel, nuclear scientists and other people who were... In this photo released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a ceremony commemorating military personnel, nuclear scientists and other people who were killed during Israeli airstrikes in June, in Tehran, Iran, Tuesday, July 29, 2025. More Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/AP What To Know "We have had various joint meetings and designed a series of joint measures that we will implement if the snapback is activated," Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said regarding coordination with allies Moscow and Beijing. The three capitals have been "working for years on a plan to counter the snapback," Iran's official news service IRNA quoted him as saying. The JCPOA capped Iran's uranium enrichment at 3.67 percent, enough for civilian energy uses but far below the threshold needed to create a bomb. President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the deal in 2018, citing its ineffectiveness at curbing Tehran's nuclear program. The snapback mechanism in the existing deal now remains the only U.N.-backed mechanism to penalize Iran for serious non-compliance. The return of U.N. sanctions on Iran would include an arms embargo, missile and drone restrictions, bans on most nuclear activity, and travel, banking and asset freezes on designated Iranian entities and individuals. Araghchi, however, dismissed their effectiveness. "The economic sanctions of the Security Council are far more limited than the current unilateral U.S. sanctions." "Things will not become any worse than the current situation. Yes, from a psychological and political, and even strategic point of view, there are consequences, but not to the extent that it would bring diplomacy to a dead end or paralyze the country," he said. What People Are Saying Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, said in an interview on Wednesday: "They think the snapback is the only tool they have. Here we have clearly explained our position: first, you have basically no right to use it as you, too, have effectively withdrawn from the deal following the U.S. withdrawal, and with your recent positions, including the zero enrichment. So you're no longer a participant in the JCPOA, and the right to snapback belongs only to remaining members." Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia's permanent representative to international organisations in Vienna, said on X on Wednesday: "The above-mentioned European states are themselves in violation of res.2231 and the #JCPOA. Therefore, legally speaking, they as violators don't have the right to launch SnapBack." Lin Jian, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said on Friday: "China stays committed to peacefully resolving the Iranian nuclear issue through political and diplomatic means, opposes invoking Security Council 'snapback' sanctions." What Happens Next With the JCPOA's so-called "sunset clauses" set to expire in October, Tehran is hardening its position on nuclear enrichment by steering future IAEA cooperation under the authority of its Supreme National Security Council, the country's top national security body.

Mamdani sidesteps 'communism' question, says his campaign is about 'distribution of wealth'
Mamdani sidesteps 'communism' question, says his campaign is about 'distribution of wealth'

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mamdani sidesteps 'communism' question, says his campaign is about 'distribution of wealth'

New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani dodged a question about President Donald Trump labeling him a "communist" when pressed by Fox News' Nate Foy on Wednesday. Referencing a Fox News Digital report, in which his supporters dismissed Mamdani's "communist" label, Foy asked the self-described democratic socialist if the distinction between communism and socialism matters. "Are there elements of communism in your platform?" Foy asked. "The elements of my platform are all about affordability, and I am a democratic socialist," Mamdani said. "When New Yorkers ask me what it means, I take them to the words of Dr. Martin Luther King, who said, 'Call it democracy or call it democratic socialism, there must be a better distribution of wealth for all of God's children in this country.'" Zohran Mamdani Supporters Unfazed By Trump's 'Communist' Label, Defend The Candidate's Affordability Fight Since Mamdani's primary upset earlier this summer, the Democratic mayoral nominee has been branded a "communist" by Trump. Read On The Fox News App Zohran Mamdani Launches Anti-trump Tour Across Five Boroughs In New York City Mamdani supporters who spoke to Fox News Digital at a canvass launch in Prospect Park on Sunday dismissed the term, arguing that his primary win represented more than arbitrary labels. "It's not necessarily communism that won the New York City primary, but the vision that he's delivering for a more affordable New York," said Nina, a door-knocker who wore an "Educators for Zohran" T-shirt on Sunday. "That's what people voted for, and that's what he won on, and that's what he's going to win on." Mamdani has been endorsed by progressive leaders, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. Trump was quick to label him a "100% Communist Lunatic" after Mamdani declared victory in June. Perry, another Brooklyn canvasser, flipped the script on Trump's nickname for Mamdani, telling Fox News Digital to "look at the people who are saying he can't do it or who are calling him a socialist or communist." Bridget, a New York City teacher, and Perry both shook their heads in disagreement when asked if those labels worry them. "It's not about ideology," said Nicholas, a Mamdani supporter who volunteered in Prospect Park on Sunday for the campaign's canvass launch. "It's not trying to demonize these terms, communism and socialism, which, quite frankly, I think the American public does not have a very good idea of what those terms exactly mean." Fox News Digital posed the same question to everyday New Yorkers in Manhattan's Union Square on Tuesday evening. One voter, Ritvik, who said he was voting for Mamdani in the upcoming November election, despite usually leaning to the right, said the "communist" label didn't phase him. "That kind of rhetoric has always come from the Trump administration, so not particularly surprising to me," Ritvik said. Another Mamdani voter, Ian, told Fox News Digital that it's "hard not to ignore the connection between the biggest city in America and the president." But despite Trump's eagerness to criticize Mamdani, Ian said he appreciates that Mamdani is more focused on delivering for New Yorkers. Mamdani hosted a weeklong "Five Boroughs Against Trump" tour across New York City last week. The mayoral hopeful spoke to reporters on Wednesday after joining the Hotel & Gaming Trades Council (HTC) union for a rally outside the Surrey Hotel. The protesters criticized the hotel for allegedly not rehiring over 100 union workers who were laid off during the article source: Mamdani sidesteps 'communism' question, says his campaign is about 'distribution of wealth' Solve the daily Crossword

Rwanda-backed rebel group M23 denies role in Congo massacres

timean hour ago

Rwanda-backed rebel group M23 denies role in Congo massacres

DAKAR, Senegal -- The Rwanda-backed rebel group M23 has denied involvement in a series of massacres in eastern Congo which were detailed in a report published by a rights group Wednesday. Lawrence Kanyuka, spokesperson for the M23 military, called the Human Rights Watch report 'fake and a falsification of reality' and accused the group of spreading 'extremist propaganda' in a statement late Wednesday. M23 is the most prominent of more than 100 armed groups fighting for control in Congo's mineral-rich east. Both M23 and the Congolese military have previously been accused of violence against civilians. Earlier this year, Congolese authorities accused M23 of extrajudicial killings during its seizure of major cities. In the report, Human Rights Watch accused M23 of killing over 140 civilians as part of a military campaign against the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group made up mostly of ethnic Hutu fighters. Nearly 2 million Hutus from Rwanda fled to Congo after the 1994 Rwandan genocide that killed 800,000 Tutsis, moderate Hutus and others. Rwandan authorities have accused Hutus who fled of participating in the genocide, alleging that the Congolese army protected them. Bertrand Bisimwa, an M23 leader, said on social platform X that the report was intended to influence the United Nations Security Council and was not based on evidence. A separate report by another rights group, Amnesty International, also published Wednesday, found that both M23 and Congolese government-sponsored militias regularly committed mass atrocities and sexual violence against civilians. With 7 million people displaced in Congo, the U.N. has called the conflict in eastern Congo 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth.' The United States and others have been trying to achieve a permanent ceasefire since fighting between M23 and Congolese forces escalated in January. The Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers signed a peace deal at the White House in July. But M23 was not directly involved in the negotiations and said it could not abide by the terms of the agreement. The final step was meant to be a separate deal between Congo and M23, facilitated by the Gulf state of Qatar, that would bring about a permanent ceasefire. However, a deadline for the deal was missed and there have been no public signs of major talks between Congo and M23 on the final terms. The U.S. Bureau of African affairs, in a statement late Wednesday on X, called for an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council to discuss the 'horrific abuses perpetrated against civilians, including by M23.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store