Most people prefer to spend time and de-stress with pets over partners, new research finds
A global survey of 30,000 pet owners found that 65 percent of people would prefer to de-stress in the company of their dog, cat or other household pet – significantly more than those who said their partners (37 percent), family (24 percent), children (22 percent) or friends (21 percent).
More than half of pet owners – 59 percent – said their pets provided company without the need to talk during stressful times, while nearly a quarter said their pet provided a space for them to express worries or concerns without expecting a response.
But for most pet owners – 90 percent of them – the simple presence of their pet is relaxing, offering a sense of calm that doesn't require words or actions.
The findings, commissioned by pet care business Mars and mental health company Calm, also revealed how pets can reinforce other good mental health habits, such as encouraging us to step away from screens, spend more time outdoors and take a break from work and chores.
Almost eight in 10 said their pet reminds them to pause and take a break from work, chores or tasks, while 77 percent said their pet encourages them to take a break away from screens.
The heartwarming results make it no surprise that nine in 10 Aussies surveyed said their pet had positively impacted their mental wellbeing.
'While we love our pets, we often don't realise how much they give back,' Dr Tammie King, a specialist in human-animal interaction and senior research manager at the Waltham Petcare Science Institute said.
New research reveals that a majority of pet owners prefer to spend time with their pets over their life partners when they are stressed out.
yurakrasil – stock.adobe.com
'Reframing your pet's daily 'interruptions' as loving reminders to pause, breathe and be present can be a powerful wellness tool.'
'Research shows that touch-based pet interactions can boost oxytocin levels in humans.'
'The findings of this survey will help more people reflect on and acknowledge the little wellbeing moments pets nudge us towards on a daily basis.'
The survey marks the launch of a partnership between Mars – which produces pet care brands including Pedigree, Royal Canin and Whiskas – and meditation app Calm.
The survey conducted by Mars and mental health company Calm, reveals that 65% of 30,000 pet owners would rather de-stress in the company of their household pet over their partner, family, children, or friends.
tonefotografia – stock.adobe.com
The businesses have joined forces to shine a light on how our furry friends can boost our mental health through a pet-inspired content series.
The content is designed to help users relax, reflect and recharge.
In addition to the content series, Mars and Calm have launched a social media campaign to find stories from pet owners of their pets, to explore how they help our mental health.
The stories will become inspiration for Calm content later in the year.
'We know that small, intentional moments of calm can have a big impact on our overall wellbeing, and our pets have an incredible way of guiding us there,' Dr Chris Mosunic, chief clinical officer at Calm said.
'A quick dog walk or cat cuddle at our desk when they stroll in front of the screen, can provide a simple moment to reset and recharge.'
'We're proud to partner with Mars and bring this data to the forefront to highlight the potential of our bond with pets and help more people discover the wonderful wellbeing benefits our relationship with pets can bring.'
For more information on the Mars x Calm partnership, visit: kinship.com/petsandwellbeing
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Brain expert shares simple breathing technique to calm the mind and body in seconds
Dr. Daniel Amen — psychiatrist, brain imaging specialist and founder of Amen Clinics in California — says this quick, 15-second method can help calm the body and mind.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
'Our priority remain patients and staff' - hospital needs to £37M of savings
Bolton NHS Foundation needs to save a staggering £37 million to balance the books. Health bosses say they, like other trusts, are facing challenges - but their priority remains patients, staff and the community. The trust, which runs the Royal Bolton Hospital, reported a £2.4 million deficit in April, with board members told the figure was £900,000 worse than planned at a recent meeting. Schemes are being drawn up to make these savings, which include the roll-out of an electronic stock system and a Mutually Agreed Resignation Scheme (MARS). Agency spending exceeded NHS England targets, accounting for 2.2 per cent of pay costs compared to the national benchmark of 1.5 per cent. A presentation from the Finance and Investment Committee said PwC had been approached to assist with evaluating the Trust's financial position. READ MORE: Royal Bolton Hospital in line for multi-million cash boost Bolton NHS waiting lists fall by more than 7000 people Bolton NHS Foundation Trust struggling to plug £29m funding gap It was noted that Public Dividend Capital funding cash has provided a temporary benefit of £2.0m and some other cash has been received in advance. Speaking at the board meeting, Bolton NHS FT Non-Executive Director Sean Harriss said: 'The Trust's issues around performance and quality are moving in the right direction, but we do have some challenges. 'It is something we need to keep an eye on as a board going forward, as we get back to targets there are questions as to where quality and delivery are put under strain. 'I think a collective refection from the executive team would be useful for understanding what's happening, with triangulation between those areas.' Chief Finance Officer Annette Walker also presented the annual accounts for 2024/25 to the Audit and Risk Committee, which showed a year-end deficit of £8.9 million before adjustments. After impairments and other technical items, the operational deficit stood at £5.9 million. The Trust's year-end cash balance was reported at just over £10.6 million, with £16.7 million in capital expenditure. The board was also told that the Trust is engaging collectively with other organisations in the system before seeking any additional cash support. Annette Walker, Chief Finance Officer at Bolton NHS Foundation Trust said: 'Along with other Trusts across Greater Manchester, we are currently facing financial challenges. A great deal of work needs to take place to deliver significant savings over the next twelve months and beyond, including really challenging ourselves on the choices we make and how our services operate. 'We have identified £37 million worth of cost improvement schemes, which is the amount we need to save, but know due to slippage and other pressures we are likely to experience, we need to aim to deliver even more to maintain a balanced budget. 'This will not be easy but we have structures in place to help us manage and stay on track with our financial recovery, and our priority will always be to do what's right for our patients, communities and staff.'
The Hill
6 days ago
- The Hill
Mars says M&M's, Starbursts without synthetic dyes coming in 2026
Video above: FDA announces in April 2025 that it will phase out food dyes. (NEXSTAR) — While several other food companies had confirmed they would drop artificial food dyes in response to a mission set forth by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. earlier this summer, Mars Wrigley was considered a holdout. That quietly changed late last month. In a late-July statement, which was first reported by Bloomberg on Thursday, Mars Wrigley North America announced it plans to release 'product options' made without artificial dyes in 2026. These options without synthetic dyes will be available only across four of its brands to start, according to the statement: M&M's, Skittles Original, Extra Gum Spearmint, and Starburst Original fruit chews. They'll be available to purchase online throughout the U.S. A spokesperson confirmed to Nexstar that the 'choice products' without artificial dyes will be additions to the current brands. They declined to say whether currently available products will be affected by the dye changes. AT&T reached a $177M settlement over data breaches: Will you get a payment? Mars did not immediately respond to Nexstar's request for additional information, like whether these options will replace others within each brand's portfolio, or if currently available products would be otherwise impacted. 'When we have identified fully effective, scalable solutions across the entire portfolio, we will share additional item commitments and timelines,' the company said in its statement. In April, Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would move to eliminate several synthetic dyes by the end of next year. That includes Green 3, Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, and Blue 2. Red 3 was set to be banned in food by 2027 because it caused cancer in laboratory rats; the FDA called for that deadline to move up. The FDA has been relying on companies voluntarily ditching the aforementioned dyes, but does plan to establish a standard and timeline for the food industry to switch to natural alternatives and revoke authorization for dyes not in production. Additionally, the FDA said it would authorize four new natural color additives. Several food manufacturers have already announced plans to ditch synthetic colors. That includes General Mills, Pepsico, ConAgra, Nestle, McCormick, Tyson Foods, Sam's Club, JM Smucker, Hershey, Kraft Heinz, and dozens of companies that make ice cream and frozen dairy desserts. Mars, however, was a holdout as of mid-July. The company now stands to be among the first to have products without artificial dyes available. Artificial dyes are used widely in U.S. foods. In Canada and in Europe — where synthetic colors are required to carry warning labels — manufacturers mostly use natural substitutes. Several states, including California and West Virginia, have passed laws restricting the use of artificial colors in foods. Health advocates have long called for the removal of artificial dyes from foods, citing mixed studies indicating they can cause neurobehavioral problems, including hyperactivity and attention issues, in some children. The FDA has maintained that the approved dyes are safe and that 'the totality of scientific evidence shows that most children have no adverse effects when consuming foods containing color additives.' The FDA currently allows 36 food color additives, including eight synthetic dyes. Removing dyes from the food supply will not address the chief health problems that plague Americans, said Susan Mayne, a Yale University chronic disease expert and former director of the FDA's food center. 'With every one of their announcements, they're focusing in on something that's not going to accomplish what they say it is,' Mayne said of Kennedy's initiatives. 'Most of these food dyes have been in our food supply for 100 years. … So why aren't they driving toward reductions in things that do drive chronic disease rates?'
