Watch: Ukrainian military takes down Russian drones
Aerial footage shared by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine on Saturday (2 August) shows several unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) being intercepted by The 93rd Mechanized Brigade, which is known as one of Kyiv 's most effective front-line brigades,
Sharing the footage online, the ministry said: 'Warriors of the 93rd Mechanized Brigade are taking down russian drones — Orlan, Lancet, ZALA, Supercam, Albatros — at altitudes of several kilometers.
'Every enemy wing will have its final flight.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Zelensky ‘twice as popular as Trump in US'
Volodymyr Zelensky is twice as popular in the United States as Donald Trump, according to a recent poll. The Ukrainian leader enjoys 18 per cent net favourability, with the US president at 16 per cent net unfavourability. The Gallup poll of 1,002 people's opinions towards 14 'newsmakers' places Mr Zelensky in second place when it comes to favourability, behind the recently appointed Pope Leo XIV, the first American pontiff. Pope Leo's net favourability stands at 46 per cent. Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky's relationship has suffered a series of setbacks since the US leader took office for a second time. The US president had vowed to end the Ukraine conflict on 'day one' of his presidency, but has become increasingly frustrated with both sides as his repeated efforts to bring Russia's attacks to an end have failed. In an Oval Office meeting in February, the US president, along with JD Vance, the vice-president, pointedly criticised the Ukrainian leader and accused him of ingratitude towards the US. Favourability towards the pair has fallen along partisan lines. Mr Zelensky is seen 68 per cent net positively by Democrats and 23 per cent net negatively by Republicans, whereas Mr Trump is 91 per cent net negative among Democrats and 86 per cent net positive for Republicans. In recent weeks, Mr Trump has taken a more strident stance towards Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, stationing two nuclear submarines closer to Russia while threatening him with sanctions and tariffs. Bernie Sanders, the Vermont senator, Emmanuel Macron, the French president, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the New York congresswoman, rank third to fifth. Only Mr Sanders has net positive popularity. Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO and former Department of Government Efficiency chief, emerged as the least popular in the survey with a -18 per cent net approval rating. Net favourability, calculated by subtracting the percentage with unfavourable views from the percentage with favourable views, is the most effective method to compare public sentiment towards more-and-less known figures, according to Gallup.
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ukrainian raid behind enemy lines kills 330 Russian troops
Ukrainian special forces on Tuesday claimed to have killed more than 330 Russian troops in a dawn raid behind enemy lines. Kyiv's defence intelligence (HUR) said a Russian advance in Sumy was 'stopped cold' when troops from its elite Timur unit infiltrated enemy positions and eliminated scores of Vladimir Putin's soldiers in close-quarter fighting and with coordinated drone and artillery strikes. HUR did not specify the exact date or location of the battle, but it comes as Russia's push into the region has stalled in recent weeks because of Ukraine's strong resistance. A video released by HUR shows Ukrainian fighters approaching the target area in a low-flying helicopter before engaging the enemy in a wooded area with assault rifles, machine guns and grenade launchers. Explosions and screams are heard as Ukrainian artillery pounds enemy positions and dead bodies lie on the ground. Outside the trees, Timur troops can be seen speeding in open-top trucks down dirt roads and hand-launching drones in fields. Overwhelmed Russian soldiers were heard over intercepted radio transmissions refusing to attack Ukrainian positions, HUR wrote. '[They were] justifying themselves with far-fetched reasons,' it added. At least 334 Russian troops were killed and over 550 wounded, HUR said. It signed off the video with: 'The armed struggle continues! Glory to Ukraine!' HUR said the operation disrupted Russian supplies of food and ammunition. The action was carried out by the forces of the Chymera, Yunger, Stugna, Siberian Battalion, Aratta, 1514, Paragon, Art Division, First Line, Raven Group, and 6th Special Operations Unit, which are part of the overall Timur Special Unit. Russian forces entered the Sumy Oblast earlier this year after recapturing most of the neighbouring Kursk Oblast in Russia. They aimed to carve out a 'buffer zone' along Ukraine's northeastern border. Ukraine claimed to have halted the Russian advance and even recaptured some villages. Severnnyi, a Russian military blogger, wrote on Monday that Moscow's forces had been surrounded in the Oleksiivka area of the region. He said: 'They have us trapped. Water on three sides, and Ukrainians on the fourth.' The elite Timur unit is an umbrella command within HUR that coordinates a number of specialised forces. The group takes its name from its leader, Lieutenant-Colonel Timur, who planted a Ukrainian flag on Crimea for the first time in 10 years in a special operation in August 2024. In March 2024, The Wall Street Journal reported that HUR operators from the Timur unit were actively fighting Russian-aligned forces in Sudan.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Old man rule is lacking critical wisdom
Vladimir Putin, I'm reliably told, has developed a nasty morning cough. In quieter times, doctors would probably have urged the 72-year-old to soak up the sun in a Black Sea dacha. But as demonstrated by last weekend's Ukrainian drone raid on an oil refinery near Sochi, air space over the Russian seaside is no longer entirely safe. There's no rest, it seems, for the wicked. Still, the health of world leaders should be of public concern. Gerontocrats, like it or not, currently hold the future of the world in their palms. Are they up to it or are they beginning to buckle? Should we trust them? Do we have a choice? As AI algorithms infiltrate everyday lives, as populists revolt and postwar institutions crumble, so the political realm is changing at galloping pace — and guiding us through the tangle will be a bunch of old men (all men so far), analogue boomers who barely know how to organise their emails. I know these people; they are my cohort. My birthday this week reminds me I'm still older than Putin and Xi Jinping, both 72, and Tayyip Recep Erdogan at 71, but a bit younger than Binyamin Netanyahu (75), Narendra Modi (74) and, of course, Donald Trump at 79. Some of them are autocrats, endlessly inventive in devising wheezes to extend their terms in office. Others are democrats with an autocratic bent. Their lives are ordered a bit like mine. We all (I'm sure) enjoy an afternoon nap and work best in rooms with sofas. We procrastinate. Our recall isn't perfect. We pretend we are putting in work while flying or travelling by armoured train but really our daily productivity is about four hours a day. Much depends on whether one's back is playing up. Do young people want the future to be determined by this crowd? The premise of gerontocracy is that ageing leaders construct governing networks around the principle of longstanding and tested loyalty rather than standout merit. Those born in the 1970s are seen as a threat, their ambition too naked. As a result these log-jammed 'youngsters' are finding it difficult to progress beyond the level of political middle management. It is said of Xi that he will rule China until he 'gets to meet Marx', and to this end he has two trusted sidemen, Cai Qi, his de facto chief of staff, and an ex-chief of staff and now prime minister, Li Qiang. Their task: to watch over all critical appointments inside the bureaucracy, head off any challenge to Xi when his third five-year term ends. When you reach the final stretch of a marathon you want to be sure there are no lurking surprises. The creepy 2019 Sweden-set film Midsommar features a cult in which the elders, unquestioned and revered because of their wisdom, serve until the age of 72, then, watched by the brainwashed community, jump off a cliff. If they fail to die, a disciple finishes them off with a mallet. I saw the film with younger people and they were broadly in favour: there should, they argue, be an age cut-off point for political leaders not because oldies were out of touch but because the whole system slows down if gerontocrats set rules of promotion and succession binding on younger generations. Anything else will destabilise society. That is an argument understood by Xi critics, wary of what happens when a paramount leader with control of party, state and military, grows old and fallible. Since Joe Biden fell victim to an act of political senicide (real word alert!), Trump has found a way of dividing and ruling by destroying the global trading system and replacing it with ad hoc arrangements. That's grounded in Old Manpolitik: bad for long-term stability, bad for growth, but turns the rest of the world into supplicants. Cooked up in part with his 76-year-old maverick adviser Peter Navarro, it is a model that retires the idea of allies as people you stick with until death do us part and replaces it with the world as a grand bazaar. Modi was hugged by Trump as a great friend in February then heard India described as a 'dead economy', punished with 25 per cent tariffs for buying cheap Russian oil. Trump plays hot with Putin (a reset in the offing?) and cold (two US nuclear submarines mobilised because of Russian insults). There are variants of the same power game on everybody; social media has taught him that saying things can be just as effective, and much less work, than doing things. Ultimately, the weak surrenders to the strong. The 70-plus leadership club should know better. They should be posing the questions that Trump glides over. Should the US mimic China's industrial policy in order to beat it? If so, will Trump ever recognise the essential role of America's traditional trading allies? If the US becomes too brutal to love but too irrelevant to fear, what happens to its orphaned allies? The Oldie response is to leave the fundamental choice — China or America — to future generations, to hide under the duvet until Trump goes. They know that's cowardice because a solitary 79-year-old leader, Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, has already been doing some straight-talking. 'At no point will Brazil negotiate as if it were a small country up against a big country,' he tells Trump. The power of the US, he says, 'doesn't make us afraid, it makes us concerned'. The other Oldies should take a leaf out of Lula's book. Age is supposed to bring critical wisdom. Let's use it.
