A test for China-India ties after Pakistan credits J-10C in Kashmir fight
A thaw in relations between
China and India is expected to be tested after Pakistan said it used a Chinese-made jet fighter to bring down Indian military aircraft, observers say.
Neither Beijing nor New Delhi has confirmed the use of Chinese weapons in last week's four-day clash, but two US officials confirmed with Reuters on Thursday that at least two Indian fighter jets had been hit.
04:36
Pakistan says India will 'bear the repercussions' as death toll from strikes climbs
Pakistan says India will 'bear the repercussions' as death toll from strikes climbs
This may cast a shadow over the
detente between Beijing and Delhi . The two countries had slowly been moving to restore ties after reaching an agreement in October to end their bitter military stand-off at the Himalayan border.
'China's role in the India-Pakistan conflict has come under [a] cloud for its 'all-weather' friendship with Islamabad,' said Srikanth Kondapalli, a professor in Chinese studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University.
Lin Minwang, deputy director of the Centre for South Asian Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai, said India had long been suspicious of China's strong ties with Pakistan.
'It is likely that India would put the blame on China but overall, China is quite restrained this time,' Lin said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
5 hours ago
- Asia Times
India-EU deal holds key to a new world trade era
The European Union and India have reached consensus on almost half of the topics to be covered by a trade deal they hope to seal this year, according to a report. The India-EU trade deal isn't just about tariffs or trade quotas—it's a cultural cage match between India's vibrant, improvisational spirit and Europe's love for order. And if resolved in a win-win deal, it could rewrite the rules of global trade. This trade pact is more than a deal on goods; it's a daring experiment in fusing two wildly different worldviews: India's adaptive, sometimes chaotic economic approach—rooted in jugaad , the art of making do with what's at hand—with Europe's rigid, regulation-heavy ethos. This tension isn't necessarily a flaw; it's the deal's potential secret sauce. By forcing both sides to confront their blind spots, this agreement could birth a new trade model that values flexibility over cookie-cutter uniformity, giving India a chance to tilt the global economic balance more toward the Global South. Trade deals sound like dusty policy papers, but they're the arteries of the global economy, pumping goods, ideas, and power across borders. With world trade fracturing under US tariff threats and China's constrictive supply chain grip, India and the EU are racing to secure their economic futures. India, with its 1.4 billion people and roaring growth, is no longer a bit player. The EU, a trade giant, needs new partners as old alliances wobble. Recent reports peg the deal's deadline for late 2025, but the real story is how this pact could redefine who sets the terms in a world where emerging powers are flexing their muscles. To understand why this deal matters, consider the broader picture. Global trade is no longer just about who makes the cheapest widgets. It's about who controls the flow of ideas, technology and resources. India's tech sector, for instance, is a powerhouse, with companies like Infosys and TCS already competing globally. The EU wants a slice of that expertise, especially as it pushes for digital transformation. But India's negotiators are savvy—they know their tech and pharmaceutical industries are bargaining chips. By leveraging these strengths, India could secure better terms for its smaller industries, like textiles, which employ millions but struggle against global competition. India's negotiators are playing a bold hand, and it's not just about lowering tariffs on cars or whisky, though those matter (Europe wants India's 100% duties on autos slashed; India wants access for its textiles and pharmaceuticals). The heart of the deal lies in cultural friction. India's refusal to open its dairy and small-farm sectors—vital to millions of livelihoods—challenges the EU's free-market ideals. Indian farmers, often working tiny plots, aren't just economic units; they're the backbone of a rural culture that resists the EU's vision of efficient, large-scale agriculture. This isn't just about milk or mangoes; it's about whether global trade can respect local realities. In India, trade isn't just numbers—it's lives. The dairy sector alone supports over 80 million farmers, many of whom rely on small-scale operations. Opening it up to European competition could devastate rural communities. India's negotiators know this, which is why they're digging in their heels. For the EU, this feels like protectionism, but for India, it's about survival. This push-and-pull isn't just a hurdle; it's a chance to redefine what fairness in trade looks like. Can a deal respect both India's small farmers and Europe's efficient markets? That's the question both sides are wrestling with. Europe, meanwhile, is grappling with its own dogma. Its obsession with predictability—think carbon taxes and strict labor standards—clashes with India's improvisational resilience. Indian businesses, accustomed to navigating red tape and power cuts, see the EU's rules like the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (set to hit Indian steel and cement exports in 2026) as a fancy tax on their hustle. Yet, this friction is productive. India's pushback forces the EU to rethink its one-size-fits-all approach, while Europe's insistence on transparency nudges India toward clearer rules. Moreover, the deal could shift power toward the Global South. India, projected to be the world's third-largest economy by 2030, isn't just negotiating for itself. It's setting a precedent. If India can protect its farmers while securing market access for its tech and textiles, other developing nations—say, Brazil or South Africa—might demand similar treatment at the negotiating table. The EU-India trade corridor, already worth 184 billion euros in 2023, could become a blueprint for deals that balance growth with cultural identity. Unlike the UK-India deal, which focuses heavily on whisky and cars, this pact dives deeper, tackling investment protection and geographical indications. The stakes go beyond economics. This deal is a test of whether two vastly different systems can find common ground. For India, it's a chance to prove it can negotiate as an equal, not a junior partner. For the EU, it's about staying relevant in a world where Asia's giants are rising and the US is withdrawing behind protectionist walls. Success here could inspire other trade blocs to rethink their approaches, prioritizing nuance over rigid templates. Failure, though, risks entrenching old power dynamics, where the Global North sets the rules and the Global South scrambles to comply. The India-EU trade deal is a high-stakes drama where two worlds collide—one thriving on chaos, the other craving order. As they hammer out the final chapters, they're not just trading goods; they're trading ideas about how the new world order should work. If they pull it off, the pact could inspire a new kind of global trade—one where the Global South doesn't just follow rules but helps write them. Brabim Karki is an author and businessman and the owner of Mero Tribune media. Follow him on X at @brabim7
South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Russia moves again to join with China and India despite trust issues from border disputes
Russia's fresh bid to revive a strategic triangle with China and India as a counterbalance to the Western-led international order faces headwinds given the deep-seated distrust between the two Asian powers, according to observers. Advertisement However, United States President Donald Trump and his aggressive and unpredictable policies could be the catalyst to bring the three together, one analyst says. The assessment was made as Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov objected to what he described as Nato's attempt to draw India into 'anti-China' efforts, and reaffirmed Moscow's hope for India and China to restore a three-way mechanism that has been in limbo since the deadly 2020 China-India border dispute 04:07 Xi Jinping says China, Russia have 'special responsibility' to stand up to power politics Xi Jinping says China, Russia have 'special responsibility' to stand up to power politics 'Now that India and the People's Republic of China are reaching an understanding on de-escalating tensions along their shared border, the moment has arrived to revitalise RIC,' Russia's top diplomat said at a Eurasian security forum in the Russian city of Perm last week, referring to the Russia-India-China framework. It is not the first time since violence broke out at the China-India border in May 2020 that Russia has tried to push for a resumption of the trilateral mechanism. The border dispute largely froze bilateral ties until a disengagement agreement was reached in October last year in a bid to de-escalate tensions between the world's two most populous nations and normalise the relationship. Russia brokered two high-level meetings between senior defence and foreign policy officials of China and India months after their countries' border conflict broke out in 2020, a move that highlighted Moscow's influence within the RIC mechanism. Advertisement Russian President Vladimir Putin also tried to push for a leaders' summit of the two countries when he had separate talks with his Chinese and Indian counterparts in December 2021, before his country invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
South China Morning Post
13 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Are Chinese solar panels the answer for Global South, or do costs not add up?
The rise of decentralised solar power has prompted a Pakistani think tank to call for China to play a leading role in Pakistan's energy transition, creating a model for other countries in the Global South. However, a Chinese energy scholar has questioned whether its vision is too expensive to be true. Advertisement An increasing flow of cheap Chinese solar panels to the South Asian nation is undercutting demand for power from coal-fired plants that China helped finance and leading to a vicious cycle of stranded assets, according to a report by Renewables First, a think tank based in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad. 'China's solar panels are outcompeting China's power plants,' said Muhammad Basit Ghauri, lead author of the report. 'What we are seeing is an unintentional but profound strategic contradiction. And Pakistan is ground zero for this global experiment in energy disruption.' Pakistan had witnessed a rapid transition to 'distributed' solar power generation on people's rooftops over the past five years, with 39 gigawatts of solar panels imported over that time, mostly from China, the report said, adding that was roughly the equivalent of three-quarters of Pakistan's total installed power generation capacity. With a zero tax rate for solar power imports, Pakistan has emerged as the second-largest destination for Chinese solar panels, behind only Brazil. Advertisement According to data from the Pakistani government's Finance Division, thermal power generation accounted for 59.4 per cent of the country's installed capacity at the end of March last year, followed by hydroelectricity on 25.4 per cent, nuclear on 8.4 per cent and renewables on 6.8 per cent.
