Federal jobs were seen as a gateway to the middle class for Black America, then came DOGE
Denise Smith began working for the federal government a half century ago, during President Richard Nixon's administration. She was still in high school when she accepted a post as a Navy intern in Annapolis, Maryland.
Over the following three and a half decades, she held various human resources leadership roles in the Navy before joining the Energy Department.
Smith also helped dozens of aspiring Black professionals find government jobs, including her husband, Jesse, an Army veteran. Over a 26-year-career in the Navy, he rose from a meat cutter in the commissary to an ammunition assistant and he eventually retired as a machinist.
"We were able to buy a house, raise five kids, send three of them to college and live a very comfortable life,' said Denise Smith, 73, and now retired, noting that she worked under seven different presidential administrations. "The federal civil service gave us opportunities to live out our American Dream."
Government jobs have long been viewed as an entry point for Black Americans into the middle class and job security when opportunities were scarce elsewhere.
As the nation's largest single employer, with about 3 million workers at the end of 2024, the federal government has a history of being more welcoming to Black workers than the private sector has, civil rights leaders say.
So President Donald Trump's massive layoffs across the U.S. government have hit Black Americans particularly hard.
"I absolutely think that the attacks on federal workers will have an acute and disproportionate impact on Black federal workers and that's because the federal government is highly diverse," said Jennifer Holmes, deputy director of litigation at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.
Trump and Elon Musk, who leads the Department of Government Efficiency, say the government is bloated and wasteful, and must be purged of tens of thousands of workers.
Black Americans, who account for about 12% of the population, make up about 13% of workers in the nongovernment workforce, but they make up roughly 19% of the federal government employees, labor statistics show.
The rise of the Black federal workforce helped build a Black middle class in America after generations of segregation, prejudice and worse, said Marc Morial, president and CEO of the National Urban League, told USA TODAY.
"It began with the Postal Service and the military, and their roles have expanded," Morial said. "In the last 40 to 50 years, we have made great progress and advanced through the ranks of these civil service positions with pride and distinction, and the nation has benefitted from it."
As a result, sturdy middle-class Black communities sprouted up in major metropolises, Morial said, including New York, Philadelphia, Chicago and Washington with its surrounding suburbs in neighboring Maryland and Virginia. Because of the federal workforce, Washington is consistently among the highest median incomes for Black households for any city nationally, Morial added.
A study by the University of California at Berkeley's Labor Center, for instance, found Black workers in the public sector earned roughly 25% more than their private sector counterparts.
Do the math: Education Dept. layoffs by the numbers: Which staff were ousted, where cuts hit hardest
Janice Lee, 65, who recently retired from the U.S. Department of Transportation after 18 years, said she gained a more stable foothold through her public service, which included a stint working on Capitol Hill and in the Education Department.
'My father gained his federal employment beginning as a busboy,' she said. 'Now I see our country crumbling.'
Lee said that although the president's supporters want to believe federal workers are lazy, federal workers provide critical and professional functions for the country.
"What (Trump) needs to know is most Black people were promoted on merit,' she said. 'So the way I see it, this is a way to defund Black people as a whole because I will tell you upward middle-class living was provided through the opportunities that we received through promotions in the federal government."
Historically, the federal government had more progressive hiring and retention practices than private enterprises even amid the rising tide of racial segregation in the late 19th Century, as a massive influx of Black workers flocked into Washington, D.C., after emancipation.
But historians note much of that began to change after the 1912 presidential election, when Woodrow Wilson imposed strict segregation rules in federal workplaces that relegated Black workers to more menial jobs.
Civil rights activists say they cannot overlook today's parallels given several of Trump's actions since returning to power, such as ending diversity and equity programs and rescinding a landmark 1965 executive order prohibiting discriminatory employment practices for government contractors.
The president recently signed an executive order dismantling several federal agencies focused on libraries, museums and ending homelessness. Tucked away in the list of government entities the decree deemed "unnecessary" was the Minority Business Development Agency, which promoted growth of minority-owned businesses.
Holmes, the NAACP legal defense fund attorney, said that as civil rights groups consider various legal challenges against Trump's mass layoffs, there are other troubling areas, such as possibly privatizing the U.S. Postal Service, which could have a disproportionate impact on Black federal workers.
'Black people helped build this country into a great powerhouse through their civil service, through their military service and their hard work, talent and expertise across all agencies," she said. "So to push them and others out of government will be just a devastating loss."
'Will I have a job?': Federal workers full of uncertainty, fear over Trump plans
No clear data is available on how Trump's cuts have impacted Black workers specifically as of yet, but during an online meeting with NAACP Legal Defense Fund members and others earlier this year, the group said many of the departments targeted by the administration have the highest percentage of Black employees.
As of January 2023, the civil rights organization said in a presentation provided to USA TODAY, about 36% of the Housing and Urban Development and Education departments, 33% of the Small Business Administration, and 29% of the Social Security Administration and Treasury Department were Black.
USA TODAY reached out to a dozen Black federal employees, but nearly all declined to talk on the record, fearing for their jobs.
Quay Crowner no longer has one to lose.
After more than 30 years, last week was her last as a federal employee, after mass layoffs swept through the Education Department.
Crowner, the eldest daughter of Denise and Jesse Smith, spent almost 11 years in supervisory positions within the department: human resources director, chief administration officer, and most recently, outreach and engagement director in the Federal Student Aid office, which handles student loans and financial aid disbursement.
Crowner said her mission throughout has been to help students and their parents find money to attend college or trade school. She said her division provides an estimated $120 billion in federal grants, loans, and work-study funding to more than 15 million students from all backgrounds, whether they live in Philadelphia or Paducah, Kentucky. She's taken to social media to tell them the dream of attending college is possible and why filling out a FAFSA form is so important.
"Contrary to popular belief, we operate more like a financial organization than an educational one,' said Crowner, 55, a married mother with a daughter in college. "No student should be denied the opportunity to get an education. It's our job to make sure they do."
However, Crowner's professional life has been tumultuous these past two months. With threats of the Trump administration dismantling her department, Crowner was put on administrative leave.
'I'm not choosing to leave or retire. My departure has been chosen for me,' she said.
Crowner said the family lineage of federal government workers will likely stop with her. Her own daughter plans to attend law school. 'She has a different vision of public service.'
Still, Crowner said, she's not done helping her country or her community.
'I'm far from finished; I have more work to do,' she said. 'And it will include public service, somewhere.'
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 'Defund Black people': Civil rights leaders warn of bias in DOGE cuts

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What the capsizing and relaunching of a warship tells us about North Korea's regime
When North Korea's new warship capsized into the sea during its launch last month, it made international headlines. News organisations followed every development, from its successful refloating to its relaunch last Friday. But why such interest, given there were no casualties, and the damage to the hull appeared relatively minor? The intrigue has less to do with the failure itself and more with how Kim Jong Un reacted. Kim immediately denounced the failure as "a criminal act" that "could not be tolerated", saying it had damaged the country's "dignity". He ordered that the ship be restored immediately, and those responsible be punished. Four party officials were subsequently arrested. This furious outburst, followed by the ship's swift repair, teaches us a lot about the North Korean regime, whose moves are often so difficult to decipher. First, it reveals how serious North Korea is about building a nuclear-armed navy. Despite having a nuclear arsenal, which is growing in size and sophistication, and an enormous standing army, North Korea's navy is considered greatly inferior to those of its enemies - South Korea, Japan and the United States - who have some of the most powerful naval fleets in the world. "Kim Jong Un believes nuclear weapons are the only way he can protect his country, and yet all it has at sea is an old submarine and some small support ships," said Choi Il, a retired South Korean navy captain. Therefore, almost since the start of his reign, Kim has prioritised building a modern and powerful navy, equipped with nuclear weapons. This warship is a key first step towards this goal. It is one of two destroyers North Korea has built over the past year, the first of which launched successfully in April. Weighing 5,000 tonnes, they are by far the biggest warships North Korea has, and are capable, in theory, of firing nuclear short-range missiles. According to Mr Choi, who now heads South Korea's Submarine Research Institute, it is extremely rare for a destroyer of this class to capsize during its construction and launch, given the advanced technology required to build one. This would therefore have been "a very embarrassing incident" for Kim Jong Un, he said, as it "highlights the limitations of North Korea's shipbuilding". Worse still, this flagship project failed in front of his eyes. Kim was attending the ship's launch ceremony, along with his daughter and a crowd of spectators. "North Korea is obsessed with showing off. I imagine they were planning a whole series of performances, so of course Kim couldn't help but be furious", Mr Choi added. But experts in North Korea propaganda believe there is far more to Kim Jong Un's outburst than raw anger and humiliation. Choosing to publicise the capsizing in the way he did was a deliberate political strategy, they say, and shows Kim is shifting away from the regime's tendency to conceal unpleasant truths. Rachel Minyoung Lee from the Washington-based Stimson Centre, who has analysed North Korean propaganda for decades, explained how this has become a core pillar of Kim's propaganda strategy. Before Kim came to power, and even in the early years of his rule, the regime would hide anything negative as a way to control the narrative. But as information has started to spread more freely in North Korea, it has become harder to cover up such major incidents. "The leadership decided it was almost silly to try and hide what people already knew, and much more effective to show people they were dealing with problems," Ms Lee said. "Now, when there's a problem, you publicise it, you call out those responsible, and demonstrate to people that if you don't do your job, you will be held accountable. And in doing so, you let everyone know that the government and the leadership are doing their jobs well". In the case of the warship, this strategy appears to have worked remarkably effectively. The repairs were completed ahead of schedule, in just over three weeks, defying the expectations of naval experts. "The rapid relaunch shows how even a failure can be turned into a political success," said Kim Dong-yup, an assistant professor at the University of North Korean Studies in Seoul. But he and others say Kim has used this incident not just to project success but to strengthen people's loyalty to the regime and its ideology – another consistent feature of his rule. The ship capsized as it was launched sideways from the dock into the sea – a complicated maritime manoeuvre – and part of the bow got stuck on the launching ramp. But rather than present this as a technical failure, Kim Jong Un claimed the incident was caused by "absolute carelessness and irresponsibility." In contrast, he praised a worker who died during the ship's construction, for "putting his blood and sweat" into the project. "They turned his death into a symbol of devotion, to strengthen people's loyalty," said Professor Kim Dong-yup. Rather than present Kim Jong Un as an infallible god as was the case for his father and grandfather, they elevated the loyal worker, he said. "This is a big shift in North Korea's governing technique and shows Kim Jong Un's astonishing ability to adapt and control the narrative". The biggest takeaway for Ms Lee, the propaganda expert, is that "the North Koreans achieve whatever they set out to do." "They set this goal of having a nuclear armed navy, and now they're demonstrating they're on their way to achieving that". No-one thought they could build the destroyers in just over a year, or repair this damage in less than a month, but they have, Ms Lee added, much like they did with their nuclear and missile programme despite the world's initial scepticism. The retired navy captain Mr Choi agreed. "People may look at this episode and laugh, and think 'oh, North Korea is so far behind', but they're making significant progress", he said. Most concerning, say he and others, is that Kim Jong Un is intent on transforming his navy from one that is limited to patrolling its own seas into one that will be able to sail the world's oceans and launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes. "We must be vigilant and prepare accordingly," he said. Additional reporting by Hosu Lee and Leehyun Choi. North Korea claims warship launch successful on second try North and South Korea are in an underground war - Kim Jong Un might now be winning North Korea says US 'Golden Dome' risks 'space nuclear war' Is North Korea's leader actually considering war?
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fort Gregg-Adams to be named Fort Lee once again, but this time honoring a different Lee
Goodbye, Fort Gregg-Adams, hello, Fort Lee ... again. The Defense Department announced June 10 that the Prince George County military installation will once again bear the name "Fort Lee" two years after it was changed as part of the process of removing the names of Confederate Civil War heroes. Only this time, the original honoree – Robert E. Lee – will not be memorialized. Instead, the post will be named for Army Private Fitz Lee, a Dinwiddie County native and part of the Army's 'Buffalo Soldier' division for soldiers of color. Lee received the Medal of Honor for bravery in the Spanish-American War when he risked enemy fire to save wounded comrades in Cuba. Lee became ill shortly after the rescue and died in 1899 at the age of 33. He is buried in the national cemetery in Leavenworth, Kansas. The name change is expected to take place immediately. More: Will Fort Gregg-Adams be renamed? Why a change might be difficult in Virginia The Defense Department announced the changes shortly after President Donald Trump's appearance at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, where he said he would push for the renamings. At the end of his first term in 2020, Trump vetoed the defense authorization bill that including the name-change requirement, but Congress overrode it. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts — it's no time to change," Trump said. "And I'm superstitious, you know, I like to keep it going right." In addition to Fort Lee's revision, the Defense Department said two other renamed posts in Virginia – Fort Walker in Caroline County and Fort Barfoot in Nottoway County – will be changed back to Fort A.P. Hill and Fort Pickett, respectively. Just like with Fort Lee, the new names will not honor Confederate heroes. Fort Pickett will be named for 1st Lt. Vernon W. Pickett, a Distinguished Service Cross recipient during World War II. The new Fort A.P. Hill will recognize three Civil War Medal of Honor recipients from the Union Army – Lt. Col. Edward Hill, First Sgt. Robert A. Pinn and Pvt. Bruce Anderson. All three received Medals of Honor at separate Civil War battles in Virginia and North Carolina. More: Retired Lt. Gen. Arthur Gregg, for whom Fort Lee's name was changed, dies at 96 More: Fort Lee will change 27 names in transition to Fort Gregg-Adams later this month The move was decried by Rep. Jennifer McClellan, D-Virginia, who called it 'a slap in the face to the thoughtful process' of renaming the posts. The original defense authorization bill threatened to withhold funding to any military installation that did not remove the Confederate name. As a result, the Pentagon's Naming Commission vetted names to reflect diversity and inclusion. Chosen for Fort Lee was Fort Gregg-Adams in honor of the late Lt. Gen. Arthur Gregg, a pioneer in military sustainment [one of the post's core missions], and the late Col. Charity Adams, who led the first all-Black women Army regiment in World War II. It was the first time two former Black military officers would be remembered with a base name. 'It's profoundly disappointing,' McClellan said of the decision. 'The Naming Commission went through a thorough, thoughtful process to choose the names.' Trump's decision, McClellan said, was a 'waste of that effort.' It was done unilaterally and without any community input. 'It's simply political theater,' McClellan said, noting the timing of the announcement to the commemoration of the Army's 250th anniversary this year. It also precludes ceremonies scheduled for June 13 to rededicate the fort's drop zone for paratrooper training and the readjustment of the post's borders to allow unfettered public access to visitors at the post's museums. McClellan said the move also dishonors the legacy of her predecessor in Congress, Democratic Rep. Donald McEachin. McEachin pushed hard for Fort Lee to be named after Gregg, an old family friend, but he died before the name became official. 'It erodes it, and that's a shame,' McClellan said of McEachin. 'But his legacy will live on in other areas.' Bill Atkinson (he/him/his) is an award-winning journalist who covers breaking news, government and politics. Reach him at batkinson@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @BAtkinson_PI. This article originally appeared on The Progress-Index: Fort Gregg-Adams becomes Fort Lee after Trump pushes for renaming


The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Senate scales back additional Trump tax cuts in its version of ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate Republicans' tax and spending cut bill makes many of the core elements of their 2017 tax cuts permanent but scales back additional cuts from what the House passed. The Senate Finance Committee unveiled its version of the central piece of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' on Monday. The Senate bill locks in existing federal tax brackets, boosts the standard deduction and maintains the termination of personal exemptions — all without sunsets. Different from the House version, the bill sets a lower increase for the child tax credit (CTC), raising it to $2,200 per child as opposed to the House's $2,500. The bill creates new deductions for taxes on tips, overtime pay and car loan interest but doesn't make them fully deductible. Tips are deductible up to $25,000 through 2028. Overtime pay is deductible up to $12,500, or $25,000 for joint filers, through 2028. Auto loan interest is deductible up to $10,000, also through 2028. Notably, the legislation re-establishes the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap at $10,000. The House had agreed after intense debate to raise it to $40,000. The reversion is sure to incense members of the SALT Caucus in the House who had threatened to vote against the measure absent the deal — and maybe President Trump as well, who promised to 'get SALT back' while campaigning. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters on Monday that SALT would continue to be 'a negotiation' but the total reversion nullifies the tenuous deal struck in the lower chamber. Additionally, the bill sets up savings accounts for children. Parents and relatives can contribute up to an inflation-indexed $5,000 annually of after-tax dollars into the accounts. For U.S. children born between 2024, and 2028, the government will contribute $1,000 per child into the accounts. In addition to a smaller boost in the child tax credit, the bill adds restrictions to the earned income tax credit, another tax break geared to help low-income workers. The new certification program for the credit will require taxpayers to provide information and documentation 'as the Secretary by regulation requires.' Critics of the provision were quick to point out that it will likely result in many new audits of lower income taxpayers, which studies have shown can be biased against Black American taxpayers in particular. 'The EITC pre-certification requirement would lead to an unprecedented number of audits, overwhelmingly focused on low- and moderate-income workers,' NYU tax law center senior fellow Greg Leiserson wrote on Monday. Stanford University researchers found in 2023 that the IRS 'disproportionately audits Black taxpayers' due in part to the way the earned income tax credit is administered. The legislation extends the increased inheritance and gift tax exemption cap of $15-million for single filers and $30 million for married couples in 2026, indexing the amount for inflation. The passthrough entity deduction – cherished by many businesses and always top of mind for Republicans – is kept at 20 percent and made permanent. This is another difference from the House version, which increased it to 23 percent. This passthrough deduction's phase-in range is increased to $75,000 and $150,000 for joint filers. Changes are made for businesses designated as a 'specialized service trade or business,' which covers some professional service industries. Other business tax breaks are in there as well, including a trifecta of changes from 2017 that had already expired and were the subject of tax legislation that was voted down last year. Research and development costs are made immediately deductible and will be retroactive to 2024. Bonus depreciation, allowing companies to immediately deduct depreciation costs, is made permanent. The allowance is increased to 100 percent for equipment bought and used after January 19, 2025. Business interest expenses will get an increased cap of deductibility corresponding to the EBITDA accounting standard, as opposed to EBIT, which excludes depreciation and amortization costs. This is a tax break especially valued by leveraged buyout firms who finance investments with borrowed money.