Oregon's 'bottle deposit bill' was the first, but now it may be getting an overhaul
The Brief
Oregon's 1971 bottle bill, the first of its kind, may soon be overhauled to limit late-night returns and add mobile sites.
Lawmakers say the changes aim to reduce safety issues and public disorder near some redemption centers.
Critics warn the law's reform could hurt low-income residents who rely on the refunds as a key income source.
After more than 50 years, Oregon's groundbreaking bottle deposit law could soon look very different.
A new proposal seeks to update the state's first-in-the-nation "bottle bill" by placing time limits on when bottles and cans can be returned, and by creating alternative redemption sites in cities like Portland.
The goal: ease tensions between community members, retailers, and those who depend on canning for income, as concerns mount about safety, drug use, and homelessness around some redemption centers.
While some praise the changes as necessary, others warn they may go too far—or not far enough.
The backstory
Oregon's bottle bill, passed in 1971, was a landmark environmental law designed to reduce litter by giving consumers a small refund for every eligible beverage container returned. Initially set at 5 cents, the deposit rose to 10 cents in 2017, and the program expanded to include more types of containers.
The state now boasts the highest redemption rate in the country: 87% of containers were returned in 2023. Twenty-seven dedicated centers operate across Oregon, including facilities like The People's Depot under a Portland bridge, where workers process tens of thousands of bottles each day.
What we know
The new legislation aims to balance environmental goals with public safety by updating how and when containers can be returned across the state.
The proposed bill would:
Allow all stores to stop accepting bottle returns after 8 p.m.
Let Portland retailers limit or refuse hand-counted returns after 6 p.m.
Introduce mobile redemption units and other nonprofit-run alternatives in urban areas.
Enable some stores near these alternative sites to opt out of accepting returns altogether.
Retailers, including the Plaid Pantry convenience chain, support the changes, citing safety concerns linked to people redeeming containers late at night.
Residents like Monica Truax, who lives near a redemption center in Portland, told the AP her once-quiet neighborhood now faces ongoing issues with drugs, garbage, and violence.
What we don't know
It remains unclear how many mobile redemption sites will be created—or how soon. Lawmakers have also not finalized whether the state will redirect unclaimed deposit money, which critics say could fund environmental programs. In 2019 alone, the Oregon Beverage Recycling Cooperative (OBRC) retained over $30 million in unclaimed refunds.
What they're saying
In written testimony, Kristofer Brown of The People's Depot acknowledged the divide over the bill but said most people who redeem bottles rely on it to survive. "Since becoming manager of The People's Depot, I'm learning how polarizing The Oregon Bottle Bill is," he said.
Jonathan Polonsky, CEO of Plaid Pantry, previously argued in The Oregonian/OregonLive that the system endangers employees by forcing them to accept late-night returns from people who may be under the influence or aggressive. He noted that a small number of cans can buy enough fentanyl to feed addiction.
Meanwhile, community members like Truax say the spirit of the original law has been lost: "It's just a mess," she said.
Why you should care
This isn't just about recycling. For some, the 10-cent refund per bottle is a lifeline. For others, it's a safety concern that threatens local businesses and neighborhoods. What happens in Oregon could influence other states with similar systems—and reshape the national conversation around environmental programs and social impact.
What's next
The bill has already passed the Oregon Senate and is now in the House. Lawmakers have until late June to finalize the legislation.
The Source
This report is based on Associated Press reporting from Portland, Oregon. It includes direct quotes from residents, lawmakers, and stakeholders as presented in AP interviews and public testimony. Data from the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission and a 2020 state audit of the bottle bill were also cited. This story was reported from Los Angeles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
14 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Academic Publishers Sign AI Deals as Trump Cuts Research Funding
Academic publishers are rushing to sign licensing deals with artificial intelligence companies, carving out a new revenue stream as US research funding cuts dim their outlook. Informa Plc 's Taylor & Francis signed a $10 million deal with Microsoft Corp. last year to provide the tech giant access to part of its library to train large language models, or LLMs. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc is looking to 'monetize academic content through AI deals,' it said in its latest set of results, while John Wiley & Sons Inc. announced partnerships with Amazon Web Services and Perplexity earlier this year.
CBS News
33 minutes ago
- CBS News
Minnesota Legislature during special session passes next state budget to avert government shutdown
The Minnesota Legislature approved the remaining pieces of the next state budget on Monday during a special session, after lawmakers failed to complete their work last month. The House adjourned around 10:40 p.m., and the Senate was on track to do the same around midnight or early on Tuesday. They had 14 bills on their to-do list; most of them were spending plans that made up the roughly $66 billion budget for the next two years. The political make-up of the Capitol is unique, with a tied House for only the second time in state history, and is as closely divided as a Legislature can be in Minnesota, with 100 Republicans and 101 Democrats. That made negotiations challenging and forced compromise. "The tie forced us to work together, and I think that's something that people outside of the bubble here in St. Paul are looking for people to do," said House Speaker Lisa Demuth, R-Cold Spring. "They want representation in the state that can work together and do the best things for our state." A delayed start in the House, after DFL lawmakers boycotted the first few weeks over a power dispute, ended in overtime. But a divided Legislature is not unique in Minnesota. Four of the last five budget-writing sessions, including this one, have ended with special sessions because they didn't finish the budget on time when Republicans and Democrats shared power. "We prevented a duly elected member of the Minnesota House from being kicked out for no reason whatsoever other than political expediency. And I think in the end, fighting for that equal shared power made this a better session," said former DFL House Speaker Melissa Hortman. "And I think the way that today unfolded was about cooperation and collaboration, we could have had that from the word go. I'm really happy that we did finally get there." Finishing their work on Monday prevented nearly 30,000 state workers from getting layoff notices on Tuesday in advance of a partial government shutdown on July 1 if they failed to approve a budget. As of 11:30 p.m. Monday, the Senate had to pass a tax bill and a bonding proposal funding infrastructure projects before they adjourned, but had approved the budget bills. The legislation made significant cuts to stave off a projected $6 billion deficit in future years. Most of the day was smooth sailing after lawmakers in the House began by passing the most contentious bill of the year that will remove undocumented immigrant adults from MinnesotaCare, a state health care coverage program, by the year's end. The debate in that chamber lasted for four hours and at times was emotional. The change was a top priority for Republicans who are concerned that growing enrollment would balloon costs in an unsustainable way. Democrats in both chambers are deeply opposed to the measure, which will preserve coverage for children despite the rollback for adults. Through tears, Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy, DFL-St. Paul, said approving it, which she agreed to in a larger budget compromise among legislative leaders, was among the most "painful" votes she ever had to take. She and three other Democrats supported it in the Senate. Hortman was the sole DFL vote alongside Republicans in the House. Hortman was similarly emotional when reflecting on that moment. "What I worry about is the people who will lose their health insurance. I know that people will be hurt by that vote," she said. "We worked very hard to try to get a budget deal that wouldn't include that provision, and we tried any other way we could to come to a budget agreement with Republicans, and they wouldn't have it. So I did what leaders do, I stepped up and I got the job done for the people of Minnesota."
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Most US workers say they have unpredictable, inflexible schedules, new survey finds
FacebookTweetLink Follow After seven years as a retail associate at a big-box store in Virginia, Alicia Costello still did not have a consistent schedule week to week, and requesting paid time off was a hassle. For a while, Costello got by — until she became pregnant with her first child. Doctors' appointments had to be noted at least a month in advance, and approval wasn't guaranteed, she said. 'It's frustrating to be limited on the time that you've accrued and worked so hard for, not knowing when you can and cannot use that time,' Costello said. 'There's only so much that we can take on physically and mentally.' Needing a job that would allow her to spend more time with her family, Costello quit in April, and her experience is shared by a majority of the US workforce. Almost two-thirds of US workers struggle with volatile, inflexible work schedules, according to a new national Gallup survey, called the State of American Jobs Study, published Tuesday. Meanwhile, workers with predictable schedules enjoy more financial security, better work-life balance and more overall satisfaction with their jobs, according to the survey of 18,000 employees. 'I think one of the biggest questions on people's minds right now is, even though unemployment is fairly low, why are millions of workers still feeling so disillusioned and disengaged and struggling to get by?' said Rachel Korberg, executive director and cofounder of the Family and Workers Fund, which partnered to create the survey. 'We need to shift from a conversation that's just about job quantity to a conversation also about job quality.' Most notably, about 41% of those surveyed said they had little to no control over how many hours they work, what days they work or when they can take time off. Additionally, more than one quarter of workers said they don't know their schedule two weeks or more in advance. 'I think the important thing to underscore here is not just that everyone wants a 9-to-5 with the exact same hours all the time Monday through Friday,' Korberg said. 'It's actually about the worker having a say in their schedule.' Unpredictable schedules often involve frequent schedule changes and shift cancellations, making it difficult to plan for life events or maintain a second form of employment, according to the survey. For this reason, about 38% of those with low-quality schedules reported facing financial hardship. Many employers may cut hours in the week to be just below 40 hours so that overtime pay won't be necessary — a small adjustment that can have a big impact for low-wage workers, Korberg said. In Costello's case, she had to work 39-hour weeks. 'There was never any approval for overtime,' Costello recalled. 'That was difficult because, especially in preparation for the holidays, it would be nice to save up money and get overtime here and there.' Schedule volatility was found to be especially common among part-time workers and those without a college degree, even when controlled for age, gender, education and industry, according to the survey. 'There's an (attitude) that these employees are potentially more replaceable and may have less say in their workplace,' said Guy David, the Alan B. Miller Professor and Chair of Health Care Management at the Wharton School and professor of medical ethics and health policy at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He was not involved in the survey. From his own research into the working conditions of health care employees, David found those with unreliable schedules were more likely to quit. However, many employers may be unaware of just how important work-life balance has become for workers, he added. 'I think this (survey) confirms our findings and is a wake-up call for companies wishing to increase or improve retention without potentially increasing payroll,' David said. 'Newer generations especially want to have very clear boundaries.' The Covid-19 pandemic was likely a big driver in this attitude change as well, suggested Maria Flynn, CEO and president of Jobs for the Future, which also partnered to create the survey. As more companies shifted to at-home work, the labor force became more accustomed to greater flexibility. Though automated scheduling systems are widely used across industries already, in the future more companies may adopt artificial intelligence-driven systems capable of studying the needs of workers and balancing them with the demands of the company, David said. While Flynn and Korberg suggested workers communicate openly about schedule preferences with their managers, they also acknowledged the change will largely have to take place among employers. 'A good schedule helps businesses engage and retain workers, and that contributes to the bottom line,' Korberg said. 'I'm hoping companies will take note of the study and look at (whether) there (are) changes, they could make to their scheduling practices.'
