
WPP chief steps down as advertising group struggles with rise of AI
WPP
chief executive Mark Read is standing down from the UK's largest advertising group as it struggles with a near five-year low in its share price and an industry-wide upheaval caused by artificial intelligence.
Mr Read's exit will end a more than 30-year career at WPP and leaves it looking for a new chief executive during one of the most turbulent periods for the industry. He will continue as chief executive until the end of the year while the board starts the search for a successor.
Former BT boss Philip Jansen became chair of the group at the start of the year, sparking speculation about the future of Read. In an internal note to staff, Mr Read said 'there is never a perfect time to move on as CEO ... but this feels like the right time for me'.
In a statement on Monday, Mr Jansen said Mr Read had 'played a central role in transforming the company into a world leader in modern marketing services'.
READ MORE
Read has sought to restructure and streamline the group's global operations and invest more in technology since taking over from Sir Martin Sorrell in 2018, but WPP's share price has halved during his tenure, taking its market capitalisation to about £6bn.
Shares in WPP fell 1.3 per cent in early trading on Monday. People familiar with the move said it was Mr Read's decision to leave now, although he did not have a job lined up. He is expected to seek other roles in the tech, marketing or consumer industries.
How to manage your pension in these volatile times
Listen |
37:00
WPP last year lost its position as the world's largest ad agency by revenues to French rival Publicis, while its two largest US rivals – Omnicom and IPG – have announced plans to merge to create a single, North American advertising heavyweight.
WPP is still Britain's biggest advertising group, with revenues of close to £15 billion (€18 billion) and more than 100,000 employees around the world.
[
Advertising giant WPP sees 2023 revenue gains above analyst estimates
Opens in new window
]
Mr Read, who is 58 years old, took over from Mr Sorrell, who resigned after an inquiry into his workplace conduct. Mr Read has overseen the company as it has tried to reorientate its business to cope with the dominance of the advertising market by tech giants Meta and Alphabet.
Social media and influencer content have become key marketing channels, while traditional advertising media such as TV have shrunk in importance.
More recently, Read has pushed WPP to invest hundreds of millions of pounds in AI, which has threatened to shake up the advertising agency model by offering much quicker and cheaper ways to do labour-intensive creative and media planning work. More than 50,000 people now use WPP Open, its AI platform, to assist them with their work.
Mr Read said in January that WPP needed to move on from a difficult period of restructuring and rebuild its network of businesses with AI at the centre.
WPP last year sold its controlling stake in public relations group FGS to private equity group KKR for $767 million (€671 euro) in cash.
In the internal note to staff, Read said the company 'needed to make many difficult decisions that were necessary to serve our clients better, simplify the company, build our culture and put WPP on a more solid financial footing'.
He added: 'We have also lived through some of the most challenging external events of modern times, from the pandemic to the war in Ukraine, and navigated an increasingly polarised and difficult world ... However, I strongly believe that the future for WPP is a very positive one.'
Media analyst Claire Enders said Read had initially been a 'steady pair of hands holding the ship together through hundreds of acquisitions and integrations', and then had overseen a 'complete simplification' as chief executive of the business.
'WPP has struggled against stronger headwinds than its peers, largely due to its UK history and listing,' she said. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Q&A: What is the pension payment error all about and can the money be recouped?
Unions and representatives of retired civil servants say they are awaiting detail of the errors made in relation to the pensions of their current or former members . However, there is concern that some of the issues could require legislation and that senior politicians could be impacted by any changes to the law. What has happened? On Tuesday the Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said 'serious and systemic operational issues' had been identified at the National Shared Services Office (NSSO), which employs about 850 people and handles payroll administration for all government departments. The belief is these errors have resulted in some retired civil servants being underpaid in their pensions; incorrect pension contributions having been deducted from current and previous ministers; and the wrong amount of tax being deducted from the lump sums paid to about 30 senior civil servants upon retirement. With a review of 13,000 retirees' positions under way, however, and an external audit of the NSSO to be undertaken, it is uncertain how the situation will develop. READ MORE What will happen in respect of people who owe or are owed money? Mr Chambers said he was committed to ensuring 'all monies owed to the State are fully recouped and monies owed to individuals are refunded'. The former is likely to create issues, however, especially in relation to the larger amounts, with one retiree said to owe €280,000. With Mr Chambers suggesting some ministers may be asked to repay more than €30,000, the tax issue could be considerable. Details of the time frame have not been clarified, but Ciaran Rohan of the Association of Higher Civil and Public Servants says recouping overpayments stretching back more than four years could leave retirees, or potentially some politicians, substantially out of pocket. This is because current legislation would only allow the reclaiming of the extra tax paid as a result of receiving the extra money for the past four years, even if the overpayments stretched further back. Could that be changed? Only by legislation, says employment lawyer Barry Kenny, who says the issue means 'the original error has financial implications beyond a simple repayment issue'. It also has the potential to make it a political one. How could the money be recouped? A government circular in 2018 sets out the various ways in which overpayments can be reclaimed but there is no provision for anything like a liability of €280,000. The intention should be to recoup all the money and ideally within a year, it suggests, usually by deductions from pay or pensions of up to 8 per cent of the gross amount the person is receiving. But these people can afford to repay, no? The largest figures relate to people who had pension funds on retirement worth more than €2 million. That would certainly suggest they are well off but coming up with the funds to repay a six-figure sum is likely to be regarded as an issue. Cloda Ryan of the Retired Civil and Public Servants Association (RCPSA), which has some 7,000 members, says the vast majority of amounts involved are likely to be far smaller but still have the potential to cause problems for the pensioners concerned. 'Contrary to public perception, the majority of Civil Service pensioners have moderate pensions, in many cases lower than they would receive under the social welfare State pension for which, in general, civil servants recruited before April 6th, 1995 do not qualify.' The organisation is seeking assurances 'that no recovery of pension overpayments would take place without consultation and agreement with each pensioner affected'. And if an agreement can't be reached? 'Any civil servant faced with a request to refund money, large or small, should take legal advice to clarify the legal basis for the demand to repay and whether the figures are accurate,' says Mr Kenny. He says where the validity is established, 'reasonable' deductions or instalments would need to be agreed.


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Casement Park redevelopment: British government offers £50m to back scheme
Uncertainty over the British government's commitment to rebuilding Casement Park in west Belfast ended at lunchtime on Wednesday. After weeks of speculation, a £50 million (€59 million) investment was offered by the treasury to Stormont to 'support the redevelopment' of the stadium as part of the British government's spending review. This sets out the government's spending plans over the coming years, subject to 'sufficient finance' being raised elsewhere. And therein lies the rub, given that there is a £90 million shortfall remaining of the estimated £260 million cost to transform the dilapidated site. [ Government 'absolutely committed' to pursuing redevelopment of Casement Park for Euro 2028 Opens in new window ] But for the GAA and those who have long campaigned for a redeveloped Casement Park, the government's funding commitment gives fresh impetus to a project mired in controversy for more than a decade. READ MORE 'This needs to be the beginning of the end of the saga,' said former Antrim County Board member Brendan Mulgrew. 'Funding is place by the British government. Some very hard conversations need to take place very quickly around what's the maximum that can be given by other bodies ... today is an opportunity to inject urgency into this project.' To date, Stormont, the Irish Government and the GAA havejointly contributed £120 million towards Casement. And for many campaigners, its fate now rests with them. Legal challenges, political disputes and spiralling costs have delayed progress on plans to build the proposed 34,500-capacity venue. The stadium, the home ground of Antrim GAA, closed in 2013. [ 'People said it will never happen but I was firm believer it would' Opens in new window ] Preparatory work at the Andersonstown Road site began last February when it was chosen as a venue for the Uefa Euro 2028 soccer tournament. The plan was pulled when the British government said seven months later it could not bridge the gap in time for the games. 'Stormont Ministers, the Irish Government and the GAA need to get round a table and decide how they are going to get this over the line,' said Mulgrew. Within 20 minutes of British chancellor of the exchequer Rachel Reeves confirming details of her government's spending plans, Tánaiste Simon Harris welcomed its investment and said he 'will now engage' with the GAA, British and Northern Ireland authorities 'to deliver a redeveloped stadium'. Up to €50 million was offered through the Irish Government's Shared Island fund last February. The GAA recently confirmed it will also increase its contribution from an original £15 million. However, the Stormont contribution could prove to be a stumbling block as Casement has become an increasingly politicised issue. Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill has welcomed a commitment of €50 million from the Irish Government towards the rebuild of Casement Park. Stormont Ministers committed £62.5 million to Casement in 2011, as part of a strategy to revamp it along with Windsor Park and the rugby ground at Ravenhill. While the two other Belfast-based projects proceeded, the GAA scheme stalled. As recently as Monday, DUP Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly said that no 'special case' should be created to fund one particular organisation or sport in Northern Ireland, when asked about her support for Casement ahead of Wednesday's announcement. With Sinn Féin First Minister Michelle O'Neill calling for Casement to be built in the wake of the British funding commitment, the onus will now be on her Executive team to deliver. The project is an Executive 'flagship project' and 'more than just a sporting venue', she said on Wednesday.


Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish homebuilding shares leap following rent reform news
European shares closed in the red as early gains motivated by better than expected inflation reports were evaporated by US-China trade talks that offered less detail than expected. The pan-European Stoxx 600 index lost 0.3 per cent, remaining 2 per cent shy of its all-time high in February. DUBLIN The Iseq All-Share index ended the session down 0.02 per cent at 11,716.64. READ MORE Dalata, the owner of the Maldron and Clayton Hotel brands, had a good day, rising 0.79 per cent to €6.38. Last week, the board of Dalata Hotel Group rejected a €1.3 billion bid from the Nordic Pandox consortium , which had tabled a €6.05 a share, non-binding cash offer. Home builders tried to keep the index positive following the announcement of a rewrite of rental regulations, which will allow exemptions from existing rental rules for new tenancies and new-build apartments. Cairn Homes shot up 3.18 per cent to €2.27, Glenveagh Properties added 1.22 per cent to its share price to reach €1.83, and insulation specialist Kingspan Group jumped 0.32 per cent to €77.8. Ires Reit fell among the group, dropping 0.37 per cent to €1.08. The banking sector had a mixed day. Permanent TSB rose 1.37 per cent to €1.86, Bank of Ireland marginally rose 0.16 per cent while AIB declined 0.29 per cent. LONDON The benchmark FTSE 100 closed 0.1 per cent higher, sitting about 45 points away from its all-time highs. The mid-cap FTSE 250 also ended 0.2 per cent higher. Setting out day-to-day budgets for Government departments from 2026 to 2029 and investment plans out to 2030, British finance minister Rachel Reeves prioritised spending on health, defence and infrastructure projects to drive economic growth. An index for aerospace and defence shares closed 0.7 per cent higher. Reeves also announced an additional £10 billion investment to build thousands more homes in England. Home builders and household goods stocks gained 1.5 per cent. On the downside, industrial metal miners slipped 1 per cent tracking falling copper prices. Ibstock sank 15.6 per cent to the bottom of the FTSE 250 after the bricks and concrete producer issued a warning of a hit to its adjusted Ebitda outlook for 2025. Ricardo shares jumped 27.8 per cent after Canada-based WSP Global said it would acquire the British environmental and engineering consulting firm. EUROPE The European benchmark closed 0.3 per cent lower – it's third straight day of losses. The pan-European STOXX 600 had risen following a cooler-than-expected US inflation report that eased tariff-related concerns and bolstered hopes for the Federal Reserve to cut rates. The biggest catalysts for European markets are increased defence spending and the European Central Bank cutting borrowing costs. However, ECB officials have indicated that the easing cycle will come to an end. Traders are pricing in just one more rate cut by the tail-end of this year. On the markets side, retailers led the decline, sinking 1.7 per cent due to a 4.4 per cent drop in Inditex after the Zara owner missed first-quarter sales forecasts. NEW YORK The S&P 500 and Nasdaq were trading near record levels in mid afternoon trading, with the S&P 500 about near all-time highs touched in February, and the Nasdaq just below its record peaks reached in December. Data showed consumer prices increased only marginally in May, but inflation is expected to accelerate in the coming months due to the Trump administration's import tariffs. Annually, headline inflation stood at 2.4 per cent, lower than the 2.5 per cent rise estimated by economists polled by Reuters. A day after officials from Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework to put their tariff truce back on track, President Donald Trump said the US deal with China was done, with Beijing to supply magnets and rare earth minerals. Tesla advanced as signs of a thaw in hostilities between CEO Elon Musk and Trump emerged following an abrupt rift that had roiled the electric-vehicle maker's shares. Shares of video game retailer GameStop fell after it reported a decline in first-quarter revenue. Intel shares fell, after gaining 7.8 per cent in the previous session. – Additional reporting: Reuters, PA.