Trump Considering Asbestos Ban Reversal Sparks Warning: 'Lives at Risk'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Trump administration will "reconsider" a ban on the use of asbestos in the U.S. that took a decades-long battle to be finalized, sparking concern among health advocates.
"This is another attempt by industry, going back to when they blocked the first EPA asbestos ban in 1989, to allow for continued use of a deadly material responsible for some 40,000 U.S. deaths and some 250,000 worldwide deaths each year," Dr. Arthur L. Frank, a professor of public health and medicine at Drexel University, told Newsweek.
"We know in some settings as little as one day of exposure can give some individuals cancer," he added.
Newsweek has contacted the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) via email for comment.
File photo: Workers begin the abatement and demolition of a property contaminated with asbestos in Michigan.
File photo: Workers begin the abatement and demolition of a property contaminated with asbestos in Michigan.
Conor Ralph/The Flint Journal- MLive.com via AP
Why It Matters
Asbestos was used by building and construction industries for strengthening cement and plastics as well as for insulation, roofing, fireproofing and sound absorption. Since 2000, more research uncovered the health risks associated with the mineral, and it has been classified by various U.S. departments as a known human carcinogen.
Exposure to asbestos is linked to more than 40,000 deaths in the U.S. each year, according to the EPA under the Biden administration.
Chrysotile asbestos, also known as white asbestos, is banned in 50 countries because of its association with lung cancer, and in 2024, the Biden administration finalized its own ban, meaning the last type of asbestos used in or imported into the country would be prohibited.
What To Know
According to court documents filed with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the EPA said that the process of re-evaluating the ban would take about 30 months, delaying the implementation of the ban finalized by the Biden administration.
The move was opposed by the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, the court filings said.
"Reconsidering the EPA's 2024 Chrysotile Asbestos Rule is deeply concerning," Linda Reinstein, president and co-founder of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, told Newsweek. Reinstein lost her husband, Alan, to a type of lung cancer, mesothelioma, caused by asbestos.
"While this rule was a landmark step under the Toxic Substances Control Act, it only banned one fiber—chrysotile—in six specific conditions of use," Reinstein added. "Now, due to litigation and political pressure, the EPA has signaled it may reverse core parts of the rule, including protections for chlorine and caustic soda manufacturing."
The Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, within the EPA, will be investigating whether the Toxic Substances Control Act "went beyond what is necessary to eliminate the unreasonable risk and whether alternative measures—such as requiring permanent workplace protection measures—would eliminate the unreasonable risk."
The Toxic Substances Control Act includes the Biden administration's plan to ban asbestos from use in the U.S.
When the Biden administration announced its finalization of the ban in the summer of 2024, the EPA administrator at the time, Michael Regan said: "The science is clear—asbestos is a known carcinogen that has severe impacts on public health."
However, Trump, in his 1997 book The Art of the Comeback, said that asbestos is "100 percent safe, once applied."
"I believe that the movement against asbestos was led by the mob, because it was often mob-related companies that would do the asbestos removal," he added.
In 2018, Uralasbest, one of the world's largest producers and sellers of asbestos, put Trump's face, along with the words "Approved by Donald Trump, 45th president of the United States," on some of its products, according to the Guardian.
What People Are Saying
Dr. Arthur L. Frank, a professor of public health and medicine at Drexel University, told Newsweek: "Although this partial ban went through proper procedures, to now come and claim, as their document states, 'no party would be prejudiced by the requested abeyance,' fails to recognize that putting off this ban will lead to unnecessary disease and death for some Americans going forward. The U.S. has not yet joined some 70 countries in the world, including all developed countries, in banning—and in all other cases totally banning—the use of all forms of asbestos.
"While there is currently little import of much raw asbestos fiber, products containing asbestos such as friction products and roofing materials can still be bought and used. The U.S. should have a comprehensive and total ban on import and use and should see that proper disposal takes place for tons still in place. Because of the long latency to develop disease, even with such a ban, new cases of asbestos disease will still be seen 50 years from now."
Linda Reinstein, president and co-founder of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, told Newsweek: "This rollback is happening in the context of broader deregulatory actions by the Trump administration. Executive Orders 14303 and 13771, combined with EPA staffing cuts, will severely limit the agency's ability to evaluate and manage chemical risks. These changes threaten to dismantle science-based safeguards and delay action on a known carcinogen that kills 40,000 Americans annually.
"There is no safe level of asbestos exposure. Only federal legislation can ensure a comprehensive and lasting ban. That's why the bipartisan 2025 Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now (ARBAN) Act is essential. It would ban all forms of asbestos, close dangerous loopholes and prevent further rollbacks."
Senator Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, on Monday: "The Trump Administration's 'Polluters over People' agenda is once again threatening our health, this time undermining the chance for all Americans to have a future free of asbestos exposure. We know that asbestos is a killer, which is why it has been banned in more than 50 countries around the world.
"The United States was starting to catch up, but the Trump EPA is delaying and rolling back this vital public health safeguard, undermining this progress. I will continue to explore all options—including legislation—to phase out all dangerous asbestos fibers and provide stronger protections for our health."
What Happens Next
While the EPA said, according to the court filings, it would need 30 months to review the legislation, it has requested that the court extend the suspension of the law for six months, subject to additional extension requests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Trump admin shortens ACA enrollment window
The Trump administration on Friday narrowed the period to sign up for Affordable Care Act coverage and imposed other restrictions aimed at rolling back Biden-era flexibilities for the program. Why it matters: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services expects the new policies to lower marketplace premiums by about 5% on average, and save taxpayers $12 billion next year. But between 725,000 and 1.8 million people are expected to lose coverage, per CMS's projections. The big picture: Congress is considering codifying many of the same provisions in the massive GOP budget bill that's now in the Senate. That would make them much harder for a future administration to undo. State of play: CMS is shortening the period for enrolling in marketplace insurance by two weeks, starting for plan year 2027. Federal exchanges will then be open for sign-ups from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31 of each year. It's also repealing the monthly opportunity started under the Biden administration for lower-income people to get marketplace coverage. The new rule limits plans' ability to cover gender-affirming care beginning next year. It also excludes Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients from obtaining ACA coverage. CMS said the policies will ensure federal subsidies to offset the cost of ACA coverage only support statutory goals of the law. Yes, but: In response to public comments, CMS is making several of its changes temporary. For plan year 2026 only, CMS will begin charging a $5 monthly premium for consumers who are automatically reenrolled in an ACA plan from one year to the next and would otherwise have fully subsidized coverage. Other changes concerning income verification for enrollees will also end after 2026. Between the lines: Insurance losses from the new policy will be felt hardest in states where "erroneous and improper enrollment is most noticeable," including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Utah, CMS said.
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump administration makes sweeping changes to ObamaCare, ends ‘Dreamer' coverage
The Trump administration is shortening ObamaCare's annual open enrollment period and ending the law's coverage of immigrants that entered the U.S. illegally as children, according to a final rule announced Friday. The Biden administration made it easier and more affordable to sign up for Affordable Care Act plans, causing enrollment to swell to an all-time high. The Trump administration claims those moves opened a wave of fraudulent enrollment that's costing taxpayers billions of dollars. According to the rule, the federal open enrollment period will run from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31. Currently, federal open enrollment ends Jan. 15. States operating their own health insurance exchanges will have the flexibility to set their own open enrollments, so long as they run no longer than nine weeks between the November and December dates. In addition to the shortened enrollment period, the administration said it is ending ObamaCare coverage for immigrants that came into the U.S. illegally as children, also known as 'Dreamers.' The provision will undo a Biden-era rule that was estimated to allow 147,000 immigrants to enroll in coverage. A federal judge blocked the rule from being enforced in 19 states, and it is still being litigated. The administration also banned plans from covering 'sex-trait modification' as an essential health benefit beginning in plan year 2026. The policy will apply to the five states that currently include coverage for gender-affirming care, as well as in states that do not have such coverage expressly mentioned. But many of the other changes announced Friday will only last a year, like requiring more income verifications for people to enroll in coverage on federal exchange plans. The one-year sunset is a change from when the rule was proposed in March. It's designed to give Republicans on Capitol Hill an opportunity to codify the provisions into law for the long-term and use the savings to fund their massive party-line tax and spending bill. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the rule is projected to save up to $12 billion in 2026 by 'reining in wasteful federal spending, and refocusing on making health insurance markets more affordable and sustainable for hardworking American families.' For instance, the rule requires federal exchange plans to check consumers' eligibility for special enrollment periods and raise the burden of verification for people who are automatically re-enrolled in subsidized plans. The rule also requires plans to charge those people a $5 monthly premium until they confirm or update their eligibility information. The rule also ends a monthly special enrollment period for people with income below 150 percent of the federal poverty line, which CMS said 'has been exploited to enroll consumers or change their plans without their knowledge.'
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Transgender Veterans Barred From Fertility Treatment Under New Rules
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Transgender veterans eligible for Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) health benefits will no longer receive financial coverage for egg- and sperm-freezing fertility treatments, new guidance shows. According to a leaked email from a person at the VA's Women Veterans Health Care department, transgender veterans preparing for gender dysphoria treatment and seeking cryopreservation—the process in which eggs or sperm (gametes) are frozen and stored to be thawed for later use—will no longer see the costs of this process covered by the department. Treatment for gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder can affect an individual's ovaries or testes and thus fertility. Individuals sometimes freeze their eggs to mitigate against this prior to treatment. The email indicates a shift from previous policy. As it stands, everyone eligible for VA health care benefits (i.e. those who previously served in the military, navy or air service) can access these fertility preservation treatments, including transgender veterans, according to a Women Veterans Health Care document, published in October 2023. There are more than 134,000 transgender veterans in the U.S., according to the Williams Institute, a research center at UCLA School of Law that focuses on sexual orientation and gender identity. Newsweek contacted the VA by email to comment. A laboratory assistant shows a sperm sample in a cryopreservation container at minus-170 degrees Celsius at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine in Muenster, Germany, on February 6, 2013. A laboratory assistant shows a sperm sample in a cryopreservation container at minus-170 degrees Celsius at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine in Muenster, Germany, on February 6, 2013. Photo by: Friso Gentsch/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images Since taking office for the second time, President Donald Trump has made a plethora of actions regarding transgender people, including signing an executive order stating that there are only two unchangeable sexes and another attempting to ban transgender women from competing in women's sports. He also signed an order aimed at restricting access to puberty blockers and other gender care for people under age 19. Some of the actions have sparked ongoing legal challenges. On February 18, he also signed an executive order expanding access to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and making it more affordable for patients. While IVF does not always require cryopreservation, it is often used to store excess embryos or to enable people to delay embryo transfer until a time of their choosing. The White House directed Newsweek to the VA after a request for comment. In the VA specifically, in March it was announced that the department was phasing out treatment for gender dysphoria in response to Trump's executive order recognizing two sexes. The VA said trans veterans would still continue to receive VA health care. The VA email, viewed by Newsweek said: "On yesterday's (6/16/2025) National Fertility Interdisciplinary Teams Office Hours call, it was announced that VA will no longer pay for cryopreservation of gametes for a medical indication if it involves transgender veterans seeking cryopreservation in preparation for treatment of Gender Dysphoria or Gender Identity Disorder. This will reportedly affect new authorizations and will not disrupt cryopreservation that has already been initiated." It added that according to another senior official in the Veterans Health Administration "the change is reportedly already in effect and an official announcement will be forthcoming" and advised the department to "hold on authorizing any new cryopreservation for medical indications related to gender dysphoria/gender identity disorder" while waiting for further guidance. "We want to avoid a situation where veterans could be told they are approved for cryo, only to find out after the fact that VA cannot pay for care they received," the email read. Newsweek chose not to name the person who sent the email as well as the senior official named in the correspondence to protect their privacy. According to the October 2023 Women Veterans Health Care document, fertility preservation of eggs and sperm, but not embryos, is covered by the VA for medical reasons. "If your VA health care provider determines there is a medical indication, VA can cover the cost of retrieving and freezing your eggs or sperm to preserve your fertility preservation," it said. It listed examples of medical indications that would be covered, including "veterans who are undergoing gender-affirming care that can affect their ovaries or testes." Roz Keith, the founder and executive director of the Michigan-based transgender charity Stand With Trans, said the policy was "discrimination." "Clearly, the rights of the trans community are the target of attack," she told Newsweek. "It doesn't matter whether someone is an adult, a minor, a veteran, a professional, or other, if one is trans identified, they are seeing rights being taken away one by one. It is deplorable. If one class of people can receive treatment paid for with their benefits, then other classes of people should receive the same. This is why we have the equal protection clause in our Constitution. "No one should be excluded from a particular treatment because they are transgender. This is the very definition of discrimination."
