
Europe scrambles to aid Ukraine after US intelligence cutoff
The U.S. has provided Kyiv with everything from signals intelligence, satellite imagery and targeting data used to strike Russian positions during the three-year war.
Now, it will likely fall to other intelligence heavyweights within the NATO alliance — Britain, France and to an extent Germany — to pick up the slack. But they are unlikely to be able to replicate the scope and scale of the sprawling U.S. intelligence community.
'I'm not sure that European countries can really bridge this gap,' said a European official familiar with the capabilities of allies, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly about the continent's security arrangements.
The U.S. intelligence community, which spans 18 agencies, vastly outguns any of its European counterparts, particularly in the realms of satellite technology and analytic capacity.
'It's really a matter of mass,' said Jim Townsend, who served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for Europe and NATO during the Obama administration. 'We have more analysts and more systems and in some ways, some more exquisite systems.'
The pause on intelligence sharing has added to the distress in Europe over how to fend off Russia as the Trump administration has been increasingly conciliatory toward Moscow and antagonistic toward Ukraine — including halting arms transfers to Kyiv.
Confusion reigned in the wake of the announcement on Wednesday, with Ukraine's defense minister acknowledging on Thursday that the country had not yet received details on how intelligence would be restricted. The European official said Thursday that it was 'still puzzling' how far the ban extended.
The U.S. intelligence relationship with Ukraine has been carefully nurtured over a decade. Washington has a broad range of tools at its disposal, from signals and human intelligence to satellite capabilities, that have played a decisive role in alerting Ukraine about Moscow's plans to invade in 2022, and defending against the onslaught of Russian missiles.
The National Security Council declined to comment when asked about the scope of the pause on intelligence sharing, and whether it applied to information that could be used for defensive purposes.
'Turning off intelligence is the most damaging and hostile decision,' said Camille Grand, former assistant secretary general for defense investment at NATO. 'Cuts in weapons supply will take a few months to have a massive impact and can be partially mitigated by the Europeans. If the intel denial is not a pause, it will have consequences in the short term,' he said.
NATO allies have been discussing how to handle the U.S. announcement of the intel-sharing pause with Ukraine. One person familiar with those discussions said NATO members are not prohibited from sharing some U.S intelligence with Ukraine, though such sharing could be very limited, as allies don't want to jeopardize existing relationships with Washington or one another.
One NATO official emphasized that the American suspension of arms shipments and intel sharing with Ukraine is being described to allies as a temporary measure until Washington sees some movement in talks to end the war, and they are under no pressure from the Trump team to reduce or curtail their own work with Ukraine on either intelligence sharing or arms shipments.
Still, the Daily Mail reported Wednesday that the United States had ordered the U.K. to stop sharing American intelligence previously cleared to be shared with Ukraine. (A British official declined to comment on the reporting.)
France's Armed Forces Minister Sébastien Lecornu said Thursday that French intelligence was 'sovereign' and that the country would continue to share intelligence with Ukraine. He did not provide details on what sort of intelligence France is sharing with the Ukrainians.
The effects of the U.S. intel halt are already being felt.
U.S. satellite company Maxar, one of the leading providers of commercial satellite imagery to Ukraine, has blocked Ukraine's access to its services, which are used by Ukrainian troops to study the terrain of the battlefield and plan strikes on Russian positions.
In a statement, Gia DeHart, a spokesperson for Maxar, said that the U.S. government has suspended Ukrainian access to the company's Global Enhanced GEOINT Delivery program, which is provided under a U.S. government contract.
Without U.S. intelligence, the Ukrainians also have far less real-time, over-the-horizon knowledge of Russian military formations, movements and logistics.
'We now have less information about what's happening on the other side of the front line,' said Mykola Bielieskov, an analyst with Ukraine's National Institute for Strategic Studies. 'We have some of our own indigenous capability from human intelligence sources, but U.S. intelligence was very valuable in keeping us informed,' he said.
Ukraine is particularly worried about any interruption in warnings about Russian missile attacks.
'With anti-ballistic missile defense every second is important,' Bielieskov said. 'You need military-grade satellite intelligence to detect a missile launch.'
On average since the start of the war, Russia has fired 24 missiles a day at Ukraine. There are lulls, possibly due to Moscow's production challenges, but there are days when up to a hundred missiles can be launched targeting critical infrastructure and residential areas in Ukraine's cities.
'This is going to impact our cities and could result in mass destruction,' said Ukrainian lawmaker Maryana Bezuhla, who until recently served on the parliamentary defense and intelligence committee.
The intelligence sharing pause will also deprive the Ukrainian armed forces of targeting data when firing U.S.-supplied HIMARS rockets. 'We can still fire them but we're shooting half-blind,' Bielieskov said.
Asked if any European countries can substitute for the now-suspended intelligence, Bielieskov, said 'only partially, fully no.'
The intelligence pause is already fueling longer-term questions in Europe as to whether the continent can continue to rely on U.S. military and intelligence support to underpin its security.
Konstantin von Notz, chair of the German parliament's intelligence oversight committee, is calling for the establishment of a European spy network, cautioning that the continent can no longer continue to rely on U.S. intelligence support.
'We need a European intelligence cooperation format — call it 'Euro Eyes' — to ensure that strong states can exchange information swiftly and securely on clear legal grounds,' von Notz said in an interview with POLITICO published Friday. 'There is no way around increasing our own intelligence capabilities in the future.'
Jack Detsch contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
Chris Pratt talks hanging out with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: 'I love him'
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has a fan in Chris Pratt. The "Guardians of the Galaxy" star, 46, spoke with Bill Maher on the "Club Random" podcast about his relationship with the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services. "I've spent a number of occasions hanging with him, just in a strictly family dinner kind of vibe, and I really got along with him well," Pratt said during the episode released on Aug. 18. "I think he's great. I think he's funny. I like him. I love him." Pratt's wife, Katherine Schwarzenegger, is a member of the Kennedy family. She is the granddaughter of Eunice Kennedy Shriver, a philanthropist and sibling of Robert F. Kennedy. Pratt also told Maher that politics is a "nasty business," and he has seen "how the person you are can be such a contrast to the person that people are being told that you are." Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger welcome their first son together Kennedy, who endorsed Trump's 2024 election bid after dropping his own campaign for president as an independent, has been criticized for his history of promoting false or misleading claims about vaccines. "When you jump on the bandwagon with the most divisive president ever, it makes sense that you're going to be made to look terrible," Pratt said. "So I don't know what to believe. It's not like I sit with Bobby and go, 'So hey, let's talk about this.' We're just playing cards or playing Mafia or having fun or having dinner. I'm not going to pick his brain to find out exactly which of those things are true. I just kind of assume that none of them are, and for the most part, I wish him well." Pratt argued that even critics of the Trump administration should be able to root for its success in some instances. "I'd hate to be so mired in hatred for the president that any success from his administration is something I'd have an allergic reaction to," he said. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. declares 'loyalty' to Trump, rules out a 2028 presidential bid The "Terminal List" actor did not endorse a candidate in the 2024 presidential election, even as several of his Marvel costars rallied around former Vice President Kamala Harris. In an essay for his mother-in-law Maria Shriver's Sunday Paper before the election, Pratt wrote that he was "trying to make sense of the election through the eyes of Americans on both sides." "I've been thinking a lot about where we'll be as a nation on November 6th, how we can attempt to move forward after so much division, and how some of the lessons that sports teach us may be just what all of us need as we chart a course forward," he wrote. Pratt went on to add that after the election, Americans should exercise their "civic duty" to "accept the results and focus instead on showing up for each other." Contributing: Hannah Hudnall and Erin Jensen, USA TODAY


Los Angeles Times
10 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Europeans demand a ceasefire before Trump summits with Putin and Zelensky
Russia must agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine before negotiations can advance toward a formal peace agreement, top European leaders told Donald Trump at the White House on Monday, urging the U.S. president to 'put pressure on Russia' in his push to end the war. The meeting had an historic flair with six European heads of government, the NATO secretary general, and the president of the European Commission all converging on Washington for discussions with the president — a flurry of diplomatic activity after Trump's summit last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska sparked widespread fears over the fate of U.S. support for security on the continent. Trump first met with Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, in the Oval Office, striking an affable tone following their last, disastrous meeting in the room back in February. This time, Trump emphasized his 'love' for the Ukrainian people and his commitment to provide security guarantees for Kyiv in an ultimate peace settlement with Russia. Zelensky offered only praise and gratitude to Trump, telling reporters that they had their 'best' meeting yet. But an expanded meeting with Zelensky and the chancellor of Germany, the presidents of France and Finland, the prime ministers of the United Kingdom and Italy, and the heads of NATO and the European Commission hinted at a more challenging road ahead for the burgeoning peace effort. 'The next steps ahead are the more complicated ones now,' said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said. 'The path is open — you opened it. but now the way is open for complicated negotiations, and to be honest, we would all like to see a ceasefire, at the latest, from the next meeting on.' 'I can't imagine the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire,' Merz added. 'So let's work on that. And let's put pressure on Russia.' Emmanuel Macron, the French president, sat sternly throughout the start of the meeting before echoing Merz's call. 'Your idea to ask for a truce, a ceasefire, or at least to stop the killings,' Macron said, 'is a necessity, and we all support this idea.' Trump had been in agreement with his European counterparts on the necessity of a ceasefire for months. Zelensky first agreed to one in March. But Putin has refused, pressing Russian advantages on the battlefield, and in Anchorage on Friday convinced Trump to drop his calls for an immediate halt to the fighting. 'All of us would obviously prefer an immediate ceasefire while we work on a lasting peace. Maybe something like that could happen — as of this moment, it's not happening,' Trump said at the meeting. 'But President Zelensky and President Putin can talk a little bit more about that.' 'I don't know that it's necessary,' Trump added. 'You can do it through the war. But I like the ceasefire from another standpoint — you immediately stop the killing.' The European leaders all emphasized to Trump that they share his desire for peace. But the president of the commission, Ursula Van der Leyen, called for a 'just' peace, and Zelensky would not engage publicly with reporters on Putin's central demand: a surrender of vast swaths of Ukrainian territory to Russian control. Putin first invaded Ukraine in 2014, occupying the Crimean peninsula in a stealth operation and funding an attack on the eastern Donbas region using proxy forces. But he launched a full-scale invasion of the entire country in 2022, leading to the bloodiest conflict in Europe since World War Two. In a hot mic moment, before press were ushered out of the expanded meeting with European leaders, Trump told Macron that he believes the Russian president and former KGB officer would agree to a peace deal because of their personal relationship. He 'wants to make a deal for me,' he said, 'as crazy as it sounds.' European leaders said that detailed U.S. security guarantees — for Ukraine specifically, and more broadly for Europe — were at the top of the agenda for Monday's meetings, including the prospect of U.S. troops on the ground in Ukraine to enforce any future peace settlement. Asked whether U.S. forces would be involved, Trump did not rule it out, stating, 'we'll be talking about that.' 'When it comes to security, there's going to be a lot of help,' he said in the Oval Office. 'It's going to be good. They are first line of defense, because they're there — they are Europe. But we're going to help them out, also. We'll be involved.' Van der Leyen, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer praised the Trump administration for discussing what it called 'Article 5-like' security guarantees for Ukraine, referencing a provision of the NATO charter that states that an attack on one member is an attack on all. But the provision also provides countries in the NATO alliance with broad discretion whether to participate in a military response to an attack on a fellow member. Starmer and Macron have expressed a willingness for months to send British and French troops to Ukraine. But the Russian Foreign Ministry said on Monday that Moscow would oppose the deployment of NATO troops to the country as 'provocative' and 'reckless,' creating a potential rift in the negotiations. Despite the gulf between Europe and Russia, Trump expressed hope throughout the day that he could schedule a trilateral meeting amongst himself, Putin and Zelensky, possibly within a matter of days. He planned on calling Putin shortly after European leaders left the White House, he told reporters. Trump's team floated inviting Zelensky to attend the negotiations in Alaska last Friday, and Zelensky has said he is willing to participate in a trilateral meeting. He repeated his interest to Trump on Monday and asked him to attend. But Moscow has yet to commit to a trilateral summit. Ahead of Friday's meeting, Russian officials said that conditions weren't right for a direct talks between Putin and the Ukrainian president. The Russian leader has repeatedly questioned Zelensky's legitimacy, and has tried to assassinate him on numerous occasions. In the Oval Office, a Fox News reporter asked Zelensky if he was 'prepared to keep sending Ukrainian troops to their deaths,' or whether he would 'agree to redraw the maps' instead. The Ukrainian president demurred. 'We live under each day attacks,' Zelensky responded. 'We need to stop this war, to stop Russia. And we need the support — American and European partners.' Trump and his team largely adopted Putin's position on Friday that Russia should be able to keep the Ukrainian territory it has occupied by force — and possibly even more of the Donbas region of Donetsk that remains in Ukrainian control — in exchange for an end to the fighting. But European officials were silent on the idea on Monday. The Ukrainian Constitution prohibits the concession of territory without the support of a public referendum, and polls indicate that three out of four Ukrainians oppose giving up land in an attempt to end the war. Steve Witkoff, the president's envoy for special missions, said Sunday that Putin agreed to pass legislation through the Kremlin that would guarantee an end to wars of conquest in Ukraine, or elsewhere in Europe. But Russia has made similar commitments before. In 1994, the United States and Britain signed on to a agreement in Budapest with Ukraine and Russia that ostensibly guaranteed security for Kyiv and vowed to honor Ukraine's territorial integrity. In exchange, Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons.


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Hot mic catches Trump's ‘crazy' whisper to French prez Macron before multilateral meeting
A hot mic caught President Trump whispering something he called 'crazy' as he, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and seven European heads of state spoke to the press before their closed-door meeting at the White House to talk about ending Russia's war in Ukraine. 'I think he [Russian President Vladimir Putin] wants to make a deal,' Trump whispered to French President Emmanuel Macron in the East Room. President Trump speaking to French President Emmanuel Macron in the East Room of the White House on Aug. 18, 2025. AP Photo/Alex Brandon Advertisement 'I think he wants to make a deal for me, you understand that? As crazy as it sounds.'