logo
Europe scrambles to aid Ukraine after US intelligence cutoff

Europe scrambles to aid Ukraine after US intelligence cutoff

Yahoo08-03-2025

Ukraine's allies in Europe are rushing to fill the void left by the Trump administration's decision to pause its intelligence sharing with Kyiv. It isn't going to be easy.
The U.S. has provided Kyiv with everything from signals intelligence, satellite imagery and targeting data used to strike Russian positions during the three-year war.
Now, it will likely fall to other intelligence heavyweights within the NATO alliance — Britain, France and to an extent Germany — to pick up the slack. But they are unlikely to be able to replicate the scope and scale of the sprawling U.S. intelligence community.
'I'm not sure that European countries can really bridge this gap,' said a European official familiar with the capabilities of allies, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly about the continent's security arrangements.
The U.S. intelligence community, which spans 18 agencies, vastly outguns any of its European counterparts, particularly in the realms of satellite technology and analytic capacity.
'It's really a matter of mass,' said Jim Townsend, who served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for Europe and NATO during the Obama administration. 'We have more analysts and more systems and in some ways, some more exquisite systems.'
The pause on intelligence sharing has added to the distress in Europe over how to fend off Russia as the Trump administration has been increasingly conciliatory toward Moscow and antagonistic toward Ukraine — including halting arms transfers to Kyiv.
Confusion reigned in the wake of the announcement on Wednesday, with Ukraine's defense minister acknowledging on Thursday that the country had not yet received details on how intelligence would be restricted. The European official said Thursday that it was 'still puzzling' how far the ban extended.
The U.S. intelligence relationship with Ukraine has been carefully nurtured over a decade. Washington has a broad range of tools at its disposal, from signals and human intelligence to satellite capabilities, that have played a decisive role in alerting Ukraine about Moscow's plans to invade in 2022, and defending against the onslaught of Russian missiles.
The National Security Council declined to comment when asked about the scope of the pause on intelligence sharing, and whether it applied to information that could be used for defensive purposes.
'Turning off intelligence is the most damaging and hostile decision,' said Camille Grand, former assistant secretary general for defense investment at NATO. 'Cuts in weapons supply will take a few months to have a massive impact and can be partially mitigated by the Europeans. If the intel denial is not a pause, it will have consequences in the short term,' he said.
NATO allies have been discussing how to handle the U.S. announcement of the intel-sharing pause with Ukraine. One person familiar with those discussions said NATO members are not prohibited from sharing some U.S intelligence with Ukraine, though such sharing could be very limited, as allies don't want to jeopardize existing relationships with Washington or one another.
One NATO official emphasized that the American suspension of arms shipments and intel sharing with Ukraine is being described to allies as a temporary measure until Washington sees some movement in talks to end the war, and they are under no pressure from the Trump team to reduce or curtail their own work with Ukraine on either intelligence sharing or arms shipments.
Still, the Daily Mail reported Wednesday that the United States had ordered the U.K. to stop sharing American intelligence previously cleared to be shared with Ukraine. (A British official declined to comment on the reporting.)
France's Armed Forces Minister Sébastien Lecornu said Thursday that French intelligence was 'sovereign' and that the country would continue to share intelligence with Ukraine. He did not provide details on what sort of intelligence France is sharing with the Ukrainians.
The effects of the U.S. intel halt are already being felt.
U.S. satellite company Maxar, one of the leading providers of commercial satellite imagery to Ukraine, has blocked Ukraine's access to its services, which are used by Ukrainian troops to study the terrain of the battlefield and plan strikes on Russian positions.
In a statement, Gia DeHart, a spokesperson for Maxar, said that the U.S. government has suspended Ukrainian access to the company's Global Enhanced GEOINT Delivery program, which is provided under a U.S. government contract.
Without U.S. intelligence, the Ukrainians also have far less real-time, over-the-horizon knowledge of Russian military formations, movements and logistics.
'We now have less information about what's happening on the other side of the front line,' said Mykola Bielieskov, an analyst with Ukraine's National Institute for Strategic Studies. 'We have some of our own indigenous capability from human intelligence sources, but U.S. intelligence was very valuable in keeping us informed,' he said.
Ukraine is particularly worried about any interruption in warnings about Russian missile attacks.
'With anti-ballistic missile defense every second is important,' Bielieskov said. 'You need military-grade satellite intelligence to detect a missile launch.'
On average since the start of the war, Russia has fired 24 missiles a day at Ukraine. There are lulls, possibly due to Moscow's production challenges, but there are days when up to a hundred missiles can be launched targeting critical infrastructure and residential areas in Ukraine's cities.
'This is going to impact our cities and could result in mass destruction,' said Ukrainian lawmaker Maryana Bezuhla, who until recently served on the parliamentary defense and intelligence committee.
The intelligence sharing pause will also deprive the Ukrainian armed forces of targeting data when firing U.S.-supplied HIMARS rockets. 'We can still fire them but we're shooting half-blind,' Bielieskov said.
Asked if any European countries can substitute for the now-suspended intelligence, Bielieskov, said 'only partially, fully no.'
The intelligence pause is already fueling longer-term questions in Europe as to whether the continent can continue to rely on U.S. military and intelligence support to underpin its security.
Konstantin von Notz, chair of the German parliament's intelligence oversight committee, is calling for the establishment of a European spy network, cautioning that the continent can no longer continue to rely on U.S. intelligence support.
'We need a European intelligence cooperation format — call it 'Euro Eyes' — to ensure that strong states can exchange information swiftly and securely on clear legal grounds,' von Notz said in an interview with POLITICO published Friday. 'There is no way around increasing our own intelligence capabilities in the future.'
Jack Detsch contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Carney travelling to Europe for security, defence talks with EU, NATO
Carney travelling to Europe for security, defence talks with EU, NATO

Hamilton Spectator

time43 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Carney travelling to Europe for security, defence talks with EU, NATO

OTTAWA - Prime Minister Mark Carney will depart for Europe on Sunday for back-to-back summits where he is expected to make major commitments for Canada on security and defence. Carney will be joined by Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand, Defence Minister David McGuinty and secretary of state for defence procurement Stephen Fuhr at the EU and NATO summits, where military procurement and diversifying supply chains will top the agendas. The international meetings come as Canada looks to reduce its defence procurement reliance on the United States due to strained relations over tariffs and President Donald Trump's repeated talk about Canada becoming a U.S. state. Carney will fly first to Brussels, Belgium, starting the trip with a visit to the Antwerp Schoonselhof Military Cemetery where 348 Canadian soldiers are buried. He will also meet with Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever, European Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. At the EU-Canada summit, Anand and McGuinty are expected to sign a security and defence agreement with the EU in what one European official described Friday as one of the most ambitious deals Europe has ever signed with a third country. The agreement will open the door to Canada's participation in the ReArm Europe initiative, allowing Canada to access a 150-billion-euro loan program for defence procurement, called Security Action for Europe. An EU official briefing reporters on Friday said once the procurement deal is in place, Canada will have to negotiate a bilateral agreement with the European Commission to begin discussions with member states about procurement opportunities. A Canadian official briefing reporters on the summit Saturday said the initial agreement will allow for Canada's participation in some joint procurement projects. However, a second agreement will be needed to allow Canadian companies to bid. At the EU-Canada summit, leaders are also expected to issue a joint statement to underscore a willingness for continued pressure on Russia, including through further sanctions, and call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza. After Brussels, Carney heads to The Hague in the Netherlands for the NATO leaders' summit on Tuesday and Wednesday. There, Carney will meet with the King of the Netherlands and later with leaders of Nordic nations to discuss Arctic and transatlantic security. At the NATO summit, Carney will take part in bilateral meetings with other leaders. The summit agenda includes a social dinner hosted by the king and queen of the Netherlands and a two-and-a-half hour meeting of the North Atlantic Council. NATO allies are expected to debate a plan to hike alliance members' defence spending target to five per cent of national GDP. NATO data shows that in 2024, none of its 32 members spent that much. The Canadian government official who briefed reporters on background says the spending target and its timeline are still up for discussion, though some allies have indicated they would prefer a seven-year timeline while others favour a decade. Canada hasn't hit a five- per- cent defence spending threshhold since the 1950s and hasn't reached the two per cent mark since the late 1980s. NATO says that, based on its estimate of which expenditures count toward the target, Canada spent $41 billion in 2024 on defence, or 1.37 per cent of GDP. That's more than twice what it spent in 2014, when the two per cent target was first set; that year, Canada spent $20.1 billion, or 1.01 per cent of GDP, on defence. In 2014, only three NATO members achieved the two per cent target — the U.S., the U.K., and Greece. In 2025, all members are expected to hit it. Any agreement to adopt a new spending benchmark must be ratified by all 32 NATO member states. Former Canadian ambassador to NATO Kerry Buck told The Canadian Press the condensed agenda is likely meant to 'avoid public rifts among allies,' describing Trump as an 'uncertainty engine.' 'The national security environment has really, really shifted,' Buck said, adding allies next door to Russia face the greatest threats. 'There is a high risk that the U.S. would undercut NATO at a time where all allies are increasingly vulnerable.' Trump has suggested the U.S. might abandon its mutual defence commitment to the alliance if member countries don't ramp up defence spending. 'Whatever we can do to get through this NATO summit with few public rifts between the U.S. and other allies on anything, and satisfy a very long-standing U.S. demand to rebalance defence spending, that will be good for Canada because NATO's good for Canada,' Buck said. Carney has already made two trips to Europe this year — the first to London and Paris to meet with European allies and the second to Rome to attend the inaugural mass of Pope Leo XIV. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025.

Barabak: Newsom stood tall against Trump. Does that make him presidential timber?
Barabak: Newsom stood tall against Trump. Does that make him presidential timber?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Barabak: Newsom stood tall against Trump. Does that make him presidential timber?

Today we discuss presidential politics, window treatments and disasters of the natural and man-made variety. Time for Gavin Newsom to start measuring those White House drapes. Huh? You know, president of the United States. I'm thinking something Earth-friendly, like recycled hemp. Wait, what? Did you catch the nationally televised speech the governor recently gave? The one about "democracy at a crossroads." I did. It was a fine speech and the governor made some important points about President Trump's reckless commandeering of California's National Guard, his administration's indiscriminate immigration raids and the wholly unnecessary dispatch of Marines to Los Angeles. (From the halls of Montezuma, to the shores of Venice Beach.) Newsom was plenty justified in his anger and contempt. Trump, acting true to his flame-fanning fashion, turned what was a middling set of protests — nothing local law enforcement couldn't handle — into yet another assault on our sorely tested Constitution. Newsom's speech certainly "met the moment," to use one of his favorite phrases. I'll grant you that. Unlike a lot of extracurricular activities aimed at boosting his presidential prospects, Newsom was addressing a Trump-manufactured crisis unfolding right here at home. It was a moment that called for gubernatorial leadership. Just the kind of leadership despondent Democrats need. So it's been said. It's not much of a leap to see Newsom leading the anti-Trump opposition clear to the White House! Actually, that's a bigger leap than it takes to clear the Grand Canyon. Read more: Barabak: Putting the bully in bully pulpit, Trump escalates in L.A. rather than seeking calm Granted, Newsom's speech received a lot of raves from Democrats across the country. Many are desperate for someone in a position of power to give voice to their blood-boiling, cranium-exploding rage against Trump and his many excesses. Newsom did a good job channeling those emotions and articulating the dangers of an imprudent president run amok. But let's not go overboard. There is no lack of Democrats eager to take on Trump and become the face of the so-called resistance. There is no shortage of Democrats eyeing a 2028 bid for the White House. Those who run won't be schlepping all the political baggage that Newsom has to tote. Such as? Rampant homelessness. An exploding budget deficit. Vast income inequality. Plus, a lot of social policies that many Californians consider beneficent and broad-minded that, to put it mildly, others around the country consider much less so. Don't get me wrong. I love California with all my heart and soul. But we have a lot of deep-seated problems and cultural idiosyncrasies that Newsom's rivals — Democrat and Republican — would be only too happy to hang around his neck. So let's not get too caught up in the moment. The fundamentals of the 2028 presidential race haven't changed based on a single — albeit well-received — speech. It's still hard to see Democrats turning the party's fate over to yet another nominee spawned in the liberal stew of San Francisco politics and campaigning with kooky California as a home address. Stranger things have happened. True. That said, 2028 is a zillion political light years and countless news cycles away. First come the midterm elections in November 2026, giving voters their chance to weigh in on Trump and his actions. The verdict will go a long way toward shaping the dynamic in 2028. Well at least Newsom has brought his A-game to social media. His trolling of Trump is something to behold! Whatever. Read more: Lopez: My theory for why Trump's agents targeted Dodger Stadium and a bus stop outside Winchell's You're not impressed? I think it's best to leave the snark to professionals. I do, however, have some sympathy for the governor. It's not easy dealing with someone as spiteful and amoral as the nation's ax-grinder-in-chief. Consider, for instance, the disaster relief money that fire-devastated Southern California is counting on. Helping the region in its time of desperate need shouldn't be remotely political, or part of some red-vs.-blue-state feud. Historically, that sort of federal aid has never been. But this is Trump we're dealing with. To his credit, Newsom tried making nice in the days and weeks following the January firestorm. He ignored the president's provocations and held what was later described an an amicable session with Trump in the Oval Office. Their working relationship seemed to be a good one. Read more: Barabak: If Gavin Newsom wants to be president, he's got work to do — starting at home But few things last with the transactional Trump, save for his pettiness and self-absorption. Asked last week if his "recent dust-ups" with Newsom would impact the granting of wildfire relief, Trump said, "Yeah, maybe." He called Newsom incompetent, trotted out more gobbledygook about raking forests and then soliloquized on the nature of personal relationships. "When you don't like somebody, don't respect somebody, it's harder for that person to get money if you're on top," Trump said. Yeesh. Responding in a posting on X, Newsom correctly noted, "Sucking up to the President should not be a requirement for him to do the right thing for the American people." Hard to argue with that. Yet here we are. The nation's second-most populous city is occupied by National Guard and Marine troops. Thousands of people — displaced by disaster, their past lives gone up in smoke — are hostage to the whims of a peevish president who always puts his feelings first and cares nothing for the greater good. The midterm election can't come soon enough. Get the latest from Mark Z. BarabakFocusing on politics out West, from the Golden Gate to the U.S. me up. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Satellite Images Show 'Unusual' Activity at Iran Nuclear Site Before Strikes
Satellite Images Show 'Unusual' Activity at Iran Nuclear Site Before Strikes

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Satellite Images Show 'Unusual' Activity at Iran Nuclear Site Before Strikes

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Satellite imagery captured ahead of U.S. strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites showed "unusual" movement around the entrance to Iran's Fordow enrichment facility. Pictures captured on Thursday and Friday showed "unusual truck and vehicular activity" close to the entrance of the underground Fordow complex south of Tehran, satellite imagery giant Maxar said late on Saturday U.S. time. A total of 16 cargo trucks were spotted on the access road leading up to the Fordow tunnel entrance on Thursday, but most of the trucks had relocated to one kilometer (0.6 miles) northwest of the access road by the following day, Maxar said. New trucks and multiple bulldozers had appeared close to the main entrance by Friday, with one truck very close to the main tunnel entrance, the satellite imagery provider said. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday evening the U.S. had bombed the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites in central Iran in "massive precision strikes" to take out Tehran's nuclear enrichment facilities and Iran's ability to make a nuclear weapon. Satellite imagery captured by Maxar on June 19 showing cargo trucks close to the underground entrance of the Fordow fuel enrichment facility, prior to U.S. air strikes on the underground complex. Satellite imagery captured by Maxar on June 19 showing cargo trucks close to the underground entrance of the Fordow fuel enrichment facility, prior to U.S. air strikes on the underground complex. Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies The strikes were a "spectacular military success," Trump said. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." Israel launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and scientists, as well as the country's ballistic missile sites and other military assets, late on June 12 U.S. time. Iran responded with drone and ballistic missile barrages. Israel targeted Natanz and Isfahan, but experts said only the U.S.'s B-2 heavy stealth bombers and 30,000lb "bunker buster" bombs could successfully take out Fordow, a complex built deep into a mountain roughly 60 miles from Tehran. Fordow's existence was secret until 2009. This is a developing story and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store