How massive US Education Department cuts are threatening the Nation's Report Card and core federal programs
The US Supreme Court has allowed the Department of Education to move forward with laying off more than 1,300 employees, a decision that is already affecting key federal education functions.
The move is part of President Donald Trump's broader plan to dismantle the department, an effort long supported by some conservatives. The cuts reduce the department's total workforce by nearly half, following the resignation or separation of an additional 600 employees earlier this year.
Among the most severely impacted areas is the Nation's Report Card — officially known as the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) — which is a congressionally mandated program used to assess student performance across states.
According to the Washington Post, nearly all staff in the division overseeing NAEP were laid off, leaving only three employees to manage the work that was previously handled by approximately 30.
Impact on student testing and national data collection
NAEP, administered by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), is the only federal assessment that provides comparable data on student achievement across states.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Discover Why These Off-Plan Dubai Apartments Sell Fast?
Binghatti Developers FZE
Read More
Undo
It is one of the key responsibilities of the Department of Education. The significant staff reductions are already impacting operations. According to the Washington Post, the department missed its deadline for releasing the 2024 science test results and preparations for the 2026 assessment are now at risk due to insufficient staffing.
The National Assessment Governing Board, which oversees NAEP, approved a reduced testing schedule in April.
The revised plan preserves only the congressionally mandated math and reading tests and eliminates 19 other assessments that were scheduled for 2028 to 2032. The board reportedly tried to retain the most essential exams while signaling which ones should be protected from future cuts, according to a source cited by the Washington Post.
Other federal education offices affected
The layoffs have also heavily impacted the Institute for Education Sciences (IES), the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), the Office of English Language Acquisition, and the Federal Student Aid office.
The IES, the department's main research and data division, lost around 90 percent of its staff. Mark Schneider, who led the IES from 2018 to 2024, told the Washington Post that the department has yet to provide a clear plan for continuing its responsibilities, stating, "We have so many more questions than we have answers.
"
A summary of key impacts from the layoffs, as reported by the Washington Post, is shown below:
Impact of
US Education Department layoffs
Category
Details
Total layoffs approved
1,300 employees
Additional separations
~600 (via separation packages)
Overall workforce reduction
Nearly 50%
Effective separation date
August 1 (as reported by the Washington Post)
NAEP staff reduction
From ~30 to 3 employees
IES staff reduction
~90% cut
NAEP missed deadline
2024 science test results (not released on time)
Planned testing cuts (2028–2032)
19 assessments eliminated
Programs/agencies affected
NAEP, IES, NCES, OCR, Office of English Language Acquisition, Student Aid
Budget cut to NAEP
$48 million reduction (as reported by the Washington Post)
Estimated NAEP savings (5 years)
$185 million (according to Education Dept., per Washington Post)
Governing Board action
Prioritized mandated math and reading assessments; cut optional subjects
Key quote (Mark Schneider)
"We have so many more questions than we have answers." (via Washington Post)
Trump statement
"Major Victory to Parents and Students..." (via Truth Social, quoted by WP)
According to the Washington Post, department spokesperson Madi Biedermann stated that the agency is working with Congress and state leaders to ensure all required functions continue and that the Trump administration is committed to "sunsetting" the department responsibly.
Supreme Court decision and ongoing legal challenge
The Supreme Court's decision allowed the layoffs to proceed while litigation continues in a lower court. The American Federation of Government Employees Local 252 said the affected staff had remained on paid leave since a federal court issued a preliminary injunction in May. After the Supreme Court ruling, the department notified employees that their official separation date is August 1, as reported by the Washington Post.
President Trump described the court's decision as a victory for families, stating on Truth Social that the ruling was a "Major Victory to Parents and Students across the Country," according to the Washington Post. Critics, however, argue the cuts have left the future of several core federal education functions uncertain.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Appeals court finds Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship unconstitutional, upholds block
WASHINGTON: A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that President Donald Trump's order seeking to end birthright citizenship is unconstitutional, affirming a lower-court decision that blocked its enforcement nationwide. The ruling from a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals comes after Trump's plan was also blocked by a federal judge in New Hampshire. It brings the issue one step closer to coming back quickly before the Supreme Court. The 9th Circuit decision keeps a block on the Trump administration enforcing the order that would deny citizenship to children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily. "The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order's proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. We fully agree," the majority wrote. The 2-1 ruling keeps in place a decision from U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour in Seattle, who blocked Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship and decried what he described as the administration's attempt to ignore the Constitution for political gain.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Columbia University to pay $200 mn fine in fight with Trump
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills The prestigious Columbia University said Wednesday it will pay a $200 million fine to the US government after President Donald Trump threatened to pull federal funding over what he said was its unwillingness to protect Jewish a sweeping deal that will restore the New York institution's federal monies, Columbia has pledged to obey rules that bar it from taking race into consideration in admissions or hiring."Columbia University has reached an agreement with the United States government to resolve multiple federal agency investigations into alleged violations of federal anti-discrimination laws," a statement said, adding the $200 million would be paid over three university will also pay $21 million to settle investigations brought by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, it said."Under today's agreement, a vast majority of the federal grants which were terminated or paused in March 2025-will be reinstated and Columbia's access to billions of dollars in current and future grants will be restored," the statement promise of the federal funding spigot reopening offers relief to the university, which was under growing financial pressure, despite a comfortable endowment that offered some agreement undoubtedly represents a victory for Trump, who has repeatedly claimed elite universities brainwash students against his nationalist ideas with left-wing centuries-old Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, is also in a fight with the administration over Trump's threats to rip away federal funding, and Wednesday's carefully worded agreement -- in which Columbia admitted no wrongdoing -- could offer a framework for future deals."This agreement marks an important step forward after a period of sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty," Columbia's acting president Claire Shipman said."The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track."Importantly, it safeguards our independence, a critical condition for academic excellence and scholarly exploration, work that is vital to the public interest."The New York Post reported, under the settlement, Columbia will maintain a security force to prevent demonstrations in academic spaces, such as those that rocked the campus last year when pro-Palestinian protestors clashed with law enforcement, occupying university paper said there will also be stricter vetting for non-US students, with information gained during this process to be shared with the government, while disciplinary action taken against students on visas would be reported to found itself at the center of a firestorm last year over claims of anti-Semitism triggered by campus protests against Israel's war in Jewish students claimed they were intimidated and that authorities did not act to protect protests that roiled Columbia and other US schools culminated in members of Trump's Republican party grilling higher education leaders before Congress about anti-Semitism former president Minouche Shafik resigned last August just weeks before the start of the new school year, citing scrutiny she faced over her handling of the demonstrations.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Will Track Down…': Trump Threatens Ukraine Against ‘Misuse Of US Aid'; Boost For Russia Amid War?
During a meeting with Republican lawmakers at the White House, President Donald Trump questioned how Ukraine has used billions in U.S. aid. He claimed that much of the American assistance provided under President Joe Biden may have been misused or not fully directed toward defence needs. Trump criticised Biden for "giving away" vast sums without proper accountability, repeating his assertion that the aid has delivered little in return. He further argued that Ukraine was expected to purchase its own defence equipment with the funds but expressed doubt that every dollar was used as intended. The remarks come amid broader scrutiny over foreign aid and growing calls for oversight. Read More
