The Carolina Hurricanes don't care if you think they're boring: ‘We're trying to win hockey games'
RALEIGH, N.C. — Sometimes it feels like the Carolina Hurricanes can't win.
Well, proverbially, that is. We all know they can on the ice.
On Tuesday night, the Hurricanes will meet the Florida Panthers for their third Eastern Conference final in Rod Brind'Amour's seven years behind the bench of the franchise he once captained to a Stanley Cup. They have won 10 playoff series and 46 games — fifth-most in the NHL during that span. In the regular season, they have won the third-most games (325) and amassed the fourth-most points (699) — eight behind the leading Boston Bruins — by playing a hardworking style under Brind'Amour that has proven to be a winning formula.
Advertisement
Yet six years after the Canes were accused of having too much fun and dubbed by Don Cherry on 'Coach's Corner' as a 'bunch of jerks' for their postgame 'Storm Surge,' many in the hockey world are now calling them another dirty word: 'boring.'
They've apparently gone from being too entertaining to … way too bland.
Never mind that after scoring the ninth-most goals per game in the regular season, they've scored more goals per game in these playoffs than the Maple Leafs and Dallas Stars. Never mind that they're 8-2 in the postseason and look like a formidable Cup contender.
Well, naturally, just like six years ago when the old boys network was offended by the Canes' method of celebrating victories, the Canes' social media whizzes and their rabid fan base have latched onto the cynics calling their team 'boring.'
After a five-game dispatch of the New Jersey Devils, the Hurricanes ended the season of the East's best regular-season team, the Washington Capitals, also in five games. And then they reminded the naysayers just how dull they are by compiling some of those clips and jabs and compiling them into a humorous post of their own:
ECF berths are so boring! pic.twitter.com/6HNgWmjmY0
— Carolina Hurricanes (@Canes) May 16, 2025
And just like those 'bunch of jerks' T-shirts flew off the shelves in 2019 as the Canes advanced to the first conference final under Brind'Amour, red 'Keep Carolina Hockey Boring' T-shirts are being sold online.
Inside the locker room where one of the last four remaining NHL teams was preparing for the third round of the playoffs Sunday, reaction to the 'boring' accusations varied between giggles and eyerolls.
'You read it everywhere now and you're like, 'OK, we play a high-paced, puck pressure game with a lot of shots,' top-pair defenseman Jaccob Slavin said. 'So if people find that boring, then I don't know. I don't think it's a boring game. I think it's hard to play against. I don't think it's boring, though. I think people are confusing boring with hard to play against.'
Advertisement
First-line right wing Seth Jarvis smiled widely when asked if the Canes are boring.
'I feel if this was Toronto or a different team shutting teams down, they'd be getting praised out of this world,' Jarvis said. 'But it's just the way it is because we're not Toronto, and we're totally fine with it. We don't think we're boring at all.
'I mean, we create plenty of offense, maybe a little different than other teams. But scoring goals is scoring goals, and that's something that we've gotten better at and started to do more consistently, especially in the playoffs now. I mean, I have a blast playing this style.'
There's no doubt Brind'Amour demands a specific style of hockey that, in part, made him a winner and an arguably should-be Hall of Famer. If you really watch the Hurricanes play, sure, they are strict with their structure. But they don't sit back. When they don't have the puck, they pounce to get it back, then go hard on the forecheck and pepper opposing nets with pucks. After averaging the second-most shots per game in the regular season (31.7), they're averaging the second-most in the playoffs (33.2) and are by far the league's Corsi champs.
'Do you find that boring?' center Sebastian Aho said, chuckling. 'We're trying to win hockey games. That's it. Our style is hard work. Every team works this time of year and they compete, there's no question about that. But I think we're willing to work our tails off for each other. Our base is hard work — to be the hardest-working team on the ice every night. But our goal is to hound the puck and wear down opponents offensively. It's more fun to play in the offensive zone and have a chance to score goals, and that is how we play no matter what people may think.'
With that comes an attention to detail demanded by Brind'Amour that is 'probably the biggest factor in everything we do.'
Advertisement
'When we're detailed, you see a game that's hard to play against. That's the trick,' he said.
Brind'Amour joked that he could sit down and 'show you (the details all over the ice) … but I won't.'
He just asks for total buy-in, and for the most part, he's gotten it throughout his seven years as Carolina's coach. As Jordan Martinook famously said in 2019, 'I would run through hot coals for that guy.'
Brind'Amour says the 'boring' criticism probably stems from the fact the Hurricanes 'don't have those sexy players yet' that maybe play with the pizzazz of superstars like Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl, Nathan MacKinnon, Auston Matthews and Kirill Kaprizov.
'They're coming,' Brind'Amour said, an indication that just because Mikko Rantanen didn't want to move his life and career to the Tar Heel State doesn't mean the Canes are done pursuing stars in the offseasons to come.
But still, Carolina believes it has plenty of offensive talent in the likes of Aho, Jarvis, Andrei Svechnikov, Logan Stankoven and others.
'The only way to score is with the puck, so we try to keep it as long as possible,' Jarvis said. 'And whether that's rimming the puck or chipping it out and using our speed that apparently some people don't like, that's the name of the game. But this organization's done a great job at bringing people in that they know fit the mold and fit right in and be able to plug and play and not have a big drop-off or anything. I find the way we play a fun brand of hockey.'
Eric Tulsky, Carolina's general manager, couldn't care less about the criticism his team has taken from anonymous hockey fans on X or some in the media. Entertainment, to him, is winning, and the Canes do a lot of it.
'We want to win the Cup, and that's what our fans want,' Tulsky told The Athletic. 'So I don't really care what people think of the way we play. But even setting that aside, I don't believe the way we play is boring at all. I understand that criticism of teams that play a stifling defense by playing very passively and sitting back and just clogging things up and denying chances, but we play a stifling defense by being as aggressive as possible and getting on you at every turn and trying to make every single pass hard.
Advertisement
'That's what you want to see. You want to see that aggression. That's the opposite of boring to me. It's an all-out attack, so I don't know where that narrative came from. I can't imagine people that have really watched us play a lot of games have thought, 'This is boring,' but it's a matter of personal taste.'
The Canes are averaging a league-best 1.8 goals-against per game this postseason, one goal fewer allowed than in the regular season. Freddie Andersen's 12.2 goals saved above expected is the best in the playoffs and his 1.36 goals-against average through nine starts is the lowest since Ilya Bryzgalov's 1.00 with Anaheim in 2006.
But believe it or not, Brind'Amour wants his team to score goals. Two years ago, when the Canes were swept by the Panthers in the Eastern Conference final and scored six times in the series, Brind'Amour was beside himself in the postgame presser. He was almost defiant, saying, 'Everyone's going to say you got swept, and that's not what happened. I'm there. We're in the game. We didn't lose four games. We got beat but we were right there. This could have went the other way. It could have been four games the other way.'
The Canes lost Game 1 in four overtimes. They lost Game 2 in another overtime and put 38 shots on Sergei Bobrovsky. Game 3 was another 1-0 loss in which they only allowed 17 shots while Bobrovsky denied 32. And the Game 4 loss came when Matthew Tkachuk scored a tie-breaking, power-play goal with five seconds left.
Brind'amour hopes the stinging feeling after perhaps deserving better in the series will be a great learning lesson for his group this time around.
Defend well. Defend hard. And score enough goals to win, which is the name of the game and much more important than style points.
Eastern Conference finalists for the third time in seven years pic.twitter.com/PBp6PsuCYg
— Michael Russo (@RussoHockey) May 18, 2025
The Hurricanes had a lot of turnover heading into this season. Many wondered if their window was closed and they could even miss the playoffs. Then the trade for Rantanen didn't work out and many felt at the deadline they again could be in trouble coming down the stretch and into the playoffs.
Yet, here they are again … eight wins from a Stanley Cup.
Advertisement
'We've got a job to do,' Brind'Amour said. 'I think from Day 1 of the year, we had this vision of where we want to go. And I think guys have (done) a real good job staying focused on not getting too far ahead. We know it's still a long way to go. I mean, we're halfway to that. It's just understanding where we want to be but understanding how you got to get there.
'Every year is a great opportunity. I mean, we all understand how hard it is. Like, I don't know that necessarily everyone out there does, but to get to this point is extremely hard to do. I think we all appreciate that. But also you've got to take advantage of that opportunity because you don't know when they're coming around (again). I think there's a sense of urgency there on that.'
Which means, guess what? More attention to detail. More structure. And more hounding of the puck that makes the Hurricanes hard to play against and one tough out.
'The greatest thing about this team is whenever it's time to work, we work,' Aho said.
Added Jarvis, 'It's special knowing that whoever we put on the ice, we have a chance to win. We all play the same way, which is the biggest part. We know what to expect out of each other. Now it's just a matter of getting over this hump and taking the next steps to become a championship team.'
And if that means two more rounds of being called 'boring,' well, so be it.
Nobody in Raleigh will be complaining of boredom if they're hoisting that Stanley Cup for the second time in 19 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
23 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Stanley Cup Final shifts to South Florida for Game 3 after the Panthers and Oilers split in Edmonton
SUNRISE, Fla. — Back in the same locker room that was the scene of Connor McDavid's profanity-laced outburst and the tearful ending to his first Stanley Cup Final, the Edmonton Oilers hope they can avoid the same result this time around. Their next chance to take that step comes Monday night in Game 3 of their final rematch against the Florida Panthers , with play shifting to Sunrise after the teams split in Edmonton. The Oilers practiced in the shadow of the Panthers' championship banner and, afterwards, players stood in the same room McDavid did his post-Game 7 interview at the most disappointing moment of his NHL career. 'I think no matter how much time passes, it'll always be on your mind (when) you get that close,' coach Kris Knoblauch said. 'We're at a new stage of our season or our path, and we're just focused on what we need to do right now.' The Panthers won three of their four home games in the final last year, including the first two on the way to going up 3-0 in the series. The Oilers took Games 4 and 6 in Edmonton and Game 5 at Florida before their gut-wrenching loss in Game 7. This is also not their first trip back. They got that out of the way Feb. 27 and are very familiar with the arena thanks to last June. 'Absolutely, there's a comfort level in that, and there's a benefit in that,' forward Connor Brown said. 'You kind of know what to expect, you've been here and so you learn from experience, too. To be able to kind of have had to earn that experience last year, I think we'll benefit from it this year.' The Panthers went 27-12-2 at home during the regular season and 4-3 during the playoffs. 'It's never bad being in your own bed, have a nice home-cooked meal,' Florida's Sam Reinhart said. 'I mean, once the puck drops, you might use the crowd a little bit. You might have that little extra energy. But at this time, it's the two best teams that are left standing. Once that puck drops, it's going to be a real battle regardless.' ___ AP NHL playoffs: and
Associated Press
30 minutes ago
- Associated Press
US Open '25: Hogan and Woods and other key anniversaries in the U.S. Open this year
OAKMONT, Pa. (AP) — A look at some of the anniversaries this year at the U.S. Open: 100 years ago (1925) Site: Worcester Country Club Winner: Willie MacFarlane Runner-up: Bobby Jones Score: 74-67-72-78-291 Margin: Playoff (MacFarlane 147, Jones 148) Winner's share: $500 Noteworthy: Jones felt his club moved the ball in the rough on the 11th hole of the first round. Officials were unable to confirm this and left it to Jones to make a ruling. He called a one-shot penalty on himself. Praised for his sportsman ship, Jones famously replied, 'You might as well praise me for not robbing a bank.' AP story: Willie MacFarlane, 'finest of men and a great golfer,' in the words of America's greatest amateur, little Bobby Jones of Atlanta, tonight is the open champion of the United States, a victory by a single stroke today ending the greatest tournament in history. The final score was 72 to 73 at the end of the second 18 holes of a playoff to decide the deadlocked tourney. Jones' opinion of the victory is of weight, for he was was -- national amateur and former open champion -- who fell before the other's prowess in a history-making playoff. Only after a throng of several thousand had boiled in the terrific heat through 36 holes did the end come, and then it was at the final green. 75 years ago (1950) Site: Merion Golf Club Winner: Ben Hogan Runner-up: Lloyd Mangum and George Fazio Score: 72-69-72-74-287 Margin: Playoff (Hogan 69, Mangrum 73, Fazio 75) Winner's share: $4,000 Noteworthy: Hogan hit 1-iron to the 18th in the final round, leading to one of golf's most iconic photos. When he played the 18th during the third round earlier that morning, he hit 6-iron to the green. It was an example of how much fatigue he had from his battered legs. AP story: Ben Hogan's legs held out today like stanchions of steel, and the game little man from Texas smashed Lloyd Mangrum and George Fazio with strokes to spare in their 18-hole playoff for the National Open Golf Championship. In winning his second Open title within three years, Hogan climaxed gloriously the most remarkable comeback in the history of sports. This time a year ago, it was doubted that he ever would play golf again after barely escaping with his life from a head-on motor car collision near Van Horn, Texas. 50 years ago (1975) Site: Medinah Country Club Winner: Lou Graham Runner-up: John Mahaffey Score: 74-72-68-73-287 Margin: Playoff (Graham 71, Mahaffey 73) Winner's share: $40,000 Noteworthy: One year after Tom Watson had the 54-hole lead and shot 79, he had a 36-hole lead and shot 76-77. Watson won the first of his eight majors a month later at Carnoustie. AP story: Lou Graham, a 12-year-old tour veteran, wore down ambitious John Mahaffey and ended a career of golfing obscurity with a two-stroke victory Monday in the 18-hole payoff for the U.S. Open crown. 'It's the dream of a lifetime,' the 37-year-old Graham said in his soft, Tennessee drawl. He won it with a 71, even par on the 7,032 yards of gently rolling, heavily wooded countryside that makes up the Medinah Country Club course The bitterly disappointed Mahaffey, now a runner-up seven times since his lone tour title, didn't make a birdie in the hot and humid playoff and had a score of 73. 25 years ago (2000) Site: Pebble Beach Golf Links Winner: Tiger Woods Runners-up: Ernie Els, Miguel Angel Jimenez Score: 65-69-71-67-272 Margin: 15 shots Winner's share: $800,000 Noteworthy: Jack Nicklaus played in his final U.S. Open. In each of the four majors he played for the last time, Woods was the winner. AP story: Standing on the 18th fairway, Tiger Woods turned his back on Pebble Beach and looked out over Carmel Bay in the final moments of the most monumental U.S. Open victory ever. He was all alone, playing for himself — and for history. No one was close to catching him. No one is close in the game. 'We've been talking about him for two years. I guess we'll be talking about him for the next 20. When he's on, we don't have much of a chance,' Ernie Els said. While the rest of the field was playing for second, Woods took aim at the record books. When the final putt fell, Woods owned his third major championship, along with the kind of records no one imagined possible. 20 years ago (2005) Site: Pinehurst No. 2 Winner: Michael Campbell Runner-up: Tiger Woods Score: 71-69-71-69-280 Margin: 2 shots Winner's share: $1,170,000 Noteworthy: Retief Goosen and Jason Gore played in the final group and combined to take 165 strokes. Goosen shot 81, Gore shot 84. AP story: Michael Campbell answered every challenge Tiger Woods threw his way Sunday until a U.S. Open full of surprises got the biggest one of all. Woods blinked first. Ten years after being touted as a rising star, Campbell finally delivered a major championship no one expected with clutch par saves and a 20-foot birdie putt on the 17th hole that proved to be the knockout punch. The only drama at the end was whether Campbell would beat Pinehurst No. 2. He missed a 3-foot par putt on the final hole for a 1-under 69 to finish the tournament at even par. It was good enough for a two-shot victory over Woods, who charged along the back nine until missing an 8-foot par putt on the 16th hole, then three-putting from 25 feet on the par-3 17th, the same hole that doomed his chances at Pinehurst six years ago. 10 years ago (2015) Site: Chambers Bay Golf Club Winner: Jordan Spieth Runners-up: Dustin Johnson, Louis Oosthuizen Score: 68-67-71-69-275 Margin: 1 shot Winner's share: $1,800,000 Noteworthy: This was the first U.S. Open televised by Fox Sports in a 12-year deal. It gave up the rights after five years. AP story: Jordan Spieth is halfway home to the Grand Slam, a prize only three of the biggest names in modern golf have ever chased. And he still can't believe how he got there. Spieth won the U.S. Open in a heart-stopper Sunday with a turn of events even more wild than the terrain at Chambers Bay. He thought he had it won with a 25-foot birdie putt on the 16th hole. He threw away a three-shot lead one hole later. He made birdie on the final hole. And then he thought it was over as Dustin Johnson settled in over a 12-foot eagle putt for the victory. Three putts later, Spieth was the U.S. Open champion. Spieth joined Arnold Palmer, Jack Nicklaus and Tiger Woods in getting the first two legs of the modern slam that Palmer created on his way to St. Andrews in 1960. That's the next stop for the 21-year-old Texan whose two major championships could not be any more different. A wire-to-wire runaway at Augusta National. A nail-biter on the edge of Puget Sound. And another major heartache for Johnson. 5 years ago (2020) Site: Winged Foot Golf Club Winner: Bryson DeChambeau Runner-up: Matthew Wolff Score: 69-68-70-67-274 Margin: 6 shots Winner's share: $2,250,000 Noteworthy: It was the first U.S. Open in September since 1913. AP story: Call him a mad scientist in a tam o'shanter cap. Call him a game-changer in golf. Any description of Bryson DeChambeau now starts with U.S. Open champion. In a breathtaking performance Sunday at Winged Foot, on a course so demanding no one else broke par, DeChambeau blasted away with his driver and had short irons from the ankle-deep rough on his way to a 3-under 67. When his 7-foot par putt fell on the 18th, DeChambeau thrust those two powerful arms into the air. This was validation that his idea to add 40 pounds of mass, to produce an incredible amount of speed and power, would lead to moments like this. Two shots behind Matthew Wolff going into the final round, he passed him in five holes, pulled away to start the back nine and wound up winning by six shots. Wolff, trying to become the first player since Francis Ouimet in 1913 to win the U.S. Open in his debut, closed with a 75. ___ AP golf:
Associated Press
30 minutes ago
- Associated Press
US Open '25: Decades ago under dark of night, Oakmont began removing trees and started a golf trend
Last month, Scottie Scheffler made mention of a trend in golf design that rubs him wrong — removing trees from courses. This week, the world's best player and favorite to win the U.S. Open will play a course that did just that, but didn't become one bit easier the way some layouts do when the trees go away. Under the dark of night three decades ago, the people in charge of Oakmont Country Club started cutting down trees. They didn't stop until some 15,000 had been removed. The project reimagined one of America's foremost golf cathedrals and started a trend of tree cutting that continues to this day. While playing a round on YouTube with influencer Grant Horvat, Scheffler argued that modern pro golf — at least at most stops on the PGA Tour — has devolved into a monotonous cycle of 'bomb and gouge': Hit drive as far as possible, then gouge the ball out of the rough from a shorter distance if the tee shot is off line. 'They take out all the trees and they make the greens bigger and they typically make the fairways a little bigger, as well,' Scheffler said. 'And so, the only barrier to guys just trying to hit it as far as they want to or need to, it's trees.' With or without trees, Oakmont has stood the test of time Scheffler and the rest in the 156-man field that tees off Thursday should be so lucky. While the latest Oakmont renovation, in 2023, did make greens bigger, fairways are never wide at the U.S. Open and they won't be this week. Tree-lined or not, Oakmont has a reputation as possibly the toughest of all the U.S. Open (or any American) courses, which helps explain why it is embarking on its record 10th time hosting it. In the two Opens held there since the tree-removal project was completed, the deep bunkers, serpentine drainage ditches and lightning-fast greens have produced winning scores of 5-over par (Angel Cabrera in 2007) and 4 under (Dustin Johnson in 2016). In an ironic twist that eventually led to where we (and Oakmont) are today, the layout was completely lined with trees in 1973 when Johnny Miller shot 63 on Sunday to win the U.S. Open. That record stood for 50 years, and the USGA followed up with a course setup so tough in 1974 that it became known as 'The Massacre at Winged Foot' -- won by Hale Irwin with a score of 7-over par. 'Everybody was telling me it was my fault,' Miller said in a look back at the '74 Open with Golf Digest. 'It was like a backhanded compliment. The USGA denied it, but years later, it started leaking out that it was in response to what I did at Oakmont. Oakmont was supposed to be the hardest course in America.' It might still be. In a precursor to what could come this week, Rory McIlroy and Adam Scott played practice rounds last Monday in which McIlroy said he made a 7 on the par-4 second and Scott said he hit every fairway on the front nine and still shot 3 over. Nicklaus: Trees should only come down 'for a reason' While Oakmont leaned into tree removal, there are others who aren't as enthused. Jack Nicklaus, who added trees to the 13th hole at Muirfield Village after seeing players fly a fairway bunker on the left for a clear look at the green, said he's OK with tree removal 'if they take them down for a reason.' 'Why take a beautiful, gorgeous tree down?' he said. 'Like Oakmont, for example. What's the name of it? Oak. Mont. What's that mean? Oaks on a mountain, sort of. And then they take them all down. I don't like it.' A lot of Oakmont's members weren't fans, either, which is why this project began under dark of night. The golf course in the 1990s was barely recognizable when set against pictures taken shortly after it opened in 1903. Architect Henry Fownes had set out to build a links-style course. Dampening the noise and view of the Pennsylvania Turnpike, which bisects the layout, was one reason thousands of trees were planted in the 1960s and '70s. 'We were finding that those little trees had all grown up and they were now hanging over some bunkers,' R. Banks-Smith, the chairman of Oakmont's grounds committee when the project began, said in a 2007 interview. 'And once you put a tree on either side of a bunker, you lose your bunker. So, you have to make a decision. Do you want bunkers or do you want trees?' Oakmont went with bunkers – its renowned Church Pew Bunker between the third and fourth fairways might be the most famous in the world – and thus began a tree project that divides people as much today as it did when it started. 'I'm not always the biggest fan of mass tree removal,' Scott said. 'I feel a lot of courses that aren't links courses get framed nicely with trees, not like you're opening it up to go play way over there.' Too many trees, though, can pose risks. Overgrown tree roots and too much shade provide competition for the tender grasses beneath. They hog up oxygen and sunlight and make the turf hard to maintain. They overhang fairways and bunkers and turn some shots envisioned by course architects into something completely different. They also can be downright dangerous. In 2023 during the second round of the Masters, strong winds toppled three towering pine trees on the 17th hole, luckily missing fans who were there watching the action. 'There are lots of benefits that trees provide, but only in the right place,' said John Fech, the certified arborist at University of Nebraska who consults with the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America. When Oakmont decided they didn't want them at all, many great courses followed. Winged Foot, Medinah, Baltusrol and Merion are among those that have undergone removal programs. Five years ago, Bryson DeChambeau overpowered Winged Foot, which had removed about 300 trees, simply by hitting the ball as far as he could, then taking his chances from the rough. It's the sort of golf Scheffler seems to be growing tired of: 'When you host a championship tournament, if there's no trees, you just hit it wherever you want, because if I miss a fairway by 10 yards, I'm in the thick rough (but) if I miss by 20, I'm in the crowd,' Scheffler told Horvat. How well that critique applies to Oakmont will be seen this week. ___ AP Golf Writer Doug Ferguson contributed. ___ AP golf:
