logo
Vaunted public-private partnership with resort industry has public footing 92% of ongoing costs

Vaunted public-private partnership with resort industry has public footing 92% of ongoing costs

Yahoo18-02-2025
Rendering of Campus for Hope presented by Overland Partners architectural firm included in project's application to the Nevada Governor's Office of Economic Development
Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo, a Republican, has called Campus for Hope a 'groundbreaking project' that 'embodies the power of public-private partnership.' Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, a Democrat who sponsored the bill that greenlit the project, has sung similar praises.
The initial $200 million cost of constructing the planned regional homeless hub is being split between the State of Nevada and a new foundation set up by the resort industry. However, once constructed, the campus will rely almost entirely on public dollars for ongoing operational costs but still be run by the private sector through a board of directors that includes no representation from the state or municipal governments.
The Campus for Hope Foundation, whose board is instead composed entirely of resort industry executives, also plans on asking the state to donate 26 acres of state-owned land to the project.
The land ask and other financial details of the public-private partnership are included in a 283-page application submitted by Campus for Hope to the Governor's Office of Economic Development (GOED), obtained by the Nevada Current through a public records request and not previously reported on. GOED approved the project in December without any public disclosure or comment.
According to the application, Campus for Hope wants the State of Nevada to deed 26-acres on 6161 W. Charleston Blvd near the College of Southern Nevada to its foundation. The deed transfer, which the application says would happen in phases as the campus is built out, will need to be approved by the Nevada State Legislature this year.
The Current asked Lombardo and Yeager if they support such a transfer. Neither responded.
Campus for Hope in their application proposes a backup plan if a deed transfer doesn't get approved: a 99-year agreement allowing leasing to nonprofits at a reduced charge. A draft of that back-up lease says the agreement could conservatively be considered a $432 million in-kind contribution by the state.
Campus for Hope plans to clear the site between July 1 and Sept. 30 of this year. Construction of the new facility is expected to begin in February 2026, with a targeted opening date of March 2027.
A yearlong 'phase 2' for building additional structures on the property is expected to begin June 2029.
One rendering, by architectural firm Overland and included in the application, appears to show housing units lining Charleston Boulevard with a series of larger buildings behind them. The site is currently known as the Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services campus and houses multiple nonprofits and state agencies.
A spokesperson for Campus for Hope previously told the Current no construction will begin until current occupants of the site, including the approximately 18 children in residential behavioral health programs on the property, are relocated 'to housing that is significantly better than the current buildings.' Part of those plans involve temporarily relocating some of the kids from the West Charleston campus to a St. Jude's facility in Boulder City. Additional details have not been disclosed by the state.
Operating expenses for Campus of Hope are estimated at $34 million per year– $15 million of which is expected to come from participating municipalities, $15 million from the state, $1 million from the federal government, and $3 million from private contributions.
'Assurances' abound, but few details about displacement of mental health providers for homeless hub
That means taxpayers will foot 92% of operating costs.
Campus for Hope, through its public relations firm, did not directly respond to a list of questions submitted by the Current for this story, including one asking how that projected revenue breakdown was determined. Lombardo and Yeager did not respond to the Current's question about whether they feel that is an equitable split for the public-private partnership.
Revenue at Haven for Hope, the regional homeless campus in San Antonio that Campus for Hope is modeled after, is more evenly split. Two years ago, the nonprofit described itself as averaging 60% government funds and 40% private funds. More recently that split has crept to 70% public and 30% private due to COVID funding, Chief Development Officer Celeste Eggert told the Current.
For the current fiscal year, private contributions at Haven for Hope made up 24% of revenue, or $7.6 million of the $31.5 million budget, and the nonprofit United Way provided an additional 4% of revenue, or $1.3 million.
Campus for Hope was pitched to lawmakers as an emergency measure on the third-to-last day of the 2023 Legislative Session. It established a $100 million matching fund to support the development and construction of a 'transformational campus' that addresses the root causes of homelessness.
Resort industry officials had earlier indicated the proposal was driven by a desire to relocate to address the rise of 'vagrancy' on the Las Vegas Strip.
As the measure was making its way toward speedy approval, lawmakers were told ongoing expenses would be shared between private donors, local governments, and the state. But no specific breakdowns were proposed.
As of mid-December when Campus for Hope submitted their application to the Governor's Office of Economic Development for approval, Clark County and the City of North Las Vegas had signed shared service agreements for the project but the cities of Henderson and Las Vegas had not. Several lawmakers have publicly referenced behind-the-scenes tension between the municipalities over the Campus for Hope project.
As part of the shared service agreements, the municipalities must operate navigation centers and emergency intake facilities within their jurisdictions. Those facilities must provide 'immediate shelter, nutritious meals, hygiene facilities, and essential supplies to those in crisis.' Campus for Hope proposes a 'hub and spoke' model where the municipalities intake and provide immediate assistance to people within their jurisdictions and then funnel them toward the campus for additional services.
Campus for Hope's application states its initial set of services will include: medical and mental healthcare, job training and employment, transitional housing, social services, and community engagement and education.
The campus expects to have 900 residential beds and assumes people will stay between 3.5 and 12 months. That means they could help between 900 and 3,086 people annually.
Included in the application is a series of memos from Nevada GrantLab, a nonprofit that assists other nonprofits and public agencies in accessing federal grants. They summarize feedback on the project gathered during a series of meetings with more than 50 people at 21 existing nonprofits focused on addressing homelessness.
Resort industry pitches regional homelessness project, asks state for $100 million match
The first memo, dated Feb. 14, 2024, was sent to Wynn Resorts Chief Sustainability Officer Erik Hansen and Jeremy Aguero, a consultant who has worked on several high-profile private-public partnerships, including most recently the A's baseball stadium and its $360 million public subsidy.
The memo noted that 'many participants strongly recommended CFH hire staff and add board members who have subject matter expertise in homeless services (including individuals with lived experience), social services and nonprofit operations.'
'This expertise is perceived as largely missing and problematic,' read the memo.
Campus for Hope's board of directors is composed entirely of gaming executives:
Craig Billings, CEO of Wynn;
Katie Carano Miller, senior vice president of communications and government relations for Caesars;
Jyoti Chopra, chief people, inclusion and sustainability officer at MGM;
Meghan Sperano, vice president of global communications and chief of staff at Aristocrat, a gaming company;
Keith Smith, president and CEO of Boyd Gaming;
Michael Britt, senior vice president of government relations, public policy and communications at Red Rock Resorts;
Patrick Nichols, president and CEO at the Venetian, or Marcy Miles, chief marketing officer at the Venetian;
Ellen Whittemore, executive vice president and general counsel at Wynn; and
Paul Anderson, senior vice president of government and industry affairs at Boyd Gaming.
The application says the board offers expertise 'in corporate management, nonprofit leadership, healthcare, social services, economic development and public administration' but does not elaborate beyond listing their names and current titles in the gaming industry.
Campus for Hope does establish a 'technical advisory committee' consisting of nonprofit organizations and local governments that, through quarterly reports to the board of directors, would provide 'expert guidance on the most pressing community needs,' but the committee would have no formal authority.
A CEO has already been selected and hired to run Campus for Hope, according to the application. Their name was not disclosed in the application, and a project spokesperson did not answer the Current's request to identify them, but the person is described as having 'extensive experience in the nonprofit sector, with a strong background in leadership and community engagement across organizations such as nonprofit councils, foundations and human services programs.'.
The foundation will employ 315 people when fully built out.
The nonprofits also told GrantLab that Campus for Hope should more clearly define its goal and develop a plan specific to that goal, noting that 'generalized goal statements about homelessness are impractical and can be counterproductive.'
That sentiment is captured again in a later memo dated Nov. 4, 2024: 'Participants emphasized that distinct populations have distinct needs, and combining multiple programs and/or populations in a single location may be difficult or impractical,' read the memo.
While Campus for Hope did not respond to specific questions provided by the Current for this story, a spokesperson provided the following statement via email, speaking to concerns about input on the project: 'We are still in the early stages of the evolution of Campus for Hope. We have solicited extensive input from local service providers and local governments. We will continue to work closely with them and will proactively engage with individuals who have successfully transitioned out of homelessness and as well as those currently unhoused to ensure that the operational plan is informed by lived experience and is as effective as possible in providing meaningful support.'
The statement concluded by saying additional information would be made available on the project's website: nevadahope.org.
That website states that Campus for Hope's efforts 'are made possible by the generous support of many organizations and individuals' and lists 17 companies, all tied to the resort industry, that have pledged donations for the initial $100 million in private funds for construction. Mentions of the state funds are tucked behind in an answer to a 'frequently asked question.' There is no mention of Clark County or the cities of Las Vegas, North Las Vegas and Henderson.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court lets the White House suspend or end billions in foreign aid
Appeals court lets the White House suspend or end billions in foreign aid

San Francisco Chronicle​

time27 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Appeals court lets the White House suspend or end billions in foreign aid

WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided panel of appeals court judges ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration can suspend or terminate billions of dollars of congressionally appropriated funding for foreign aid. Two of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that grant recipients challenging the freeze did not meet the requirements for a preliminary injunction restoring the flow of money. In January, on the first day of his second term in the White House, Republican President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development to freeze spending on foreign aid. After groups of grant recipients sued to challenge that order, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ordered the administration to release the full amount of foreign assistance that Congress had appropriated for the 2024 budget year. The appeal court's majority partially vacated Ali's order. Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson and Gregory Katsas concluded that the plaintiffs did not have a valid legal basis for the court to hear their claims. The ruling was not on the merits of whether the government unconstitutionally infringed on Congress' spending powers. 'The parties also dispute the scope of the district court's remedy but we need not resolve it ... because the grantees have failed to satisfy the requirements for a preliminary injunction in any event,' Henderson wrote. Judge Florence Pan, who dissented, said the Supreme Court has held 'in no uncertain terms' that the president does not have the authority to disobey laws for policy reasons. 'Yet that is what the majority enables today,' Pan wrote. 'The majority opinion thus misconstrues the separation-of-powers claim brought by the grantees, misapplies precedent, and allows Executive Branch officials to evade judicial review of constitutionally impermissible actions.' The money at issue includes nearly $4 billion for USAID to spend on global health programs and more than $6 billion for HIV and AIDS programs. Trump has portrayed the foreign aid as wasteful spending that does not align with his foreign policy goals. Henderson was nominated to the court by Republican President George H.W. Bush. Katsas was nominated by Trump. Pan was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden.

Leaving a top Trump administration post? The president may have an ambassadorship for you
Leaving a top Trump administration post? The president may have an ambassadorship for you

Los Angeles Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Leaving a top Trump administration post? The president may have an ambassadorship for you

WASHINGTON — Diplomacy may be soft power, but in President Trump's administration, it's also lately a soft landing. National security adviser Mike Waltz was nominated as United Nations ambassador after he mistakenly added a journalist to a Signal chat discussing military plans. Trump tapped IRS Commissioner Billy Long to be his ambassador to Iceland after Long contradicted the administration's messaging in his less than two months in the job. And Trump last weekend named State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce as deputy representative to the U.N. after she struggled to gel with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's close-knit team. The new appointments can be viewed as consolation prizes for leaving a high-profile post in the Trump administration following rocky tenures. But they also reflect the degree to which Trump is trying to keep his loyalists close, even if their earlier placements in the administration were ill-fitting. Breaking with the reality TV show that helped make Trump a household name, the Republican president is not telling his top appointees 'You're fired!' but instead offering them another way to stay in his administration. 'It's not like 'The Apprentice,'' said John Bolton, another former Trump national security adviser, who has since become a Trump critic. During his first White House tenure, Trump was new to politics, made many staffing picks based on others' recommendations and saw heavy staff turnover. Trump has stocked his second administration with proven boosters, which has meant fewer high-profile departures. Still, those leaving often are the subject of effusive praise and kept in Trump's political orbit, potentially preventing them from becoming critics who can criticize him on TV — something that didn't happen to a long list of former first-term officials. Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, and Trump can nominate anyone he likes, though many ultimately require Senate confirmation. Typically, top ambassadorships are rewards for large donors. 'It is a tremendous honor to represent the United States as an ambassador — which is why these positions are highly coveted and reserved for the president's most loyal supporters,' said White House spokesperson Anna Kelly. 'Mike Waltz, Billy Long and Tammy Bruce are great patriots who believe strongly in the America First agenda, and the President trusts them fully to advance his foreign policy goals.' Waltz's days appeared numbered after The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg revealed in March that Waltz had added him to a private text chain on an encrypted messaging app that was used to discuss planning for a military operation against Houthi militants in Yemen. Trump initially expressed support for Waltz, downplaying the incident as 'a glitch.' Roughly five weeks later, the president announced Waltz would be leaving — but not for good. He portrayed the job change as a cause for celebration. 'From his time in uniform on the battlefield, in Congress and, as my National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz has worked hard to put our Nation's Interests first,' Trump posted in announcing Waltz's move on May 1. 'I know he will do the same in his new role.' Vice President JD Vance also pushed back on insinuations that Waltz had been ousted. 'The media wants to frame this as a firing. Donald Trump has fired a lot of people,' Vance said in an interview with Bret Baier of Fox News Channel. 'He doesn't give them Senate-confirmed appointments afterwards.' Bolton, who served as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations under President George W. Bush before becoming Trump's national security adviser in 2018, called it 'a promotion to go in the other direction' — but not the way Waltz went. 'The lesson is, sometimes you do more good for yourself looking nice,' Bolton said of Trump's reassignments. Ironically, Bruce learned of Waltz's ouster from a reporter's question while she was conducting a press briefing. A former Fox News Channel contributor, Bruce is friendly with Trump and was a forceful advocate for his foreign policy. Over the course of her roughly six months as spokesperson, she reduced the frequency of State Department briefings with reporters from four or five days a week to two. But Bruce had also begun to frequently decline to respond to queries on the effectiveness, substantiveness or consistency of the administration's approaches to the Middle East, Russia's war in Ukraine and other global hotspots. She told reporters that special envoy Steve Witkoff 'is heading to the region now — to the Gaza area' but then had to concede that she'd not been told exactly where in the Middle East he was going. Trump nonetheless posted Saturday that Bruce did a 'fantastic job' at the State Department and would 'represent our Country brilliantly at the United Nations.' Former U.S. deputy U.N. ambassador Robert Wood, who served as deputy State Department spokesman during President George W. Bush's term and as acting spokesman during President Obama's term, voiced skepticism that Bruce's new position was a move up. Wood later became the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Conference on Disarmament through the rest of the Obama's tenure and all of the first Trump administration. 'Given the disdain in MAGA world for anything U.N., it's hard to imagine Tammy Bruce's nomination as U.S. Deputy Representative to the U.N. being seen as a promotion,' referring to Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement. During her final State Department briefing on Tuesday, Bruce said Trump's announcing that he wanted her in a new role 'was a surprise,' but called the decision 'especially moving as it allows me to continue serving the State Department, to which I'm now quite attached.' Then there's Long, a former Republican Missouri congressman, who was the shortest-tenured IRS commissioner confirmed by the Senate since the position was created in 1862. He contradicted administration messaging on several occasions. Long said last month that the IRS' Direct File program would be eliminated. An IRS spokesperson later indicated that it wouldn't be, noting requirements in the tax and spending law Trump has championed. The Washington Post also reported that Long's IRS disagreed with the White House about sharing taxpayer data with immigration officials to help locate people in the U.S. illegally. After learning that Trump wanted him in Reykjavik, Long posted, 'Exciting times ahead!' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt declined to say Tuesday why Long was removed as IRS chief and being deployed to Iceland. 'The president loves Billy Long, and he thinks he can serve the administration well in this position,' she said. The soft landings aren't always heralded by Trump. Former television commentator Morgan Ortagus, who was a State Department spokesperson during Trump's first term, is now a special adviser to the United Nations after serving as deputy envoy to the Middle East under Witkoff. Trump foresaw that Ortagus might not be a good fit. He posted in January, while announcing her as Witkoff's deputy, that 'Morgan fought me for three years, but hopefully has learned her lesson.' 'These things usually don't work out, but she has strong Republican support, and I'm not doing this for me, I'm doing it for them,' Trump added. 'Let's see what happens.' Ortagus lasted less than six months in the role. Weissert and Price write for the Associated Press. AP writers Matthew Lee and Fatima Hussein in Washington contributed to this report.

California Republican drowned out by boos at town hall
California Republican drowned out by boos at town hall

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

California Republican drowned out by boos at town hall

Rep. Doug LaMalfa (Calif.) on Monday became the latest Republican to see a town hall devolve into shouts and jeers as he was peppered with hostile comments over the ' big, beautiful bill,' the Trump administration's immigration moves and other elements of the GOP agenda. At an event in Chico, Calif., LaMalfa's opening remarks were greeted with expletive-laden shrieks and boos. After staff distributed red and green placards to the crowd who packed the local Elks Lodge to register their opinions, the lawmaker repeatedly saw a sea of red. 'No fascism in America,' one man screamed at LaMalfa at the beginning. 'You need to be impeached.' 'I have many concerns, but one of the biggest ones for our area is the cuts to the Medicaid, SNAP, housing vouchers,' one woman said later during the town hall. 'There's this facade that we're not working hard enough and that's why we're trying to get free benefits. Everyone's working as hard as they can even to help their neighbors survive.' LaMalfa was greeted by another angry but smaller-scale crowd later Tuesday at a different town hall in Red Bluff, Calif. He again attempted to defend Trump's agenda, including cuts to Medicaid in the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'It doesn't cut a single dollar from people that do qualify,' he said, arguing that Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) administration had an obligation to ensure the state's Medi-Cal program was not spent on people who had immigrated illegally to the U.S. 'I think taxpayers work too hard to have their money go to illegal immigration.' As LaMalfa spoke, local news station KRCR captured a man standing at the back of the auditorium, making a mock-talking motion with his hands. He also wore a white shirt depicting Trump in a cage with the words 'Make America Great Again' surrounding it, mocking the president's campaign slogan. A few constituents did come out to support LaMalfa. 'I want to thank you for continuing to defend our rights,' said one woman, who identified herself as a Hispanic immigrant, in Chico. 'To those yelling, I suggest you get a passport and travel. You will see the grass is no greener on the other side. America is still the greatest country in the world.' The lawmaker, who represents a large swath of Northern California, is one of the five Golden State Republicans who could be pushed out of his seat by a Democratic mid-cycle redistricting effort meant to counter potential GOP gains in Texas during the midterms next year. At his Chico town hall, the California Republican said he opposed redistricting efforts in Texas, but argued that his home state's planned retaliation was worse for trying to bypass the state's independent redistricting commission established by voters. 'Texas shouldn't be doing that … this is going to start a grass fire across the country, every single state trying to change it based on a political outcome,' he said. 'California's difference from Texas is that they're going to be trampling the voice of those propositions.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store