Vaunted public-private partnership with resort industry has public footing 92% of ongoing costs
Rendering of Campus for Hope presented by Overland Partners architectural firm included in project's application to the Nevada Governor's Office of Economic Development
Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo, a Republican, has called Campus for Hope a 'groundbreaking project' that 'embodies the power of public-private partnership.' Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, a Democrat who sponsored the bill that greenlit the project, has sung similar praises.
The initial $200 million cost of constructing the planned regional homeless hub is being split between the State of Nevada and a new foundation set up by the resort industry. However, once constructed, the campus will rely almost entirely on public dollars for ongoing operational costs but still be run by the private sector through a board of directors that includes no representation from the state or municipal governments.
The Campus for Hope Foundation, whose board is instead composed entirely of resort industry executives, also plans on asking the state to donate 26 acres of state-owned land to the project.
The land ask and other financial details of the public-private partnership are included in a 283-page application submitted by Campus for Hope to the Governor's Office of Economic Development (GOED), obtained by the Nevada Current through a public records request and not previously reported on. GOED approved the project in December without any public disclosure or comment.
According to the application, Campus for Hope wants the State of Nevada to deed 26-acres on 6161 W. Charleston Blvd near the College of Southern Nevada to its foundation. The deed transfer, which the application says would happen in phases as the campus is built out, will need to be approved by the Nevada State Legislature this year.
The Current asked Lombardo and Yeager if they support such a transfer. Neither responded.
Campus for Hope in their application proposes a backup plan if a deed transfer doesn't get approved: a 99-year agreement allowing leasing to nonprofits at a reduced charge. A draft of that back-up lease says the agreement could conservatively be considered a $432 million in-kind contribution by the state.
Campus for Hope plans to clear the site between July 1 and Sept. 30 of this year. Construction of the new facility is expected to begin in February 2026, with a targeted opening date of March 2027.
A yearlong 'phase 2' for building additional structures on the property is expected to begin June 2029.
One rendering, by architectural firm Overland and included in the application, appears to show housing units lining Charleston Boulevard with a series of larger buildings behind them. The site is currently known as the Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services campus and houses multiple nonprofits and state agencies.
A spokesperson for Campus for Hope previously told the Current no construction will begin until current occupants of the site, including the approximately 18 children in residential behavioral health programs on the property, are relocated 'to housing that is significantly better than the current buildings.' Part of those plans involve temporarily relocating some of the kids from the West Charleston campus to a St. Jude's facility in Boulder City. Additional details have not been disclosed by the state.
Operating expenses for Campus of Hope are estimated at $34 million per year– $15 million of which is expected to come from participating municipalities, $15 million from the state, $1 million from the federal government, and $3 million from private contributions.
'Assurances' abound, but few details about displacement of mental health providers for homeless hub
That means taxpayers will foot 92% of operating costs.
Campus for Hope, through its public relations firm, did not directly respond to a list of questions submitted by the Current for this story, including one asking how that projected revenue breakdown was determined. Lombardo and Yeager did not respond to the Current's question about whether they feel that is an equitable split for the public-private partnership.
Revenue at Haven for Hope, the regional homeless campus in San Antonio that Campus for Hope is modeled after, is more evenly split. Two years ago, the nonprofit described itself as averaging 60% government funds and 40% private funds. More recently that split has crept to 70% public and 30% private due to COVID funding, Chief Development Officer Celeste Eggert told the Current.
For the current fiscal year, private contributions at Haven for Hope made up 24% of revenue, or $7.6 million of the $31.5 million budget, and the nonprofit United Way provided an additional 4% of revenue, or $1.3 million.
Campus for Hope was pitched to lawmakers as an emergency measure on the third-to-last day of the 2023 Legislative Session. It established a $100 million matching fund to support the development and construction of a 'transformational campus' that addresses the root causes of homelessness.
Resort industry officials had earlier indicated the proposal was driven by a desire to relocate to address the rise of 'vagrancy' on the Las Vegas Strip.
As the measure was making its way toward speedy approval, lawmakers were told ongoing expenses would be shared between private donors, local governments, and the state. But no specific breakdowns were proposed.
As of mid-December when Campus for Hope submitted their application to the Governor's Office of Economic Development for approval, Clark County and the City of North Las Vegas had signed shared service agreements for the project but the cities of Henderson and Las Vegas had not. Several lawmakers have publicly referenced behind-the-scenes tension between the municipalities over the Campus for Hope project.
As part of the shared service agreements, the municipalities must operate navigation centers and emergency intake facilities within their jurisdictions. Those facilities must provide 'immediate shelter, nutritious meals, hygiene facilities, and essential supplies to those in crisis.' Campus for Hope proposes a 'hub and spoke' model where the municipalities intake and provide immediate assistance to people within their jurisdictions and then funnel them toward the campus for additional services.
Campus for Hope's application states its initial set of services will include: medical and mental healthcare, job training and employment, transitional housing, social services, and community engagement and education.
The campus expects to have 900 residential beds and assumes people will stay between 3.5 and 12 months. That means they could help between 900 and 3,086 people annually.
Included in the application is a series of memos from Nevada GrantLab, a nonprofit that assists other nonprofits and public agencies in accessing federal grants. They summarize feedback on the project gathered during a series of meetings with more than 50 people at 21 existing nonprofits focused on addressing homelessness.
Resort industry pitches regional homelessness project, asks state for $100 million match
The first memo, dated Feb. 14, 2024, was sent to Wynn Resorts Chief Sustainability Officer Erik Hansen and Jeremy Aguero, a consultant who has worked on several high-profile private-public partnerships, including most recently the A's baseball stadium and its $360 million public subsidy.
The memo noted that 'many participants strongly recommended CFH hire staff and add board members who have subject matter expertise in homeless services (including individuals with lived experience), social services and nonprofit operations.'
'This expertise is perceived as largely missing and problematic,' read the memo.
Campus for Hope's board of directors is composed entirely of gaming executives:
Craig Billings, CEO of Wynn;
Katie Carano Miller, senior vice president of communications and government relations for Caesars;
Jyoti Chopra, chief people, inclusion and sustainability officer at MGM;
Meghan Sperano, vice president of global communications and chief of staff at Aristocrat, a gaming company;
Keith Smith, president and CEO of Boyd Gaming;
Michael Britt, senior vice president of government relations, public policy and communications at Red Rock Resorts;
Patrick Nichols, president and CEO at the Venetian, or Marcy Miles, chief marketing officer at the Venetian;
Ellen Whittemore, executive vice president and general counsel at Wynn; and
Paul Anderson, senior vice president of government and industry affairs at Boyd Gaming.
The application says the board offers expertise 'in corporate management, nonprofit leadership, healthcare, social services, economic development and public administration' but does not elaborate beyond listing their names and current titles in the gaming industry.
Campus for Hope does establish a 'technical advisory committee' consisting of nonprofit organizations and local governments that, through quarterly reports to the board of directors, would provide 'expert guidance on the most pressing community needs,' but the committee would have no formal authority.
A CEO has already been selected and hired to run Campus for Hope, according to the application. Their name was not disclosed in the application, and a project spokesperson did not answer the Current's request to identify them, but the person is described as having 'extensive experience in the nonprofit sector, with a strong background in leadership and community engagement across organizations such as nonprofit councils, foundations and human services programs.'.
The foundation will employ 315 people when fully built out.
The nonprofits also told GrantLab that Campus for Hope should more clearly define its goal and develop a plan specific to that goal, noting that 'generalized goal statements about homelessness are impractical and can be counterproductive.'
That sentiment is captured again in a later memo dated Nov. 4, 2024: 'Participants emphasized that distinct populations have distinct needs, and combining multiple programs and/or populations in a single location may be difficult or impractical,' read the memo.
While Campus for Hope did not respond to specific questions provided by the Current for this story, a spokesperson provided the following statement via email, speaking to concerns about input on the project: 'We are still in the early stages of the evolution of Campus for Hope. We have solicited extensive input from local service providers and local governments. We will continue to work closely with them and will proactively engage with individuals who have successfully transitioned out of homelessness and as well as those currently unhoused to ensure that the operational plan is informed by lived experience and is as effective as possible in providing meaningful support.'
The statement concluded by saying additional information would be made available on the project's website: nevadahope.org.
That website states that Campus for Hope's efforts 'are made possible by the generous support of many organizations and individuals' and lists 17 companies, all tied to the resort industry, that have pledged donations for the initial $100 million in private funds for construction. Mentions of the state funds are tucked behind in an answer to a 'frequently asked question.' There is no mention of Clark County or the cities of Las Vegas, North Las Vegas and Henderson.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Senator Ted Cruz discusses President Trump's deportation policy and the "big beautiful bill"
Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas tells Jack Fink about his views on the protests against President Trump's mass deportation policies. He also comments on the report that the President wants Texas lawmakers to redraw the state's congressional districts before next year's elections. He details more budget cuts he wants to see from the federal budget.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Army Sec: $40 million parade on Trump's birthday a 'Once-in-a-lifetime opportunity'
WASHINGTON — The Army's $40 million parade Saturday to celebrate its 250th anniversary is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to showcase the service, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll told USA TODAY. That it also falls on President Donald Trump's birthday, and that he'll preside over the tanks and troops that rumble and march past him from a specially built reviewing stand? Simply coincidence. 'Unless soldiers 170 years before he was born somehow timed that date,' Driscoll in a June 12 interview. Driscoll talked about the parade and who's expected to attend (invitations almost certainly have been extended to Mark Esper and Mark Milley, top former officials who clashed with Trump, he said). Driscoll also addressed the deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles over the objection of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and the No. 1 threat to his soldiers – cheap, lethal drones. Planning for the Army's 250th birthday began before Driscoll became the civilian leader of the Army on February 25, he said. A longstanding tradition for armies, a military parade was deemed a natural way to highlight the Army's strength and service to the United States. 'I think sometimes the media gets in its own way in telling stories,' Driscoll said. 'The coincidence that the president's birthday is on this date that occurred 250 years ago, and that we the Army want to tell this story, is I think going to be backed up. The reason we are spending this money, the reason we are so excited about it, I think we'll be backed up by recruiting data in the months ahead. 'This is not intended to be performative. We sincerely believe this is a once-in-a-generation opportunity.' The parade, which includes potential damage to streets in Washington, D.C. from armored vehicles including 38 70-ton Abrams tanks, will range in cost from $25 million to $40 million. Democrats have criticized the event as a waste of money to promote Trump's image. "This is Trump. This is all about his ego and making everything about him," Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on May 14. The televised parade will reach a broad audience of Americans and spur some of them to serve, Driscoll said. 'We believe that so many Americans are excited about this and will tune in,' Driscoll said. 'And it will quantitatively fill up our recruiting pipeline for the years to come. We think it is absolutely worth the investment.' Driscoll said he believed with near certainty that Esper and Milley had been invited to attend the parade. The Army, a spokesman for Milley and the White House have not confirmed that. Esper is the former Army secretary Trump promoted to Defense secretary and then fired in November 2020 after he lost the election. Esper incurred Trump's wrath for urging restraint in deploying the military against protesters. Milley, a retired Army general, its chief of staff and the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff also lost Trump's favor after apologizing for appearing in uniform near Trump after law enforcement officials forcibly cleared racial justice protesters from Lafayette Square, near the White House, so Trump could walk across it. The parade features dozens of armored combat vehicles, helicopters, vintage warplanes, thousands of soldiers in uniforms from the Revolutionary War to the present, horses, two mules and a dog. More: Soldiers excited (and nerve wracked) to drive tanks in DC military parade The procession will highlight the 'robustness and incredible talent of our soldiers,' Driscoll said. He hopes that Americans 'feel pride and honor' when they watch the parade. 'This is their Army,' he said. In 2017, during his first term, Trump wanted to hold a military parade, but Pentagon officials were leery of appearing to politicize the armed forces. Then-Defense Sec. Jim Mattis said he would 'rather swallow acid,' according to 'Holding the Line,' a book by his former speechwriter Guy Snodgrass. That Army, through its National Guard troops, is engaged at Trump's order in helping protect federal buildings and Los Angeles and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials as they continue their crackdown on migrants expected of being in the country illegally. The deployment of thousands of National Guard troops to Los Angeles is justified and was approved by the voters who elected Trump. Trump, Driscoll said, is doing exactly what he said he'd do during the campaign. 'Our system was designed for exactly these moments,' Driscoll said. 'The reason we have presidential elections, the reason so many Americans turned out in November to support our president, Donald J. Trump, was for exactly these kinds of moments. If you look at the four-year period when President Trump was out of office, I think the American people didn't want violence in their communities.' The National Guard soldiers deployed to Los Angeles are talented, well trained and 'excited' about being there, Driscoll said. The Department of Homeland Security has asked the Pentagon for more than 20,000 additional National Guard troops for law enforcement support for its immigration crackdowns. More: Trump wants 20,000 troops to hunt, transport immigrants. Cost estimate: $3.6 billion Driscoll said he hasn't been briefed on the request but that the Army is ready to operate inside U.S. borders in legally appropriate ways. 'If the president feels, in consultation with the rest of the administration leadership, that is the best use of our National Guard, the Army stands by to support,' Driscoll said. On a separate issue, Driscoll talked about what he considers to be the top lethal threat to soldiers. Cheap, weaponized drones have become the weapon of choice in the war between Russia and Ukraine. Driscoll wants the Army to lead the Pentagon's effort to counteract drones. 'It's the number one thing we talk about every single day,' Driscoll said. Ukraine stunned Russia with a drone attack on its strategic warplanes. 'That should send fear into the hearts of armies around the world,' Driscoll said. 'A solution that was tens of thousands of dollars and pretty cleverly done over six months with very little signature to catch. It took out multiple billions of dollars of equipment, and that threat is real, and that threat is one that is being faced by every country.' Is the Pentagon better prepared than Russia for such an attack? 'I don't know,' Driscoll said. 'Hope so.' This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Army's $40 million parade: 'Once-in-lifetime opportunity'


Chicago Tribune
20 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Measure before Gov. JB Pritzker would streamline firearms ID process for low-level gun offenders
On the final day of the spring legislative session, the Democrat-led Illinois General Assembly passed a measure intended to make it easier for people who have been arrested for carrying guns illegally to obtain a state firearm permit so they would be allowed to own firearms. The bipartisan bill marked a rare instance in which Democrats and Republicans largely agreed on a measure involving guns. Democrats have been criticized by the GOP for promoting measures that restrict the flow of guns to the point where they negatively affect law-abiding gun owners. But Democrats say this legislation, which awaits Gov. JB Pritzker's signature, encourages the legal ownership of firearms while still emphasizing accountability. 'Getting guns off the streets, yes, absolutely, to me that means stopping the flow of illegal weapons into our streets. That means keeping weapons out of the hands of people who wish to do harm,' said state Rep. Kelly Cassidy, a Chicago Democrat who supports the bill. 'That doesn't mean preventing people from owning a tool that is used for both personal protection and sport.' The legislation applies to participants in diversion programs that serve as alternatives to prosecution. Cook County's Democratic state's attorney, Eileen O'Neill Burke, pushed legislators to expand the programs to include a more streamlined opportunity for their participants to obtain a firearm owner's identification, or FOID, card — the form required by the Illinois State Police for state residents to be allowed to legally own guns. The legislation would apply to people eligible for placement in the diversion programs and charged with gun crimes designated as Class 4 felonies, offenses that can carry one-to-three-year prison sentences but are the least severe level of felonies. Under the measure, a person charged with those low-level gun felonies would be able to apply for a FOID card once receiving a court order attesting to their completion of a diversion program, enabling the state police to perform a background check as part of the process of granting them the card. Once the felony case is officially dropped, the state police would grant that individual a FOID card if they pass the background check, the measure would allow. As it stands now, state police can't start the process for someone requesting a FOID card until their felony case is dropped, which may not be until well after the applicant completes the diversion program. The legislation is aimed at helping people like Shamyia Phillips, who was arrested in November 2023 on a felony gun charge. When police stopped her in a car that she said had been reported stolen, she had a handgun in her purse that she said she purchased legally in Texas, an open-carry state where she lived for a time. Unaware of Illinois' gun laws, she didn't have a FOID card or concealed carry license. 'It was just to protect me and my daughter,' said Phillips, a 26-year-old single mother. 'I wasn't using it to harm anyone or anything.' Unemployed at the time, Phillips said she entered a diversion program that helped her get a job and led to the charges being dropped. Seeking work in the security field, she plans to apply for a FOID card and concealed carry license. During a visit to the Tribune Editorial Board earlier this month, O'Neill Burke said one factor motivating the legislation was that during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were major delays for people applying for FOID cards through the state police. At the same time a lot of people acquired guns illegally because of fears stoked by a nationwide rise in violent crime. 'So, we were putting people in a catch-22,' said O'Neill Burke, who took office at the end of last year. 'Suddenly we had this large population of otherwise law-abiding people who are now charged with a Class 4 felony.' The solution, she said, is part of her office's balanced approach toward gun prosecutions: Prioritizing gun cases that involve the use of 'switches,' rapid-fire devices that can convert semiautomatic guns to fully automatic use, while at the same time ensuring that others entitled to have firearms are following the law. 'It's two very different approaches to gun crimes because they're treated very differently under the law,' O'Neill Burke said. 'The goal is to get as many people into compliance with the regulation as possible, while at the same time addressing the very real threat that automatic weapons pose.' More than 2.4 million Illinoisans have FOID cards. The state police has 20 employees processing FOID applications while additional employees handle applications for concealed carry licenses, which allow for a gun owner to carry a firearm outdoors. The state police said the same participants in diversion programming who may be eligible for a FOID may also acquire a CCL, though the qualifications are different. The state police said system improvements over the years have brought down processing times for new FOID applications to an average of about 12 days. During the pandemic, staffing ranged between 17 and 28 employees dedicated to FOID card application processing, in addition to temporary contractors, the state police said. In 2020, the first year of the pandemic, the state police processed 190,693 new FOID applications with an average processing time of 83 days, the state police said. The following year, 292,523 new FOID applications were processed. The final amendment of the diversion program legislation passed through the Senate by a 55-0 vote on May 31, the final scheduled day of session. The bill was approved in the House on May 23 by a vote of 97-11. When state Sen. Elgie Sims presented the final amendment on the Senate floor on May 31, he said there was a 'unique set of proponents to the bill.' In addition to the Cook County state's attorney's office, those proponents included the Cook County public defender's office, Illinois State's Attorneys Association, Illinois State Rifle Association and Gun Violence Prevention PAC. Sims, the bill's main Senate sponsor, said in an interview that the legislation is meant to help people caught up in the criminal justice system for nonviolent gun infractions so they don't get arrested again. 'We're trying to make sure that for somebody who might have a firearm in their possession, but they've gone through the process, they've taken the steps to atone for the mistake (so) that they are able to get their FOID card,' the Chicago Democrat said. 'It was to encourage people to be law-abiding gun owners.' Among other supporters of the bill was the Gun Violence Prevention PAC, which works to stem gun violence and illegal gun access. John Schmidt, an executive board member of the group, said there's room for a balanced approach within firearm policies to respect the rights of people wanting to own a gun legally. 'G-PAC works to keep illegal guns out of the hands of unqualified owners. But we have no trouble making common ground to support laws that enable people who successfully complete diversion programs to resume their right like other citizens to own lawful guns,' said Schmidt, a former U.S. associate attorney general. Republican legislators have long accused the Democratic majority of infringing on the Second Amendment right to bear arms through laws such as the 2023 assault weapons ban, which remains under court challenge. In the new gun bill, many GOP lawmakers supported the Democrats' legislative fix around diversion programming and FOID cards. Senate Republican leader John Curran, a former assistant Cook County state's attorney, agreed with Sims' rationale behind it. 'Ultimately, if someone's going to possess a gun again down the road, they should have a FOID in Illinois. It's the law of the land. So, we should encourage that behavior. This bill does,' said Curran, of Downers Grove. State Rep. John Cabello of Machesney Park was one of 11 House members to vote against the new legislation. A Republican who has worked as a police detective, he said he's been supportive of diversion programs but was skeptical of the Democrats' motivation for this legislation. 'What they're doing in Springfield, is they take baby steps to what their final goal is. What is their final goal? Is their final goal to make sure that we can't charge felons with possession of a (gun) any longer?' Cabello said. The legislation would apply to various diversion programs for people arrested on Class 4 felony gun charges, including Cook County prosecutors' first-time weapon offense program. People charged with such crimes are eligible for the diversion program only if they've gotten permission from a judge, with the consent of the state's attorney. O'Neill Burke's office said Cook County had roughly 2,800 Class 4 felony gun cases last year of which defendants in some 1,200 were put in gun diversion programs, most of them in the first-time weapon offense program. The program was initially established by the General Assembly in 2018 as a pilot and limited to defendants under 21, while also being part of a law allowing for penalty enhancements for certain people convicted of repeatedly carrying illegal firearms. But in the last several years, especially with the makeup of the General Assembly becoming more progressive, lawmakers let the penalty enhancement provisions expire, made the diversion program permanent and removed its age restriction. Participation in the program could last from six months to two years, according to the law, and to stay in the program, the defendant must not break any laws or use any guns or other weapons. The law doesn't allow someone in the program if they've been arrested for a felony gun crime that was committed during the commission of a violent offense; if they've been previously convicted or placed on probation or conditional discharge for any violent crime; if they've completed the program in the past; or if they have an existing order of protection issued against them. Cook County Public Defender Sharone R. Mitchell Jr. said the legislation's emphasis on obtaining FOID cards is an acknowledgement by the government that the people who often get in trouble for illegal gun possession are not dangerous criminals. But if they have a blemish on their record like a Class 4 felony, that could hurt their chances to get a job and potentially be deprived of other opportunities. But Mitchell says many people might not acquire FOID cards or CCLs for a host of reasons, including ignorance of the law or a criminal conviction from decades ago preventing them from owning a gun. 'People's baseline need is to keep themselves safe and some individuals have made the decision in our community that carrying a gun is their only path toward that safety,' he said. 'People are making really tough decisions based upon safety.' Mitchell couldn't say whether the new legislation would increase awareness for the public to obtain FOID cards but said his office is hopeful the law helps change how illegal gun possession offenses are treated in the criminal justice system. 'Our hope is that this law is a first step, but that we take a more informed and measured approach to all gun possession cases,' he said.