Potatoes from tomatoes? Popular starchy vegetable derived from ancient interbreeding, researchers say
That's right, a fruit. Potatoes and tomatoes don't look alike, smell alike or taste alike, but in a study published Thursday in the journal Cell, scientists said that the potato evolved from a tomato ancestor around 9 million years ago.
"We've finally solved the mystery of where potatoes came from," corresponding author Sanwen Huang of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China, said in a news release.
The origin of the modern potato has puzzled scientists for years. In terms of appearance, potatoes resemble a species from Chile called Etuberosum, with one crucial difference: Etuberosum don't produce the starch-rich tubers. That's where the tomato comes in.
While tomatoes don't have tubers, the ancient tomato did provide a crucial gene that, when mixed with the genetics of Etuberosum, told the modern potato to form tubers, according to the researchers. The SP6A gene from the tomato parent tells the potato plant to make tubers, while the IT1 gene from Etuberosum assists in controlling the growth of the underground stems that form tubers. Both pieces were needed to create the potato that's known and loved today.
"Our findings show how a hybridization event between species can spark the evolution of new traits, allowing even more species to emerge," corresponding author Sanwen Huang of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China said in a news release.
The research team analyzed 450 genomes from cultivated potatoes and 56 of the wild potato species during the study.
"Wild potatoes are very difficult to sample, so this dataset represents the most comprehensive collection of wild potato genomic data ever analyzed," said the paper's first author Zhiyang Zhang of the Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
Outside of the ancestry, there's also a linguistic similarity, according to Merriam-Webster
"The word 'tomato' started out as 'tomate' and came from the Nahuatl word 'tomatl.' Since the potato had been introduced to the English some decades earlier, the word evolved to mimic the form of 'potato' — hence the spelling 'tomato,'" the dictionary notes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Family roots: potatoes evolved from tomatoes, study reveals ...Tech & Science Daily podcast
Listen here on your chosen podcast platform. A study has revealed that potatoes evolved from a tomato ancestor. We're joined by co-author Dr Sandy Knapp, a merit researcher at the Natural History Museum, who explains how this discovery uncovers a missing piece of the potato's evolutionary history. 'If you look in your garden at a potato plant and a tomato plant, you will immediately start to see some similarities' Welcome to the world, Thaddeus Daniel Pierce, the 'oldest baby' to have ever been born. He was born in the US from an embryo that had been stored for thirty years. And which UK city is receiving the most suspected scam emails or texts? Also in this episode: -The technology transforming a London garden into a live orchestra, with Hilary Lam, EMEA Sustainability Leader at Amazon Web Services -OpenAI have announced plans for their first data centre in Europe -Scottish ocean rower performs bagpipes via livestream during an All American Rejects set at Comic Con -Ofcom reveals YouTube as the second most-watched media service in the UK -Darth Vader's lightsaber and Michael Keaton's Batman suit go to auction
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Evolutionary origins of the potato revealed - and a tomato was involved
Evolutionary origins of the potato revealed - and a tomato was involved By Will Dunham WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The potato is one of the world's food staples, first cultivated thousands of years ago in the Andes region of South America before spreading globally from the 16th century. But despite its importance to humankind, the evolutionary origins of the potato have remained puzzling - until now. A new analysis of 450 genomes from cultivated potatoes and 56 genomes of wild potato species has revealed that the potato lineage originated through natural interbreeding between a wild tomato plant and a potato-like species in South America about 9 million years ago. This hybridization event led to the appearance of the nascent potato plant's tuber, an enlarged structure housing nutrients underground, according to the researchers, who also identified two crucial genes involved in tuber formation. Whereas in a tomato plant the edible part is the fruit, in the potato plant it is the tuber. "Potatoes are truly one of humanity's most remarkable food staples, combining extraordinary versatility, nutritional value and cultural ubiquity in ways few crops can match," said Sanwen Huang, a genome biologist and plant breeder at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and senior author of the study published on Friday in the journal Cell. "People eat potatoes using virtually every cooking method - baking, roasting, boiling, steaming and frying. Despite being stereotyped as carbohydrates, potatoes offer vitamin C, potassium, fiber and resistant starch, and are naturally gluten-free, low-fat and satiating - a nutrient-dense calorie source," Huang added. Resistant starch is a type of carbohydrate that resists digestion in the small intestine and ferments in the large intestine, feeding beneficial bacteria in the gut. The modern-day potato plant's scientific name is Solanum tuberosum. Its two parents identified in the study were plants that were the ancestors of a potato-like species now found in Peru named Etuberosum, which closely resembles the potato plant but lacks a tuber, and the tomato plant. These two plants themselves shared a common ancestor that lived about 14 million years ago, and were able to naturally interbreed when the fortuitous hybridization event occurred five million years after they had diverged from each other. "This event led to a reshuffling of genes such that the new lineage produced tubers, allowing these plants to expand into the newly created cold, dry habitats in the rising Andes mountain chain," said botanist Sandra Knapp of the Natural History Museum in London, a co-author of the study. This hybridization event coincided with the rapid uplift of the Andes. With a tuber, the potato plant was able to adapt to the changing regional environment and thrive in the harsh conditions of the mountains. "Tubers can store nutrients for cold adaptation, and enable asexual reproduction to meet the challenge of the reduced fertility in cold conditions. These allowed the plant to survive and rapidly expand," Huang said. The study's findings, according to the researchers, may help guide improved cultivated potato breeding to address environmental challenges that crops presently face due to factors such as climate change. There currently are roughly 5,000 potato varieties. The potato is the world's third most important food crop, after rice and wheat, for human consumption, according to the Peru-based International Potato Center research organization. China is the world's leading potato producer. "It always is hard to remove all the deleterious mutations in potato genomes in breeding, and this study opens a new door to make a potato free of deleterious mutations using the tomato as the chassis of synthetic biology," Huang said. The study also may open the door to generate a new crop species that could produce tomato fruit above ground and potato tubers below ground, according to Zhiyang Zhang, a postdoctoral researcher at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The potato and tomato are members of the nightshade family of flowering plants that also includes tobacco and peppers, among others. The study did not investigate the evolutionary origins of other tuberous root crops that originated in South America such as the sweet potato and yuca, which are members of different families of flowering plants. While the parts of the tomato and potato plants that people eat are quite different, the plants themselves are very similar. "We use different parts of these two species, fruits in tomatoes and tubers in potatoes," Knapp said. "If you look at the flowers or leaves, these are very similar. And if you are lucky enough to let your potato plant produce fruits, they look just like little green tomatoes. But don't eat them. They are not very nice."
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
AI Training Gets 10x Faster, 95% Cheaper With Decentralized Strategy
A quiet shift in the foundations of artificial intelligence (AI) may be underway, and it is not happening in a hyperscale data center. 0G Labs, the first decentralized AI protocol (AIP), in collaboration with China Mobile, recently announced a technical breakthrough that could have sweeping implications for how businesses access and deploy large language models. Their innovation is a new method of training massive AI models with over 100 billion parameters, without needing the ultra-high-speed internet or expensive centralized infrastructure typically required. At first glance, this might sound like a win for the engineering world. But the real story is economic and strategic. What 0G Labs has achieved could lower the cost of building AI, put more control back into the hands of enterprises, and open the door for new players to enter the space. What It Means For AI Training To understand the shift, it helps to revisit how large-scale AI models are currently trained. Models like OpenAI's GPT-4 or Anthropic's Claude require vast computing power and network throughput. Traditionally, this means training them on powerful GPUs connected across high-speed, centralized data centers owned or rented from companies like Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, or Microsoft Azure. As of early 2025, OpenAI's leadership, including Sam Altman, publicly stated that training GPT‑4 cost over $100 million. This is supported both by official statements and multiple cost models in recent AI analysis reportsIt is a model that demands capital, talent, and infrastructure that few organizations can afford. 0G Labs Is Challenging That Assumption For AI Training Their newly published framework, called DiLoCoX, introduces a low-communication training method that dramatically reduces the need for high-bandwidth connectivity. In practical terms, they successfully trained a 107 billion parameter model on a 1 Gbps network using decentralized clusters. This record is a 10x improvement of the previous record and the 300x speed-up breakthrough that made this possible for the first time. This is roughly the bandwidth of a typical office internet connection. Instead of building everything in one giant compute center, their approach links together smaller, distributed machines and optimizes how information is shared between them. The result is a highly scalable, cost-efficient way to train massive models outside the traditional cloud. In speaking with 0G labs founder and CEO Michael Heinrich, he said 'DiLoCoX marks a pivotal step in democratizing LLM training: bridging the gap between massive foundation models and decentralized clusters connected by slow, unreliable networks. By combining pipeline parallelism, delay‑tolerant communication overlap, and adaptive gradient compression, the framework delivers scale and speed previously thought exclusive to high‑bandwidth data centers. This will usher in a new era where large‑scale AI training is no longer tethered to centralized infrastructure.' Why Does AI Training Matter for Business At a time when every enterprise is under pressure to do more with AI, infrastructure is quickly becoming the bottleneck. Some businesses are starting to look at decentralized AI by design. Building large models remains expensive, exclusive, and largely confined to companies with deep resources or strategic cloud partnerships. 0G's breakthrough opens up a third path. This is not just a story of cost savings. It is a story of optionality and control. 1. Lowering the Barrier to Entry DiLoCoX's approach reduces the infrastructure by up to 95% required to participate in the LLM race. For startups, this means the ability to experiment and scale without burning through venture capital on GPU spend. For mid-sized enterprises, it offers the possibility of training models in-house without making large cloud commitments. For governments and research labs, it means more accessible and sovereign development of AI capabilities. 2. Strategic Independence from Hyperscalers Most AI training today depends on three cloud providers. That concentration carries risk in terms of cost escalation, vendor lock-in, and compliance. If your business depends on AI but also operates in a sensitive sector like healthcare, defense, or finance, the ability to train or fine-tune models independently becomes a powerful strategic lever. Decentralized AI offers a route toward digital autonomy. By breaking the assumption that cutting-edge AI must be trained inside centralized cloud platforms, 0G's model creates new room for competition and for innovation. 3. Aligning with Data Privacy and Compliance Needs Many companies are cautious about uploading proprietary data to cloud-based models or training environments. With decentralized training, it becomes possible to keep data local within jurisdiction, within the firewall, or even on edge devices while still participating in large-scale AI development. This is particularly attractive in regions with strict data sovereignty laws such as the European Union or countries building their own AI ecosystems. The 0G network never sees any of the private data 4. Accelerating Innovation in Underserved Markets The high cost of entry has kept many countries and industries on the sidelines of advanced AI development. DiLoCoX lowers that threshold. A university in Kenya, a telecom provider in Southeast Asia, or a regional bank in Latin America may not have access to the same compute as Silicon Valley, but they may soon have the tools to train and deploy their intelligent systems on existing infrastructure. 5. Geopolitical and Regulatory Risks While the technical achievement is impressive, the involvement of China Mobile raises questions. As tensions between the United States and China continue to escalate over technology leadership and national security, businesses must weigh the potential regulatory scrutiny, data governance concerns, and reputational risks associated with partnerships involving Chinese state-affiliated entities. For companies based in the United States or operating in allied markets, any integration of infrastructure or research tied to China could face export controls, legal restrictions, or public backlash. Organizations exploring decentralized AI solutions will need to consider not just performance and cost, but also political alignment, compliance frameworks, and long-term viability. However, having DiLoCoX on a decentralized infrastructure where the network is trustless, this is not a concern because China Mobile never sees your data, and the system doesn't rely on them for results. Reframing the Business Model of AI If DiLoCoX is widely adopted, it could create ripple effects across the broader AI ecosystem. Cloud revenue models, currently boosted by AI workloads, could face new pricing pressure. AI-as-a-service platforms may need to re-architect to support hybrid or decentralized deployments. Open-source frameworks might grow in influence as decentralization emphasizes interoperability and local control. Enterprise software vendors may need to rethink their AI strategies to reflect a more distributed compute landscape. This shift also aligns with the broader trend of AI for everyone. From low-code agent builders to edge-based inferencing, the movement is toward more accessible, modular, and customizable AI stacks. Decentralized training is the natural extension of that philosophy. An AI Signal for CIOs and CTOs For enterprise leaders, 0G's work serves as a signal not of immediate disruption, but of near-future opportunity. AI is evolving from its critical beginning. Now is the time to reevaluate infrastructure strategy. Should your organization continue investing in cloud-based model hosting, or begin exploring decentralized alternatives? Could your internal data center serve as a node in a distributed training system? Decentralized federated learning is a great way of tapping into private data from different parties on a network, like hospitals training a cancer diagnostic model. Might you partner with others in your sector to co-develop models using decentralized protocols? Even if the answer is not yes today, the emergence of frameworks like DiLoCoX should push AI infrastructure planning higher on the strategic agenda. Businesses that prepare for this shift by building internal capacity, evaluating partners, and understanding the technical stack will be best positioned to move when the economics tip in their favor. A Future Where AI is Built Differently What 0G Labs and China Mobile have demonstrated is more than just a technical proof of concept. It is a new way of thinking about how intelligence is built, trained, and distributed. By showing that it is possible to train 100 billion parameter models without centralized supercomputers, they are not just pushing the boundaries of scale. They are expanding access. For business, that means AI may soon be less about who owns the biggest data center and more about who can build the smartest systems with the most flexibility. That is an AI future worth preparing for.
