The ongoing struggle of South Africa's youth: Beyond Youth Month
This is not a June issue. This is a July issue, an August issue, and an every-month issue until change comes.
I was born on Youth Day. Not just into a date, but into a mission. For most people June 16 is a symbol. For me, it has been a summons. A daily reminder of what it means to inherit a nation still searching for its soul, and what it means to carry forward a legacy written in both blood and possibility.
At 26 years old, I was elected one of the youngest councillors in South Africa. I was often referred to as a youth leader, but the title came with more weight than celebration.
In my community, a councillor is not just a representative – he is the father, the fire extinguisher, the provider, the undertaker. I buried the young dead, negotiated with the government, calmed burning streets, and stood in courtrooms where hope had long since withered.
The role forced me to grow up fast. My youth was different from that of others – it was something I endured while carrying the burdens of others.
Now, at 33, I find myself looking back and forward all at once. I am still called 'young', but how does a 33-year-old, forged by duty, truly relate to an 18-year-old who is trying to find their place in a country where the rules keep changing, the jobs keep disappearing, and the violence keeps knocking at the door?
But I have learned that being young is not the same as being new. And what South Africa needs today are not just youthful faces, but new voices rooted in community, disciplined by purpose, and shaped not by entitlement.
Youth in South Africa are not just 'challenged' – they are bleeding: economically, mentally, and spiritually.
Unemployment among youth (ages 15–34) is a staggering 46.1%. Among those aged 15–24, it is over 60%. That is not a statistic; it is a quiet war.
Let me be clear: I have met many hardworking young people who want nothing more than a chance. But there is also a growing culture, which we must confront, of expectation without preparation.
We speak of the 'born-free' generation as though the end of apartheid was the end of injustice.But our youth were born into a freedom that often feels like fiction.
I have stood with and fought for them. Like some, I too live with a disability. In 2022, I was violently attacked and left with permanent damage to my dominant hand. I can no longer use my hand or fingers fully. I feel very little in that hand. But I have learned to adapt – to create artwork for the first time, to appear in court again.
I sometimes choose to wear a gold glove on that hand, not to hide it, but to remind myself that even pain can shine when purpose leads the way.
Too many youth enter politics thinking it is a job. Too many youth think activism is a career. It is neither.
Politics, at its core, is service. Activism is sacrifice. If you are not prepared to fight when there is no crowd, to serve when there is no salary, to speak when no one is listening, then you are not ready to lead.
What we need now are young leaders who are not chasing perks but principles. Leaders who are not loyal to factions or hashtags, but to people and their pain.
I recently met young people who gather at the BAT Centre in Durban. They meet every week – sharing poetry, art, music – and they do so without expectation. Just for the cause. Just for community. I was humbled by them. They remind me that we are not without hope. We are simply without investment in the right places.
I want to reflect on three people – among many – who are advocating for youth. Clive Pillay, who has spent decades building young leaders at the Nelson Mandela Community Youth Centre in Chatsworth.
Ravi Pillay, who creates platforms for youth to be heard – not just spoken to – by those in power. And Kiru Naidoo, who documents the untold stories of our communities so that young people may know who they are and what they survived.
Three different paths, but with one mission: to uplift. We each have a role.
So what now? First, let us reimagine how we define 'youth.' Not merely by age, but by contribution, courage, and creativity.
Second, let us build spaces where youth can be more than passive recipients, but actual architects of the future.
Third, we must demand more – from our youth and for our youth. There can be no revival of this country without their full, fearless, and honest inclusion.
Finally, we must listen – truly listen – to our young. Not to pacify them, but to understand what they are trying to say: 'This country belongs to us too. Let us shape it.
Now that Youth Month has passed, let us not reduce our young people's future to hashtags and forgotten speeches. There are young leaders already among us.
Let us build that country together. Not later. Now.
Previn Vedan is a lawyer, human rights advocate and activist based in Durban
*The opinions expressed in this article does not necessarily reflect the views of the newspaper.
DAILY NEWS

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
12 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Teacher unions yet to react to Bela Act regulations
With the 5 September deadline looming, Sadtu and Naptosa say they are finalising their positions on the Bela Act regulations. The country's leading teacher trade unions are still consulting on the new dual sets of regulations pertaining to the Basic Education Law Amendment (Bela) Act recently gazetted by Minister of Basic Education Siviwe Gwarube. The South African Democratic Teachers Union (Sadtu) and the National Profession Teachers Organisation of SA (Naptosa) appear to be in no hurry, despite the deadline of 5 September being around the corner. The minister issued the regulations for public comments on 6 August and the public has until 5 September to submit their comments. Focus on admissions and school capacity The two sets of regulations deal with school admissions and the determination of school capacity. The admissions and capacity draft regulations are the first instalment in the process. Instead of releasing all the regulations at once, the minister opted for a 'modular release approach'. She promised a public awareness campaign would be launched to enable the public to make informed comments. ALSO READ: Bela Act: Here's how you can have your say on school regulations in South Africa Key issues raised in the regulations Among issues discussed in the regulations are proof of immunisation before the enrolment of a pupil, admission refusal, language and curricula preferences, classroom capacity and pupil-teacher ratios, special education needs and school zoning or admission of non-South Africans or children of undocumented immigrants. Dear South Africa (DearSA), a civil society organisation that facilitates public comments on public legislative and policy issues, noted the short time remaining. DearSA managing director Rob Hutchinson encouraged the public to make submissions. Deadline pressure for public submissions Public comments should be submitted to parliament for consideration by the portfolio committee on basic education before the deadline. Some people are using the DearSA website platform. Both Sadtu and Naptosa said they would make comprehensive comments later. Naptosa executive director Basil Manuel said the teacher unions were involved in drafting the regulations and were consulted by the department of basic education. 'We are working on our response, but the fact that we were part of the drafting process doesn't mean we agree with everything that has been published around the admissions and capacity. ALSO READ: Bela Act: Here's how many kids should be in your child's classroom Teacher unions consult their members 'We are just happy that the regulations were published at all, but we are worried about the passage of time without the other regulations being made public,' Manuel said. Manuel said Naptosa was consulting broadly with members before formulating a comprehensive report. The union would hold a webinar soon to discuss the matter and hear the views of members. It would have wrapped up its position by 27-28 August and then make an announcement. Sadtu general secretary Mugwena Maluleke said the union's response would be ready as soon as their lawyers had finished it. Bridging the gap Gwarube was expected to formulate regulations after the Bela Act was passed and signed by President Cyril Ramaphosa in May last year. The regulations are the last hope to bridge the gap between parties which disagreed on the passing of the controversial legislation. The DA and Freedom Front Plus opposed the Act. But soon after the regulations were gazetted on 5 August, the DA welcomed them. NOW READ: Gwarube calls for bold education law reforms to address inequality


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Crooks rip away poor's better life
William Huma must repay R21 million, but no court can restore the opportunities stolen from the poorest South Africans. Sometimes, there are glimmers of hope that justice will be served in South Africa and that the country could become the prosperous, fair, place we all believe it should be. One such was news former National Lotteries Commission board member William Huma has been ordered to pay back R21 million in stolen grant funds, which should have been used to empower women and children in villages in the North West. The Special Investigating Unit and the Special Tribunal have been on the case of malfeasance in the structures of the national Lotto for some years now, following the dogged reporting of the corruption and theft by news organisation GroundUp. Brave whistle-blowers in the organisation have also provided valuable information. ALSO READ: WATCH: Mashatile denies family tied to multibillion-rand lottery deal Huma is but one of the examples of individuals in the lottery structure manipulating the system of grants to enrich themselves and their families. As with many schemes concocted by our corrupt and immoral civil servants, or those working for state-owned enterprises and statutory bodies, these thefts can never be written off as 'victimless crimes'. Countless numbers of the poorest of the poor and the most vulnerable in society have had any chance of a better life ripped away from them by these evil people.

TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
National dialogue: How much time does SA have before frustration boils over?
The launch of the national dialogue has reignited debate about whether the process can genuinely help fix the country's problems or it is just another stage to advance elite interests. Political analyst and Public Affairs Research Institute executive director Dr Sithembile Mbete says dialogue has been a recurring theme in South Africa's democratic journey. 'It comes from this idea that we are so fractured as a nation across political, racial and class lines and that we somehow need to talk to each other to find a solution,' she explains. She likens the initiative to 'post-conflict negotiations' but warns that dialogue without a clear end goal risks becoming hollow. 'We should always ask: what is the outcome supposed to be?' Arena Holdings editor-at-large S'thembiso Msomi agrees, saying South Africans have long felt that 'what we have is not enough'. 'Clearly there's general unhappiness about where South Africa is going,' he says. Listen to the conversation: The dialogue has already been rocked by high-profile withdrawals from key organisations and legacy foundations. Ramaphosa, however, insisted the process would continue with or without them. Mbete says the public fallout between elite actors should alarm ordinary citizens. 'We often talk about South African problems as if they're problems of ordinary people or voters. Actually, we've got an elite problem. Some of the most important people in this country could not get themselves together to resolve their disagreements,' she says. She questions whether the disputes dominating headlines have any connection to citizens' everyday struggles: 'It's not clear to me that the things being fought over at an elite level have anything to do with joblessness, the education system or service delivery.' Msomi suggests the dialogue may be Ramaphosa's attempt to revive a failed promise. 'One of the president's big issues after the Covid crisis was to deliver a social compact. He kept promising it in 2021 but it fizzled out. I sometimes wonder if he now looks at this process and thinks: here is my opportunity to deliver something since I was unable to deliver the social compact.' Msomi still sees value in the initiative if it is genuinely broad-based: 'It's not really a bad idea to have a national dialogue that is not driven by political parties, but that involves them.' Pressed on how much time South Africa has before citizens lose patience, Msomi is cautious but hopeful: 'I hope that we do achieve something out of it, where we are we cannot sustain this [status quo].'