The Gee Bee Racers of the early 1930s created winners and widows
The year was 1931, and the Great Depression was devastating to the once-thriving sport aircraft industry. Nevertheless, the Granville brothers designed the Model Z Super Sportster to compete for the Thompson Trophy at the National Air Races in Cleveland that year, in hopes it would lead to a sales boost.
The Model Z Super Sportster was basically a giant engine, the Pratt and Whitney R-985 radial producing 535 horsepower, stuffed into the smallest airframe possible. It was completed in just five weeks at a cost $5,000 (more than $106,000 in today's dollars). In August 1931, it was ready for its maiden flight.
Due to its small size, measuring 15 feet long and 23 feet in wingspan, the Model Z was a lot to handle, but an absolute hot rod with a top speed of 267 miles per hour. The Model Z began stacking up record-qualifying speeds and wins. On September 7, 1931, barely a month after its first flight, Lowell Bayles piloted the Z and won the Thompson Trophy Pylon race. The brothers recouped their investment.
Its story doesn't end there.
It was slated for more power, and a larger 750 horsepower radial engine was installed. On the first flight of the more powerful model, it was unofficially clocked at 314 mph. Another flight was officially clocked at 281 mph. On December 5, the Z was making another speed record attempt when tragedy struck.
In one of the best-known crash films from this era, the Z is seen blazing through the sky when its right wing folds in half, sending the Z into a corkscrew and exploding on impact. Investigation of the crash with a frame-by-frame examination of the footage determined that the gas cap was not secured, came off, and punched through the windshield, striking Bayles in the face, knocking him unconscious. The change in pitch caused severe vibration in the right wing, causing a structural failure. Bayles was killed, but was posthumously awarded a new speed record.
Although the Gee Bee won several races that year, the plane was considered unsafe due to the crash.
The Gee Bee R-1 & R-2 Super Speedster
In 1932, design work began on the successor to the Z model. Engineers Zantford Granville and Howell Miller used a wind tunnel to determine that a more teardrop-shaped design reduced drag. The new design was wider at the engine and tapered back, with the cockpit now in front of the vertical stabilizer. The result was the R-1 and its sister ship, the R-2.
In its first race, the R-1 was piloted by Jimmy Doolittle, future commander of the World War II Tokyo Raid, who flew to victory at the 1932 Thompson Trophy race and set a world land speed record of 296 mph. Publicly, Doolittle spoke highly of the Gee Bees' performance.
Privately, Doolittle had other thoughts about the plane's stability.
'I could tell from the first moment that it was a touchy and probably unpredictable airplane. I didn't trust this little monster. It was fast, but flying it was like balancing a pencil or an ice cream cone on the tip of your finger. You couldn't let your hand off the stick for an instant, and I didn't know how much angle of bank would be safe when making pylon turns.'
The R-1 would come to deserve its dangerous reputation. In 1933, pilot Russell Boardman was killed after taking off from a refueling stop at the Bendix trophy race. The plane was rebuilt with an 18-inch extension to its fuselage. The aircraft crashed again in a runway overrun incident soon after its rebuild and was sold as is to Cecil Allen just before the bankruptcy auction that ended the Granville Brothers' company.
Allen rebuilt the aircraft with several modifications, including the addition of a rear fuel tank for long-distance races. When learning about this change, Gee Bee engineer Pete Miller wrote to Allen, warning him never to fill the rear tank, as it would drastically change the center of gravity and lead to some bad things.
In 1935, Allen took off from Burbank airport for the run to the Cleveland Bendix trophy race with all tanks full, and bad things did indeed happen. The Gee Bee crashed after takeoff in a field just beyond the runway, killing Allen.
Of the 22 original Gee Bees, none survived. There are a few replicas about, both flying and non-flying. The Fantasy of Flight museum in Lakeland, Florida has flying replicas on display, and another flying replica was used in the Disney film 'The Rocketeer.'
The Gee Bees were ahead of their time. They were designed for speed and required a skilled pilot. Meanwhile, many believed they were simply killer planes.
In 1954, the U.S Air Force developed a similar aircraft, the F-104 Starfighter. While not directly based on the Gee Bee's design, it, too, was built for speed as an interceptor, and it handled differently. It was in the Starfighter that the post-war German Luftwaffe set a record for pilots killed. Between 1961 and 1989, they lost 292 of 916 aircraft, and 116 pilots were killed, earning it the nickname Witwenmacher – the Widowmaker.
Aircraft
Fixed Wing
Why Saddam Hussein buried Iraq's air force in the desert
By Blake Stilwell
Cold War
How the US Air Force handled its first-ever 'Broken Arrow' How the US Air Force handled its first-ever 'Broken Arrow'
By Friedrich Seiltgen
Aviation
If the F-47 is named after Trump, here are the namesakes of America's other fighter jets If the F-47 is named after Trump, here are the namesakes of America's other fighter jets
By Logan Nye
Fixed Wing
Midnight Hammer was the second-longest bombing mission: The B-2 also flew the longest Midnight Hammer was the second-longest bombing mission: The B-2 also flew the longest
By Miguel Ortiz
Technology
The surprising importance of magnets in military technology The surprising importance of magnets in military technology
By Miguel Ortiz
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spain's Alex Palou wins third consecutive IndyCar season title
Spain's Alex Palou captured his third consecutive IndyCar season title and fourth in five campaigns by finishing third in Sunday's Portland Grand Prix, which was won by Australian Will Power. Palou became only the fourth driver in IndyCar history to win three consecutive season crowns after American Ted Horn, France's Sebastien Bourdais and Scotland's Dario Franchitti. "It's unbelievable. It's crazy. I couldn't be happier right now," Palou said. "This has been an amazing season, an amazing five years with CGR (Chip Ganassi Racing). "I have no words to describe how grateful I am to everybody at CGR. This has been an amazing year and I cannot wait for more." With four career season titles, Palou ranks third on the all-time IndyCar list behind the record 10 won by A.J. Foyt and the six taken by New Zealand's Scott Dixon. Power collected his second victory in a row after 110 laps over the 12-turn, 1.964-mile (3.16km) Portland International Raceway road course with Dane Christian Lundgaard second and Palou third. "It was a shame we couldn't end it with another win but we fought," Palou said of the race. "I gave everything that I had. I tried everything to overtake Lundgaard but I couldn't make it today." With 626 points, Palou stands 151 ahead of Mexico's second-place Pato O'Ward in the season ladder, an insurmountable gap with two races remaining. Palou's eight triumphs this season include the Indianapolis 500, St. Petersburg, Thermal, Alabama, Indianapolis Grand Prix, Road America, Iowa and Laguna Seca. Palou, 28, can still match the one-season IndyCar win record of 10 with victories later this month at Milwaukee and Nashville. A.J. Foyt won 10 races in 1964 and Al Unser Sr. won 10 in 1970 while Mario Andretti captured nine in the 1969 campaign. Power captured his 45th career IndyCar win and first of a difficult season. "It's a big win for all of the team," Power said. "We've had a rough year. It's not really because we've been off the pace. It has just been unfortunate circumstances. It was a good hard-fought win." Pole-sitter O'Ward was the only racer who could have denied Palou the crown, but his car suffered an electrical failure on lap 21 and he went eight laps down, all-but ensuring Palou the crown since O'Ward needed to gain 14 points on Palou in the race to stay in the title chase. O'Ward's 25th-place finish was his worst result of the season. - O'Ward was powerless - O'Ward pitted for fuel after an early crash while Power and Palou stayed out to take first and second. But O'Ward's car lost power and rolled to a stop on the pit lane, crew members running out and pushing him into the service area where they could work on the electrical problem. O'Ward returned to the track eight laps down with Palou second overall, stealing any drama from the title fight. Former Indy 500 winner Tony Kanaan, team principal for Arrow McLaren, said faulty electrical wiring foiled O'Ward's bid. "The DI box, which is one of the electronic boxes that goes through to make everything work, had a connector with a little bit more of a vibration and, we don't know why, vibrated a little too hard and actually short-fused the whole box -- it was burning when we unplugged it," the Brazilian said. "It's one of those things. I don't have an explanation for it. It's really nobody's fault. Sometimes you need a little bit of luck to survive those situations... We couldn't really put up a fight today." js/bb
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rivian Faces a Dreaded Triple Whammy. Can the Stock Recover?
Key Points Losing sales of regulatory credits is a blow to the bottom line. Tariffs have added costs and complexities to the supply chain. Removing the $7,500 federal EV tax credit will hurt demand late in 2025. 10 stocks we like better than Rivian Automotive › Rivian (NASDAQ: RIVN) just drove in its second quarter that certainly felt negative impacts from multiple angles. The company reported a 13% rise in revenue to $1.3 billion and a narrowing net loss of $1.1 billion compared to the prior year's $1.5 billion, and reaffirmed its delivery guidance of 40,000 to 46,000 vehicles. Rivian also reported its full-year adjusted EBITDA loss is expected to be between $2 billion and $2.25 billion, worse than the prior forecast of $1.7 billion to $1.9 billion. Let's take a quick look at the triple whammy sending speed bumps at the young electric vehicle (EV) maker. Goodbye easy money When it comes to easy money, it doesn't get much easier than EV makers selling zero-emission, or regulatory, credits. Essentially, automakers that produce EVs are given credit for meeting emissions standards, while vehicles that don't meet emissions standards are fined. One way to get out of the fine is to simply purchase regulatory credits from automakers such as Rivian that don't have an internal combustion vehicle portfolio to offset. However, the Trump administration recently did away with the penalty for not meeting emissions standards, and thus removed the incentive to buy these regulatory credits. That's a significant, and sudden, removal of a vital chunk of business for Rivian. Now Rivian expects to receive no more revenue for the credits and for regulatory credits to generate roughly $160 million in 2025, down from the prior expectation of $300 million. Tortuous tariffs You aren't to be blamed if you can't keep up on all the tariffs, reciprocal tariffs, retaliatory tariffs, trade policy changes, among other developments. But the simple truth is the introduction of these tariffs complicated the lives of automakers and their investors, and Rivian is no different. The tariffs set by the current administration hit imported auto parts, causing pain even for companies such as Rivian that manufacture vehicles inside the U.S. Not only is that raising costs and eroding margins, it's causing supply chain disruptions and constraints that contributed to Rivian producing under 6,000 vehicles during the quarter, compared to nearly 14,000 during the prior year. Unfortunately for investors, management expects changes in trade regulation and tariffs to have a negative impact on cash flow, which had been long trending in the right direction, as you can see in the graph below. Rivian also expects tariffs to negatively impact vehicles by a couple thousand dollars per unit for the remainder of 2025, which is a big deal for a company already losing tens of thousands per vehicle. But tariffs are only part of the problem, and it goes hand in hand with the administration's removal of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit. No longer a shock In the world's least kept secret, the $7,500 federal tax credit for EV purchases is set to go away at the end of September. It's apparent that long-term demand will be negatively impacted with the tax credit making every qualifying vehicle more expensive. But investors also need to be aware of the impact the knowledge of the credit's removal had on demand. First, it created a pull forward effect as consumers on the fence rushed to buy an EV before the credit disappeared. That coincided with a boost in OEM production as automakers rushed production ahead of tariffs, increasing costs on imported parts and vehicles. But that also means there's almost certainly going to be an equally powerful lull once that pull-through demand is worked through and the new reality of likely cost increases sets in, probably during the fourth quarter. That's important because for Rivian to hit its full-year delivery target it needs a strong second half for demand and deliveries. It currently expects the third quarter to post the strongest for deliveries, so it will be a key quarter for investors to watch after demand and deliveries have trended lower. What it all means A triple whammy of negative impacts from tariffs and trade regulation, removal of the federal tax credit, and lost revenue from regulatory credits amid slower than anticipated EV industry growth makes for a rough year for Rivian. For long-term investors, the thesis hasn't changed: It's all hands on deck until the R2, R3, and R3X are driving into consumer garages. Rivian can absolutely recover from these negative developments. However, it's becoming more and more clear how much Rivian's future depends on the R2, and that's why the company remains high risk, high reward. Invest accordingly. Should you invest $1,000 in Rivian Automotive right now? Before you buy stock in Rivian Automotive, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Rivian Automotive wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Daniel Miller has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rivian Faces a Dreaded Triple Whammy. Can the Stock Recover? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Penske No Longer Winless in 2025 IndyCar Season, Will Power Delivers The Captain First Win
In a year where his future at Penske has been a talking point from weekend to weekend, Will Power delivered Roger Penske his first win of the season in the Grand Prix of Portland Sunday afternoon. With just three races to go heading into this weekend, it was starting to look like the bad luck that has marred the three Penske Chevrolets all year could lead to the first winless season for The Captain since 1999. Power started fourth after qualifying fifth and moving up one spot, thanks to pole winner Christian Lundgaard's six-place grid penalty for an engine change. Power and Lundgaard were on the same strategy all race, with Power coming up ahead in the closing half. The two were chased down by Alex Palou, who secured his third straight championship with a third-place finish. Power's last win came last year at Portland, when he was still within striking distance of stealing a championship away from Palou, in a less dominant year for the Chip Ganassi Racing driver. Since then, engine failures, tire failures, and Indy 500 controversies have kept Power from a race win. Power knows that it hasn't been pace that has been keeping Penske and the No. 12 team back. "I just think it's a big win for all the team, we've had a rough year, and it's not really because we've been off the pace, but it's just been unfortunate circumstances," Power told IndyCar on Fox. "I've had two engine failures, a tire failure, it was hard for the win. We picked that strategy to run hard and pull enough of a gap. It was a bit dicey at the end there." The first half of the race was marked by cautions and chaos, starting with Santino Ferrucci hard into the pit wall on the exit of the final corner of the first lap. Two A few laps later, pushing and shoving between Christian Rasmussen and Conor Daly ended when Rasmussen sent Daly into the wall in a brutal hit. On the third restart, Pato O'Ward fell off pace, suffering a failure that forced him to the pits with no power, ultimately ending his hopes of winning the 2025 IndyCar Championship. Ultimately, Tony Kanaan explained that the issue in the No. 5 Chevy was that a wire connected to O'Ward's engine injection box was vibrating, causing a short in the entire wire system, burning the box. In the closing half, Palou cut the lead from 20 seconds behind Power and Lundgaard on the alternative strategy to under 10 seconds. Lundgaard, who would go on to finish second, was the first of the three leaders to pit for the final time, coming back to the race track in eighth. Power followed with 29 laps remaining in the race to put on a pair of used reds (tires), as Lundgaard and Palou still had new reds to run in the closing segment. Power's teammate, Josef Newgarden, went around after contact with Scott Dixon with 26 laps to go, bringing out a local yellow as Lundgaard was gaining on Power for the lead. With 20 laps to go Power, Lundgaard and Palou are within 1.9 seconds of each other. Eleven laps later, with nine to go, the three were within a second of each other, with Palou holding on to almost double the amount of push-to-pass of the leaders, attempting to force them to use it. Palou made his move on Lundgaard with four laps to go and ran out of track, running off into the grass and rejoining the track still in third place ahead of Graham Rahal, who had his best race of 2025. Alexander Rossi completed the top five ahead of the Prema of Callum Ilott in sixth. Power's teammate Scott McLaughlin finished seventh ahead of Marcus Armstrong and Felix Rosenqvist, who fell to ninth after starting next to O'Ward on the front row. Colton Herta completed the top ten. You Might Also Like You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners The Man Who Signs Every Car