logo
How a stage-managed vote in China shaped my first real vote in Australia's federal election

How a stage-managed vote in China shaped my first real vote in Australia's federal election

Along with a record number of early voters, I have just cast my ballot in Australia's 2025 federal election — the first free vote of my life.
For most Australians, voting is a routine civic duty, often accompanied by sausage sizzles, crowded polling booths, and familiar arguments about which party will "fix" the economy.
For me, it was a moment that carried the weight of memory — and a hard-won freedom.
I was 16 years old when I cast my first vote at high school in China, after the school suddenly ordered all staff and students into the indoor stadium.
Later, I learned the vote was for a district representative to the Communist Youth League — a pathway towards membership of the ruling Communist Party.
The scene remains vivid in my mind: red curtains and flags covering the stage, and three giant red banners hanging from the ceiling, each bearing only a name.
Below them stood three large red boxes.
There were no speeches. No policies. No chance to ask questions.
As I stood there, trying to figure out who the candidates were, a teacher quietly moved through our ranks, telling us: vote for the second candidate.
So I did. We all did.
I wondered: if the outcome was already decided, why go through the motions?
Our textbooks told us China practised democracy. But here we were, performing a strange kind of theatre, where choice was an illusion and disobedience was almost impossible.
When I shared my confusion with my mother that evening, she simply laughed.
"Welcome to the real world,"
she said.
"One day you will see what a vote in Australia or the United States looks like."
But it wasn't until years later that I truly grasped the difference between democracy that is claimed —and democracy that is lived.
Peter Khalil, the Labor member for Wills, hands me my Australian citizen certificate.
(
Supplied: Bang Xiao
)
Democracy is not perfect
It was a simple act, over in a matter of minutes.
I walked into the early voting centre, showed my ID, collected my ballot papers and quietly filled them in.
Voting this week, in an ordinary suburban booth, I realised how extraordinary the ordinary can be.
Loading YouTube content
In my Melbourne electorate of Wills, cynicism runs high and trust in politicians wavers.
Yet beneath the noise and imperfections lies something precious: the genuine ability to choose.
My family back home was full of questions.
"Which person did you vote for the prime minister role?" my father asked eagerly.
I explained that Australia doesn't have a presidential system where the leader is elected directly, but rather a parliamentary one.
Read more about the federal election:
Want even more? Here's where you can find all our 2025
He sounded surprised. "I thought it was the same as the US election. Do Australians know that?" he asked.
I laughed. Not everyone, I said, but democracy here is like the air — so natural that people sometimes forget it exists.
In Australia, it is a quiet, living reality — present even when invisible, important even when overlooked.
In China, democracy was a chapter in a textbook.
My father sees the political chaos in the United States as evidence of democracy struggling.
The ongoing tariff war between Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump has led to broader questions about democracy and governance.
(
Reuters
)
Yet at the same time, he fully supported me becoming a citizen of a democratic country, even though the price was having to renounce my Chinese citizenship.
It's not a contradiction. It reflects a view common among many Chinese people: nothing is perfect, and very little in the world is black and white.
Some in Australia have also questioned whether democracy still "works".
The chaos of the US-China trade war deepened this conversation, not only within Chinese communities, but across the world.
The re-election of Donald Trump has triggered fierce debate: is democracy too chaotic? Is the Chinese model more stable, more efficient?
Photo shows
A crowd pulses through the city
The recent debate and policy approach highlights a deeper issue in how we view and treat those who come to Australia seeking better opportunities.
Some went further, suggesting the United States was undergoing its own "Cultural Revolution", amid rising polarisation, political violence, and distrust in institutions.
It is tempting, sometimes, to draw parallels.
Democracies can look messy. They can fail to deliver clear outcomes. They can feel broken.
But standing in that voting booth, I was reminded of how different it feels when you have lived under an authoritarian system.
You cannot compare a system where leaders change by force to one where leaders change by votes.
You cannot compare a system where the public has no real voice to one where every vote counts.
No, democracy is not perfect. But democracy is not about perfection.
It is about the right of participation.
It is about the right to question, to choose, and to be heard.
I arrived in Australia in 2007 as an international student, and in 2023, I finally began the journey towards citizenship.
(
Supplied
)
AI is a game-changer for first-time voters
New Australians like me — especially migrants who have come from vastly different political systems — have often been viewed as a "wildcard" in elections.
Historically, we have been seen as less politically engaged, or easily swayed by cultural or linguistic barriers.
But the 2025 federal election tells a more complicated story.
For many new Australians, the journey towards full political participation is no longer filled with as many obstacles as before.
Most people in the community have not had the opportunity, like me, to cover multiple elections as a journalist.
For many, the ballot paper can still feel intimidating.
Photo shows
The blue-and-white Vote compass logo: The words, with a tick through the "o" of "Vote".
The ABC's Vote Compass can help you understand your place in the political landscape.
Long lists of candidates. Complicated instructions. Political parties that often communicate in broad slogans rather than clear policies.
For voters whose first language is not English, understanding the nuances of party platforms and policy debates requires extra effort.
But this time, something was different: artificial intelligence is helping.
From Chinese-language voter guides to AI translations and digital campaigns on WeChat and Xiaohongshu, AI is playing a role in keeping new voters informed in their own language.
The community is as diverse and dynamic as any other.
Younger generations, in particular, are dramatically less tied to the traditional leanings of their parents and grandparents.
They are navigating Australian politics on their own terms.
Though technology has its dark sides, it doesn't only make voting easier.
It also helps break the language barrier, making an informed vote a more powerful one.
The first vote with a tough moment
Photo shows
Collage of Australian politicians on Red.
Of Red's 150 million active users, almost 700,000 are based in Australia. That presents both opportunities and risks for Australian politicians.
Even my first vote in Australia came with an unexpected complication.
When I arrived at the early voting centre to film my experience as a journalist, I was genuinely excited.
I wanted to capture the moment — not just for myself, but for others who might relate to the feeling of casting a real vote for the first time.
But that excitement quickly turned into something else. A volunteer stopped me and asked me not to record.
It was a fair request — but what followed was a surprise.
She asked to see my press pass, then scoffed and claimed she could make a similar one herself.
Then she yelled at me to leave, threatening to call the police.
I stopped filming immediately and spoke to the Australian Electoral Commission's on-site manager, who came over to explain that I had a media appointment with their team.
But the woman refused to listen and told me to "go away".
I didn't feel trusted — not as a voter, and not as a journalist.
But I knew not everyone was like that.
A few people in the line smiled and congratulated me on voting for the first time.
That kindness meant a lot.
Democracy isn't just about voting. For people from a minority background like me, it's about being seen — as part of the public we all belong to.
In both China and Australia, my first voting experiences came with something I didn't expect — being present, but not fully seen.
As I placed my ballot into the box, I thought again of that day nearly 20 years ago — standing under three giant banners, confused and obedient.
At least this time, there was no one telling me what to do.
No predetermined outcome. No fear. Just a simple choice.
Voting doesn't make a country perfect, but it makes change possible.
It makes hope real.
And for new Australians like me, it is the quiet proof that democracy — for all its flaws, frustrations, and noise — is still something worth believing in.
Loading
Having problems seeing this form? Try
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Get on with the job' after failed bid to turf premier
'Get on with the job' after failed bid to turf premier

Perth Now

time25 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

'Get on with the job' after failed bid to turf premier

Tasmania's returned minority Liberal premier has declared he wants to get on the with job after a snap election and weeks of political uncertainty. Jeremy Rockliff received parliament's green light to continue governing on Tuesday afternoon when a Labor bid to seize power via a no-confidence motion fell spectacularly flat. Neither the Liberals (14 seats) or Labor (10) reached the required 18 seats needed for majority at the July 19 election. Labor, which has been in opposition for 11 years, tried to unseat Mr Rockliff as premier and install its leader Dean Winter in the role on parliament's first day back. But none of the cross bench, which includes five Greens, five independents and one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP, backed Mr Winter's motion. Several crossbenchers lashed Mr Winter for a lack of compromise during negotiations and for still moving a motion that was doomed to fail after the Greens ruled out support on Monday. The Greens and several independents noted they lacked faith in the Liberals, but has less faith that Labor could form a workable government. First-term independent and former journalist Peter George said Labor had undermined the very notion of collaboration by not shifting on any of its policies. "In my years of reporting politics, which stretch back to the Whitlam years, never have I come across an opposition party less ready for government," he said. Labor received its worst primary vote in more than a century at the election and suffered a 3.1 per cent swing against it. Mr Rockliff, who has presided over a minority government since 2023, said MPs had learnt a lot in recent weeks. "The time to get on with the job, to work together in the best interests of Tasmania, starts right now," he said. The Liberals made several policy concessions to a largely progressive cross bench, including a ban on greyhound racing and a review examining the state's salmon industry. Mr Winter accused Mr Rockliff of selling out jobs and doing anything to stay in power. Mr Rockliff defended the concessions as an acknowledgement of the minority situation. The snap election, Tasmania's fourth in seven years, was triggered after Mr Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion in June criticising the state's ballooning budget debt. The Greens offered at that point to work with Labor to form government, but Mr Winter refused.

Disability funding reforms trigger 'so many questions'
Disability funding reforms trigger 'so many questions'

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Disability funding reforms trigger 'so many questions'

Long-term concerns about an overhaul of the NDIS are still unanswered, disability advocates say, as they wait for a major update on the multibillion-dollar scheme from the man in charge. Disability Minister Mark Butler will deliver an address at the National Press Club on Wednesday on the future of the NDIS, a year after major reforms to curb spiralling spending passed federal parliament. The scheme is the budget's third-largest expense and is set to cost taxpayers more than $52 billion in 2025/26. The NDIS reforms include a cap of eight per cent growth in spending per year. But the changes had not fully hit the mark, People with Disability Australia deputy chief executive Megan Spindler-Smith said. "There's still so many questions unanswered about what the reform will look like long-term," she told AAP. "Is it on people with disability and their needs, or other things that are not necessarily focusing on what we need?" Of the estimated 5.5 million people in Australia living with disability, the NDIS covers fewer than 700,000. "We would love to see consistency across how people are able to access their support needs, regardless of whether or not they're able to be a participant with the NDIS or not," Ms Spindler-Smith said. Commitments to funding individual advocacy and foundational supports should be important points of discussion for the minister, Disability Advocacy Network Australia chief executive David Petherington said. "They're really desperately needed by people with disabilities," he told AAP. Every Australian Counts chair and NDIS participant George Taleporos said participants and their families must be included to co-design reforms. "Too often we face bureaucratic barriers and decisions that do not reflect our needs or our voices," he told AAP. Foundational supports include information and advice, disability employment supports, peer support and self-advocacy. Mr Butler's speech at the National Press Club follows the federal government's announcement of an NDIS Reform Advisory Committee on Tuesday to oversee how the laws are implemented. NDIS Minister Jenny McAllister said the committee would ensure changes to the scheme were implemented with "transparency, integrity and accountability". "Australians with disability, and those who care for them, deserve no less," she said.

Push to recognise overseas qualifications before unions and business clash on tax
Push to recognise overseas qualifications before unions and business clash on tax

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Push to recognise overseas qualifications before unions and business clash on tax

Nurses, engineers and other immigrants with qualifications from overseas would be able to work in Australia under a proposal that won support at Tuesday's economic roundtable as unions and bosses jousted over a bid to slap a new tax on businesses. Treasurer Jim Chalmers hailed the first day of the three-day Canberra talkfest as a moment of consensus on skills reform, prompting Labor to do an about-face and start drafting a joint statement of intent after last week downplaying expectations of any international summit-style statement. As Chalmers prepared to oversee disputes over artificial intelligence at Wednesday's session, he lauded the collaboration of economists, captains of industry and workers' representatives, who he said had 'really risen to the occasion'. But other sources in the closed-off cabinet room said the meeting was highly stage-managed. 'No one is challenging anyone,' one participant said on the condition of anonymity. Former Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe launched a significant attack on Labor's economic record, saying in a clip released as the roundtable began that Chalmers had spent more at a time when restraint was needed to bring down inflation. 'After COVID, we haven't really got back to a clearly articulated framework for decision-making with fiscal policy,' Lowe said in a video recorded a month ago and released on Tuesday by the University of NSW and think tank e61. Noting that higher interest rates were the chief tool used to tackle inflation, Lowe said 'exercising discipline is not popular, and exercising restraint is not popular. It's much easier for the political class to say, if things need to slow, we'll get the central bank to do that with interest rates, and they can, they can take the blame.' At the roundtable, there was broad backing for slashing another tranche of so-called 'nuisance tariffs' – tiny charges on imports which add to compliance costs and consumer prices. But trade union bosses at the high-profile talkfest, including the ACTU's Sally McManus, raised concerns about acknowledging some foreign degrees and warned that industries would need to be protected if tariffs were removed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store