‘No sentencing in POSCO case, victim did not see it as crime': Supreme Court delivers ruling using Article 142
Livemint
Published 23 May 2025, 01:16 PM IST
'No sentencing in POCSO case; victim did not see it as a crime, living together with accused as a couple' : Supreme Court delivers landmark ruling using its extraordinary powers under Article 142, as reported by NDTV.
(This is a breaking news)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC stays trial against former Haryana IAS officer in Manesar land case
The Supreme Court has stayed trial proceedings against former Haryana IAS officer Rajeev Arora in the Manesar land deal, investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The former IAS officer had petitioned the apex court after his revision petition challenging his summoning by a special CBI court was dismissed by the Punjab and Haryana high court on May 15. A special CBI court had on December 1, 2020 ordered that the former IAS officer be summoned to face trial for committing offence under section 120-B read with 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in the Manesar land matter. However, on a revision petition filed by Arora, the Punjab and Haryana high court on December 14, 2020 had stayed the operation and implementation of the order of the special CBI court. Rejecting the challenge to the special CBI court's December 1, 2020 order, the HC on May15 said it found no illegality or infirmity in the order passed by learned special CBI court in summoning the petitioners. An apex court bench headed by chief justice BR Gavai, however, on May 29 ordered that notice be issued to the respondents and 'proceedings qua the petitioner (Rajeev Arora) shall stand stayed till the next date of hearing.' During the trial court proceedings on Friday, Special CBI judge, Rajeev Goyal while referring to the apex court's order of May 29 ordered that proceedings against all the accused persons except Rajeev Arora shall commence. The special court in its June 6 order noted that it is, therefore, seen that all the accused except accused Dhare Singh, Kulwant Singh Lamba, DR Dhingra and Rajeev Arora, have been ordered to be charge-sheeted qua the offences as detailed in the order December 1, 2020. The court said that now arguments need to be advanced on charges in respect of accused Dhare Singh, Kulwant Singh Lamba and DR Dhingra. Learned defence counsels seek time to prepare the arguments. Learned senior public prosecutor Harsh Mohan Singh submits that charge-sheet may kindly be framed against the accused persons who have already been ordered to be charge-sheeted vide order dated December 1,2020. 'I am not able to accept the submission made by the senior public prosecutor as it will not be appropriate to frame charge-sheet before considering the case concerning framing of charges in respect of accused Dhare Singh, Kulwant Singh Lamba and DR Dhingra. In case, the court after hearing contentions of the said accused persons and senior public prosecutor for CBI, concludes that charges are required to be framed against said accused persons as well, then a consolidated charge-sheet qua all the accused persons shall be framed and in my opinion, it will be more appropriate if such a course is adopted, for framing charge-sheet in a piecemeal manner is not desirable. As such, to come up on July 10, 2025 for arguments on charge qua accused Dhare Singh, Kulwant Singh Lamba and DR Dhingra,'' ordered the special court.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
POCSO court in Gujarat's Mehsana awards life imprisonment to father for raping minor daughter
A Special Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) court in Mehsana district on Friday sentenced a 51-year-old man to rigorous imprisonment for life for repeatedly raping and impregnating his 17-year-old daughter by threatening to kill her and the rest of the family. Awarding the punishment to the accused in the case, the court held that the POCSO Act legislature could 'also not have a reason to think that any father can be an accused' under the Act. Stating that the crime is 'unique and serious', the court said, '…this is a very unfortunate moment that this court had to try this case where an accused under POCSO Act is the father of the victim girl… This court has no words to describe its anguish against the heinous act of this accused… During the whole period of trial the body language of the accused was also observed by this court… no sign of sorrow or (repentance) was there… This court is speechless and really shocked to come across such a case.' The prosecution's case was that in April 2024, the brother of the victim approached the Mehsana district police to lodge an FIR as the victim, who had been taken to a hospital after she complained of stomach pain, was found to be pregnant. The complainant informed the police that the victim had confided in him that her father had raped her and threatened to kill her and the rest of the family members if she complained about the incident. Accordingly, the accused was booked under Indian Penal Code sections for rape, criminal intimidation and under relevant sections of the POCSO Act. 'During deposition of the victim … she repeatedly said that she couldn't believe that her own father had raped her… Accused had threatened the victim. This court is really worried for the future of this victim girl.' The court also awarded a compensation of Rs 5 lakh to the victim under the Gujarat Victim Compensation Fund.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
UP shocker: Army man arrested for alleged rape of colleague's minor daughter in Meerut cantonment; probe on
MEERUT: A 45-year-old havildar in the Army, a non-commissioned officer, was arrested by UP police for allegedly raping the minor daughter of a fellow serviceman at the army quarters within the Meerut Cantonment area, as stated in the FIR. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The FIR further reads that the victim is a 17-year-old Class 12 student. According to the FIR, a copy of which is with TOI stated, "The incident took place on the night of June 3, between 12 to 2am. The minor stepped out of her quarter to stroll when the accused forcefully dragged her to his house and violated her." The traumatised girl, upon returning home, recounted the horrific ordeal to her parents, who were left in shock. Following this, the victim approached Meerut police on June 4, and an FIR was lodged under BNS Section 64 (rape) and relevant POCSO sections. The accused and the victim's father are reportedly stationed in the same unit in Meerut. Initially, the accused was absconding but was eventually arrested late Friday night. He is scheduled to be presented before the court on Saturday. A senior police official, requesting not to be named, said, "We lodged an FIR against the accused and are investigating the case thoroughly." (The victim's identity has not been revealed to protect her privacy as per Supreme Court directives on cases related to sexual assault)
