Interview with Gardiner Harris, author of The Dark Secrets of Johnson & Johnson
The book is a hard hitting expose on what went on at J&J, the pharma major, and it uncovers the secrets across the company's repertoire of drugs and products from baby powder, Tylenol, Risperdal (antipsychotic), EPO (a cancer drug), metal-on-metal hip implants, among others, all adversely impacting the health of users. Chillingly, the company continued to market them, fully cognisant of the harmful effects. In a conversation, Harris, an investigative reporter himself, describes the Herculean task he took on, and what he was up against.
In conversation with Gardiner Harris
Among all the violations that you have chronicled, what did you think was the most egregious?
J&J, early on, would find out that its product was dangerous, and would hide those dangers not only from the public, but from the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and other regulatory agencies, knowing that it could result in a number of deaths. I estimate that at least 2 million Americans alone died from using J&J products. So it really is hard to rank order. But the worst of the worst, just in terms of sheer numbers, would probably be Risperdal. Epidemiological analysis shows that it is probably one of the most deadly drugs that has ever been sold in the U.S. It is sold to children, even though it causes boys to grow breasts and young girls to express milk. And again, the company hid those risks, lied about them in publications.
You have written about how you grew up in a J&J town. How did you move on from that to investigating the company?
I spent part of my growing up years in Princeton, New Jersey, right next to New Brunswick, where J&J is headquartered. There was a sense, growing up, that it was really a capitalistic ideal -- this was a company that both did well financially and did good in in society, and that it was seen as a sort of mom, apple pie and America all rolled into one. So when I first got the pharmaceutical beat, when I worked for The Wall Street Journal, I expected to have a wonderful time covering J&J. But my interactions with them were just the opposite and it surprised me that they were the least open with reporters, the most secretive.
When the AIDS crisis in Africa hit at the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century, the scandal around the pricing of drugs led many U.S. pharma companies to agree to allow generics companies to sell drugs in Africa. J&J was the only major manufacturer of AIDS drugs that refused to allow that. I couldn't believe it. I thought there must be some mistake, but in story after story, the image of this company ended up being entirely the opposite of what we had believed so long.
It probably hit me hardest when my own first son was born. He was born early and ended up spending days in the NICU. Soon after, I got a whole bunch of documents on J&J's heartburn drug Propulsid. Even though the company had done 20 clinical trials in children and infants, each one of which had failed to show that there was a benefit; the company nonetheless underwrote a marketing programme to sell them to infants. Not only did this drug not help these children, but it caused a QT prolongation, which is a heart arrhythmia, and for newborns, and particularly for preemies, a heart arrhythmia can be fatal.
What was J&J's response to the book?
I did cover the company for many years, I knew a lot of the executives and I certainly knew how to reach out to the company. As soon as I got the contract for this book, I told them that I'm writing this book and I would love for them to participate in it. But J&J had the same reaction it had had throughout my career -- which is to stonewall, not talk to me, not participate, and hope the story goes away.
Did you, at some time, feel a bit like Erin Brockovich?
I never looked that good; it's tough competing with Julia Roberts! But what was difficult about this process was just how dark it was, and how depressing the work often was. I spent more than five years writing this book and I go to church quite regularly. I found that I really needed that outlet throughout this process, even more than normal because I found I needed to appeal to God to help me through this, because you can lose hope. For me, it's just a very dark tale and I am thrilled, and surprised, actually, that it's gotten as many readers as it has.
Do you think that the FDA, as a regulatory agency, could have done better?
The portrait I paint of the FDA is one of real feckless disregard for protecting the public. Unfortunately, the FDA is largely funded by drug makers by what are known as user fees. The result of that is that the FDA has become captive to the very industry that it regulates. When I talk about baby powder, for instance, people had petitioned the FDA repeatedly to mandate a cancer warning on all products with talcum powder, and this would have included Johnson's baby powder. The FDA refused to answer those petitions until finally J&J lost its first baby powder case, and then suddenly, the FDA had to answer these petitions; it did so in the negative and claimed that the baby powder was fine.
In the U.S., it was the drug kingpin when it came to opioids and the FDA got a lot of criticism of its oversight of opioids. To deal with that criticism, the agency actually hired a former FDA commissioner who served on the board of directors for J&J for the previous dozen years. So, to advise the agency on how to deal with this crisis that was created by J&J, it hired a top J&J person!
How did you decide on your chosen style for the book, an engaging, but investigative journalistic piece?
I have to say, you know, as I said, the book was nearly twice as long and I ended up hiring an editor to help me not only on the decisions about which products to include in the end, but also about the style. The original version of the book had had more personal stuff and my years as a reporter covering the company. But my editors thought the reader needed a really neutral voice in telling this story. The only way that it can work is to be told in a very low-key, neutral way.
In your view, was there was a turning point when J&J could have reversed things?
I really think it was that period in the early 1980s and perhaps the late 1970s. It was Johnson's baby powder in particular, that provided the ladder down which the company itself descended into real darkness.
The Dark Secrets of Johnson & Johnson Gardiner Harris Ebury Press ₹899
ramya.kannan@thehindu.co.in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Over 29,000 Kg Of Butter Recalled In US For This Serious Reason
More than 29,000 kilos (64,800 pounds) of butter have been voluntarily recalled after it was discovered the packaging forgot to mention a crucial detail - it contains milk. Milk in butter might sound obvious, right? But when it is not listed on the label and someone with a milk allergy unknowingly consumes it, things can get serious real quick. On July 30, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classified the recall as a 'Class II' level. That is one notch below the most urgent level. According to the FDA website, a Class II recall refers to "a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote." Here, a 'recall' is a safety step to remove or correct a product that is not meeting regulatory standards or could harm consumers. The butter being recalled is from Bunge North America Inc., a food company based in Missouri. On July 14, they voluntarily recalled 1,800 cases of their NH European Style Butter Blend (500 gm packs). Each case had 36 blocks of butter, packed in white paperboard boxes. The problem? Milk, a major food allergen, wasn't mentioned anywhere on the product label. The company said the recalled butter was sent to 12 distribution centres across the US and one in the Dominican Republic. So far, there is no official word from the FDA on whether anyone has fallen ill from eating the product. Allergen labelling rules are in place for a reason. As the FDA explains, food-related allergic reactions can range from mild (like hives, vomiting, diarrhoea or lip swelling) to severe, life-threatening ones like anaphylaxis. That is when the immune system goes into overdrive and releases a flood of chemicals, sending the body into shock. This is potentially fatal if not treated quickly. Because of such risks, the FDA enforces strict regulations to make sure allergens are clearly declared on packaging. The FDA advises that if someone with a milk allergy has already eaten the butter and is experiencing symptoms, "stop eating the food immediately, evaluate the need to use emergency medication (such as epinephrine) and seek medical attention." Butter is made from cream, not straight from plain milk. The cream is separated, pasteurised, then churned until fat separates and forms butter. That clumpy fat is processed, washed, worked, sometimes salted, and packaged into the block you buy. Earlier this week, High Noon Hard Seltzers were recalled after a labelling mix-up led to some vodka-filled cans being mistakenly packaged as non-alcoholic Celsius Astro Vibe Energy Drink. Read all about it here.
Hindustan Times
16 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
FDA recalls butter across US: What Class II warning means, which product has been recalled
Beware while buttering your toasts as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently escalated a nationwide butter recall to Class II, a higher risk level. The butter recall for 64,800 lbs (or 1,800 cases) was initially issued by Bunge North America Inc. Image for representation(Pixabay) The risk classification was raised by the FDA on Wednesday, July 30. Why was butter recall issued and who is to blame? The butter recall for 64,800 lbs (or 1,800 cases) was issued by Bunge North America Inc, which is based out of Chesterfield, Missouri. The product that has been recalled is its European Style Butter Blend 1 lb. The voluntary recall came on July 14, and has now been escalated by the government entity. The company said it was recalling the product because milk was undeclared and not listed on the product label. The lot code number for the butter is 5064036503. Milk is one of the nine food allergens as per the FDA site. Food-related allergies can vary in symptoms ranging from face and lip swelling to vomiting. However, there is also the risk of severe reactions like anaphylaxis, where the immune system could release a 'flood of chemicals' which could make a person go into shock and end up being fatal for them, Mayo Clinic said. As per the FDA, they enforce regulations to avoid such situations and they said there are 'more specific labeling requirements' for foods that can cause allergies and other hypersensitive reactions. What does FDA's Cass II warning mean? As per the FDA site, a Class II recall indicates 'a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote'. They advised people, that if anyone has consumed the product and starts to feel something is not right, they should 'stop eating the food immediately, evaluate the need to use emergency medication (such as epinephrine) and seek medical attention.'
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
FDA butter recall: Over 64,000 pounds of butter recalled due to ‘life-threatening' milk allergen risk, warning issued
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has raised the alert level on a major butter recall involving 64,800 pounds of Bunge North America Inc.'s NH European Style Butter Blend, citing the undeclared presence of milk, a known major allergen that poses potentially life‑threatening risks to consumers with milk allergies. Recall details and timeline The recall was voluntarily initiated on July 14 by Bunge North America Inc., headquartered in Chesterfield, Missouri, due to a failure to declare milk on the ingredient label. The FDA elevated the recall to a Class II classification, its second‑highest alert level, on July 30, signaling that exposure may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health effects, with only a remote chance of serious harm. What has been recalled Affected product: NH European Style Butter Blend in one‑pound blocks. Lot code: 5064036503. Packaging: white paperboard cases containing 36 blocks per case; total of about 1,800 cases, equating to approximately 64,800 lbs. Distribution: 12 centers across the US and one center in the Dominican Republic. As of early August, no confirmed illnesses or hospitalizations have been reported in connection with the recall. Risk from milk allergens Consuming milk allergens can lead to a range of reactions, from mild digestive issues to severe, life-threatening anaphylactic shock. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mix 3 Kitchen Ingredients, Wake Up Thinner Every Morning Get Fit Today Click Here Undo Common symptoms include hives, vomiting, stomach cramps, and diarrhea. In some cases, milk allergy can trigger anaphylaxis, which requires immediate medical attention. Here's a detailed breakdown: Allergic reactions: Milk allergy is a common food allergy, particularly in children. It involves the immune system mistakenly identifying milk proteins (like casein and whey) as harmful and launching an attack. This can result in various symptoms: Mild to moderate: Hives, itching, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach cramps, and skin rashes. Severe: Anaphylaxis, a potentially fatal reaction characterized by difficulty breathing, wheezing, throat swelling, dizziness, and a drop in blood pressure. Lactose intolerance: Many individuals lack sufficient lactase, the enzyme needed to break down lactose, the sugar found in milk. This can lead to: Digestive issues: Abdominal cramps, bloating, diarrhea, and gas. Other potential issues: Skin problems: Some studies suggest dairy consumption can exacerbate acne and other skin conditions. Hormonal influence: Dairy cows are sometimes given hormones, which may have an impact on the human endocrine system. Notably, the severity of reactions to milk allergens can differ significantly from person to person, and while many children outgrow milk allergy, some may need to avoid milk products throughout their lives. FDA regulations Milk is one of the nine major allergens defined by US law, alongside eggs, peanuts, tree nuts, soybeans, wheat, fish, shellfish, and sesame. The FDA enforces strict labeling requirements under the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA), and milk remains the most frequent factor behind undeclared allergen recalls in dairy and processed foods. Undeclared milk can provoke reactions ranging from mild itchy hives, vomiting, or lip swelling to anaphylaxis, a severe, life‑threatening immune response that demands immediate medical attention. Consumer recommendations Consumers who purchased NH European Style Butter Blend with lot code 5064036503 are urged to stop consuming the product immediately. Those with a known milk allergy or sensitivity should look for the product in their homes and discard it or return it for a refund. If allergic symptoms occur, such as swelling of the face, throat tightness, difficulty breathing, hives, vomiting, or dizziness, consumers are urged to seek medical care immediately and use emergency medication like epinephrine if prescribed. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
