logo
CNN pundit Van Jones shames liberal colleagues for their Iran comments

CNN pundit Van Jones shames liberal colleagues for their Iran comments

Daily Mail​4 hours ago

CNN 's Van Jones blasted liberals for 'underestimating' the threat posed by Iran, hours before the US bombed the nation's nuclear facilities.
The former Obama aide made the remarks on CNN's Saturday Morning Table for Five, in a discussion that included Republican commentator Scott Jennings, ex-Biden aide Dan Koh and conservative commentator S.E. Cupp.
Both Koh and Cupp had expressed disapproval of President Donald Trump's decision-making leading up to the attack.
This earned a stern rebuke from Jones, who demanded that progressives 'get on board' with Trump's position.
'I think progressives underestimate how dangerous Iran is,' he began, as Jennings, fresh off a trip to Israel, nodded his head in approval.
'Iran is not a normal country. Normal countries don't blind women because they showed some hair.
'They don't empower little gangs and proxies to surround a country and fire rockets and rape people,' he continued.
'Two things are clear: the what - they cannot have a bomb.'
'And the why: because they say, "Death to America. Death to Israel. And death to all the Jews."
'One of those should offend you - if you're progressives. At least one should offend you.'
He then turned to the 'who' and 'how' of the conflict.
'Is Israel going to take out this nuclear capacity by dropping people there who blow it up?' Jones asked.
'Or is America going to take it out by dropping a bomb that blows it up?'
Pleading for a preemptive strike that soon came to pass, Jones then turned back to 'the what and the why' of the situation, which he said was quite 'clear.'
'We cannot have a nuclear armed Iran,' he said.
'I was in the region. You were in the region,' Jones said, motioning to Jennings.
'This is a very dangerous power that cannot get a nuclear weapon.
'Progressives should get on board with that.'
That evening, Jones words proved prophetic, with the US attacking several known nuclear facilities in Iran.
The move - made a little over a week after Israel claimed Iran had been close to obtaining nuclear weapons - sparked pushback from both sides of the aisle.
Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie slammed it as 'not Constitutional,' since it was made without the approval of Congress.
'This is not about the merits of Iran's nuclear program. No president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the US without the approval of Congress,' added Democratic Rep. Sean Casten of Illinois, calling the bombings 'an unambiguous impeachable offense.'
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez - one of the fiercest critics of Israel - unsurprisingly agreed.
'The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers,' the New York Democrat said.
'He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations,' she went on, also calling the order 'grounds for impeachment.'
The president, meanwhile, deployed B-2 stealth bombersin the attack, after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran.
On Friday, Trump said he was going to wait two weeks before deciding whether to enter the conflict.
Iran has since promised to respond, after saying the strikes on the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites constituted the US 'enter[ing] the war clearly and directly'.
The country is currently weighing its military options. It launched a new wave of missiles and drones against Israel Monday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: Americans worry conflict with Iran could escalate, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
Exclusive: Americans worry conflict with Iran could escalate, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

Reuters

time30 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Exclusive: Americans worry conflict with Iran could escalate, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

WASHINGTON, June 23 (Reuters) - Americans are anxious over a brewing conflict between the U.S. and Iran and worry the violence could escalate after President Donald Trump ordered the bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Monday. Some 79% of Americans surveyed said they worried "that Iran may target U.S. civilians in response to the U.S. airstrikes." The three-day poll, which began after the U.S. airstrikes and ended early Monday before Iran said it attacked a U.S. air base in Qatar, showed Americans were similarly concerned about their country's military personnel stationed in the Middle East. Some 84% said they worried in general about the growing conflict. The poll, which surveyed 1,139 U.S. adults nationwide, underscored deep divisions in America over what Washington should do next and highlighted the political risks faced by Trump, whose presidential approval rating fell to 41%, the lowest level of his current term in office that began in January. The poll had a 3 percentage point margin of error. The U.S. bombing took place just two days ago and the public's view of the conflict could evolve in the days and weeks ahead. Only 32% of respondents said they supported continued U.S. airstrikes, compared to 49% who said they were opposed. However, within Trump's Republican Party, 62% backed further strikes and 22% were opposed. Republicans were more deeply divided when asked if they supported an immediate end to U.S. involvement in the conflict with Iran, with 42% saying Washington should end its involvement now and 40% opposed to the idea. Significant majorities of Democrats were opposed to bombing Iran further and in favor of ending the conflict immediately. Trump ordered the U.S. military to bomb Iran's nuclear sites on Saturday, a dramatic and risky shift in foreign policy following repeated pledges by Trump to avoid military interventions in major foreign wars. The president's overall approval rating, down 1 percentage point from 42% earlier in the month, has largely held steady in recent months, but is below the 47% reading in a Reuters/Ipsos poll just after he returned to the White House.

Watch: Eyewitness captures possible missiles in Qatar skies on video
Watch: Eyewitness captures possible missiles in Qatar skies on video

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Watch: Eyewitness captures possible missiles in Qatar skies on video

Eyewitness footage captured possible missiles in Qatar 's skies after the country's airspace was closed on Monday, 23 June. Iran launched missile strikes on a US base in the country after it vowed to retaliate against Washington for bombing its nuclear facilities on Sunday. Iran informed the US via two diplomatic channels hours ahead of the attacks in Qatar, a senior regional source told Reuters. It comes after American officials said Donald Trump was 'simply raising a question' after the US president entertained the idea of a regime change in Tehran following his claim he had taken a nuclear bomb 'right out of Iran's hands'.

Rights groups warn Gaza Humanitarian Foundation it may be liable for international law violations
Rights groups warn Gaza Humanitarian Foundation it may be liable for international law violations

The Guardian

time30 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Rights groups warn Gaza Humanitarian Foundation it may be liable for international law violations

Fifteen international human rights organisations have called on the Israel- and US-backed Gaza food delivery group, Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), and other private groups running humanitarian aid delivery in Gaza to cease their operations or face legal consequences. In a letter sent on Monday to GHF and the affiliated Safe Reach Solutions and UG Solutions, the rights advocates warned that private contractors operating in Gaza in collaboration with the Israeli government risk 'aiding and abetting or otherwise being complicit in crimes under international law, including war crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide'. They also noted that the contractors may be liable under US law and in other jurisdictions. The letter marks the latest warning against GHF, which has been mired in controversy since replacing most UN-run relief operations in Gaza. Major aid groups have boycotted it and accused it of violating the principles of neutrality and independence that are bedrocks of humanitarian work. GHF did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The rollout of GHF operations over the last three weeks – after a two-month blockade on most aid entering Gaza that has pushed the territory's 2.1 million residents to the verge of famine – has been deadly. Scores of Palestinians seeking food aid have been killed by Israeli forces in chaotic scenes surrounding four privately run distribution hubs a UN official has described as 'death traps'. 'GHF's militarized model, coupled with its close collaboration with Israeli authorities, undermines the core humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence,' the letter sent Monday warned. 'We urge all parties involved – State actors, corporate entities, donors and individuals – to immediately suspend any action or support that facilitates the forcible displacement of civilians, contributes to starvation or other grave breaches of international law, or undermines the core principles of international humanitarian law.' Earlier this month, the US-based Center for Constitutional Rights had warned in a separate letter to Johnnie Moore, the evangelical leader and Trump adviser appointed to run the foundation after its former head resigned, that he and other GHF representatives may face civil litigation or criminal prosecution. 'Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed in the weeks since GHF began its dehumanizing, militarized 'distribution hubs' in coordination with Israeli forces,' said Katherine Gallagher, a senior staff attorney at CCR, which also signed onto the most recent letter. 'If it continues its deadly, militarized operations, legal consequences will follow, whether in the United States or beyond.' Raji Sourani, director of the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, another signatory, said it is 'immoral and inhuman when those committing the genocide take responsibility to feed those whom they have starved'. 'They are using the GHF to humiliate, degrade and kill daily tens of starving people,' he added, referring to Israel. Last week, US senator Elizabeth Warren questioned the Trump administration's proposal to redirect $500m from USAID, which the administration has gutted, to GHF, which is registered in the US and Switzerland. 'The questions surrounding GHF – its funding sources and connection to the Trump Administration, its use of private contractors, its ability to serve and be seen as a neutral entity, its abandonment by its founders, and its basic competence in providing aid – must be answered before the State Department commits any funding to the organization,' Warren wrote. Human rights and humanitarian groups across the world have denounced the replacement of independent, long-established humanitarian relief operations by private, militarized groups and called for UN-operated relief efforts to be allowed in the strip again. 'This is not how you avert famine,' James Elder, Unicef's global spokesperson, wrote in the Guardian. 'There is no need to reinvent the wheel. We delivered aid at scale during the ceasefire, and we can do it again. We just need to be allowed to do our jobs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store