New SCARP process eases popular restaurant's post-Covid recovery
Big Mike's, a seafood-focused restaurant located in Blackrock, Co Dublin, underwent formal restructuring in 2025 through Ireland's Small Companies Administrative Rescue Process (SCARP).
The process, introduced in 2021, is designed to support small and micro businesses facing short-term financial pressure by enabling them to reorganise outside of the courts.
The restaurant is part of the Michael's group, founded by chef and restaurateur Gaz Smith. Delays related to the pandemic meant Big Mike's opened later than planned, and fit-out costs exceeded original estimates. Despite strong customer demand, the business encountered ongoing cash flow pressure as a result of rising input costs and residual liabilities from the build.
Smith publicly acknowledged the situation, noting, 'I put everything into Big Mike's. Even my house deposit.' Rather than allow conditions to deteriorate further, management appointed a process adviser and initiated the SCARP process. The goal was to restructure debt, stabilise operations and protect employment.
SCARP was selected over examinership due to its suitability for smaller businesses. It avoids court proceedings in most cases and is completed within a seven-week statutory period.
According to Barbara Galvin, partner at William Fry, the process is underutilised but well-suited to companies like Big Mike's.
'SCARP is for businesses that are in trouble but still have something worth saving,' she says. 'It is not a wind-down mechanism. It is about early action and recovery.' Under the process, an insolvency practitioner reviews the company's position, prepares a plan, and presents it to creditors for approval. If sufficient support is secured, the plan proceeds without the need for court involvement. At Big Mike's, this was achieved with minimal disruption.
Key to the outcome was the business's proactive engagement with stakeholders. Smith communicated openly with suppliers, staff and customers throughout, which helped maintain relationships and facilitate agreement on the restructuring plan.
'He was open with people from the beginning,' Galvin says. 'That transparency helped maintain relationships and made it easier to secure support for the plan.' Following creditor approval, the plan was implemented, and Big Mike's exited the process while remaining fully operational. No court hearing was required. The restaurant retained staff and continued to serve its customer base without interruption.
'This is a clear example of SCARP working as intended,' Galvin says. 'It was a viable business, but overextended. The process allowed it to restructure and recover.' The case highlights the importance of early action, clear communication and appropriate legal frameworks. Management acted before the situation became unmanageable, allowing for a structured solution. Suppliers and creditors supported the process in the belief that the business could succeed long-term.
Despite SCARP's proven utility, uptake has been limited. Galvin attributes this to cultural hesitation and a lack of awareness.
'There is still a stigma around business rescue in Ireland,' she says. 'But SCARP is a practical tool. It allows businesses to survive financial shocks without entering costly and complex legal proceedings.' Big Mike's is one of a small but growing number of companies to use SCARP effectively. The case demonstrates that with timely decision-making and professional support, small firms can manage financial challenges without resorting to liquidation.
'If you wait too long, there may be nothing left to save,' Galvin says. 'SCARP only works if the fundamentals are still intact.' The experience at Big Mike's underscores the value of structured rescue frameworks and provides a real-world example of what successful business recovery can look like in practice.
Key Lessons from Big Mike's:
Act early: Management initiated the process before operations became unsustainable. Early engagement was essential.
Communicate Clearly: Smith's transparent communication helped preserve confidence among staff, customers and creditors.
Use the right framework: SCARP was more suitable than examinership, given the size of the company and the time-sensitive nature of the issue.
Stakeholder support is critical: Continued supplier cooperation and creditor agreement enabled a smooth resolution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
13 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Legal guides to rescue or liquidation
Rising interest rates and patchy post-pandemic demand are driving more Irish companies into difficult territory. When the balance sheet tips, four statutory routes exist: examinership, the Small Company Administrative Rescue Process (SCARP), liquidation and receivership. Each route triggers a different playbook for owners, lenders and employees, yet the boundaries overlap. Choosing well and choosing early decides whether a firm re-emerges or disappears. Shane Harron, partner at Dillon Eustace. Shane Harron, partner, Restructuring, Insolvency and Commercial Litigation, Dillon Eustace, sketches the purpose of examinership: 'Examinership is a rescue mechanism for companies in financial distress that meet certain criteria. It is generally considered to be a successful and flexible process designed to allow companies to continue to survive difficult periods.' Court protection freezes creditor action for up to one hundred days while an independent examiner prepares a scheme of arrangement. Directors stay in charge day-to-day and work with the examiner on investment, cost cuts or debt write-downs. SCARP offers similar breathing space to smaller companies but avoids court hearings. David O'Connor, partner at BDO. 'Smaller companies will often prefer the newer SCARP process, because examinership is quite expensive,' says David O'Connor, partner with BDO, whose team prepares independent expert reports for both processes. The same insolvency practitioner acts from start to finish, which trims fees and shortens timelines. In 2024, thirty businesses used SCARP to restructure, according to EY partner Alan Large. Barbara Galvin, partner with William Fry. At the opposite end sits liquidation. 'Liquidation marks the end of a company's life,' says Barbara Galvin, partner with William Fry. A liquidator takes control, sells assets and distributes the proceeds down a statutory waterfall. Solvent liquidations close in under a year, but insolvent cases, from IBRC to Treasury Holdings, can run for a decade when litigation clogs the pipeline. Receivership is narrower again. Here, the secured lender, not the board, fires the starting gun. 'Receivership differs from examinership and liquidation in that it is a process initiated by a company's creditors to realise a secured debt,' Harron explains. Once the charged assets are sold and the lender repaid, the receiver's mandate ends, sometimes in weeks. Speed and Scope Examinership follows a strict clock: seventy days plus a possible thirty-day extension. During that moratorium, creditors cannot sue, appoint a receiver or seek liquidation. SCARP moves faster because it is out of court; the process adviser must file a rescue plan within forty-two days. Liquidation moves only as quickly as asset sales, creditor claims, and disputes allow. Standard solvent cases average six to nine months, but complex insolvent estates stretch far longer. Receivership aligns with asset disposals and often completes within two years. Control and creditor influence Directors retain operational control in examinership and SCARP, yet they do not dictate outcomes. The examiner or process adviser groups creditors into classes, and a majority in at least one impaired class must vote for the scheme. 'Creditor negotiation forms a crucial part of the process,' Galvin says. Once the court, or in SCARP, the process adviser, confirms the plan, dissenting creditors are bound. In liquidation, directors lose all authority on appointment. They also face forensic scrutiny of decisions taken in the run-up to collapse. Receivership sits between the two: directors may still trade the unencumbered parts of a business if the receiver is appointed over specific assets rather than the entire undertaking. Director liability in the insolvency zone Statute now requires Irish directors to prioritise creditor interests once insolvency is likely. Ignoring warning signs carries a personal cost. 'As soon as a company's directors become aware of its insolvency, they should take all necessary steps to preserve the assets of the company for the benefit of its creditors,' Harron says. Liquidators must report to the Corporate Enforcement Authority and, unless excused, bring restriction proceedings against directors of insolvent firms. Sanctions range from a five-year restriction on acting as a director to full disqualification or personal liability for reckless trading. 'There is no statutory obligation to place an insolvent company into liquidation, but directors should only continue to trade where they believe on reasonable grounds that the company can survive,' Large says. Cost and suitability Examinership's court involvement adds expense. O'Connor sees boards hesitate when legal and advisory fees could top €300,000. 'You need to be of a certain size to justify going into the examinership,' he says, pointing out that smaller firms owe far less and cannot fund the process. SCARP cuts that hurdle because one practitioner fills the dual role of independent expert and process adviser, reducing duplication. Despite the options, uptake among SMEs remains modest. 'The number of SMEs availing of SCARP and examinership is not very high,' Galvin says. She blames a lack of awareness and the stigma that any insolvency procedure equals failure. Large adds that many owners wait too long and erode the working capital needed for a viable rescue. Outcomes in practice History shows rescue can work. The Goodman Group examinership in 1990 restructured wartime debt and protected thousands of jobs in the beef industry. More recently, Big Mike's restaurant in Dublin used SCARP to prune debt and safeguard employment. O'Connor's team provided the independent expert report for a nationwide food chain that entered examinership this month. 'There is a requirement for an independent expert to show that if this company goes into examinership, then there's a high probability it will succeed,' he explains. The court accepted the report and appointed an examiner, opening a path to protect what O'Connor calls 'potentially significant' jobs. Large has watched investors step in after balance-sheet clean-ups. 'The process allows companies to continue with a clean balance sheet and facilitate new investments that are essential for safeguarding their future,' he says. Choosing a path No single test determines which option fits. Harron emphasises early diagnostic work: cash-flow modelling, creditor mapping and covenant reviews. Owners must weigh the probability of survival against liquidity, fixed-charge security and stakeholder appetite for compromise. Galvin underscores timing: examinership and SCARP require enough cash to trade through the protection period. Liquidation or receivership may be unavoidable if working capital has already evaporated. Creditors influence direction, too. A lender can pre-empt examinership by appointing a receiver the moment a covenant is breached. Conversely, a successful examinership can bind secured lenders if the courts are satisfied the scheme treats them fairly. Practical steps before a crisis hits Directors can shrink legal risk long before insolvency lawyers arrive. Harron recommends daily cash monitoring and tight board minutes that show decisions and advice taken. Galvin adds that accurate books and records are the best defence against subsequent restriction applications. Large tells boards to scenario-model each pathway while funds are still available: comparing examinership, SCARP, and liquidation costs clarifies the trade-offs and underpins talks with creditors or investors. O'Connor's experience is blunt. 'Sometimes a solution is, guys, you're at the end of the road, you need to go into liquidation,' he says, warning directors against compounding debt once insolvency is obvious. The bottom line Ireland's corporate insolvency framework offers genuine rescue tools alongside orderly termination routes. Examinership and SCARP can salvage viable enterprises if boards act quickly, secure fresh capital and engage constructively with creditors. Liquidation and receivership close a chapter but still demand disciplined governance to avoid personal fallout. The legal pathway is never chosen in the courtroom; it is chosen months earlier in board meetings where directors either confront the numbers or flinch from them. In a tightening credit cycle, that distinction will decide which Irish businesses live to trade another day and which do not.
Irish Times
15 hours ago
- Irish Times
William Fry set to hire Eversheds Ireland partners and ESRI cuts growth forecasts
Law firm William Fry is in advanced talks to hire as many as four equity partners from Eversheds Sutherland Ireland following the collapse of merger between both firms talks last month, according to sources. Joe Brennan reports that about nine current and former equity partners at Eversheds Sutherland Ireland are also on track to join a new practice Eversheds Sutherland (International) is setting up in the Republic. The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) has downgraded its growth forecasts for the Irish economy, citing US trade policy uncertainty which it said was already dampening investment and consumption. Eoin Burke-Kennedy reports. Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan is preparing to bring a memo to Cabinet on July 8th to pave the way for draft legislation that would give effect to a plan by the State's judiciary to hike personal injury awards by almost 17 per cent, according to sources. Joe has the scoop. On the Inside Business podcast, Ciarán Hancock is joined by Willie Walsh, the director general of IATA, the Geneva-based representative group for the airline industry . The former Aer Lingus CEO talks about airline profits and whether air fares are likely to go up or down in the near term, as well as why Ireland is something of a laughing stock on the international stage thanks to the Dublin Airport passenger cap. READ MORE Irish consumer sentiment improved in June as worries around tariffs cooled and interest rates fell, but concerns over trade wars, escalating military conflicts and cost of living pressure kept the gains marginal. Hugh Dooley reports. This is probably the era of technology products for babies. Sometimes the choice can feel overwhelming though. Helpfully, Ciara O'Brien goes through the best baby tech of the year to date. Penneys parent company, Primark is set to cut around 100 roles from its Dublin headquarters, planning to outsource a number of support roles to India through Accenture. Hugh has the story. More than 90 per cent of Irish businesses believe they are adequately protected against cyberattacks even though almost six in 10 do not regularly update their software, according to research by insurance broker Gallagher. Colin Gleeson reports. One of the companies in the international human resources (HR) firms' ' spy ' dispute instructed that 'discreet' surveillance be carried out on the Irish payroll compliance manager at the centre of High Court proceedings over the affair, a judge was told on Wednesday. If you'd like to read more about the issues that affect your finances try signing up to On the Money , the weekly newsletter from our personal finance team, which will be issued every Friday to Irish Times subscribers.
Irish Times
15 hours ago
- Irish Times
William Fry in talks to hire some Eversheds partners after failed merger talks
Law firm William Fry is in advanced talks to hire as many as four equity partners from Eversheds Sutherland Ireland following the collapse of merger talks between the two firms last month, according to sources. Nine current and former equity partners at Eversheds Sutherland Ireland are also on track to join a new practice Eversheds Sutherland (International) is setting up in the Republic, other sources said. It is expected that about 150 of the existing firm's 290 employees will end up with the new practice. However, sources said that final numbers have yet to be determined as the fallout from the abortive merger talks continues to reverberate. London-based Eversheds Sutherland (International) put the existing Irish practice on notice that it was taking back the Eversheds name after it emerged late last year that Eversheds Sutherland Ireland was in tie-up talks with William Fry. READ MORE [ William Fry ends merger talks with Eversheds' Irish arm Opens in new window ] Eversheds Sutherland (International) confirmed last month that that two of the original 25 equity partners at Eversheds Sutherland Ireland, Pamela O'Neill and Gareth Planck, will lead the Dublin and Belfast offices of the new Irish firm, respectively, from September. A number of other equity partners are either planning to retire, join other law firms, or are weighing opportunities for in-house counsel in large corporations, sources said. Eoin Mac Aodha, a partner in Eversheds Sutherland Ireland's dispute resolution and litigation group, has signed up to join Byrne Wallace Shields later in the summer, according to sources. Spokesmen for William Fry and Byrne Wallace Shields and a spokeswoman for Eversheds Sutherland Ireland declined to comment. A spokeswoman for Eversheds Sutherland (International) did not provide comment when asked. Eversheds Sutherland Ireland's managing partner, Alan Connell, who spearheaded the merger talks with William Fry, did not respond to efforts to contact him. While Eversheds Sutherland Ireland is structured as a stand-alone firm within the Eversheds network, Eversheds Sutherland (International) has said that the new firm will be fully integrated into it. However, one of the options being suggested in some quarters is that the new firm could essentially reverse into the existing operations and premises of Eversheds Sutherland Ireland. The outstanding liabilities of the existing firm would need to be resolved beforehand. Eversheds Sutherland Ireland has a little more than a year to run on its existing lease at One Earlsfort Terrace in Dublin 2. The firm had been planning to move to a new office development, called Cadenza, at the junction between Earlsfort Terrace and Adelaide Road. It first emerged in December that William Fry, one of the largest corporate law firms in the State, was in tie-up talks with senior representatives from Eversheds Sutherland Ireland. However, William Fry walked away from the negotiations in late May, after the two sides failed to agree on commercial terms for a deal. This came as a surprise, as William Fry's managing partner, Stephen Keogh, highlighted the 'complementary mindset' of the two firms in an interview published only weeks earlier – and that the Eversheds team would 'hopefully be joining us some day soon'. William Fry had 216 practising solicitor certificates at the end of last year, making it the sixth largest law firm in the State, according to the Law Society. It employs about 500 people. It has been led since the start of November by Mr Keogh and is chaired by Liam McCabe. Eversheds Dublin had 107 practising solicitor certificates at the end of last year, placing it in 12th position among firms in the Republic. It had about 290 staff at that stage.
